Research Progress in Organic Photomultiplication Photodetectors

Abstract

Organic photomultiplication photodetectors have attracted considerable research interest due to their extremely high external quantum efficiency and corresponding high detectivity. Significant progress has been made in the aspects of their structural design and performance improvement in the past few years. There are two types of organic photomultiplication photodetectors, which are made of organic small molecular compounds and polymers. In this paper, the research progress in each type of organic photomultiplication photodetectors based on the trap assisted carrier tunneling effect is reviewed in detail. In addition, other mechanisms for the photomultiplication processes in organic devices are introduced. Finally, the paper is summarized and the prospects of future research into organic photomultiplication photodetectors are discussed.

1. Introduction

Photodetectors are optoelectronic devices which can absorb light energy and convert it into electrical energy, having found applications in wide areas of image sensing, missile guidance, environmental pollution monitoring, light communications, photometric metrology, industrial automation, and so on [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. In particular applications, it is required that the sensitivity of photodetectors is sufficiently high to detect weak light signal, for example, bio-imaging sensing or long range light communication [9,10,11,12]. There are two routes to improve the sensitivity of photodetectors, one of which is to improve the external quantum efficiency (EQE) and the other is to reduce the dark current density. Using photomultiplication (PM) effect to improve the EQE is one of the most important approaches to achieve high-sensitivity photodetection.

Traditional photomultipliers, based on a complex vacuum system including photo induced electron emission, secondary electron emission, and electron optics possessing components, are bulky and of high cost, severely limiting their applications [13,14,15,16]. Avalanche photodiodes are another commonly used high-sensitivity photodetector, which are made of inorganic semiconductor materials such as silicon, germanium, indium gallium arsenide [13,17,18,19], and so on. Their working mechanism is that photo generated carriers are accelerated under the strong electric field induced by a large reverse bias, and then the impact ionization with the crystal lattice takes place, thereby bringing forward the avalanche multiplication effect [20,21,22].

Besides inorganic semiconductors, organic semiconductors have also been widely favored in the field of optoelectronics due to their advantages of a simple synthesized method and adjustable bandwidth, as well as their light weight, low cost, eco-friendliness, good flexibility, and so on. High performance organic photodetectors have been reported successively in the past few years [23,24,25,26,27], some of which also allow the excitation of PM effects, providing another route to realize high-sensitivity photodetectors [4,28,29,30,31,32]. Since the exciton binding energy of organic semiconductor materials is approximately 0.1–1.4 eV, about three orders higher than that of inorganic semiconductor materials, impact ionization cannot occur in organic PM photodetectors like in inorganic avalanche photodiodes. Instead, the working mechanism of organic PM photodetectors has been identified mainly due to the trap assisted carrier tunneling effects [33,34,35].

After more than 20 years of development, the active layer materials of organic PM photodetectors have transitioned from organic small molecular compounds to polymers, and their device performance has also been optimized constantly. In this review, we will firstly introduce the typical structures and working mechanisms of organic PM photodetectors along with their key performance parameters. Next, we will give a detailed review of the research progress for PM photodetectors based on organic small molecular compounds and polymers, respectively. Some important progresses in improving the quantum efficiency, dark current, response speed, and spectral performance of both types of PM photodetectors are presented. In addition, we will introduce some other working mechanisms of organic PM photodetectors. Finally, we will summarize the paper and consider prospects for the future research of organic PM photodetectors.

2. Basic Structures and Working Mechanisms of Organic PM Photodetectors

2.1. Basic Structures of Organic PM Photodetectors

The basic structures of organic PM photodetectors as shown in Figure 1 comprises of the anode, the cathode, and the active layer with a large amount of interfacial/bulk carrier traps. They can be mainly grouped into two types, the single junction type and the bulk heterojunction type, which are similar to those of organic solar cells [36,37,38]. The early organic PM photodetectors belonged to the single junction type with their active layers made of an N-type or P-type organic compound. In contrast, the bulk heterojunction type organic PM photodetectors possess active layers made of donor/acceptor (D/A) blend. Although the bilayer heterojunction type organic solar cells, in which the active layer consists of a stack of N-type and P-type semiconductor films, have been frequently researched, there are rare studies about applying this junction in organic PM photodetectors. In practice, extensive efforts have been made on introducing interfacial modified layers between the electrode and the active layer to improve the PM effects in organic photodetectors. In addition, doping other materials into the active layer has also been carried out for improving PM performances.

2.2. Working Mechanisms of Organic PM Photodetectors

Most of organic PM photodetectors realize EQE far exceeding 100% based on the trap assisted carrier tunneling effect. In all, the trap assisted carrier tunneling effect contains four steps which are the formation of the Schottky barrier, the capture of carriers by traps after light illuminations, the carrier transport toward the Schottky junction under applied bias, and the carrier tunneling through the narrowed Schottky barrier. Based on the type of the trapped carrier (electron or hole), the working mechanisms of organic PM photodetectors are divided into two categories. Figure 2 shows the working mechanism of the case of electron trap assisted carrier tunneling effect.

The premise of realizing the carrier tunneling effect is the formation of Schottky junction when the metal electrode is in contact with the semiconductor layer [39]. For the organic semiconductor with a large number of electron traps, the proper Schottky band bending without bias is shown in Figure 2a. It corresponds to the case when the Fermi energy level of the metal electrode (E_FM) is higher than that of the organic semiconductor material (E_FS). In such a case, electrons flow from metal into the semiconductor, yielding a built-in electric field toward the semiconductor with a downward energy band bending, thereby hindering the diffusion of holes in the organic semiconductor to the electrode. To achieve such a downward band bending, low work function electrodes like Ag (4.26 eV), Al (4.28 eV), and Mg (3.66 eV), are required. After light illumination, photo-generated electrons are captured by the electron traps as shown in Figure 2b. When a bias is applied with the electric field pointing from electrode to the semiconductor (reverse bias if the electrode works as cathode; forward bias if the electrode works as anode), the trapped electrons transport toward the Schottky junction as shown in Figure 2c. In the junction region, these arrived electrons narrow the Schottky junction and thus enhance the intensity of the built-in electric field, causing the holes to tunnel through the junction and inject into the organic semiconductor from the external circuit, and finally resulting in the current multiplication effect, as shown in Figure 2d.

The corresponding processes of hole trap assisted electron tunneling effect are exactly the opposite (not shown), which requires E_FM lower than E_FS. Using a high work function metal such as Au (5.1 eV), ITO (4.7 eV), Pt (5.65 eV), and so on, can fulfill such a condition, thereby an upward band bending is constructed in the semiconductor. In addition, the applied bias for trapped hole transportation is the reverse, with the electric field pointing from the semiconductor to the electrode, facilitating the holes transport toward the Schottky junction. In practice, the surface of the metal electrode is always modified in order to adjust its work function and further regulate the band bending.

2.3. Key Performance Parameters of Organic PM Photodetectors

Key performance parameters of organic PM photodetectors include photoresponsivity, quantum efficiency, detectivity, linear dynamic range, and response time, which are listed as follows.

2.3.1. Photoresponsivity

The photoresponsivity is defined as the ratio of photocurrent to the power intensity of incident light, which characterizes the sensitivity of photodetectors to incident light. The greater photoresponsivity, the better sensitivity to incident light for PM photodetectors. Photoresponsivity can be expressed by Equation (1):

$$R=\frac{I_{ph}}{P_{in}}=\frac{I_l-I_d}{P_{in}}$$

(1)

where I_ph is photocurrent, I_l is the current under light illumination, I_d is dark current, and P_in is the incident light intensity.

2.3.2. External (Internal) Quantum Efficiency

The external quantum efficiency (EQE) is defined as the electron number detected per incident photon, as presented by Equation (2):

$$EQE=\frac{N_e}{N_p}=\frac{I_{ph}/e}{P_{in}/h\nu }$$

(2)

where N_e and N_p are the number of detected electrons and incident photons, respectively, h is the Planck’s constant, ν is the frequency of light, and e is the electronic charge. The absorption properties of the selected materials, the structural design of the device, and the electrical properties of the materials are all key factors affecting EQE. In traditional photodiode type photodetectors, EQE is smaller than unity. However, if current gain exists, EQE can be greater than 1, for example, in avalanche photodiode, photoconductor, or phototransistor type photodetectors [40,41].

