Next Article in Journal
Formation of Gold Microparticles by Ablation with Surface Plasmons
Next Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Upconversion Luminescence in Yb3+/Tm3+-Codoped Fluoride Active Core/Active Shell/Inert Shell Nanoparticles through Directed Energy Migration
Previous Article in Journal
Susceptibility of CoFeB/AlOx/Co Magnetic Tunnel Junctions to Low-Frequency Alternating Current

Nanomaterials 2013, 3(4), 583-591; doi:10.3390/nano3040583

Article
Tuning NaYF4 Nanoparticles through Alkaline Earth Doping
Xian Chen 1, Dengfeng Peng 1 and Feng Wang 1,2,*
1
Department of Physics and Materials Science, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Hong Kong; E-Mails: zjuchenxian@gmail.com (X.C.); dengpeng@cityu.edu.hk (D.P.)
2
City University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen 518057, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: fwang24@cityu.edu.hk; Tel.: +852-3442-4898; Fax: +852-3442-0538.
Received: 10 October 2013; in revised form: 20 October 2013 / Accepted: 21 October 2013 /
Published: 24 October 2013

Abstract

: Phase and size of lanthanide-doped nanoparticles are the most important characteristics that dictate optical properties of these nanoparticles and affect their technological applications. Herein, we present a systematic study to examine the effect of alkaline earth doping on the formation of NaYF4 upconversion nanoparticles. We show that alkaline earth doping has a dual function of tuning particle size of hexagonal phase NaYF4 nanoparticles and stabilizing cubic phase NaYF4 nanoparticles depending on composition and concentration of the dopant ions. The study described here represents a facile and general strategy to tuning the properties of NaYF4 upconversion nanoparticles.
Keywords:
impurity doping; nanoparticles; phase transformation; upconversion

1. Introduction

The synthesis of lanthanide-doped upconversion (UC) nanoparticles with well-defined phase and size is important for understanding the enormously complex optical transitions in the host lattice [1,2,3] and for realizing applications of these nanoparticles in solid-state lasers, three-dimensional flat-panel display, solar cells and especially biolabeling and bioimaging [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. The phase and size of lanthanide-doped nanoparticles are usually tuned by controlling the thermodynamic or kinetic growth of the nanoparticles through manipulation of several experimental variables, such as temperature, reaction time, and relative concentrations of the precursors [16,17,18,19,20]. The major problems of these approaches includes the difficulty in fine tune the nanoparticle size over a broad range and the need for extreme reaction conditions such as toxic reactants and high temperatures [21,22,23].

Impurity doping that involves incorporating suitable foreign ions into a host lattice has recently emerged as a promising alternative to control the formation of lanthanide-doped nanoparticles [24,25,26,27,28,29]. The doping approach usually allows the fine tuning of a variety of nanoparticle properties including phase, size, and even shape following a facile and standard synthetic procedure by simple modification of dopant composition and concentration [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Doping also modifies free energies of a materials system and stabilizes a particular crystal phase or particle morphology that is typically inaccessible by a common synthetic method [35,36].

For better understanding and control of doping-mediated crystal growth process, herein we describe the synthesis and characterization of a series of NaYF4:Yb/Er nanoparticles in the presence of alkaline earth dopant ions of varying composition (Sr2+ and Ca2+) and concentration (0–60 mol %). As one of the most studied upconversion materials, NaYF4 nanoparticles generally crystallize in either the cubic or hexagonal form. We show that the Sr2+ or Ca2+ dopant ions can significantly modify the phase and size of the as-synthesized NaYF4:Yb/Er nanoparticles through precise control of dopant concentration. We also correlate upconversion emission of the nanoparticles with the dopant composition and concentration by optical measurement.

2. Results and Discussion

Previous investigations suggest that in wet chemical synthesis NaYF4 nanoparticles usually crystallize in cubic phase at first, which spontaneous transformed to the corresponding hexagonal phase as the reaction proceeds [16,37]. The cubic to hexagonal phase transformation of NaYF4 is accompanied by a distortion and compression in electron cloud of the cation ions to accommodate the more asymmetric and dense hexagonal crystal structure (Figure 1). We reasoned that the presence of impurities of significant larger ionic size than Y3+ (r = 1.159 Å) [38] in the host lattice should suppress the phase transformation by increasing the energy barrier, thereby stabilizing the cubic phase product.

Nanomaterials 03 00583 g001 1024
Figure 1. A comparison of the crystal site for the metal ions in the (a) cubic and (b) hexagonal phase NaYF4.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. A comparison of the crystal site for the metal ions in the (a) cubic and (b) hexagonal phase NaYF4.
Nanomaterials 03 00583 g001 1024

As a proof-of-concept experiment, Sr2+ ions (r = 1.40 Å) [38] that are optically inactive and chemically compatible with trivalent lanthanide ions were introduced to modify the growth process of NaYF4:Yb/Er nanoparticles. A series of samples obtained in the presence of Sr2+ ions at different concentrations (0–50 mol %) were first examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD). As shown in Figure 2, XRD pattern of the Sr2+ free sample can be indexed as pure hexagonal phase NaYF4 (JCPDS file number 16-0334 [39]), which is consistent with previous studies [16,24]. On doping with increased Sr2+ concentrations, the preservation of the cubic phase in these samples is evident and pure cubic phase NaYF4:Yb/Er nanoparticles was obtained when the Sr2+ ion concentration reached 40 mol %. The observed single cubic phase at a significantly high Sr2+ dopant concentration (50 mol %) can be attributed to the small structural difference between the cubic phase NaYF4 and SrF2. Notably, the diffraction peaks shift towards low diffraction angles with increasing dopant concentration of Sr2+, which results from expansion in unit-cell volume due to the larger Sr2+ dopant ions and confirms the formation of a homogeneous Y-Sr solid solution.

Nanomaterials 03 00583 g002 1024
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the NaYF4:Yb/Er (18/2 mol %) nanoparticles obtained in the presence of different amount of Sr2+ dopant ions. The bottom line spectra are literature data for cubic phase SrF2 (JCPDS file number 06-0262 [40]), cubic phase NaYF4 (JCPDS file number 77-2042 [41]) and hexagonal phase NaYF4 (JCPDS file number 16-0334 [39]), respectively.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the NaYF4:Yb/Er (18/2 mol %) nanoparticles obtained in the presence of different amount of Sr2+ dopant ions. The bottom line spectra are literature data for cubic phase SrF2 (JCPDS file number 06-0262 [40]), cubic phase NaYF4 (JCPDS file number 77-2042 [41]) and hexagonal phase NaYF4 (JCPDS file number 16-0334 [39]), respectively.
Nanomaterials 03 00583 g002 1024

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterizations were then carried out to study the morphology and size of NaYF4:Yb/Er (18/2 mol%) samples doped with Sr2+ ions at different concentrations. Figure 3a presents the Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the NaYF4:Yb/Er nanoparticles without Sr2+ doping and shows uniform nanoparticles with a spherical morphology. In the presence of Sr2+ (20 mol %), the TEM images shows two distinct particle morphologies including small irregular particles and large hexagon prisms (Figure 3b), which is consistent with the presence of two phases observed by XRD. Selected area electron diffraction analysis reveals that the small nanoparticles are cubic phase NaYF4 (Figure 3b, inset). We therefore concluded the large prisms to be hexagonal phase NaYF4. The increase in particle size of the hexagonal phase product is attributed to the increased positive charge density associated with substitutional Sr2+ ions at the nanoparticle surface, which promote the nanoparticle growth and results in a larger particle size [42]. With increasing dopant concentration of Sr2+ (50 mol %), the large prisms disappeared (Figure 3c), suggesting the formation of pure cubic phase NaYF4 nanoparticles.

Nanomaterials 03 00583 g003 1024
Figure 3. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the NaYF4:Yb/Er (18/2 mol %) nanoparticles obtained in the presence of (a) 0 mol %, (b) 20 mol %, and (c) 50 mol % of Sr2+ dopant ions, respectively.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 3. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the NaYF4:Yb/Er (18/2 mol %) nanoparticles obtained in the presence of (a) 0 mol %, (b) 20 mol %, and (c) 50 mol % of Sr2+ dopant ions, respectively.
Nanomaterials 03 00583 g003 1024

We next investigated optical properties of the NaYF4:Yb/Er nanoparticles as a function of Sr2+ dopant concentration. Figure 4 depicts the upconversion emission spectra of the nanoparticles doped with varying amount of Sr2+ ion under 976-nm diode laser excitation. Characteristic emission peaks at 409 nm (blue), 526 and 545 nm (green), and 660 nm (red) were observed and assigned to 2H9/24I15/2, 2H11/2, 4S3/24I15/2, and 4F9/24I15/2 transitions of Er3+, respectively. The spectra shows that the emission intensity is slightly enhanced at low Sr2+ content (<20 mol %), which is attributed to the formation of large hexagonal prism. Further increase in Sr2+ dopant concentration results in a sharp decrease in the emission intensity because of the phase transformation from hexagonal to cubic. The amplified spectra (inset) reveal that the red-to-green intensity ratio is largely increased at high Sr2+ content, which is partly due to the formation of small sized cubic phase nanoparticles.

Nanomaterials 03 00583 g004 1024
Figure 4. Upconversion emission spectra of the NaYF4:Yb/Er (18/2 mol %) nanoparticles obtained in the presence of different amount of Sr2+ dopant ions. Inset: amplified spectra of the nanoparticles comprising high dopant concentration of Sr2+.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 4. Upconversion emission spectra of the NaYF4:Yb/Er (18/2 mol %) nanoparticles obtained in the presence of different amount of Sr2+ dopant ions. Inset: amplified spectra of the nanoparticles comprising high dopant concentration of Sr2+.
Nanomaterials 03 00583 g004 1024

In a further set of experiments, we examined the effect Ca2+ doping on crystal growth process of the NaYF4:Yb/Er nanoparticles. TEM images (Figure 5) of the as-synthesized nanoparticles all show no phase separation for dopant concentrations below 40 mol %, suggesting that the cubic phase was not effectively stabilized by Ca2+ ions. The observation can be ascribed to the smaller ionic size of Ca2+ ions (r = 1.26 Å) [38] than that of Sr2+ and therefore the relatively high amenability to the phase transformation into the dense hexagonal structure. Nevertheless, the nanoparticle size is fine-tuned through precise control of the Ca2+ dopant concentration. The steady increase in the nanoparticle size with increasing Ca2+ dopant concentration is mainly due to surface charge modification similar as for the Sr-doped samples.

Nanomaterials 03 00583 g005 1024
Figure 5. TEM images of the NaYF4:Yb/Er (18/2 mol %) nanoparticles obtained in the presence of (a) 0 mol %, (b) 20 mol %, (c) 40 mol %, and (d) 60 mol % of Ca2+ dopant ions, respectively.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 5. TEM images of the NaYF4:Yb/Er (18/2 mol %) nanoparticles obtained in the presence of (a) 0 mol %, (b) 20 mol %, (c) 40 mol %, and (d) 60 mol % of Ca2+ dopant ions, respectively.
Nanomaterials 03 00583 g005 1024

3. Experimental Section

Y(CH3COOH)3·xH2O (99.9%), Yb(CH3COOH)3·xH2O (99.9%), Er(CH3COOH)3·xH2O (99.9%), Sr(CH3COOH)2·2H2O, Ca(CH3COOH)2 (≥99%), NaOH (>98%), NH4F (>98%), 1-octadecene (90%), oleic acid (90%), were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as starting materials without further purification.

In a typical procedure for the synthesis of NaYF4:Yb/Er nanoparticles, 2 mL aqueous solution (0.2 M) of RE(CH3COOH)3 (RE = Y, Yb and Er) and AE(CH3COOH)2 (AE = Sr and Ca) was added to a 50 mL flask containing oleic acid (3 mL) and 1-octadecene (7 mL). The mixture was heated at 110 °C for 30 min to remove water and subsequently at 150 °C for 1 h before cooling to 50 °C. Then 5 mL methanol solution containing 1.6 mmol NH4F and 1 mmol NaOH was added and the solution was stirred at 50 °C for 60 min. The solution was then heated at 110 °C under vacuum for 10 min to remove methanol and moisture, followed by heating at 300 °C for 60 min under argon atmosphere. After cooling down to room temperature, excessive amount of ethanol was poured into the solution. The resultant mixture was separated by centrifugation, washed with cyclohexane and ethanol several times, and finally redispersed in cyclohexane.

The crystal structure of the samples was analyzed by X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD, Rigaku SmartLab, Tokyo, Japan) using a Cu Kα radiation. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements were carried out on a Philips CM-20 transmission electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) operating at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. Photoluminescence spectra were recorded at room temperature with an F-4600 spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) with the excitation source adapted to a fiber couple diode laser. All spectra were obtained at room temperature from cyclohexane dispersions of the nanoparticles (1 wt.%) at an excitation power density of 20 W cm2.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have demonstrated an alkaline earth doping approach to tuning the size and phase of NaYF4 nanoparticles following a consistent synthetic procedure. Sr2+ dopant ions are found to promote the formation of cubic phase NaYF4, mainly owing to the large ionic size that resists dense atom packing in the hexagonal structure. By contrast, Ca2+ dopant ions with a relatively small ionic size only display weak effect on phase transformation of the NaYF4 nanoparticle. However, it allows fine-tuning of the nanoparticle size through surface charge modification. The doping approach described here represents a general strategy to expand the range of nanoparticle products that can be accessed by a particular synthetic method.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by start-up grant (No. 7200317 and No. 9610257) from CityU and fundamental research grant (No. R-IND5101) from the Science Technology and Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, F.; Wang, J.; Liu, X. Direct evidence of a surface quenching effect on size-dependent luminescence of upconversion nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7456–7460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tu, D.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, H.; Li, R.; Liu, L.; Chen, X. Breakdown of crystallographic site symmetry in lanthanide-doped NaYF4 crystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1128–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Aebischer, A.; Hostettler, M.; Hauser, J.; Kramer, K.; Weber, T.; Gudel, H.U.; Burgi, H.B. Structural and spectroscopic characterization of active sites in a family of light-emitting sodium lanthanide tetrafluorides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2802–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Johnson, J.C.; Choi, H.J.; Knutsen, K.P.; Schaller, R.D.; Yang, P.; Saykally, R.J. Single gallium nitride nanowire lasers. Nat. Mater. 2002, 1, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, G.; Li, C.; Zhang, C.; Cheng, Z.; Quan, Z.; Peng, C.; Lin, J. Tm3+ and/or Dy3+ doped LaOCl nanocrystalline phosphors for field emission displays. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 8936–8943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fischer, S.; Goldschmidt, J.; Loper, P.; Bauer, G.; Bruggemann, R.; Kramer, K.; Biner, D.; Hermle, M.; Glunz, S. Enhancement of silicon solar cell efficiency by upconversion: Optical and electrical characterization. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, F.; Banerjee, D.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Liu, X. Upconversion nanoparticles in biological labeling, imaging, and therapy. Analyst 2010, 135, 1839–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Y.; Chen, M.; Cao, T.; Sun, Y.; Li, C.; Liu, Q.; Yang, T.; Yao, L.; Feng, W.; Li, F. A cyanine-modified nanosystem for in vivo upconversion luminescence bioimaging of methylmercury. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9869–9876. [Google Scholar]
  9. Haase, M.; Schafer, H. Upconverting nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5808–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Q.; Feng, W.; Yang, T.; Yi, T.; Li, F. Upconversion luminescence imaging of cells and small animals. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8, 2033–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Corstjens, P.L.; Zuiderwijk, M.; Tanke, H.J.; van der Ploeg-van Schip, J.J.; Ottenhoff, T.H.; Geluk, A. A user-friendly, highly sensitive assay to detect the IFN-γ secretion by T cells. Clin. Biochem. 2008, 41, 440–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, H.-Q.; Batentschuk, M.; Osvet, A.; Pinna, L.; Brabec, C.J. Rare-earth ion doped up-conversion materials for photovoltaic applications. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2675–2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Su, L.T.; Karuturi, S.K.; Luo, J.; Liu, L.; Liu, X.; Guo, J.; Sum, T.C.; Deng, R.; Fan, H.J.; Liu, X.; et al. Photon upconversion in hetero-nanostructured photoanodes for enhanced near-infrared light harvesting. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 1603–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, X.; Han, S.; Huang, W.; Liu, X. Enhancing solar cell efficiency: The search for luminescent materials as spectral converters. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 173–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shalav, A.; Richards, B.S.; Trupke, T.; Krämer, K.W.; Güdel, H.U. Application of NaYF4:Er3+ up-converting phosphors for enhanced near-infrared silicon solar cell response. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mai, H.-X.; Zhang, Y.-W.; Si, R.; Yan, Z.-G.; Sun, L.-D.; You, L.-P.; Yan, C.-H. High-quality sodium rare-earth fluoride nanocrystals  controlled synthesis and optical properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6426–6436. [Google Scholar]
  17. Boyer, J.-C.; Vetrone, F.; Cuccia, L.A.; Capobianco, J.A. Synthesis of colloidal upconverting NaYF4 nanocrystals doped with Er3+, Yb3+ and Tm3+, Yb3+ via thermal decomposition of lanthanide trifluoroacetate precursors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7444–7445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ahmad, S.; Prakash, G.V.; Nagarajan, R. Hexagonally ordered KLaF4 host: Phase-controlled synthesis and luminescence studies. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 12748–12754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, Z.; Kang, X.; Li, C.; Hou, Z.; Zhang, C.; Yang, D.; Li, G.; Lin, J. Ln3+ (Ln = Eu, Dy, Sm, and Er) ion-doped YVO4 nano/microcrystals with multiform morphologies: Hydrothermal synthesis, growing mechanism, and luminescent properties. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 6706–6715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schäfer, H.; Ptacek, P.; Eickmeier, H.; Haase, M. Synthesis of hexagonal Yb3+, Er3+-doped NaYF4 nanocrystals at low temperature. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 3091–3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yi, G.S.; Chow, G.M. Synthesis of hexagonal-phase NaYF4:Yb,Er and NaYF4:Yb,Tm nanocrystals with efficient up-conversion fluorescence. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 2324–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, L.; Li, Y. Controlled synthesis and luminescence of lanthanide doped NaYF4 nanocrystals. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, X.; Zhuang, J.; Peng, Q.; Li, Y. A general strategy for nanocrystal synthesis. Nature 2005, 437, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, F.; Han, Y.; Lim, C.S.; Lu, Y.; Wang, J.; Xu, J.; Chen, H.; Zhang, C.; Hong, M.; Liu, X. Simultaneous phase and size control of upconversion nanocrystals through lanthanide doping. Nature 2010, 463, 1061–1065. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhao, C.; Kong, X.; Liu, X.; Tu, L.; Wu, F.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, K.; Zeng, Q.; Zhang, H. Li+ ion doping: An approach for improving the crystallinity and upconversion emissions of NaYF4:Yb3+, Tm3+ nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 8084–8089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lei, L.; Chen, D.; Huang, P.; Xu, J.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Y. Modifying the size and uniformity of upconversion Yb/Er:NaGdF4 nanocrystals through alkaline-earth doping. Nanoscale 2013, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, D.; Huang, P.; Yu, Y.; Huang, F.; Yang, A.; Wang, Y. Dopant-induced phase transition: A new strategy of synthesizing hexagonal upconversion NaYF4 at low temperature. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 5801–5803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, D.; Yu, Y.; Huang, F.; Lin, H.; Huang, P.; Yang, A.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y. Lanthanide dopant-induced formation of uniform sub-10 nm active-core/active-shell nanocrystals with near-infrared to near-infrared dual-modal luminescence. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 2632–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, D.; Wang, Y. Impurity doping: a novel strategy for controllable synthesis of functional lanthanide nanomaterials. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 4621–4637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, D.; Yu, Y.; Huang, F.; Wang, Y. Phase transition from hexagonal LnF3 (Ln = La, Ce, Pr) to cubic Ln0.8M0.2F2.8 (M = Ca, Sr, Ba) nanocrystals with enhanced upconversion induced by alkaline-earth doping. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 2601–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cheng, Q.; Sui, J.; Cai, W. Enhanced upconversion emission in Yb3+ and Er3+ codoped NaGdF4 nanocrystals by introducing Li+ ions. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 779–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, X.; Li, M.; Xie, M.; Chen, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q. Dopant-controlled synthesis of water-soluble hexagonal NaYF4 nanorods with efficient upconversion fluorescence for multicolor bioimaging. Nano Res. 2010, 3, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, H.-Q.; Tilley, R.D.; Nann, T. Size and shape evolution of upconverting nanoparticles using microwave assisted synthesis. CrystEngComm 2010, 12, 1993–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dou, Q.; Zhang, Y. Tuning of the structure and emission spectra of upconversion nanocrystals by alkali ion doping. Langmuir 2011, 27, 13236–13241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, W.H.; Wang, F.; Zhang, W.D. Phase transformation of ultrathin nanowires through lanthanide doping: From InOOH to rh-In2O3. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 4361–6364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Feng, X.; Sayle, D.C.; Wang, Z.L.; Paras, M.S.; Santora, B.; Sutorik, A.C.; Sayle, T.X.; Yang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Wang, X.; et al. Converting ceria polyhedral nanoparticles into single-crystal nanospheres. Science 2006, 312, 1504–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, F.; Wan, Y.; Yu, T.; Zhang, F.; Shi, Y.; Xie, S.; Li, Y.; Xu, L.; Tu, B.; Zhao, D. Uniform nanostructured arrays of sodium rare-earth fluorides for highly efficient multicolor upconversion luminescence. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7976–7979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shsnnon, R.D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Cryst. A 1976, 32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) International Centre for Diffraction Data; File Number 16-0334; JCPDS International Centre for Diffraction Data: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2001.
  40. Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) International Centre for Diffraction Data; File Number 06-0262; JCPDS International Centre for Diffraction Data: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2001.
  41. Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) International Centre for Diffraction Data; File Number 77-2042; JCPDS International Centre for Diffraction Data: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2001.
  42. Chen, D.; Yu, Y.; Huang, F.; Huang, P.; Yang, A.; Wang, Y. Modifying the size and shape of monodisperse bifunctional alkaline-earth fluoride nanocrystals through lanthanide doping. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 9976–9978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials EISSN 2079-4991 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert