Faith and Form on Screen
AbstractTo understand any aspect of being-in-the-world in general or cinematic experience in particular, both reductionist and holistic approaches are needed. Psychological accounts can give us only functional explanations of human behaviour or responses to signifying artifacts such as art. To understand the significance of these experiences the psychological must be complemented by a study on a level which may be termed spiritual. This line of thought is applied to analyses of Robert Bresson’s Pickpocket, starting from David Bordwell’s formalist and cognitive account of why many people experience this film as religious despite there being no explicit reference to religion. Paul Schrader’s analysis of the formal structure of this film in terms of his notion of transcendental style in film goes a step forward by explaining how the formal structure as he analyses it suggests a transcendental dimension which cannot be addressed directly. This approach connects in an illuminating way with Slavoj Žižek’s notions of the imaginary and the symbolic sphere. Bordwell’s approach, functioning on the psychological level, is basically reductionist, while Schrader’s, boosted with Žižek’s ideas as appropriated for the purposes of this article, is holistic and operative on the spiritual level. This two-tiered analysis reveals how cinematic form in Pickpocket serves as an indirect expression of faith. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Bacon, H. Faith and Form on Screen. Religions 2016, 7, 130.
Bacon H. Faith and Form on Screen. Religions. 2016; 7(11):130.Chicago/Turabian Style
Bacon, Henry. 2016. "Faith and Form on Screen." Religions 7, no. 11: 130.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.