AbstractPastoral challenges prompted pietists among Elizabethan Catholics and Calvinists to commend what historians now call an inward turn whereby the faithful, in a sense, become their own confessors. This article suggests that spiritual exercises or soliloquies Shakespeare scripted for his Hamlet (and, less so, for Angelo in Measure for Measure) compare favorably with the devotional literature that underscored the importance of self-analysis, intra-psychic conflict, and contrition. The argument here is not that the playwright’s piety resembled his Hamlet’s but that the latter reflected efforts to structure desire in the religions of the time struggling for survival and recognition. References to passages in Shakespeare plays (act, scene) appear parenthetically in the text. Unless otherwise indicated in the bibliography appended to this article, all early printed material is accessible at the Early English Books database, http://eebo.chadwyck.com/home, verified June 1, 2011. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Kaufman, P.I. Hamlet’s Religions. Religions 2011, 2, 427-448.
Kaufman PI. Hamlet’s Religions. Religions. 2011; 2(3):427-448.Chicago/Turabian Style
Kaufman, Peter Iver. 2011. "Hamlet’s Religions." Religions 2, no. 3: 427-448.