Next Article in Journal
Cognitive Models in Intelligence Research: Advantages and Recommendations for Their Application
Previous Article in Journal
Ability Tests Measure Personality, Personality Tests Measure Ability: Disentangling Construct and Method in Evaluating the Relationship between Personality and Ability
Previous Article in Special Issue
When Irrational Biases Are Smart: A Fuzzy-Trace Theory of Complex Decision Making
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperCommentary

Inequality, Education, Workforce Preparedness, and Complex Problem Solving

Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ 08648, USA
Received: 19 March 2018 / Revised: 5 June 2018 / Accepted: 19 June 2018 / Published: 16 July 2018
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [333 KB, uploaded 17 July 2018]

Abstract

Economic inequality has been described as the defining challenge of our time, responsible for a host of potential negative societal and individual outcomes including reduced opportunity, decreased health and life expectancy, and the destabilization of democracy. Education has been proposed as the “great equalizer” that has and can continue to play a role in reducing inequality. One means by which education does so is through the development of complex problem solving skills in students, skills used to solve novel, ill-defined problems in complex, real-world settings. These are highly valued in the workforce and will likely continue to be so in the future workforce. Their importance is evident in results from employer surveys, as well as by their inclusion in large scale international and domestic comparative assessments. In this paper, I review various definitions of complex problem solving and approaches for measuring it, along with findings from PISA 2003, 2012, and 2015. I also discuss prospects for teaching, assessing, and reporting on it, and discuss the emerging importance of collaborative problem solving. Developing and monitoring complex problem solving skills, broadly defined, is a critical challenge in preparing students for the future workforce, and in overcoming the negative effects of inequality and the diminishment of individual opportunity. View Full-Text
Keywords: inequality; problem solving; complex problem solving; PISA; National Assessment of Educational Progress; collaborative problem solving; skills; general ability; cognitive ability; general fluid ability inequality; problem solving; complex problem solving; PISA; National Assessment of Educational Progress; collaborative problem solving; skills; general ability; cognitive ability; general fluid ability
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kyllonen, P.C. Inequality, Education, Workforce Preparedness, and Complex Problem Solving. J. Intell. 2018, 6, 33.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Intell. EISSN 2079-3200 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top