Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
All We Need Is Brain (and Technology)
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
New Directions in Intelligence Research: Avoiding the Mistakes of the Past
J. Intell. 2014, 2(1), 21-25; doi:10.3390/jintelligence2010021
Comment

Predictive Validity of Non-g Residuals of Tests: More Than g

Department of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
Received: 30 November 2013 / Revised: 7 February 2014 / Accepted: 25 February 2014 / Published: 11 March 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligence, Where to Look, Where to Go?)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [283 KB, uploaded 11 March 2014]   |  

Abstract

This comment argues that an important issue in intelligence research is to identify constructs with validity beyond g, and that non-g residuals of tests represent a promising target.
Keywords: general intelligence (g); non-g residuals; SAT; ACT. general intelligence (g); non-g residuals; SAT; ACT.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

Further Mendeley | CiteULike
Export to BibTeX |
EndNote |
RIS
MDPI and ACS Style

Coyle, T.R. Predictive Validity of Non-g Residuals of Tests: More Than g. J. Intell. 2014, 2, 21-25.

View more citation formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Intell. EISSN 2079-3200 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert