Next Article in Journal
Line Force and Damping at Full and Partial Stator Overlap in a Linear Generator for Wave Power
Previous Article in Journal
Development of the Hydrodynamic Model for Long-Term Simulation of Water Quality Processes of the Tidal James River, Virginia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Propeller Cavitation in Non-Uniform Flow and Correlation with the Near Pressure Field
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2016, 4(4), 83; doi:10.3390/jmse4040083

Procedure for Application-Oriented Optimisation of Marine Propellers

1
Department of Shipping and Marine Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden
2
Rolls-Royce Hydrodynamic Research Centre, Rolls-Royce AB, PO Box 1010, 68129 Kristinehamn, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Moustafa Abdel-Maksoud
Received: 9 June 2016 / Revised: 27 September 2016 / Accepted: 28 October 2016 / Published: 26 November 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Propellers and Propulsion)

Abstract

The use of automated optimisation in engineering applications is emerging. In particular, nature inspired algorithms are frequently used because of their variability and robust application in constraints and multi-objective optimisation problems. The purpose of this paper is the comparison of four different algorithms and several optimisation strategies on a set of seven test propellers in realistic industrial design setting. The propellers are picked from real commercial projects and the manual final designs were delivered to customers. The different approaches are evaluated and final results of the automated optimisation toolbox are compared with designs generated in a manual design process. We identify a two-stage optimisation for marine propellers, where the geometry is first modified by parametrised geometry distribution curves to gather knowledge of the test case. Here we vary the optimisation strategy in terms of applied algorithms, constraints and objectives. A second supporting optimisation aims to improve the design by locally changing the geometry, based on the results of the first optimisation. The optimisation algorithms and strategies yield propeller designs that are comparable to the manually designed propeller blade geometries, thus being suitable as robust and advanced design support tools. The supporting optimisation, with local modification of the blade geometry and the proposed cavity shape constraints, features particular good performance in modifying cavitation on the blade and is, with the AS NSGA-II (adaptive surrogate-assisted NSGA-II), superior in lead time. View Full-Text
Keywords: marine propeller; multi-objective optimisation; cavitation constraints; evolutionary algorithm; PSO marine propeller; multi-objective optimisation; cavitation constraints; evolutionary algorithm; PSO
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Vesting, F.; Bensow, R.E.; Johansson, R.; Gustafsson, R.; Costa, N. Procedure for Application-Oriented Optimisation of Marine Propellers. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2016, 4, 83.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. EISSN 2077-1312 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top