Next Article in Journal
Calculating MIPS 2.0
Next Article in Special Issue
The Nagoya Protocol: Fragmentation or Consolidation?
Previous Article in Journal
Clermont Preferred Future: Stakeholder Reflections on a Community Foresight and Planning Initiative
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tree Crops, a Permanent Agriculture: Concepts from the Past for a Sustainable Future
Resources 2013, 2(4), 555-580; doi:10.3390/resources2040555
Article

The Challenges for Implementing the Nagoya Protocol in a Multi-Level Governance Context: Lessons from the Belgian Case

* ,
 and
Received: 15 June 2013; in revised form: 30 September 2013 / Accepted: 8 October 2013 / Published: 23 October 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Equitable and Sustainable Use of Genetic Resources)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [273 KB, uploaded 23 October 2013]
Abstract: The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-sharing is the latest protocol to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Its implementation can lead to two fundamentally different processes: a market-oriented self-regulatory approach, which emphasizes the self-regulating capacity of the economic actors involved, or a normative institutionalist approach, which focuses on the norms and formal rules of institutions that not only support and frame, but also shape and constrain the actions of the players acting within them. This paper analyzes the challenges related to the implementation of the Nagoya Protocol in the specific case of Belgium, and evaluates the possibility of moving from a self-regulatory to an institutional approach of implementation, which we argue is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Protocol. This move is analyzed in the specific multi-level governance context characterizing the Nagoya Protocol, which has a natural tendency towards a market-oriented self-regulatory approach.
Keywords: self-regulation; institutionalism; European environmental policy; biodiversity governance; access and benefit-sharing (ABS); Nagoya Protocol; implementation challenges self-regulation; institutionalism; European environmental policy; biodiversity governance; access and benefit-sharing (ABS); Nagoya Protocol; implementation challenges
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Coolsaet, B.; Dedeurwaerdere, T.; Pitseys, J. The Challenges for Implementing the Nagoya Protocol in a Multi-Level Governance Context: Lessons from the Belgian Case. Resources 2013, 2, 555-580.

AMA Style

Coolsaet B, Dedeurwaerdere T, Pitseys J. The Challenges for Implementing the Nagoya Protocol in a Multi-Level Governance Context: Lessons from the Belgian Case. Resources. 2013; 2(4):555-580.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Coolsaet, Brendan; Dedeurwaerdere, Tom; Pitseys, John. 2013. "The Challenges for Implementing the Nagoya Protocol in a Multi-Level Governance Context: Lessons from the Belgian Case." Resources 2, no. 4: 555-580.


Resources EISSN 2079-9276 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert