Next Article in Journal
Social Cognition and Oxytocin in Huntington’s Disease: New Insights
Previous Article in Journal
Cervical Dystonia and Executive Function: A Pilot Magnetoencephalography Study
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Brain Sci. 2018, 8(9), 160; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8090160

Visually Evoked Response Differences to Contrast and Motion in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

1
Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University 525 W 120th Street, New York, NY 10027, USA
2
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center/New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA
3
Center for Autism and the Developing Brain, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 21 Bloomingdale Road, White Plains, NY 10605, USA
4
Department of Education, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Villarrica, La Araucanía Region 4930000, Chile
5
Sydney Children’s Hospital, Community Health Center, High Street, Randwick NSW 2031, Australia
6
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 20 July 2018 / Revised: 9 August 2018 / Accepted: 21 August 2018 / Published: 24 August 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [6598 KB, uploaded 24 August 2018]   |  

Abstract

High-density electroencephalography (EEG) was used to examine the utility of the P1 event-related potential (ERP) as a marker of visual motion sensitivity to luminance defined low-spatial frequency drifting gratings in 16 children with autism and 16 neurotypical children. Children with autism displayed enhanced sensitivity to large, high-contrast low-spatial frequency stimuli as indexed by significantly shorter P1 response latencies to large vs. small gratings. The current study also found that children with autism had larger amplitude responses to large gratings irrespective of contrast. A linear regression established that P1 adaptive mean amplitude for large, high-contrast sinusoidal gratings significantly predicted hyperresponsiveness item mean scores on the Sensory Experiences Questionnaire for children with autism, but not for neurotypical children. We conclude that children with autism have differences in the mechanisms that underlie low-level visual processing potentially related to altered visual spatial suppression or contrast gain control. View Full-Text
Keywords: autism; electroencephalography; P1 event-related potential; visual contrast; visual motion autism; electroencephalography; P1 event-related potential; visual contrast; visual motion
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Shuffrey, L.C.; Levinson, L.; Becerra, A.; Pak, G.; Moya Sepulveda, D.; Montgomery, A.K.; Green, H.L.; Froud, K. Visually Evoked Response Differences to Contrast and Motion in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Brain Sci. 2018, 8, 160.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Brain Sci. EISSN 2076-3425 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top