In organic photomultiplication photodetectors, the presence of deep traps in the organic active layer causes a long carrier recombination lifetime for one type of charge, resulting in a high photocurrent amplification (gain), similar to that happens in photoconductor type photodetectors. Gain is determined by the ratio of recombination lifetime and transit time for another type of charge to sweep across the device, as given by Equation (3):

$$Gain=\frac{\chi \tau }{T}=\frac{\chi \tau \mu V}{L^2}$$

(3)

where χ is the fraction of trapped electrons or holes over the total amount of the dissociated excitons, τ is the lifetime of trapped carriers, T is the transport time of the untrapped carriers flowing across the active layers, V is the applied bias, L is the active layer thickness, and μ is the field dependent mobility of the untrapped carriers. As known, in photodetectors with gain mechanisms, EQE is equal to Gain in number [42].

The internal quantum efficiency (IQE) is defined by the ratio of the number of carriers detected in the external circuit to the number of photons absorbed. The product of the IQE and the light absorption efficiency of the active layer (abs) is the EQE, as determined by Equation (4):

$$IQE=\frac{N_e}{N_{p}abs(\lambda )}=\frac{EQE}{abs(\lambda )}$$

(4)

2.3.3. Detectivity

The detectivity (D*) is the figure of merit to characterize the capability of weak light detection for a photodetector, which can be calculated from the noise density and the photoresponsivity R. It is one of the most important physical parameter for photodetectors as given by Equation (5):

$$D^{*}=\frac{R\sqrt{Af}}{i_n}$$

(5)

where A is the active area of the detector, f is the electrical bandwidth, and i_n is the measured total noise current. Considering that the noise current under dark is dominated by shot noise, the detectivity can be calculated through Equation (6):

$$D^{*}=\frac{R}{\sqrt{2e{J}_d}}$$

(6)

2.3.4. Linear Dynamic Range

The linear dynamic range (LDR) is defined as the response range of photodetector being linear over a wide range of light intensity. LDR can be calculated through Equation (7):

$$LDR=20\log (\frac{P_{\max }}{P_{\min }})$$

(7)

where and P_min are the maximum and minimum incident light intensities of the photocurrent density versus light intensity curve which lie within the linear response range.

2.3.5. Response Time

The response time of the detector reflect the response speed of the detector to receive incident light radiation, which includes two parts, the rise time (T_r) and the falling time (T_f). The rise (or falling) time is defined as the time for the photocurrent to rise from 10% to 90% (fall from 90% to 10%) during the on and off cycles of light illumination. The sum of the rise time and the falling time is counted as the response time of the photodetector.

3. Organic PM Photodetector Based on Small Molecular Compounds

The early organic PM photodetectors were based on organic small molecular compounds such as N-methyl-3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxyl-diimide (Me-PTC), naphthalene tetracarboxylic anhydride (NTCDA), fullerenes (C₆₀), 2,9-dimethyl quinacridone (DQ), and so on. Except for DQ, Me-PTC, NTCDA, and C₆₀ are all N-type semiconductor materials which support the hole trap assisted electron tunneling effect. In this section, we will first introduce the progress of organic small molecular PM photodetectors based on the single junction type and the bulk heterojunction type, respectively. Then, some important progress made by researchers in improving the performance of the organic small molecular PM photodetectors will be presented.

3.1. Single Junction Type Organic Small Molecular PM Photodetectors

In 1994, Hiramoto et al. fabricated the pioneering organic PM photodetector using the Me-PTC (a N-type perylene pigment having methyl groups) based on a triple layer configuration of Au/Me-PTC/Au on a glass substrate. The fabricated device produced an IQE of 1.0 × 10⁴ at −16 V under 600 nm light illumination at the temperature of −50 °C, as shown in Figure 3a [43]. Their later experimental work reflected that the surface of Me-PTC was very rough, leading to imperfect contact between and the metal and Me-PTC and thereby forming structural traps of holes, as indicated in Figure 3b [44]. As a result, a large number of holes were trapped by Me-PTC at the metal/Me-PTC interface, making the PM phenomenon possible. However, Me-PTC based organic PM devices cannot respond at room temperature due to too few interfacial trapped carriers. Besides Me-PTC, two other perylene pigments of PhEt-PTC and n-Bu-PTC also exhibit the PM effect due to structural traps at the imperfect metal/semiconductor interface [45,46]. Later, the same group realized the PM photodetection at room temperature based on organic small molecular material of NTCDA. The NTCDA device presented a PM effect under 400 nm light illumination and its IQE reached 1.3 × 10⁵ at −16 V [47]. Subsequent studies indicate that introducing an interfacial layer of PhEt-PTC next to the NTCDA layer [26] or reducing the grain boundaries of the NTCDA film [48] can improve the response speed of the device (see the detail in Section 3.3.4).

The organic small molecular material C₆₀ is also a commonly used material for achieving PM effects. In 2007, Huang and Yang characterized the photo current response of a device with configuration of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/C₆₀/BCP/Al, in which ITO/PEDOT:PSS was used to form a composite electrode [49]. Here, C₆₀ layer formed a disordered structure, which is better than ordered structures for producing the PM effect. With the help of the composite electrode, they realize an EQE of 5.0 × 10³% as shown in Figure 3c based on the hole trap assisted electron tunneling effect. By increasing the bias voltage the PM effect becomes more significant. However, inserting a 20 nm thick BCP layer at the PEDOT:PSS/C₆₀ interface would annihilate the PM performance, reflecting that the PM behavior occurs at the PEDOT:PSS/C₆₀ interface rather than within the C₆₀ layer.

In contrast, the organic PM devices based on the electron trap assisted hole tunneling effect have been researched not as extensively as their hole trap counterparts. In 1996, Hiramoto et al. developed the first electron trap based PM photodetector using a P-type material Quinacridone (DQ) as the active layer [50]. In their device, the DQ layer was sandwiched between ITO and Ag (or Mg) electrodes. This study concluded the metal electrode plays a significant role in influencing the multiplication performance of the photodetectors. The Ag electrode with a work function a bit higher than that of the Mg electrode is much superior on producing a high multiplication factor. Specifically, the Ag electrode device has an IQE of 2.5 × 10³ when the bias voltage is 20 V while that of the Mg electrode device is only 1.0 × 10³ at a bias of 36 V; see in Figure 3d.

3.2. Bulk Heterojunction Type Organic Small Molecular PM Photodetectors

The organic small molecular PM photodetectors with bulk heterojunction type active layers were proposed later than their single junction counterparts. So far, all reported bulk heterojunction type organic small molecular PM photodetectors are made of fullerene and a P-type semiconductor material through co-evaporation. As early as 2002, Matsunobu et al. firstly put forward the ITO/CuPc:C₆₀/Au device for PM photodetection [51]. They found that the rise and fall times of the bulk heterojunction device are only 8 ms and 15 ms, respectively, while the response time of the single junction control device is in second time scale. This is mainly because the introduction of CuPc provides a favorable path for hole transport, therefore the accumulation time of holes at the Schottky junction can be shortened.

In 2010, Hammond et al. prepared a bulk heterojunction type PM photodetector with a structure of ITO/NTCDA/C₆₀/CuPc:C₆₀/BCP/Al [52]. They found that the insertion of a composite hole blocking layer comprising of NTCDA (2–3 nm)/C₆₀ (10 nm) can facilitate the accumulation of holes at the interface between the hole blocking layer and the active layer, inducing a large amount of electrons being injected from the electrode and thereby producing a high photocurrent gain. When the composite hole blocking layer is removed, the device EQE increases at 0 V bias, but reduces to be less than 100% as the applied voltage increases. Such a phenomenon proves that the gain of the device occurs at the interface between the hole blocking layer and the photoactive layer, rather than within the photoactive layer.

Recently, bulk heterojunction organic small molecular PM photodetectors with a configuration of ITO/TPBi (or Bmpypb, LiF)/C₇₀/TAPC (or SnPc):C₇₀/BCP/Al were developed [28]. Here, the co-evaporated film of TAPC (or SnPc):C₇₀ works as the active layer. They further elucidated that for the composite interfacial layer of TPBi (or Bmpypb, LiF)/C₇₀, TPBi (or Bmpypb, LiF) plays the role of hole blocking while C₇₀ plays the role of hole accumulation. The EQE of their TAPC:C₇₀ PM devices exceed 1.0 × 10⁴% over the wavelength range from 350 nm to 650 nm and the response of the SnPc:C₇₀ device can be extended to infrared (IR) range.

3.3. Performance Studies on Organic Small Molecular PM Photodetectors

In this subsection, we will introduce the progress of performance studies on organic small molecular PM photodetectors from the aspects of water/oxygen treatment, quantum efficiency, dark current, response speed, and spectrum adjustment.

3.3.1. Water/Oxygen Treatment

Because organic materials are sensitive to water and oxygen, organic semiconductor films and devices are usually prepared in conditions without water and oxygen. However, studies reflect that performances of the prepared organic PM photodetectors bear dramatic changes after being exposed to water and oxygen [53,54]. Sometimes, the water or oxygen treatment is beneficial to the improvement of the photo current gain. For example, Hiramoto et al. found that the adsorption of oxygen by N-type materials of Me-PTC and NTCDA suppresses the PM effect while the same treatment toward P-type material of DQ increases the PM gain factor. This is because there is more O₂⁻ after the organic material adsorbing O₂ molecules. The increased O₂⁻ act as electron traps which facilitate the carrier capture in P-type semiconductor and thereby more holes being injected, but inhibit the carrier capture in N-type semiconductor due to recombination with hole traps. They also found that after the adsorption of water, devices made of N-type material Me-PTC and P-type material DQ exhibited higher PM performance due to the increased photocarrier generation.

3.3.2. Quantum Efficiency

Devices with higher quantum efficiency have higher responsivity and the corresponding devices are more sensitive at fixed dark current. The early study showed that the hole traps within Me-PTC based PM devices are structural traps produced by non-uniform Me-PTC film interfaces. From this point, research on the effect of deposition rate and deposition method of the metal electrode on the PM performance was carried out [55]. That work concluded that, based on the thermal evaporation method, decreasing the deposition rate of metal electrode from 0.7 nm/s to 0.008 nm/s brings forward the increase of the quantum efficiency by 30 times. This is because the low rate of deposition of the Au electrode can maintain the structural traps produced by the non-uniform Me-PTC film. In addition, they found that the ion sputtering method is less effective than the thermal evaporation method for yielding high PM performance due to the same reason. For the PM photodetector made of the N-type perylene pigments, its quantum efficiency can also be improved through the solvent treatment [45]. It was demonstrated that the THF solvent treatment can change the PhEt-PTC film from amorphous to poly-crystalline, therefore the PhEt-PTC becomes coarser, producing more structural traps and thus elevating the quantum efficiency, as exhibited in Figure 3d.

3.3.3. Dark Current

The dark current determines the ability of detecting weak light for photodetectors. When the quantum efficiency of different devices are comparable, the device with lower dark current has lower noise equivalent power, which allows a weaker optical signal to be detected. Jinsong Huang and his collaborators found that the dark current of PM photodetector with configuration of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/C₆₀/BCP/Al was as high as 2 mA/cm² at −6 V, not suitable for the detection of weak light. They attributed the large dark current to the possible ohmic contact between PEDOT:PSS and C₆₀. In order to reduce dark current, a high carrier injection barrier is required. The same group found that by inserting a C-TPD layer between the PEDOT:PSS and C₆₀ films, an electron injection barrier as high as 2.8 eV was realized, thereby significantly reducing the dark current by 3–4 orders [56]. But such a design brings barrier for electron injection from PEDOT:PSS to C₆₀, resulting in the EQE lower than 100%. Later, they introduced a nano-composite buffer layer C-TPD:ZnO (1:1) between PEDOT:PSS and C₆₀, through which they not only maintained the dark current at a low level but also realized the PM photodetection [57]. Compared with the device with a single C-TPD buffer layer, the composite buffer layer with ZnO nanoparticles brought additional hole traps, which could capture photo generated holes, making them recombine with the electrons in the defect state on the ZnO surface. As a result, the energy band bending between ZnO nanoparticles can be reduced, promoting the electron injection from PEDOT:PSS to C₆₀, and therefore the PM effect can be realized. Due to the reduced dark current, its LDR of PM photodetection reaches 120 dB and its detectivity at 390 nm is as high as 3.6 × 10¹¹ Jones.

3.3.4. Response Speed

Photodetectors with high response speed are crucial for many applications. Increasing the applied bias can shorten the response time. Usually, a high quality active layer can withstand a high applied voltage with respect to a poor quality one. In 2000, Nakayama et al. compared the performances of ITO/PhEt-PTC/NTCDA/Au and ITO/NTCDA/Au devices [26]. In their experiments, they failed to fabricate high quality NTCDA film but succeeded in making high quality PhEt-PTC film on ITO. With the help of high quality PhEt-PTC buffer film, the morphology of the NTCDA film can be improved apparently. As a result, the PhEt-PTC/NTCDA based device can withstand a high voltage. The transient measurement displays that the rise time of the PhEt-PTC/NTCDA device is only 3.7 s at a bias voltage of −20 V while that of the control is more than 60 s at −12 V, as exhibited in Figure 3e. It is emphasized that the insertion of a PhEt-PTC layer does not have negative effects on the electron injection from ITO to NTCDA because the LUMO level of PhEt-PTC is lower than that of the NTCDA. In addition, the response speed of the photodetector can be faster using a single-crystalline semiconductor, due to good carrier transport property, with respect to the polycrystalline one [48].

3.3.5. Spectrum Adjustment

Another important indicator of photodetector performances is its working wavelength range. Generally, a narrow band photodetector can be realized through a broadband photodetector integrated with a color filter. Thus, a high sensitivity photodetector that can respond at wavelength ranges of ultraviolet (UV), visible, and even IR would be quite attractive because of its wide applications.

The combination of two active materials is one approach to realize broadband response of PM devices. For example, NTCDA based PM devices can only sense UV light due to its large band gap, but in combination with Me-PTC, the composite device can respond to both UV light and the visible light [47]. High multiplication rate at the visible range is produced by the photo carrier generation taking place within the Me-PTC layer. It is noted that the triple layer device of ITO/Me-PTC/Au can only work at temperatures below zero Celsius. However, the bilayer system of NTCDA/Me-PTC allows the generation of holes by light absorption in Me-PTC and trapping of holes in the NTCDA film, resulting in the accumulation of holes at the NTCDA/Au interface and further the injection of electrons into the device.

Light transition based on down conversion materials is another effective way to broaden the spectral range of PM devices. Recently, aiming to enhance the response at the deep-UV range, Yang et al. applied a capping layer with the down conversion material of 4P-NPB on the illumination side of a bulk heterojunction PM device with configuration of glass/ITO/TPBi/C₇₀/SnPc:C₇₀/BCP/Al [28]. Their work demonstrates that when the UV light irradiates the 4P-NPB layer, the device will absorb the light and emit visible light, which will pass through into SnPc:C₇₀ layer and then produce the PM response. Under illumination by light that can be absorbed by SnPc:C₇₀, the 4P-NPB layer is transparent, yielding negligible influences on the multiplication rates. Overall, the wavelength range of the PM device with detectivity exceeding 10¹¹ Jones covers from deep-UV to near-IR (250–1000 nm) as shown in the Figure 3f, and the responsivity and detectivity at 780 nm are 70 A/W and 4 × 10¹² Jones, respectively.

4. Organic PM Photodetectors Based on Polymers

With respect to the small molecular counterparts, although polymer PM photodetectors were developed later, they have attracted significant interests and attention of researchers attributed to their advantages of rich materials, easy process, and good compatibility with the roll-to-roll technique. Studies on single junction type polymer PM photodetectors are scarce. In 1999, Däubler et al. fabricated a single junction type polymer PM photodetector based on a P-type semiconductor material arylamino-PPV. Due to the large amount of electron accumulation at the arylamino-PPV/Al interface, the tunneling of holes from Al into the active layer takes place, yielding the PM photodetection with an IQE up to 2.0 × 10³% [58]. In 2007, Campbell and Crone also observed PM in a device with configuration of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/MEH-PPV/Al [59] and its gain is around 20 under 500 nm light illumination at −20 V, but they provided an explanation that is distinct from the trapped carrier induced carrier injection.

In the following years, almost all related studies have focused on bulk heterojunction type polymer PM photodetectors, which can be categorized into three groups, depending on the heterojunction objects. The most widely studied group is the bulk heterojunction formed by organic semiconductors (e.g., polymer and fullerene derivative), and the other two are heterojunctions with inorganic materials and insulating polymers. In this section, we will first introduce the progress made in these three heterojunction type polymer PM photodetectors, respectively. Next, performance studies including reducing dark current and broad/narrow band spectrum adjustment of polymer PM photodetectors will be disclosed.

4.1. Bulk Heterojunction Based on Organic Semiconductors

We will introduce the progress made in bulk heterojunction polymer photodetectors based on organic semiconductors according to different donor/acceptor weight ratios.

4.1.1. Donor/Acceptor Weight Ratio of 1:1

In the early days, by reference to solar cells, bulk heterojunction type polymer PM devices were designed with the donor/acceptor weight ratio of 1:1. Experiences suggest that 1:1 donor/acceptor weight ratio forms a favorable interpenetrating network in solar cells which can facilitate the transport of both electrons and holes. However, with such design, one can hardly achieve current multiplication because of the short life time of both electrons and holes. To realize PM photodetection in a P3HT:PC₆₁BM (with the weight ratio of 1:1) device, one can incorporate inorganic nanoparticles into the active layer which will be presented in Section 4.2 [65]. Other approaches of doping organic compounds [60,66] and interface modifications [61,67,68] have been also proposed to realize the PM phenomenon in 1:1 donor/acceptor heterojunction devices as introduced in the following.

In 2010, Chen et al. incorporated an organic dye Ir-125 into the P3HT:PC₆₁BM (1:1) bulk heterojunction device and discovered current multiplication as well [60]. The device without dye does not have any gain. In contrast, the device with dye show PM from UV to near IR range as shown in Figure 4a. The EQE reaches its maximum of 7.2 × 10³% at −1.5 V under 500 nm light illumination. The exhibited PM phenomenon is because Ir-125 dye brings forward a lot of electron traps into the active layer. With the incorporation of another organic dye Q-switch 1, the PM response of the P3HT:PC₆₁BM:Ir-125 device can be extended to near IR range [66].

Besides, interface modification is an alternative effective approach to induce PM in P3HT:PC₆₁BM (1:1) devices. In 2014, Melancon et al. introduced a semi-continuous gold (s-Au) film between the ITO electrode and the active layer, with its structural diagram displayed in Figure 4b. Their work indicated that with the help of the s-Au film, PM was successfully excited with an EQE of 1.5 × 10³% at −2 V bias under 400 nm light illumination [61]. They explained this phenomenon that the s-Au film acts as a hole blocking layer which enables the accumulation of holes at the P3HT/PCBM interface and the further tunneling of electrons from ITO into the P3HT/PCBM region. In 2017, Wang et al. used PFN to modify the ITO/active layer interface but the obtained EQE was only slightly higher than 100% [67]. Later, the same group proposed to utilize the transparent polyethylenimine ethoxylated (PEIE) to modify the ITO surface [67]. Through this process, the work function of the electrode gets lower, bringing forward the energy barrier formed between the work function of the PEIE modified ITO and the HOMO of P3HT is 0.75 eV larger than that between the bare ITO and P3HT. The expanded energy barrier causes the enhanced interfacial accumulation of photo carrier, which is preferred to the increased photocurrent gain. The EQE value of the device based on PEIE modified ITO reached 3.3 × 10³% at −1 V under 370 nm light illumination. The proposed PM device exhibits a rise time of 78 μs and a fall time of 87 μs.

4.1.2. Donor/Acceptor Weight Ratio Higher than 1:1

An easy means to realize PM in the donor/acceptor heterojunction photodetectors is by increasing the amount of donor (or reducing the content of acceptor) in the blend of active material, in other words, using a blend with donor/acceptor weight ration higher than 1:1. On the condition that the ratio of acceptor in the active layer is being reduced, the acceptor forms isolated islands instead of connected networks, which can trap the photo generated electrons and thereby making possible the injection of holes from the external circuit. Compared with PM devices with balanced donor/acceptor weights, the response speed of bulk heterojunction polymer PM photodetectors with less acceptor in the active layer is significantly lower, because it takes more time for trapped carriers to accumulate at the Schottky junction due to poorer carrier transport properties.

The pioneer research of this kind of PM devices was carried out by Fujun Zhang’s group in 2015 [62]. They fabricated a PM photodetector with a configuration of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/P3HT:PC₇₁BM/LiF/Al using 100:1 P3HT/PC₇₁BM which exhibited an EQE as high as 1.7 × 10⁴% under 380 nm light irradiation at −19 V bias, as shown in Figure 4c. The acceptor islands can trap the photo generated electrons, which will transport to and accumulate at the Schottky junction formed between the active layer and the Al electrode with applied voltage. Later, by removing the LiF buffer layer, they lowered the hole injection barrier between the active layer and the Al electrode, raising the EQE up to 3.8 × 10⁴% at −19 V bias [69]. P3HT molecular arrangement with face-on is more favorable for hole transportation. Their further study indicated that rapid annealing the active layer after spin-coating can avoid atomic self-assembly, which is more helpful to form a face-on structure, bringing forward EQE rise up to 1.2 × 10⁵% at −19 V under 610 nm light illumination due to the improved hole transport property [70]. Subsequently, they employed a burn-in treatment to their PM devices by applying a voltage of −25 V and −19 V for 1000 s, successively, making the device performance more stable [63]. In order to further elucidate the working mechanism of the devices, they examined the distributions of optical field within in the PM device at different wavelengths together with the transient photocurrent measurements; see Figure 4d,e. The results indicated that stronger absorption occurring closer to the Al electrode (e.g., at wavelengths of 400 nm and 625 nm) corresponds to a faster transient response due to shorter distance of electron transport. In contrast, at 520 nm wavelength light illumination, although with relatively high light absorption, its transient response is quite slow due to the absorption taking place close to the PEDOT:PSS/P3HT:PC₇₁BM interface. Besides PCBM, they also used IC₆₀BA to make the active layer with P3HT but the obtained EQE was 6.9 × 10²% with a 100:2 donor/acceptor weight ratio [71].

Most of the active layers in bulk heterojunction polymer PM devices comprise of polymer and fullerene derivative of PCBM. Beyond fullerene and their derivatives, non-fullerene acceptor materials have also attracted attention due to their strong absorption capabilities in visible and near-IR regions, adjustable energy levels, and good stability. Through collaboration with Xiaowei Zhan’s group, Zhang’s group prepared the PM devices by blending P3HT with non-fullerene acceptor materials of DC-IDT2T [72] or ITIC [73], resulting in extended spectrum response and simultaneously more stable device performances. For the DC-IDT2T based PM device, its optimal donor/acceptor weight ratio was 100:1 as well and its EQE exceeded 1.0 × 10⁴% over the range from 350 nm to 650 nm with a maximum R of 131.4 A/W and D* of 1.43 × 10¹⁴ Jones. Moreover, compared with the PCBM based device, the DC-IDT2T based device responded much better at the near-IR wavelength range due to good absorption of DC-IDT2T. After exposing the PM devices in air for 40 h, the DC-IDT2T based device only suffered 39% degradation on EQE while the PCBM based device bore a degradation of 57%, indicating the DC-IDT2T acceptors are promising for developing stable PM photodetectors.

The P-type polymer constituting the active layer of PM photodetectors can also be regulated. In 2017, Esopi et al. used a P-type material F8T2 as the donor to prepare the PM devices with PCBM [74]. Their device configuration is ITO/PEDOT:PSS/F8T2:PC₇₁BM (100:4)/LiF/Al with the F8T2/PC₇₁BM weight ratio of 100:4 and its EQE is 5.6 × 10³% at −40 V bias under 360 nm light illumination. Most importantly, F8T2 based PM devices have a very low dark current (only 2.7 × 10⁻⁷ mA/cm² at −1 V bias), much lower than that of the P3HT based device. This is due to the inhibited hole injection from the Al electrode to the donor, produced by the increased barrier between the HOMO level of the acceptor and Fermi level of Al (F8T2: 1.2 eV, and P3HT: 0.9 eV). But the increased barrier inevitably brought the decrease of photodetector response under light illumination. They also compared the PM performances before and after removing the LiF buffer layer, and concluded that the removal of LiF made the hole injection much easier but it also deteriorated the stability of devices.

4.1.3. Donor/Acceptor Weight Ratio Lower than 1:1

It is anticipated that decreasing the donor/acceptor weight ratio would increase the amount of hole traps in the active layer, possibly leading to PM photodetection based on the hole trap assisted electron tunneling effect. In 2016, Dongge Ma and collaborators proposed a PM photodetector based on a narrow bandgap polymer donor PDPDP3T with the configuration of ITO/ZnO/PDPP3T:PC₇₁BM/Al, which showed an EQE of 1.4 × 10⁵% at a low bias of −0.5 V after the device was irradiated by UV light for 30 s, as displayed in Figure 4e [64]. In their active layer, the blend of PDPP3T:PC₇₁BM system has a weight ratio of 1:2 (lower than 1:1), which is different from the previous two situations in Section 4.1.1 and Section 4.1.2. Here, they claimed that there are a lot of hole traps in their active layer, which tended to form trapped holes accumulated at the ZnO/active layer interface under reverse bias. Because large electron injection barriers were generated at both the ITO/ZnO and ZnO/active layer interfaces, the pristine device without UV treatment behaves as a photodiode without any gain. The electron blocking effect could be alleviated through UV treatment. After absorbing ultraviolet light, the ZnO nanoparticles could generate electron-hole pairs, functioning as centers to neutralize the oxygen molecules adsorbed on the surface of the ZnO nanoparticles. As a result of the desorption of oxygen molecules from the surface of the particles, a decrease of the LUMO energy differences at both the ITO/ZnO and ZnO/active layer interfaces took place, and a reduction of the electron injection barriers from ITO to PC₇₁BM was realized. Such a phenomenon finally enabled the device to become a photoconductor with large gain.

Differently, the investigation carried out by Nie et al. into an inverted organic PM photodetector of ITO/lysine/PBDTT-DPP:PC₇₁BM (1:2)/MoO₃/Al also included an active layer with less donor. In 2017, electron traps were identified rather than hole traps [75]. In this design, the ITO modified by lysine was the cathode while the MoO₃/Al acted as the anode. The device showed a large amount of photon to electron multiplication at room temperature with an EQE up to 1.6 × 10⁵% (936.05 A/W) under 10 V bias. Inversely, no gain was found at negative bias. The gain behavior was attributed to the electron trap assisted hole tunneling from Al/MoO₃ composite electrode into the active layer. The low current under dark was due to a space charge region formed between PBDTT-DPP/MoO₃ interfaces, which could be erased after being exposed to light.

4.2. Bulk Heterojunction with Inorganic Nanoparticles or Quantum Dots

Both inorganic nanoparticles and quantum dots have been employed to form heterojunctions with polymer or polymer blend. Their incorporation provides additional carrier traps which are essential for the followed carrier tunneling at the Schottky junction.

In 2008, Chen et al. incorporated cadmium telluride (CdTe) nanoparticles into the active layer of P3HT:PC₆₁BM (1:1), obtaining an EQE of 8.0 × 10³% at −4.5 V bias under 350 nm light illumination [65]. In this study, their CdTe nanoparticles were capped with N-phenyl-N-methylthiocarbamate (PMDTC) ligands which can improve the solubility of inorganic nanoparticles in the target solution of active material. Their study implied that a solvent annealing step after film spin-coating could induce a higher concentration of CdTe nanoparticles on the top of the annealed film. Under light exposure, CdTe nanoparticles with trapped electrons lowered the energy barrier for hole injection from the top electrode to the active layer.

ZnO nanoparticles are an alternative choice of carrier trap materials which have the merits of low cost, variable synthetic strategies, and so on. In 2012, Jinsong Huang’s group incorporated ZnO nanoparticles into P3HT or PVK film and fabricated the PM devices with configurations of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PVK:TPD-Si₂/P3HT (or PVK):ZnO/BCP/Al as shown in Figure 5a [8], aiming to modify the Schottky junction for smooth hole injection into the active layer. Here, the PVK:TPD-Si₂ blend film behaved as the electron blocking layer and the BCP layer acted as the hole blocking layer, through which the dark current was controlled at an extremely low level (6.8 nA at −9 V for the PVK based device) while excellent PM performance was maintained. Specifically, the EQE of the P3HT:ZnO device and PVK:ZnO device are up to 13.4 × 10⁵% and 2.4 × 10⁵% respectively, at −9 V bias under 360 nm light illumination. Similar to the function of CdTe nanoparticles in the previous work, ZnO nanoparticles blended with the donor polymer worked as the electron traps which could modify the Schottky junction for smooth hole injection into the active layer. Later, Huang’s group incorporated ZnO nanoparticles into PDTP-DFBT film which can sense light from UV to near-IR [76]. They demonstrated that the surface treatment of active layer by Ar plasma etching can effectively enhance electron trap assisted hole injection with the gain improved by 2–3 times as displayed in Figure 5b. A control sample of spin-coating ZnO nanoparticle layer on the top of active layer provided a direct evidence that excess ZnO nanoparticles created more traps.

Beyond nanoparticles, inorganic quantum dots with sizes smaller than 10 nm have also been applied in organic PM photodetectors aiming for providing carrier traps or extending the response spectrum range. In 2014, Huang’s group doped PbS quantum dots and ZnO quantum dots together into the active layer comprising of P3HT:PC₆₁BM (1:1) [77]. The ternary active layer of P3HT:PC₆₁BM:ZnO already possesses the PM photodetection ability at wavelengths shorter than 650 nm because ZnO quantum dots offer plentiful electron traps and thus enable hole tunneling. With the incorporation of PbS quantum dots, the PM performance was extended to the wavelength as long as 1000 nm, as shown in Figure 5c. The principle is that the electrons generated due to light absorption by PbS in the IR range can transfer to ZnO traps, triggering the hole injection into the active layer and further PM photodetection with extended spectrum range.

4.3. Bulk Heterojunction with Insulating Polymers

It is an interesting finding that blending organic quantum dots into insulating polymer can also induce PM photodetection. In 2015, Peng et al. proposed a bulk heterojunction photodetector made of oxotitanium phthalocyanine in the crystal form of phase-Y (Y-TiOPc) quantum dots and an insulating polycarbonate resin PCZ-300 (shorted as Y-TiOPc@PC) in contact with two parallel metal electrodes, which had a wide spectral response from 400 nm to 940 nm and an EQE of 3.6 × 10⁴% at 830 nm [78]. The explanation of their finding is as follows. In the device, Y-TiOPc nanoparticles were separated by PC, forming a large amount of Y-TiOPc/PC interfaces, therefore the only allowed charge transport mechanism in the active layer is based on charge tunneling. Because the energy barrier for the hole is higher by 1.4 eV than that for the electron, the tunneling probability of photo generated electrons in the conduction band is estimated to be much higher than that of photo-induced holes in the valence band of the separated Y-TiOPc quantum dots. As a result, efficient trapping of holes is produced, so that more electrons can flow through the device before the recombination of photo induced charge carriers occurs. Actually, this work did not mention the tunneling of carrier at the interface between the active layer and electrode, thus its principle should be different from that presented in Section 2.2 We will come back to this kind of mechanism for organic PM photodetection in Section 5.

Subsequently, Li et al. proposed a polymer PM photodetector based on Y-TiOPc quantum dots as well [27]. In that work, the Y-TiOPc quantum dots were dispersed into a polyvinyl butyral (PVB) based solution to make the active layer, and a blended film of polycarbonate (PC) and m-TPD were selected as the hole transport layer. The prepared photodetector exhibited an obvious PM phenomenon with the highest EQE of 3.5 × 10⁵% (see in Figure 5d), an excellent photosensitivity with the maximum responsivity of 2227 A/W, and an outstanding low-light detection with the highest normalized detectivity of 3.1 × 10¹⁴ Jones under 780 nm light illumination. Different from the explanation in previous work [78], they attributed the multiplication to the enhanced external hole tunneling injection assisted by trapped electrons at the interface of active layer and ITO. They found that the hole energy barrier was only 0.2 eV at the Y-TiOPc/m-TPD interface while the electron energy barrier reached 0.7 eV at the Y-TiOPc/ITO interface, causing an unbalanced transport of electrons and holes. Such an unbalance further lead to the accumulation of electrons at the Y-TiOPc/ITO interface, enabling the following narrowing of Schottky junction and thus hole tunneling. Their study also reflected that Y-TiOPc quantum dots with smaller diameter could not only generate more photo carriers, but also contribute to the formation of a steeper band bending, promoting the injection of a large amount of holes.

4.4. Performance Studies of Polymer PM Photodetectors

In this subsection, we will introduce the progress of performance studies on polymer PM photodetectors from the aspects of dark current, broadband response, and narrowband response.

4.4.1. Dark Current

Inserting an appropriate buffer layer between the active layer and electrode can greatly reduce the dark current while maintaining the photo current [67,73]. For example, Zhang’s group systemically compared the performances of ITIC based polymer PM photodetectors using PEDOT:PSS and PFN as the buffer layer with their current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics under dark and light respectively [73]. It was found that the PEDOT:PSS device can only work under reverse bias; in contrast, the PFN device can work effectively under both reverse and forward bias. Moreover, the dark current of the PFN device (10⁻⁶ mA/cm²) was much lower with respect to the PEDOT:PSS device (10⁻⁴ mA/cm²) at 0 bias; the dark current of the PFN device also decreased significantly at the bias when PM was triggered (e.g., −15 V). Such a phenomenon was explained as follows based on the energy diagrams displayed in Figure 6a,b. Under the reverse bias, the amount of holes injected from the Al electrode to the HOMO level of P3HT is relatively low because the difference between the LUMO level of P3HT and the Fermi level of Al is high (about 1.2 eV), causing the dark currents in both PEDOT:PSS and PFN devices to be low. The difference in performance between PFN and PEDOT:PSS devices is mainly due to difference between HOMO levels of these two buffer materials (PEDOT:PSS: −5.1 eV; PFN: −5.6 eV). Therefore, PFN behaves more effectively than PEDOT:PSS to prevent holes transit from active layer to the ITO electrode, yielding a reduced dark current. Under forward bias, the high HOMO level of PEDOT:PSS cannot block the hole injection from ITO to the active layer under dark, resulting in no response difference before and after light illumination. In contrast, there is a difference of 0.9 eV between the HOMO level of PFN and the Fermi level of ITO, which can effectively block holes being injected from the ITO electrode, yielding a very low dark current under forward bias.

4.4.2. Broadband Response

In order to extend the response spectrum range of organic PM devices, researcher constructed ternary bulk heterojunctions which are realized through blending two donors with different absorption spectrum range together with the acceptor, similar as in solar cells [79,80,81,82,83,84,85]. In 2015, Zhang’s group prepared an polymer PM photodetector with the structure of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/P3HT:PTB7-Th:PC₇₁BM/Al [79]. The photodetector with the active layer containing only PTB7-Th possess very weak PM effect, while the ternary device shows very high multiplication rates over the wavelength range from 350 nm to 800 nm. The highest EQE values of the ternary device with P3HT:PTB7-Th:PC₇₁BM weight ratio of 50:50:1 are around 3.8 × 10⁴% in the spectral range from 625 nm to 750 nm under −25 V bias (as shown in Figure 6c), and the corresponding R is 229.5 A/W and D* is 1.91 × 10¹³ Jones. The broad spectral response range was due to the contribution of PTB7-Th exciton dissociation on the number of trapped electrons in PC₇₁BM near the Al cathode. The results also showed that, with respect to P3HT/PC₇₁BM junctions, PTB7-Th/PC₇₁BM junction induced shallower traps due to smaller LUMO differences between donor and acceptor, resulting in quick filling of the electrons as turning on the incident light and thereby a faster response.

4.4.3. Narrowband Response

Traditional photodetectors obtain narrowband response utilizing color filters, which are at the cost of light attenuation, the reduced responsivity, as well as the relatively complicated system with the increased cost [86,87,88,89,90]. In 2015, the Paul L. Burn and Paul Meredith’s group firstly achieved narrowband organic photodetector with thick active layers through adjusting the carrier collection efficiency [88]. Later, Zhang’s group applied the exact idea into polymer PM devices and implemented a filterless narrowband PM photodetector. The thicknesses of their active layers (100:1 P3HT:PC₇₁BM) were in micrometer scale and the highest EQE reached 5.3 × 10⁴% at −60 V and the FWHM of their detection spectrum was only 28 nm [91]. Its principle is that, with thick active layer, close to the Al electrode, the amount of photo carriers decreases linearly from short wavelength to long wavelength, leading to a wavelength regime with poor hole collection efficiency at the opposite electrode under reverse bias. By using a PFN type buffer layer, the narrowband PM photodetector can work under both forward and reverse bias [92], with the reasons being present in Section 4.4.1. The PFN based PM device exhibited two narrowband response windows under forward bias (EQE: 7.2 × 10³% or 8.2 × 10³%, for 340 nm or 650 nm light illumination at 60 V) and a single narrowband response window under reverse bias (EQE: 1.6 × 10³% for 665 nm light illumination at −60 V) as displayed in Figure 6d,e, respectively. The two narrowband response windows obtained under forward bias can be well explained based on the photo carrier generation maps as functions of position and wavelength. Close to the ITO/PFN electrode, the photo carriers in the wavelength range of 400–600 nm is much larger, corresponding to poorer hole collection efficiency at the Al electrode due to long transport length, than that outside this range. As a result, under forward bias, two wavelength regimes are left with good hole collection efficiency, that is, the bands are shorter than 400 nm and longer than 600 nm. In 2018, they also applied this idea into ternary PM photodetectors [93]. Thanks to the doped PTB7-Th, the device had a narrowband response under −50 V reverse bias, corresponding to a maximum EQE of 2.0 × 10²% at 800 nm with an FWHM of 40 nm.

Similar works have also been carried out for bulk heterojunction polymer PM photodetectors based on inorganic quantum dots. In 2016, Huang’s group developed a narrowband PM photodetector with the structure of ITO/PVK/P3HT:PC₆₀BM:CdTe QDs/BCP/Al with a 3.5 μm thick active layer thickness [94]. Compared with the quantum dot free photodetector, the photodetector with CdTe quantum dots maintained the low dark current under reverse bias as well as the narrow band response. Besides, the EQE values of the photodetector were improved significantly with the incorporation of the quantum dots which provide vast electron traps in the active layer, reaching nearly 2.0 × 10²% at 660 nm light irradiation and the corresponding LDR is 110 dB. Through a device with configuration of ITO/SnO₂/PEIE/PDTP-DFBT:PC₇₁BM:PbS QDs (4 μm-thick)/MoO₃/Ag [95], they also obtained a filterless narrowband photodetection response with a 50 nm FWHM at near-IR range. In their design, PbS QDs behaved as hole traps, triggering the injection of electrons from Ag electrode to the active layer.

5. Other Mechanisms of Organic PM Photodetectors

In addition to the explanations presented in Section 2.2, researchers have also put forward some other mechanisms for realizing organic PM photodetection.

In 2006, Reynaert et al. used the organic small molecular F₁₆CuPc as the active layer to prepare an organic PM photodetector with a structure of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/F₁₆CuPc/Al, yielding the EQE exceeding 3.0 × 10³% at 633 nm [96]. They believed that the PM effect of this device was caused by the local charge induced exciton quenching in semiconductors. The reason is that F₁₆CuPc is a unipolar disordered organic small molecular that forms an ohmic contact with the metal electrode rather than a Schottky contact. To verify the deduction, they compared the device performances with different metal electrodes. When the Schottky contact is formed at the semiconductor/metal interface, band bending will be different for metal electrodes with different work functions, thereby the device performances would be altered. However, their experiments indicated that the devices with Au electrodes and Al electrodes have exactly the same performance, reflecting that the ohmic contact is constructed between F₁₆CuPc and the metal electrode. This theory is distinct from the trap assisted carrier tunneling mechanism, because the PM phenomenon of this F₁₆CuPc based device is a bulk effect rather than an interfacial effect.

There are also other works confirming that the gain of their organic PM detectors is not due to interfacial effects. In 2007, Campbell and Crone prepared a series of organic PM photodetectors using MEH-PPV as the active layer [59]. They found the device with bare MEH:PPV had similar gain characteristics as those of devices with active layers doped with 10 wt% PbSe quantum dots or 10 wt% C₆₀. Without mentioning any interfacial effects, they proposed that a small fraction of the optically excited excitons dissociate producing deeply trapped electrons and free holes. The trapped electrons can lead to photoconductive gain if the electron lifetime is longer than the hole carrier transit time. The gain per trapped electron is determined by the number of holes passing through the device during the lifetime of the trapped electron. This principle is similar to that of photoconductive type photodetectors. Later in 2009, the same researchers realized PM photodetection at near-IR range through a device with configuration of ITO/PEDOT/OSnNcCl₂/BCP/Ca [97] based on the circulation of free carriers in response to trapped photo carriers as well. Peng et al. clarified that their Y-TiOPc@PC based PM devices were based on the same principle of carrier circulation [78].

One can also employ inorganic quantum dots to realize PM photodetection based on the principle of multiple exciton generation. In 2005, Qi et al. prepared an organic PM photodetector by doping PbSe QDs in MEH-PPV with the structure of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PbSe:MEH-PPV/Al [98]. According to their study, when MEH-PPV was doped with PbSe quantum dots (with an absorption peak at 1900 nm) with a diameter of 8 nm, the device’s EQE reaches 1.5 × 10²% at −8 V bias under 510 nm light illumination. In contrast, the reference device only showed an EQE of 40%. Their explanation was as follows. When the incident photon energy was at least three times larger than the quantum dot band gap, the PbSe QDs could absorb photons and generate multiple excitons, resulting in multiplication of carriers. Another control study was carried out by altering the size of the PbSe quantum dots to 4.5 nm which corresponds to an absorption peak at 1100 nm, but the device did not induce any PM effect. The dependence of this photodetector performance on the size of quantum dots reflects that multiple exciton generation ascribed to the strong quantum confinement effect of quantum dots is responsible for the PM effect.

6. Summary and Outlook

In this paper, we have summarized past studies on organic PM photodetectors since 1994. Performances of representative organic small molecular PM photodetectors and polymer PM photodetectors are summarized in

Table 1. Representative organic small molecular PM photodetectors and their performances.

Mechanism	SJ/BJ	Year [Ref]	Device Structure	QE (%) at Bias	Other Performances
electrons tunneling	SJ	1994 [43]	Glass/Au/Me-PTC/Au	1.0 × 106 (IQE@600 nm), −16 V	Working temperature: −50 °C
		1996 [47]	ITO/NTCDA/Au	1.3 × 107 (IQE@400 nm), −16 V	Rise time: >60 s
		2000 [26]	ITO/PhEt-PTC/NTCDA/Au	1.7 × 107 (IQE@400 nm), −20 V	Rise time: 3.7 s
		2007 [49]	ITO/PEDOT:PSS/C60/BCP/Al	5.0 × 103 (EQE@450 nm), −4 V	-
		2014 [57]	ITO/PEDOT:PSS/C-TPD:ZnO/C60/BCP/Al	4.0 × 102 (EQE@390 nm), 8 V	LDR: 120 dB; D*: 3.6 × 1011 Jones
	BJ	2002 [51]	ITO/CuPc:C60/Au	1.5 × 103 (IQE@560 nm), −14 V	Response time: ms
		2010 [52]	ITO/NTCDA/C60/CuPc:C60/BCP/Al	3.4 × 104 (EQE), −4 V	Response time: ms
		2016 [28]	ITO/TPBi/C70/TAPC:C70/BCP/Al	1.0 × 103 (EQE), −4 V	-
			4P-NPB/glass/ITO/TPBi/C70/SnPc:C70/BCP/Al	1.0 × 104 (EQE@780 nm), −10 V	R: 70 A/W; D*: 4 × 1012 Jones
holes tunneling	SJ	1996 [50]	ITO/DQ/Ag (or Mg)	Ag: 2.5 × 105 (IQE@600 nm), 20 V Mg: 1.0 × 105 (IQE@600 nm), 36 V	Response time: 10–20 s

and

Table 2. Representative organic polymer PM photodetectors and their performances.

BHJ Type	Year [Ref]	Device	EQE (%) at Bias	Other Performances
Polymer/Organic 1:1	2010 [60]	ITO/PEDOT:PSS/P3HT:PCBM: Ir-125 (1:1:1)/Ca/Al	7.6 × 102@800 nm, −5 V	R: 4.9 A/W; Broadband response
	2012 [66]	ITO/PEDOT:PSS/P3HT:PCBM:Q-Switch1 (1:1:1)/Ca/Al	8.4 × 102@560 nm, −5 V	R: 4 A/W; Broadband response
		ITO/PEDOT:PSS/P3HT:PCBM: Ir-125:Q-Switch1 (1:1:0.5:0.5)/Ca/Al	5.5 × 103@560 nm, −3.7 V	R: 23 A/W; Broadband response
	2014 [61]	ITO/s-Au/P3HT:PCBM (1:1)/Al	1.5 × 103@400 nm, −2 V	-
	2017 [67]	ITO+PEIE/P3HT:PC61BM (1:1)/Al	3.3 × 103@370 nm, −1 V	R: 14.2 A/W; D*: 1.0 × 1012 Jones; Time: 78 µs (rise), 87 µs (decay)
Polymer/Organic Higher than 1:1	2015 [62]	ITO/PEDOT:PSS/P3HT:PC71BM (100:1)/LiF/Al	1.7 × 104@380 nm, −19 V	-
	2015 [79]	ITO/PEDOT:PSS/P3HT:PTB7-Th: PC71BM (50:50:1)/Al	3.8 × 104@750 nm, −25 V	R: 229.5 A/W; D*:1.9 × 1013 Jones; Broadband response
	2016 [73]	ITO/PFN/P3HT:ITIC (100:1)/Al	2.3 × 103@625 nm, −15 V	R: 41.9 A/W; D*: 7.1 × 1012 Jones
	2017 [91,92]	ITO/PFN-OX/P3HT:PC61BM (100:1, 4 μm)/Al	8.2 × 103@650 nm, 60 V	D*: 7.7 × 1011 Jones@10 V; Narrowband response
	2017 [74]	ITO/PEDOT:PSS/F8T2:PC71BM (100:4)/LiF/Al	5.6 × 103@360 nm, −40 V	R: 15.9 A/W
	2018 [93]	ITO/PFN-OX/P3HT:PTB7-Th: PC61BM (40:60:1,3 μm)/Al	2.0 × 102@800 nm, −50 V	D*: >1.0 × 1011 Jones@10 V; LDR: 180 dB@550 nm, 30 V; Narrowband response
Polymer/Organic Lower than 1:1	2016 [64]	ITO/ZnO/PDPP3T:PC71BM (1:2)/Al	1.4 × 105@680 nm, 0.5 V	D*: 6.3 × 1012 Jones; Decay time:0.27 s
	2017 [75]	ITO//Lys/ PBDTT-PP:PC71BM (1:2)/MoO3/Al	5.0 × 103@730 nm, 1 V	R: 29.5 A/W; D*: 1.6 × 1015 Jones @735 nm; Time: 162 μs (rise), 7.9 ms (decay); LDR: 160 dB
Polymer/Inorganic	2008 [62]	ITO/PEDOT:PSS/P3HT:PCBM:CdTe (1:1)/Ca/Al	8.0 × 104@350 nm, −9 V	-
	2012 [8]	ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PVK:TPD-Si2/P3HT:ZnO/BCP/Al	3.4 × 105@360 nm, −9 V	R: 1001 A/W; D*: 3.4 × 1015 Jones; Time: 25 µs (rise), 142 µs (decay)
	2015 [76]	ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PVK:TPD-Si2/PDTP-FBT:ZnONPs (1:3)/BCP/Al	2.5 × 102@800 nm, −4.5 V	R: 1.6 A/W; D*: 7.1 × 109 Jones
	2016 [95]	ITO/SnO2/PEIE/PDTP-DFBT:PC71BM:PbS QDs (4 μm)/MoO3/Ag	1.8 × 102@890 nm, −7 V	R: 1.3 A/W; D*: 8.0 × 1011 Jones; LDR: 110 dB; Time: 318 μs; Narrowband response
	2016 [87]	ITO/PVK/P3HT:PC60BM:CdTe QDs (1:1, 3.5 μm)/BCP/Al	2.0 × 102@660 nm, −6 V	D*: 7.3 × 1011 Jones; LDR: 110 dB; Narrowband response
Polymer/Insulator	2015 [78]	Au/Y-TiOPc@PC/Au	3.6 × 104@830 nm, 225 kV/cm	LDR: 7.1 dB@808 nm
	2016 [27]	ITO/Y-TiOPc NPs/m-TPD/Al	3.5 × 105@780 nm, 15 V/µm	R: 2227 A/W; D*: 3.1 × 1014 Jones; Broadband response

, respectively.

Studies on organic small molecular PM photodetectors came out early. From Table 1, one sees clearly that most of reported studies focused on N-type semiconductor materials which produced PM performances based on the mechanisms of hole trap assisted electron tunneling. In these devices, the carriers are captured by interfacial structural traps, which bare the limitations of low quantity and complexity to control. In addition, single junction type PM devices suffer slow transient response, that is in second time scale or even longer, due to poor carrier transport in the active layer. These limitations were alleviated by constructing a bulk heterojunction active layer. C₆₀ (or C₇₀) was frequently combined with P-type semiconductor materials (e.g., CuPc, TAPC, SnPc) to form bulk heterojunction active layers, based on which the response time of PM photodetection can be reduced to millisecond timescale. The reason of improved response speed is that the trapped hole carriers can freely transport through the network formed by the P-type semiconductor material and thus the accumulation of carrier at the Schottky junction can be accelerated.

Table 2 reflects that polymer PM photodetectors have become a hot research topic since 2010, which must be closely related with the success made in the field of polymer solar cells. Compared with the single junction counterparts which have received little attention, bulk heterojunction type polymer PM photodetectors with diverse heterojunction formulas have been widely studied. For the heterojunction formula of polymer/inorganic-nanoparticles, Huang et al. realized an EQE of 3.4 × 10⁵% by blending ZnO nanoparticles into the active layer P3HT [8]. For the heterojunction formula of polymer/insulator, Li et al. proposed to make the active layer by dispersing the Y-TiOPc quantum dots into a PVB solution [27], yielding an EQE of 3.5 × 10⁵%. Beyond these two heterojunction formulas, the most popular researched one is the formula made of organic semiconductors comprising of donor and acceptor with different weight ratios. Introducing carrier traps is the primary task to realize current multiplication in organic bulk heterojunction type photodetectors. In 2015, Zhang et al. for the first time put forward introducing electron traps in the donor/acceptor active layer through reducing the weight ratio of acceptor, yielding an EQE of 1.7 × 10⁴% [62]. To bring in carrier traps into bulk heterojunction photodetector devices with 1:1 donor/acceptor weight ratio, approaches of doping organic dyes or incorporation of a gold island film have been adopted, but the achieved EQEs are far below those obtained by reducing the acceptor ratio. We also noticed that using PDPP3T:PC₇₁BM blend with a weight ratio of 1:2 can also induce a PM effect with an EQE as high as 1.4 × 10⁵% after the LUMO energy differences at both the ITO/ZnO and ZnO/active layer interfaces are reduced by UV irradiation [64].

By comparison with organic small molecules which can only be processed through film deposition techniques, it is concluded that the solution processable polymers are the best candidates for developing low cost organic PM photodetectors because the solution process technique allows introduction of carrier traps into the bulk heterojunction active layer through blending. We also note that among the diverse methods of introducing traps into the polymer bulk heterojunction active layer, adjusting the weight ratio of acceptor/donor is the simplest one and researches on this topic might achieve greet success in the future. In order to improve the multiplication rate, it was necessary to insert a composite layer comprising of a hole blocking layer and a hole accumulation layer between the bulk heterojunction active layer and the electrode. The selection of the inserted hole blocking layer needs to be carried out delicately. On one hand, its HOMO level should be sufficiently lower than that of the P-type material in bulk heterojunction for reducing dark current under dark; on the other hand, its LUMO level should not be higher than that of N-type material in bulk heterojunction, enabling fluent electron injection from the electrode to the active layer. In addition, organic PM devices with broadband response, which can be sensitive to the light over wavelength ranges of ultraviolet (UV), visible, and even IR, can be realized through assembly of two different active materials as well as incorporation of down conversion materials, organic dyes, and so on. Especially, for polymer PM photodetectors, Zhang et al. have constructed a series of ternary bulk heterojunctions through blending two donors which respond at different spectrum ranges together with the acceptor [79,80] In order to realize filterless narrowband organic PM photodetectors, active layers with thicknesses of several micrometers were utilized to adjust the carrier collection efficiency.

Beyond the exotic achievements listed in this review for organic PM photodetectors, there are still some problems to be solved. For example, the response speeds of most reported organic PM photodetectors are slow, which cannot meet the needs of high speed photodetectors. In most of the work, the stabilities of the organic PM devices are not discussed, which is crucial to solve before putting them into practical applications. Moreover, the introduction of metal micro/nano structures into organic PM photodetectors should be consolidated with more attention as a feasible approach of manipulating the carrier generation and distribution like in organic solar cells [99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111]. It is emphasized that, recently, organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite photodetectors have also been reported with extremely high quantum efficiency [112,113,114,115] of which the principles were explained based on the trapped carrier assisted carrier tunneling or ion migration effect. And compared with organic devices, perovskite PM photodetectors require lower bias and possess faster response but their stability is inferior. Furthermore, it’s worth noting that, there are also plenty of original works on organic/inorganic hybrid heterojunction photodetectors with the inorganic materials of diverse structures including bulk films [116,117,118], 2D materials [119,120,121], nanomaterials [121,122], etc. A combination of organic materials with perovskite or inorganic semiconductors might offer a promising route to realize overall high performance PM photodetectors.