Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
All We Need Is Brain (and Technology)
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
New Directions in Intelligence Research: Avoiding the Mistakes of the Past
J. Intell. 2014, 2(1), 21-25; doi:10.3390/jintelligence2010021
Comment

Predictive Validity of Non-g Residuals of Tests: More Than g

Department of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
Received: 30 November 2013 / Revised: 7 February 2014 / Accepted: 25 February 2014 / Published: 11 March 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligence, Where to Look, Where to Go?)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [283 KB, uploaded 11 March 2014]   |   Browse Figures

Abstract

This comment argues that an important issue in intelligence research is to identify constructs with validity beyond g, and that non-g residuals of tests represent a promising target.
Keywords: general intelligence (g); non-g residuals; SAT; ACT. general intelligence (g); non-g residuals; SAT; ACT.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Share & Cite This Article

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Coyle, T.R. Predictive Validity of Non-g Residuals of Tests: More Than g. J. Intell. 2014, 2, 21-25.

View more citation formats

Article Metrics

Comments

Citing Articles

[Return to top]
J. Intell. EISSN 2079-3200 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert