Was the Watchmaker Blind? Or Was She One-Eyed?
AbstractThe question whether evolution is blind is usually presented as a choice between no goals at all (‘the blind watchmaker’) and long-term goals which would be external to the organism, for example in the form of special creation or intelligent design. The arguments either way do not address the question whether there are short-term goals within rather than external to organisms. Organisms and their interacting populations have evolved mechanisms by which they can harness blind stochasticity and so generate rapid functional responses to environmental challenges. They can achieve this by re-organising their genomes and/or their regulatory networks. Epigenetic as well as DNA changes are involved. Evolution may have no foresight, but it is at least partially directed by organisms themselves and by the populations of which they form part. Similar arguments support partial direction in the evolution of behavior. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Noble, R.; Noble, D. Was the Watchmaker Blind? Or Was She One-Eyed? Biology 2017, 6, 47.
Noble R, Noble D. Was the Watchmaker Blind? Or Was She One-Eyed? Biology. 2017; 6(4):47.Chicago/Turabian Style
Noble, Raymond; Noble, Denis. 2017. "Was the Watchmaker Blind? Or Was She One-Eyed?" Biology 6, no. 4: 47.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.