Exploring the Future Potential of Jute in Bangladesh
AbstractThe study assesses the future potential of the jute sector in Bangladesh by examining its growth performance, international competitiveness, profitability, and production efficiency using national time-series data of over the period 1973–2013 and farm survey data from 289 farmers from two major jute growing areas of Bangladesh. Results revealed that the jute sector has experienced substantial growth in area, production, productivity, prices, and exports. However, productivity has stagnated during the latter 10-year period (2004–2013), while it grew at a rate of 1.3% per annum (p.a.) during the first 31-year period (1973–2003). Only traditional jute production is globally competitive, although financial profitability of white jute is relatively higher (benefit cost ratio = 1.24 and 1.17, respectively). Land, labor, and irrigation are the main productivity drivers for jute. The mean production efficiency of jute is estimated at 75% indicating substantial scope to improve yield by eliminating inefficiency. Marginal farmers are relatively inefficient. Policy implications include investments in research and development, irrigation, and tenurial reform and export protection for white jute in order to revive the sector and boost export earnings. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Rahman, S.; Kazal, M.M.H.; Begum, I.A.; Alam, M.J. Exploring the Future Potential of Jute in Bangladesh. Agriculture 2017, 7, 96.
Rahman S, Kazal MMH, Begum IA, Alam MJ. Exploring the Future Potential of Jute in Bangladesh. Agriculture. 2017; 7(12):96.Chicago/Turabian Style
Rahman, Sanzidur; Kazal, Mohammad M.H.; Begum, Ismat A.; Alam, Mohammad J. 2017. "Exploring the Future Potential of Jute in Bangladesh." Agriculture 7, no. 12: 96.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.