Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Microarray for Identification of the Chiropteran Host Species of Rabies Virus in Canada
Previous Article in Journal
A Flexible Microarray Data Simulation Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gene Dosage Analysis in a Clinical Environment: Gene-Targeted Microarrays as the Platform-of-Choice
Microarrays 2013, 2(2), 131-152; doi:10.3390/microarrays2020131
Article

Evaluation of Different Normalization and Analysis Procedures for Illumina Gene Expression Microarray Data Involving Small Changes

1,2,3,4,* , 1,5
, 2
, 6,7,8
, 7,8
, 1,4,5
, 9,10,11
, 1,2,12
, 1,4,5
 and 1,2
Received: 25 March 2013; in revised form: 8 May 2013 / Accepted: 10 May 2013 / Published: 21 May 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [789 KB, uploaded 21 May 2013]   |   Browse Figures
Abstract: While Illumina microarrays can be used successfully for detecting small gene expression changes due to their high degree of technical replicability, there is little information on how different normalization and differential expression analysis strategies affect outcomes. To evaluate this, we assessed concordance across gene lists generated by applying different combinations of normalization strategy and analytical approach to two Illumina datasets with modest expression changes. In addition to using traditional statistical approaches, we also tested an approach based on combinatorial optimization. We found that the choice of both normalization strategy and analytical approach considerably affected outcomes, in some cases leading to substantial differences in gene lists and subsequent pathway analysis results. Our findings suggest that important biological phenomena may be overlooked when there is a routine practice of using only one approach to investigate all microarray datasets. Analytical artefacts of this kind are likely to be especially relevant for datasets involving small fold changes, where inherent technical variation—if not adequately minimized by effective normalization—may overshadow true biological variation. This report provides some basic guidelines for optimizing outcomes when working with Illumina datasets involving small expression changes.
Keywords: gene expression microarray; normalization; Illumina gene expression microarray; normalization; Illumina
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Johnstone, D.M.; Riveros, C.; Heidari, M.; Graham, R.M.; Trinder, D.; Berretta, R.; Olynyk, J.K.; Scott, R.J.; Moscato, P.; Milward, E.A. Evaluation of Different Normalization and Analysis Procedures for Illumina Gene Expression Microarray Data Involving Small Changes. Microarrays 2013, 2, 131-152.

AMA Style

Johnstone DM, Riveros C, Heidari M, Graham RM, Trinder D, Berretta R, Olynyk JK, Scott RJ, Moscato P, Milward EA. Evaluation of Different Normalization and Analysis Procedures for Illumina Gene Expression Microarray Data Involving Small Changes. Microarrays. 2013; 2(2):131-152.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Johnstone, Daniel M.; Riveros, Carlos; Heidari, Moones; Graham, Ross M.; Trinder, Debbie; Berretta, Regina; Olynyk, John K.; Scott, Rodney J.; Moscato, Pablo; Milward, Elizabeth A. 2013. "Evaluation of Different Normalization and Analysis Procedures for Illumina Gene Expression Microarray Data Involving Small Changes." Microarrays 2, no. 2: 131-152.


Microarrays EISSN 2076-3905 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert