Next Article in Journal
Loving the Many in the One: Augustine and the Love of Finite Goods
Next Article in Special Issue
Losing Touch: A Theology of Death for Michael Haneke’s Amour
Previous Article in Journal
The Potential of the Bi-Directional Gaze: A Call for Neuroscientific Research on the Simultaneous Activation of the Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Nervous Systems through Tantric Practice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Screening Belief: The Life of Pi, Computer Generated Imagery, and Religious Imagination
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Religions 2016, 7(11), 130; doi:10.3390/rel7110130

Faith and Form on Screen

Film and Television Studies, University of Helsinki, P.O.Box 59, Helsinki 00014, Finland
Academic Editor: Joseph Kickasola
Received: 2 June 2016 / Revised: 18 October 2016 / Accepted: 25 October 2016 / Published: 18 November 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Film and Lived Theology)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1376 KB, uploaded 18 November 2016]   |  

Abstract

To understand any aspect of being-in-the-world in general or cinematic experience in particular, both reductionist and holistic approaches are needed. Psychological accounts can give us only functional explanations of human behaviour or responses to signifying artifacts such as art. To understand the significance of these experiences the psychological must be complemented by a study on a level which may be termed spiritual. This line of thought is applied to analyses of Robert Bresson’s Pickpocket, starting from David Bordwell’s formalist and cognitive account of why many people experience this film as religious despite there being no explicit reference to religion. Paul Schrader’s analysis of the formal structure of this film in terms of his notion of transcendental style in film goes a step forward by explaining how the formal structure as he analyses it suggests a transcendental dimension which cannot be addressed directly. This approach connects in an illuminating way with Slavoj Žižek’s notions of the imaginary and the symbolic sphere. Bordwell’s approach, functioning on the psychological level, is basically reductionist, while Schrader’s, boosted with Žižek’s ideas as appropriated for the purposes of this article, is holistic and operative on the spiritual level. This two-tiered analysis reveals how cinematic form in Pickpocket serves as an indirect expression of faith. View Full-Text
Keywords: faith; film form; film style; transcendental style; pickpocket; Robert Bresson; David Bordwell; Paul Schrader; Slavoj Žižek faith; film form; film style; transcendental style; pickpocket; Robert Bresson; David Bordwell; Paul Schrader; Slavoj Žižek
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Bacon, H. Faith and Form on Screen. Religions 2016, 7, 130.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Religions EISSN 2077-1444 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert Logo copyright Steve Bridenbaugh/UUA
Back to Top