Next Article in Journal
Next Article in Special Issue
Previous Article in Journal
Previous Article in Special Issue
J. Intell. 2014, 2(1), 21-25; doi:10.3390/jintelligence2010021
Comment

Predictive Validity of Non-g Residuals of Tests: More Than g

Received: 30 November 2013; in revised form: 7 February 2014 / Accepted: 25 February 2014 / Published: 11 March 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligence, Where to Look, Where to Go?)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [283 KB, uploaded 11 March 2014]
Abstract: This comment argues that an important issue in intelligence research is to identify constructs with validity beyond g, and that non-g residuals of tests represent a promising target.
Keywords: general intelligence (g); non-g residuals; SAT; ACT. general intelligence (g); non-g residuals; SAT; ACT.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Coyle, T.R. Predictive Validity of Non-g Residuals of Tests: More Than g. J. Intell. 2014, 2, 21-25.

AMA Style

Coyle TR. Predictive Validity of Non-g Residuals of Tests: More Than g. Journal of Intelligence. 2014; 2(1):21-25.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Coyle, Thomas R. 2014. "Predictive Validity of Non-g Residuals of Tests: More Than g." J. Intell. 2, no. 1: 21-25.

J. Intell. EISSN 2079-3200 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert