Next Article in Journal
Attoclock Ptychography
Next Article in Special Issue
The Simulation of an Automotive Air Spring Suspension Using a Pseudo-Dynamic Procedure
Previous Article in Journal
An Improved Abrasive Flow Processing Method for Complex Geometric Surfaces of Titanium Alloy Artificial Joints
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neural Prediction of Tunnels’ Support Pressure in Elasto-Plastic, Strain-Softening Rock Mass
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Research on the Principle of a New Flexible Screw Conveyor and Its Power Consumption

1
School of Light Industry, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, China
2
Aerospace Mechanism and Control Center, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150003, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2018, 8(7), 1038; https://doi.org/10.3390/app8071038
Submission received: 7 April 2018 / Revised: 12 June 2018 / Accepted: 15 June 2018 / Published: 26 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soft Computing Techniques in Structural Engineering and Materials)

Abstract

:
A new screw conveyor with flexible discrete spiral blades is proposed to solve the problem of particle material gathering between the screw and the tube wall in the traditional screw conveyor. With a theoretical analysis, the power consumption model of the screw conveyor with flexible discrete spiral blades is built. Then, its practicability is verified by simulation and experimental testing. The simulation results show that the increase of the spiral angle will raise the transportation speed of the particles. The diameter of the flexible blades raises with the increase of the power consumption of the screw conveyor. The experimental testing verified the analysis and simulation results.

1. Introduction

Screw conveyors are widely used in modern production and in the logistics of transporting granular materials [1]. When traditional rigid screw conveyors convey sticky bulk materials, the phenomenon of material gathering at the inner wall happens. This will reduce the transmission efficiency of the screw convey.
A flexible tube screw conveyor is proposed in this study to expand the self-loading range. The chief shaft and outer tube are made of rubber, and the screw blade is made of continuous-rigidity plastic. The conveyor to swing widely in a broaden range for the flexibility [2]. A method is proposed to reduce the wear and tear of the screw conveyor. In addition, the power consumption variation of the conveyor transmission affected by the structure parameters of the screw is analyzed [3]. The filling factor of the screw conveyor is a key point for the transmission efficiency. It can be determined by using a ribbon-type screw at different screw speeds [4]. A feeding device based on equal diameter and dual-spiral is designed for animals feeding. The structure parameters and rotary speed are optimized with the simulation software EDEM. Then, the theoretical results are verified by an experimental test [5].
In this paper, a flexible, discrete spiral blades screw conveyor is proposed. The power consumption parameters when using a flexible helical blade structure were studied by theoretical analysis and simulation experiments.

2. Analysis of the Mechanical Properties of a Single Flexible Blade

2.1. The Radial Analysis of a Single Blade

Since the fiber length is slightly longer than the inner diameter of the tube wall, the wall of the nylon fiber is shown in Figure 1. A nylon fiber can be idealized as an elongated cylindrical rod. The force passing through the center of the rod cross section, perpendicular to the rod’s axis, is the radial force.
According to Figure 1, the single fiber bundle length is l, dN1 is a single fiber bend preloaded force, f2 is the radial wall of the axial preload force of friction. The fiber bundle is slightly longer than the diameter of the wall.
A single fiber bend force dN1 is:
d N 1 = π 3 E d s 4 256 l 2
where E is the elastic modulus of the material, ds is the diameter of the single nylon fiber, l is the distance between the working point and the supporting point.

2.2. The Axial Analysis of a Single Blade

The flexible blades are the elements of the screw conveyor. As a mechanical element, they must possess adequate strength and rigidity. When the end of the nylon fiber axis is fixed on the shaft, the other end is free, so this structure can be considered as a flexible cantilever beam of nylon fibers. The nylon fibers are thin cylinders, and the cross section of each fiber is circular. The force analysis is shown in the Figure 2.
In the Figure 2, F1 is caused by the weight of the material of the uniformly distributed load. Since there is no granule material, the study of the screw conveyor is an idealization. f3 is the radial wall friction preload in the axial direction.
When the fiber bundle gets bent, resistance to bending internal forces will be produced as well. Depending on the shape of the material, the internal forces resisting deformation are different. The formula of the maximum bending stress of the fiber bundles is:
σ max = μ 1 d N 1 l 0.2 d s 3
The friction along the axial preload is f3, so its maximum deflection Wmax is:
W max = 64 f 3 l 3 3 π E d s 4

2.3. The Structural Parameters Analysis of the Flexible Blade

The material of the flexible blade is wear-resistant fiber. The flexible screw diameter is slightly longer than the spiral pipe’s diameter. According to the principle of material mechanics [6,7,8], the flexible blade is bent and contacts the inner wall of the tube. With the fibers rotation, there is no material-gathering phenomenon occurring. The structural parameters of the flexible blade are shown in Figure 3.
Based on Formula (1):
l = π d s 2 4 E π d N 1
ds is from 0.5 mm to 2.5 mm. E is 3.2 × 109 N/m2. dN1 = 100 N, 1.5625 mm ≤ l ≤ 39 mm, Stress must satisfy the condition that, less than the allowable stress [σ], the material or institutions allowable stress is the national standard.
σ max [ σ ]
Based on Formula (2), l is:
l 0.2 d s 3 [ σ ] μ 1 d N 1
[σ] of nylon 66 is 12 MPa, dN1 = 100 N, the friction factor between plastic and plastic μk is 0.4, the calculation is
1.5 mm ≤ l ≤ 187.5 mm
The design should meet the stiffness conditions as follow:
ω max = 64 f 3 l 3 3 π E d s 4 [ ω ]
The formula is:
l 1 8 3 π E d s 4 [ ω ] f 3 3
With ds from 0.5 mm to 2.5 mm, and f3 = 30 N, the calculation is:
6.5 mm ≤ l ≤ 38.75 mm

2.4. The Flexible Blade Discrete Coefficient

As can be seen from Figure 4, the flexible spiral blade adopts a spiral form similar to that of the traditional spiral blade. This structure can make the material rising along the surface. When the gap between two fibers is too big, the flexible blade cannot meet the requirements of the conveying material blade. If the gap is small, the power consumption will be increased.
The discrete coefficient λ formula is:
λ = d j d i + d j
where di is the diameter of the nylon, and dj is the average distance between two nylon fibers.

3. The Conveying Power Consumption Model

3.1. Single Particle Motion Analysis

We assume that the granular material is a continuous medium [9,10,11,12], and the particle size, shape and natures are the same. The material on the spiral vane motion analysis is shown in Figure 5.
In Figure 5, Vs is the screw rotational speed, VR is the relative speed of material along the spiral surface, VA is the speed of the material, VLT is the speed of the screw conveyor, VT is the transport velocity.
The spiral angle of the blade is:
α = tan 1 P π D
The tangential velocity VS of the material is:
V S = ω R = 2 π n R 60 = π n z R 30
where R is the radius from the centerline of the screw axis to the wall, and nz is the screw shaft speed. Therefore, the tangential velocity of the material increases with the acceleration of the rotation speed of the helical shaft and the increase of the helical radius. The relative speed of the material along the spiral surface VR is:
V R = V S sin ρ sin ( α + ρ )
The synthesis speed VA is:
V A = V S sin α sin ( α + ρ )
Figure 5 shows the vertical speed of the materials that is:
V L = π n z R sin α sin ρ 30 sin ( α + ρ )

3.2. Power Consumption Calculation

The friction consumption of fibers is P1.
As shown in the Figure 6, the frictional force can be represented as:
d f 1 = tan δ ρ ( z ) h b g d l cos α
where ρ(z) is the density of the powder material, h is the thread height, b is the spiral groove width, dl is the length along the spiral element, and δ is the friction angle.
The corresponding torque infinitesimal dM1 can be represented as:
d M 1 = 1 2 ( D d Z ) ρ ( z ) h b g tan δ cos α λ π D p d z
where D is the diameter of the inner wall, and dz is the screw shaft outer diameter.
By the formula P = , we have:
P 1 = M 1 ω = ω 0 z ( D d Z ) ρ ( z ) h b g tan δ cos α λ π D 2 p d z
In Figure 7, the frictional force df2 is:
d f 2 = tan δ 1 ω 2 D d Z 2 d m = ρ ( z ) h b ω 2 ( D d Z ) π D tan δ 1 2 p d z
The corresponding torque infinitesimal dM2 can be represented as:
d M 2 = D d Z 2 d f 2 = ( D d Z ) 2 4 ρ ( z ) h b ω 2 π D tan δ 1 p d z
The consumption of the material due to the interaction with the spiral wall is P2.
By the formula P = , we have:
P 2 = M 2 ω = ω ( D d Z ) 2 h b ω 2 π D tan δ 1 4 p 0 z ρ ( z ) d z
Power is required to overcome the elastic deformation of the flexible helical fibers [13,14]. When the flexible screw rotates with the helical axis, the centrifugal force of single fiber will produce a force f0 on tangent direction.
f4 is the difference between dN1 and f0. It is the elastic potential energy, as shown in Figure 8.
The centrifugal force f0 and the friction force f4 are:
f 0 = m ω l 2
f 4 = μ m ω l 2 + f 3
where m is the quality of a single fiber, and ω is the rotating speed of the screw shaft.
We assumed the elastic potential energy of the fibers as the elastic potential energy of a spring:
E P = 1 2 k δ 2
where δ is the deformation of the fiber bundle, and k is the spring stiffness which depends on the material itself:
δ = f 4 l E A
The total elastic energy of the nylon fiber is:
E z = N E p = 1 2 N k [ ( μ m ω l 2 + μ d N 1 ) l E π d s 2 ] 2
We can obtain the total power consumption of elastic energy of the nylon fiber:
P 3 = E Z t = 1 2 t N k [ ( μ m ω l 2 + μ d N 1 ) l E π d s 2 ] 2
where t is the working time.
To sum up, the total power consumption P is:
{ P 1 = M 1 ω = ω 0 z ( D d Z ) ρ ( z ) h b g tan δ cos α λ π D 2 p d z P 2 = M 2 ω = ω ( D d Z ) 2 h b ω 2 π D tan δ 1 4 p 0 z ρ ( z ) d z P 3 = E Z t = 1 2 t N k [ ( μ m ω l 2 + μ d N 1 ) l E π d s 2 ] 2
P = P 1 + P 2 + P 3

4. Discrete Element Simulation

The Discrete Element Method (EDEM) software is used to simulate the process of a flexible screw conveyor transporting granular materials [15,16,17,18]. In the software, the flexible screw, tube wall, and granular material are built [19]. The material’s parameters [20,21,22,23] are shown in Table 1.
The starch granules contact properties are shown in the Table 2, and the contact models in simulation are shown in Table 3.

4.1. The Spiral Angle

Considering the limits of the manufacturing capacity, the spiral angles of the flexible screw conveyor is 20°, and the diameter of the spiral is 70 mm, which is the capability of the screw. Therefore, the maximum distance of each fiber is 1 mm, and the diameter of the spiral is 70 mm. The spiral shaft is 150 mm long, and the rotational speed is 400 rpm. The particle number is 10,000. We set three spiral angles of 10°, 20°, and 30° to simulate the process of the flexible screw working. Figure 9 shows the simulation results.
The low-speed material particles are colored in blue, and the high-speed particles are colored in red. It can be seen from Figure 9a that for most of the particles, the speed is from 100 mm/s to 480 mm/s. In Figure 9b, the speed of most particles is from 400 mm/s to 860 mm/s. In Figure 9c, the speed of most particles speed is from 800 mm/s to 1200 mm/s. The results show that the speed of the particles can be increased by the speed of the screw conveyer under certain other conditions. By collating the simulation data, the speed of the three experiments at the same transportation distance is shown in Figure 10.
From Figure 10, it can be seen that increases of the spiral angle will improve the transportation efficiency of the granular material.

4.2. The Different Rotary Speed

The rotary speeds of the motor are 200 rpm, 600 rpm, and 800 rpm. We can see from Figure 11a that the rotary speeds of most particles are from 100 rpm to 2000 rpm. The particles rotate with the rotation of the helical axis, but the upward transport of the particles is not obvious. We can see from Figure 11b that the speed of most particles is between 100 rpm to 5000 rpm. The particles rotate with the rotation of the helical axis, and the upward transport of the particles is obvious. The speed of the particles are from 1000 rpm to 8000 rpm in Figure 11c.
The data collected are shown in Figure 12. This shows that, under certain conditions, the transport of the particles increases with the increase of the speed of the screw conveyor.

5. Test and Results

5.1. Experiments

The experiments performed regard the sensor, rotary motor, tube and screw, data collection device, as can be seen from Figure 13a,b. The rotary speed range is from 100 rpm to 1000 rpm. Figure 14 shows the flexible blade screw conveyor, which is composed of tube, flexible blade, and axis. The conveyor is 2 m long, the diameter is 60 mm, and the screw angle is 20°. The transportation object is sand with homogeneous particle size.

5.2. Results

In order to eliminate the adverse effects of No-load of the rotary motor, rotary torque curves without load were obtained from 100 rpm to 300 rpm. Figure 15 is a torque curve without load under 300 rpm. The other two torque curves are the same as in Figure 15. As we can see, the curve are similar to a horizontal straight line, and the value is 0.40 × 104 Nm.
As shown in the Figure 16, the three curves indicate the torque consumption under load. The data obtained with the Matlab software, are shown in Figure 17. The three lines represent test data, simulation data, and numerical solution when the rotary speed is 300 rpm. The numerical solution by the model is a limited data. Therefore, it is a horizontal line in Figure 17. In contrast, the test and simulation curves are obtained at the same time. It can be seen that the two curves raise with time, but the maximum values are lower than the numerical solution.

6. Conclusions

The conclusions of this paper can be summarized as follows:
(1)
A flexible screw blade which is made of flexible fiber bundles is proposed as the spiral conveying shaft of screw conveyor for powder conveying. The ability to transmit particles whose diameter is bigger than that of the flexible fibers is verified by experiments.
(2)
According to the theory of particle mechanics and material mechanics, the power consumption and conveying quantity model of flexible screw blades for conveying bulk materials are established. The main parameters affecting the conveying amount and power consumption are: helical diameter, spiral rising angle, blade dispersion coefficient, and so on.
(3)
The mechanism of flexible spiral blade conveyor is verified by the particle material mechanics software EDEM. From the results of the simulation, we show that the conveying capacity of the particles decreases with the acceleration of the clearance of the flexible helical blades and increases with the speed, diameter, and angle of the screw conveyer; the power consumption of the particle material increases with the speed of the screw conveyor and the diameter of the spiral.
(4)
The theoretical and simulation results are verified by experiments. By comparing the power (torque) curves at the same speed, the growth trend of the experimental curves is consistent with the results of the theoretical analysis and simulation curves.

Author Contributions

Y.T. and J.G.; Methodology, M.C.; Software, P.Y.; experiment, Y.S. and T.D.; Data Analysis, F.Y. and J.T.; Validation, K.Z.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, Q.C.; Editing paper format.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Fund (41772387), Youth Innovative Talent Support Project of Harbin University of Commerce (2016QN067), doctoral research startup project (2016BS07).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, D.-X. Research on Numerical Analysis and Optimal Design of the Screw Conveyor. Univ. Technol. 2012, 27, 32–36. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hevko, R.B.; Rozum, R.I.; Klendii, O.M. Development of Design and Investigation of Operation Processes of Loading Pipes of Screw Conveyors. Agric. Eng. 2016, 3, 200–210. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hu, K. Screw conveyor principle and design. J. Nanchang Univ. (Engl. Ed.) 2000, 4, 30–36. [Google Scholar]
  4. Mondal, D. Study on filling factor of short length screw conveyor with flood-feeding condition. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 1286–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Qi, J.; Meng, H.; Kan, Z.; Li, C.; Li, Y. Analysis and test of feeding performance of dual-spiral cow feeding device based on EDEM. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2017, 33, 65–71. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhao, W.-M.; Li, G.-X. Screw Drill Test for Soil Delivering Speed and Resistance. Constr. Mach. 2006, 37, 23–25. [Google Scholar]
  7. David, R. Gill Basics of Flexible Screw Conveyors. Plant Eng. 2003, 25, 232–235. [Google Scholar]
  8. Spiroflow Clitheroe Lances. Flexible Screw solves sticky problem. Prof. Eng. 2002, 45, 118–121. [Google Scholar]
  9. Xu, D.-W.; Liu, G.-B.; Cheng, D.-W. Design and Construction of the TPS310 Screw Conveyor. Packag. Food Mach. 2002, 20, 35–37. [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu, Z.-K.; Liu, Y.-Z. Analysis and Calculation of Powder of Screw Conveyor. Feed Ind. 1987, 5, 32–36. [Google Scholar]
  11. Huang, S.-Y. Mechanics of Granular; Machinery Industry Press: Beijing, China, 1993; pp. 42–45. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kapur, P.C.; Meloy, T.P. Industrial Modeling of Spirals for Optimal Configuration and Design: Spiral Geometry, Fluid Flow and Forces on Particles. Powder Technol. 1999, 102, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Woodcock, C.R.; Mason, J.S. Bulk Soilds Handling; Black & Son Limited: London, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  14. Uchida, K.; Okamoto, K. Measurement Technique on the Diffusion Coefficient of Powder Flow in a Screw Feeder by X-ray Visualization. Powder Technol. 2008, 187, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lv, B.-Y. Manufacturing and forming technology of the blade of a screw conveyer. For. Mach. Woodwork. Equip. 2009, 37, 49–51. [Google Scholar]
  16. Roberts, A.W. Design and Performance Criteria for Screw Conveyors in Bulk Solides Operation. Bulk Solids Handl. 2002, 22, 436–444. [Google Scholar]
  17. Morton, W.E.; Hearle, J.W.S. Physieal Properties of Textile Fibres, 2nd ed.; William Heinemann Ltd.: London, UK, 1975; pp. 399–440. [Google Scholar]
  18. Xu, Y.; Sun, Q.-C.; Zhang, L. Research Progress on Particle Discrete Element Method. Adv. Mech. 2003, 33, 251–256. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sun, L.-M. Research on the Current Situation and Development of Mechanics of Granular. J. Kaifeng Univ. 2011, 25, 74–77. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhu, L.-T. The Mechanical Properties of the Fiber Strain Rate Effect and Knitted Composite Ballistic Impact Damage Mechanism. Donghua Univ. 2010, 6, 32–36. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yan, Z.-J. Study on structural change of fiber and its composites mechanical properties and fracture process. Synth. Fiber 2010, 28, 46–48. [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, J.-H.; Fu, C.-M.; Xia, P. Optimization Design of Screw Conveyor Mode Based on Simulation. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2011, 30, 512–516. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tian, Y.; Deng, Z.-Q.; Tang, D.-W. Structure Parameters Optimization and Simulation Experiment of Auger in Lunar Soil Drill-sampling Device. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2012, 48, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A single flexible blade radial force diagram.
Figure 1. A single flexible blade radial force diagram.
Applsci 08 01038 g001
Figure 2. Single flexible helical blade axial force diagram.
Figure 2. Single flexible helical blade axial force diagram.
Applsci 08 01038 g002
Figure 3. Flexible blade characteristics.
Figure 3. Flexible blade characteristics.
Applsci 08 01038 g003
Figure 4. Flexible helix blade clearance diagram.
Figure 4. Flexible helix blade clearance diagram.
Applsci 08 01038 g004
Figure 5. Diagram of the velocity of a single particle.
Figure 5. Diagram of the velocity of a single particle.
Applsci 08 01038 g005
Figure 6. Diagram of the stress of the material along the spiral surface.
Figure 6. Diagram of the stress of the material along the spiral surface.
Applsci 08 01038 g006
Figure 7. Vertical plane stress analysis.
Figure 7. Vertical plane stress analysis.
Applsci 08 01038 g007
Figure 8. Stress analysis of the elastic deformation of the flexible spiral strand.
Figure 8. Stress analysis of the elastic deformation of the flexible spiral strand.
Applsci 08 01038 g008
Figure 9. Different angles simulation results. (a) spiral angle 10°; (b) spiral angle 20°; (c) spiral angle 30°.
Figure 9. Different angles simulation results. (a) spiral angle 10°; (b) spiral angle 20°; (c) spiral angle 30°.
Applsci 08 01038 g009
Figure 10. Transmission distance with different angles.
Figure 10. Transmission distance with different angles.
Applsci 08 01038 g010
Figure 11. Different rotary speeds simulation. (a) Rotary speed 200 rpm; (b) rotary speed 600 rpm; (c) rotary speed 800 rpm.
Figure 11. Different rotary speeds simulation. (a) Rotary speed 200 rpm; (b) rotary speed 600 rpm; (c) rotary speed 800 rpm.
Applsci 08 01038 g011
Figure 12. Particles speed with different rotary speeds.
Figure 12. Particles speed with different rotary speeds.
Applsci 08 01038 g012
Figure 13. Test bed and parts. (a) Test bed. (b) Parts of test bed.
Figure 13. Test bed and parts. (a) Test bed. (b) Parts of test bed.
Applsci 08 01038 g013
Figure 14. Flexible blade screw.
Figure 14. Flexible blade screw.
Applsci 08 01038 g014
Figure 15. Torque without load.
Figure 15. Torque without load.
Applsci 08 01038 g015
Figure 16. Torque of three rotary speeds.
Figure 16. Torque of three rotary speeds.
Applsci 08 01038 g016
Figure 17. Contrast diagram.
Figure 17. Contrast diagram.
Applsci 08 01038 g017
Table 1. Material properties.
Table 1. Material properties.
MaterialPoisson’s RatioModulus of Elasticity (pa)Density (kg/m3)
Starch0.252 × 1071500
Nylon 660.283.2 × 1091130
PVC0.353 × 1061400
Table 2. Starch granules’ contact properties.
Table 2. Starch granules’ contact properties.
InteractionCoefficient of RestitutionStatic Friction CoefficientRolling Friction Coefficient
Particle to particle0.10.70.01
Particles to nylon0.30.50.01
Particles to PVC tube0.30.50.01
Table 3. Physical interaction model.
Table 3. Physical interaction model.
InteractionModel
Particle to particleMertz–Mindin with bonding built-in
Particles to nylonMertz–Mindin (no slip) built-in
Particles to PVC tubeMertz–Mindin (no slip) built-in

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tian, Y.; Yuan, P.; Yang, F.; Gu, J.; Chen, M.; Tang, J.; Su, Y.; Ding, T.; Zhang, K.; Cheng, Q. Research on the Principle of a New Flexible Screw Conveyor and Its Power Consumption. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8071038

AMA Style

Tian Y, Yuan P, Yang F, Gu J, Chen M, Tang J, Su Y, Ding T, Zhang K, Cheng Q. Research on the Principle of a New Flexible Screw Conveyor and Its Power Consumption. Applied Sciences. 2018; 8(7):1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8071038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tian, Ye, Panpan Yuan, Fei Yang, Jihai Gu, Mengmeng Chen, Junyue Tang, Yilin Su, Tianxiang Ding, Kailiang Zhang, and Qiang Cheng. 2018. "Research on the Principle of a New Flexible Screw Conveyor and Its Power Consumption" Applied Sciences 8, no. 7: 1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8071038

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop