Next Article in Journal
A Review of Physical and Perceptual Feature Extraction Techniques for Speech, Music and Environmental Sounds
Previous Article in Journal
A Self-Paced P300 Healthcare Brain-Computer Interface System with SSVEP-Based Switching Control and Kernel FDA + SVM-Based Detector
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Physical and Degradable Properties of Mulching Films Prepared from Natural Fibers and Biodegradable Polymers

Institute of Bast Fiber Crops, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha 410205, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2016, 6(5), 147; https://doi.org/10.3390/app6050147
Submission received: 2 March 2016 / Revised: 27 April 2016 / Accepted: 6 May 2016 / Published: 12 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Science and Engineering)

Abstract

:
The use of plastic film in agriculture has the serious drawback of producing vast quantities of waste. In this work, films were prepared from natural fibers and biodegradable polymers as potential substitutes for the conventional non-biodegradable plastic film used as mulching material in agricultural production. The physical properties (e.g., mechanical properties, heat preservation, water permeability, and photopermeability) and degradation characteristics (evaluated by micro-organic culture testing and soil burial testing) of the films were studied in both laboratory and field tests. The experimental results indicated that these fiber/polymer films exhibited favorable physical properties that were sufficient for use in mulching film applications. Moreover, the degradation degree of the three tested films decreased in the following order: fiber/starch (ST) film > fiber/poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) film > fiber/polyacrylate (PA) film. The fiber/starch and fiber/PVA films were made from completely biodegradable materials and demonstrated the potential to substitute non-biodegradable films.

1. Introduction

The practice of using mulching film to improve the growth and yield of annual and perennial crops has long been recognized [1]. Mulching film preserves heat and moisture, reduces pressure from weeds and pathogens, and conserves water and fertilizer [2,3,4]. In these ways, mulching film contributes to sustainable agricultural production.
Plastic films (e.g., polyethylene (PE), poly(vinyl chloride), polybutylene, copolymers of ethylene with vinyl acetate) are the most widely used materials because of their excellent mechanical properties and low cost. However, the major problem associated with the use of non-biodegradable plastic films is that they can pollute soil when they are buried in landfills; in addition, the removal and disposal of these plastic residues from the field either before or after harvest is costly and time-consuming [1,5]. For these reasons, farmers usually incorporate used films into the soil; occasionally, they burn the used plastic films, causing harmful pollution [6]. In order to increase the sustainability of agricultural practices and to overcome the disposal problems associated with conventional plastic films, the development and use of mulching films based on biodegradable materials is highly desirable.
Until now, various films capable of being degraded by microorganisms in the soil have been developed, including oxo-degradable plastic film [7], paper film [8], and biodegradable film [9,10,11]. Oxo-degradable plastic is low-cost and easy to install, but the parts of the film that are buried in the soil do not break down and must be exposed to light and air for degradation [12]. Paper film has been considered as an alternative to plastic film; however, paper film suffers from very rapid degradation and is easily broken down after exposure to soil, rain, and wind [13]. Furthermore, in order to cause no undesirable effects to the performance of agricultural soil, no harmful substances resulting from the degradation of biodegradable materials used as mulching film should accumulate in the soil [14].
The fibrous materials derived from renewable crops or from their by-products or agro-industrial wastes are good candidates for use in blends and composites [15]. Natural fibers have good mechanical properties and are biodegradable, which makes them highly suitable for use in films in combination with biodegradable polymers. Some natural fibers, such as ramie, flax, hemp, and cotton, are abundant in China and are mainly used for textiles. However, the waste fiber has not been suitably recycled after industrial production. Some biodegradable polymers such as starch, poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT), poly(butylene succinate-co-adipate) (PBSA), and poly(lactic acid) (PLA) have been used to prepare biodegradable agricultural films [13,14,16,17,18,19,20]. Some films based on natural fibers and polymers were also prepared, such as an orange fiber residue/PVA film [21] and an Osage orange wood/PLA film [10]. These films were prepared using the mixture of grinded fibers and a polymer aqueous solution. The aim of this study was to prepare films based on natural fibers and biodegradable polymers as potential substitutes for plastic films. In this work, three mulching films were severally developed from natural fibers (a blend of waste ramie and cotton fiber) and polymers (PA, ST, and PVA) using the method of air laying in nonwoven fabric. The biodegradability of the films was studied in detail.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

Three mulching films (fiber/PVA, fiber/PA, and fiber/ST, originally white) were prepared in our cooperative enterprise (YuanJiang Jingzhu Science and Technology Co. Ltd, Yiyang, China). The fiber/PA, fiber/ST, and fiber/PVA films all had an approximate thickness of 0.35 mm and weight of 40 g/m2, which contained approximately 16% polymer (polyacrylate, starch, or poly(vinyl alcohol), respectively) and 84% waste fibers in the textile industry (ramie and cotton fibers with a mass ratio of 4:1). The properties of ramie fiber are as follows: approximately 2–5 cm in length, 30 μm in diameter, a density of 1.49 g/cm3, and 6.5% moisture content. The properties of cotton fiber are as follows: approximately 13 mm in length, 20 μm in diameter, a density of 1.58 g/cm3, and 7.2% moisture content. All the polymers were of technical grade. Polyacrylate (30% emulsion) was mixed copolymers of methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, and butyl acrylate, with an average molecular weight of 1,2000 and purchased from Zhuzhou Chemical Factory, Zhuzhou, China; corn starch was purchased from Suzhou Shuanghuan Chemical Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China, with an average molecular weight of 15,000 and purity of ≥ 98%; PVA (model 100-40H) was purchased from Shanxi Sanwei Group Co., Ltd., Linfen, China, with an average molecular weight of 14,000 and alcoholysis degree ≥ 99%. In addition, a commonly used PE film (white and black) was purchased from the market with a thickness of 0.04 mm.

2.2. Physical Properties of Mulching Films

2.2.1. Mechanical Properties

The tensile strength and percentage elongation of each film were measured using a Tininus Olsen testing machine (Model H5KL, Tinius Olsen Testing Machine Company, Horsham, PA, USA) according to ASTM D4964-64 (Test method for tension and elongation of elastic fabrics). The test was carried out before the trial in the field, and each sample was determined in triplicate.

2.2.2. Heat Preservation

Heat preservation was investigated by performing a field test that involved the cultivation of Chinese cabbage in the garden of Wangcheng District, Changsha, China (latitude: 28°18′ N, longitude: 112°51′ E, altitude: 50 m). The soil temperature was recorded by a soil temperature recorder (model TZS-6W-G, Zhejiang Top Instrument Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China). The heat preservation behavior of the three fiber/polymer films was similar; therefore, only the results from the fiber/PVA film have been reported. The films were laid on the field, and the temperature at the position of 0 cm, 10 cm, and 20 cm under the soil surface was recorded with no film as a control using the reported method by Moreno [22]. The test was carried out over a period of 39 days from November 8, 2014 to December 17, 2014.

2.2.3. Water Permeability

The films’ water permeability was assessed using 6-cm-diameter Fisher Payne permeability cups that contained 5 mL of water and were sealed by the films. No film was set as control [21]. The experiment was performed in an air-conditioned room (25 °C temperature and 60% relative humidity (RH)) and variations in the water weight over time were recorded.

2.2.4. Photopermeability

The percentage of light transmittance was measured at different wavelengths (450, 650, and 850 nm) using an ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometer (UV-2100, Unico, San Diego, CA, USA), with the sample placed in the light path using the reported method by Kijchavengkul [23].

2.2.5. Thermal Stability

Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed to analyze the thermal stability of the film samples using a TGA/DSC 1 SF/1382 analyzer (METTLER TOLEDO, Shanghai, China). A sample of 10 mg was placed in an aluminum pan and heated from 25 to 600 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a nitrogen atmosphere.

2.3. Biodegradability Tests

2.3.1. Micro-Organic Culture Test

Microbial measurements were based on the dilution method of plate counting. Suspensions of soil collected from the garden of Wangcheng District, Changsha, China, which had been covered with the fiber/PVA and PE films for the cultivation of Chinese cabbage, were prepared. The properties for the soil were as follows: Thesoil pH was 6.05, the soil carbon was 24.52 g/kg, total nitrogen was 1.28 g/kg, total phosphorus was 0.85 g/kg, and total potassium was 17.37 g/kg. The test was carried out over a period of 49 days from November 1, 2014 to December 19, 2014. The fiber/PVA film was used for the micro-organic culture test by laying the film at the bottom of the culture dish. Beef-protein agar medium was used to culture bacteria at 37 °C for 48 h, Martin substratum was used to culture fungi at 28 °C for 72 h, and Gause’s No. 1 synthetic medium was used to culture Actinomycetes at 28 °C for 72 h. The measurement of microorganism was performed in triplicate.

2.3.2. Soil Burial Test

Soil burial biodegradation tests were performed in a flowerpot with a capacity of approximately 1000 mL. Soil samples were obtained from the test garden in Wangcheng District, Changsha, China. All of the film samples (50 mm × 50 mm) were buried in the pot under 10 cm of soil with 65% moisture. The temperature was 10–25 °C, and the air humidity was 25%–45%. The test was carried out over a period of 45 days in the laboratory from November 4, 2013 to December 18, 2013. At different time points, samples were collected from the pot, gently cleaned by rinsing with water and brushing, dried to a constant weight at 105 °C, and weighed. The percentage weight loss of the samples was calculated according to the following equation:
Weight loss = [(M0M1)/M0] × 100% ,
where M0 is the initial mass of the films before the test, and M1 is the residual mass of the films after the test.
Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was used to analyze the samples before and after degradation by the standard KBr pellet method. The IR spectra were obtained using a Thermo Nicolet 380 Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) in the range of 4000–600 cm−1. The films were tested before and after degradation using the transmission method. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to observe surface changes on the films before and after degradation. The film samples were coated with gold, and the surface was observed using a Hitachi S-4800 scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) with a stated resolution of 1.4 nm at 1 kV acceleration voltage.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mechanical Properties

The results from the tensile strength test and the percentage elongation of the four tested films are shown in Table 1; these results indicated that the tensile strength and elongation of the fiber/polymer films were poorer than that of commonly used PE film. The fiber/polymer films of this tensile strength were sufficiently strong for use as a mulching film in our field test.

3.2. Heat Preservation

The fiber/PVA and PE films were used to culture Chinese cabbage; the control used no film. The results in Figure 1 show that the ability of the films to preserve temperature followed the following order: PE film > fiber/PVA film > no film. The ability of the fiber/polymer film to preserve heat was poorer than that of the PE film; however, our field test demonstrated that the fiber/polymer film could be beneficial under certain conditions, such as during the summer season or in high-temperature regions.

3.3. Water Permeability

The water permeability of the three fiber/polymer films was measured under constant conditions of 25 °C and 60% RH. The results shown in Figure 2 reveal that the water permeability of different treatments decreased in the following order: no film > fiber/ST > fiber/PVA > fiber/PA. It can be inferred that this arrangement is in line with the hydroscopicity of the films and, indirectly, is in accordance with the hydrophilic ability of polymers. Both fiber/polymer films allowed water to easily permeate into the soil and maintain the moisture content of the soil, which had a better water holding capacity than PE film.

3.4. Photopermeability

The determination of photopermeability can provide the data of the extent to which the white fiber/polymer films can prohibit the light. Figure 3 shows that the light transmittance of the three white fiber/polymer films is below 25%, much lower than that of the PE film; the black PE film had alight transmittance below 3%. Therefore, the fiber/polymer films were able to prohibit the growth of weeds by reducing the transmitted light to some extent. Some natural dyes, such as carbon black, tannin, and humic substances, can be blended with the films to produce different colors.

3.5. Thermal Stability

The TGA curves in Figure 4 show that weight loss began to occur for the three fiber/polymer films at approximately 300 °C, indicating that their thermal stability was poorer than that of the PE film; however, they were sufficiently stable for use as a mulching film at temperatures occurring in the natural environment.

3.6. Biodegradability

3.6.1. Micro-Organic Culture Test

The three fiber/polymer films behaved similarly in the micro-organic culture test through our primary experiments; therefore, only the results from the fiber/PVA film had been reported. The soil microbial quantities are presented in Figure 5 and show that the amount of microbes increased over time. The bacteria and actinomycetes were richest using fiber/polymer films, and the fungi was richest using the PE film. The covering of films can produce more microbial, which can be caused by the degradation of the film or heat generated beneath the films; thus, the increase in bacteria and actinomycetes might be beneficial for the degradation of this fiber/polymer film.

3.6.2. Soil Burial Test

The weight loss of the samples in the soil burial test is shown in Table 2; the results indicated that the degradation degree of the three fiber/polymer films decreased in the following order: fiber/ST film > fiber/PVA film > fiber/PA film.
In the soil burial test, the three films were degraded for four weeks. The samples were characterized by FT-IR before and after degradation to identify the changes in spectra intensities in the films’ functional groups [23]. The results are shown in Figure 6. Before degradation, the fiber/PVA film showed characteristic absorption bands at 3331 cm−1 (O–H stretching), 2902 cm−1 (C–H stretching), 1628 cm−1 (C–O stretching), and 1316 cm−1 (–CH2 bending). In addition, the absorption bands at 1159 cm−1 (anti-symmetric stretching of the C–O–C bridge) and 1028 cm−1 (skeletal vibrations involving C–O stretching) were characteristic of a saccharide structure. The IR spectra for the fiber/ST film and the fiber/PA film were similar to that of the fiber/PVA film, although the fiber/PA film had a characteristic absorption band at 1727 cm−1 (C=O stretching). Figure 6 shows major differences of absorption intensity in spectra for both the fiber/PVA and fiber/starch films before and after degradation, whereas the fiber/PA film spectra show little variance before and after degradation. The IR spectra indicates that the contents of the samples changed with the absorption intensity, also changing some characteristic peaks. These findings also indicate that the fiber/PVA and fiber/starch films degraded rapidly during this period, while the fiber/PA film degraded more slowly by contrast.
SEM micrographs of films taken before and after the soil burial test are presented in Figure 7. The samples had many ripples and holes after 1 month of degradation, indicating the partial biodegradation of the polymer and fiber; however, degradation of the fiber requires more time. The SEM micrographs showed that the degradation degree of the fiber/PVA and fiber/ST films was greater than that of the fiber/PA film.
Both the field and laboratory tests indicate the potential usefulness of the fiber/starch film; however, because of its rapid degradation in soil (approximately 1–2 months in different seasons), it can only be used as a mulching film for crops with short growth periods. The fiber/PVA and fiber/PA films can be completely degraded in 2–3 months and 3–4 months, respectively, during different seasons according to the findings of our field test. PVA and starch were reported as biodegradable polymers; however, it reported that polyacrylate was not a biodegradable polymer [24,25,26,27]. Therefore, the fiber/PA film will not be suitable for large-scale applications. On the whole, the fiber/polymer films used in this study have a much shorter degradation time, which can only be used for crops with a short growth periodicity. Therefore, much work should be done by us to prolong the degradation time of these fiber/polymer films in our further studies.

4. Conclusions

The use of biodegradable films in agriculture can promote sustainability, reduce soil contamination, and increase the use of renewable raw materials obtained from agro-industrial waste. The wastes of some fibers such as ramie and cotton can be recycled, and PVA and starch are biodegradable polymers that can be used to prepare mulching film. The tested fiber/polymer films showed good physical properties. The water permeability and heat preservation tests demonstrated that the films had good water permeability and heat preservation capability. The micro-organic culture and soil burial tests demonstrated the good biodegradability of the films. The soil burial test and the FT-IR and SEM analyses indicated that the degradation degree of the three films decreased in the following order: fiber/ST film > fiber/PVA film > fiber/PA film. In the view of the biodegradability, fiber/ST and fiber/PVA films are more suitable than non-degradable films for use as mulching film for crops, but much work should be done to prolong the degradation time of these fiber/polymer films.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the earmarked fund for the China Agriculture Research System (No. CARS-19), and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program (No. ASTIP-IBFC07).

Author Contributions

Zhijian Tan and Chaoyun Wang conceived and designed the experiments; Yongjian Yi, Hongying Wang, and Wanlai Zhou performed the experiments; Zhijian Tan and Yuanru Yang analyzed the data; Zhijian Tan wrote and revised the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
PVApoly(vinyl alcohol)
PApolyacrylate
STstarch
PEpolyethylene
PBATpoly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate
PBSApoly(butylene succinate-co-adipate
PLApoly(lactic acid)
RHrelative humidity
TGAthermal gravimetric analysis
FT-IRFourier transform-infrared spectroscopy
SEMscanning electron microscopy

References

  1. Shogren, R.L.; Rousseau, R.J. Field testing of paper/polymerized vegetable oil mulches for enhancing growth of eastern cottonwood trees for pulp. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2005, 208, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, M.; Huang, Z.; Yang, Y.J. Analysis of biodegradability of three biodegradable mulching films. J. Polym. Environ. 2010, 18, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, E.; He, W.; Yan, C. ‘White revolution’ to ‘white pollution’—Agricultural plastic film mulch in china. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 091001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, C.; Moore-Kucera, J.; Miles, C.; Leonas, K.; Lee, J.; Corbin, A.; Inglis, D. Degradation of potentially biodegradable plastic mulch films at three diverse us locations. Agroecol. Sust. Food 2014, 38, 861–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tocchetto, R.; Benson, R.; Dever, M. Outdoor weathering evaluation of carbon-black-filled, biodegradable copolyester as substitute for traditionally used, carbon-black-filled, nonbiodegradable, high-density polyethylene mulch films. J. Polym. Environ. 2001, 9, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Briassoulis, D.; Babou, E.; Hiskakis, M.; Kyrikou, I. Analysis of long-term degradation behaviour of polyethylene mulching films with pro-oxidants under real cultivation and soil burial conditions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 2015, 22, 2584–2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Corti, A.; Sudhakar, M.; Chiellini, E. Assessment of the whole environmental degradation of oxo-biodegradable linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) films designed for mulching applications. J. Polym. Environ. 2012, 20, 1007–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Anderson, D.F.; Garisto, M.A.; Bourrut, J.C.; Schonbeck, M.W.; Jaye, R.; Wurzberger, A.; DeGregorio, R. Evaluation of a paper mulch made from recycled materials as an alternative to plastic film mulch for vegetables. J. Sustain. Agric. 1995, 7, 39–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Russo, R.; Malinconico, M.; Petti, L.; Romano, G. Physical behavior of biodegradable alginate-poly(vinyl alcohol) blend films. J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Phys. 2005, 43, 1205–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Finkenstadt, V.L.; Tisserat, B. Poly(lactic acid) and Osage Orange wood fiber composites for agricultural mulch films. Ind. Crop Prod. 2010, 31, 316–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Scarascia-Mugnozza, G.; Schettini, E.; Vox, G.; Malinconico, M.; Immirzi, B.; Pagliara, S. Mechanical properties decay and morphological behaviour of biodegradable films for agricultural mulching in real scale experiment. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2006, 91, 2801–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cirujeda, A.; Aibar, J.; Anzalone, A.; Martin-Closas, L.; Meco, R.; Moreno, M.M.; Pardo, A.; Pelacho, A.M.; Rojo, F.; Royo-Esnal, A.; et al. Biodegradable mulch instead of polyethylene for weed control of processing tomato production. Agron. Sust. Dev. 2012, 32, 889–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shogren, R.L. Preparation and characterization of a biodegradable mulch: Paper coated with polymerized vegetable oils. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1999, 73, 2159–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kapanen, A.; Schettini, E.; Vox, G.; Itävaara, M. Performance and environmental impact of biodegradable films in agriculture: A field study on protected cultivation. J. Polym. Environ. 2008, 16, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chiellini, E.; Cinelli, P.; Chiellini, F.; Imam, S.H. Environmentally degradable bio-based polymeric blends and composites. Macromol. Biosci. 2004, 4, 218–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Su, J.F.; Huang, Z.; Liu, K.; Fu, L.L.; Liu, H.R. Mechanical properties, biodegradation and water vapor permeability of blend films of soy protein isolate and poly(vinyl alcohol) compatibilized by glycerol. Polym. Bull. 2007, 58, 913–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xiong, H.; Tang, S.; Tang, H.; Zou, P. The structure and properties of a starch-based biodegradable film. Carbohyd. Polym. 2008, 71, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bilck, A.P.; Grossmann, M.V.; Yamashita, F. Biodegradable mulch films for strawberry production. Polym. Test 2010, 29, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kijchavengkul, T.; Auras, R.; Rubino, M.; Selke, S.; Ngouajio, M.; Fernandez, R.T. Biodegradation and hydrolysis rate of aliphatic aromatic polyester. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2010, 95, 2641–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yamamoto-Tamura, K.; Hiradate, S.; Watanabe, T.; Koitabashi, M.; Sameshima-Yamashita, Y.; Yarimizu, T.; Kitamoto, H. Contribution of soil esterase to biodegradation of aliphatic polyester agricultural mulch film in cultivated soils. AMB Express 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Imam, S.; Cinelli, P.; Gordon, S.; Chiellini, E. Characterization of biodegradable composite films prepared from blends of poly(vinyl alcohol), cornstarch, and lignocellulosic fiber. J. Polym. Environ. 2005, 13, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Moreno, M.; Moreno, A. Effect of different biodegradable and polyethylene mulches on soil properties and production in a tomato crop. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 116, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kijchavengkul, T.; Auras, R.; Rubino, M.; Ngouajio, M.; Fernandez, R.T. Assessment of aliphatic-aromatic copolyester biodegradable mulch films. Part I: Field study. Chemosphere 2008, 71, 942–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chandra, R.; Rustgi, R. Biodegradable polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1998, 23, 1273–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Leja, K.; Lewandowicz, G. Polymer biodegradation and biodegradable polymers—A review. Pol. J. Environ. Studies 2010, 19, 255–266. [Google Scholar]
  26. Amass, W.; Amass, A.; Tighe, B. A review of biodegradable polymers: Uses, current developments in the synthesis and characterization of biodegradable polyesters, blends of biodegradable polymers and recent advances in biodegradation studies. Polym. Int. 1998, 47, 89–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Siracusa, V.; Rocculi, P.; Romani, S.; Rosa, M.D. Biodegradable polymers for food packaging: A review. Trends Food. Sci. Technol. 2008, 19, 634–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Temperatures measured under soil (at depths of 0, 10, and 20 cm) covered by different mulching films (fiber/PVA and PE) and no film.
Figure 1. Temperatures measured under soil (at depths of 0, 10, and 20 cm) covered by different mulching films (fiber/PVA and PE) and no film.
Applsci 06 00147 g001
Figure 2. Water permeability of the three fiber/polymer films.
Figure 2. Water permeability of the three fiber/polymer films.
Applsci 06 00147 g002
Figure 3. Photopermeability of the four tested films.
Figure 3. Photopermeability of the four tested films.
Applsci 06 00147 g003
Figure 4. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) curves for the four tested films.
Figure 4. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) curves for the four tested films.
Applsci 06 00147 g004
Figure 5. The amount of microorganisms in soil covered by different films between November 1, 2014 and December 19, 2014.
Figure 5. The amount of microorganisms in soil covered by different films between November 1, 2014 and December 19, 2014.
Applsci 06 00147 g005
Figure 6. Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra for the three fiber/polymer films before (solid line) and after (dashed line) degradation.
Figure 6. Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra for the three fiber/polymer films before (solid line) and after (dashed line) degradation.
Applsci 06 00147 g006
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of film samples before and after degradation. (A-1) original fiber/starch film; (A-2) fiber/starch film after 4 weeks of degradation. (B-1) original fiber/PVA film; (B-2) fiber/PVA film after 4 weeks of degradation. (C-1) original fiber/polyacrylate film; (C-2) fiber/polyacrylate film after 4 weeks of degradation.
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of film samples before and after degradation. (A-1) original fiber/starch film; (A-2) fiber/starch film after 4 weeks of degradation. (B-1) original fiber/PVA film; (B-2) fiber/PVA film after 4 weeks of degradation. (C-1) original fiber/polyacrylate film; (C-2) fiber/polyacrylate film after 4 weeks of degradation.
Applsci 06 00147 g007
Table 1. Tensile strength at break of the different mulching films. ST: Starch; PVA: Poly(vinyl alcohol); PA: Polyacrylate; PE: Polyethylene a.
Table 1. Tensile strength at break of the different mulching films. ST: Starch; PVA: Poly(vinyl alcohol); PA: Polyacrylate; PE: Polyethylene a.
Type of FilmMachine (average, MPa)Percentage Elongation (%)Cross-Machine (Average, MPa)Percentage Elongation (%)
Fiber/ST film2.92b24.77b3.52a9.06b
Fiber/PVA film3.58a,b23.71b2.62b10.92b
Fiber/PA film3.69a10.92b3.74a18.31b
PE film12.96c132.3a12.96c132.3a
a The different lowercases indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 level in the same column.
Table 2. The weight loss of fiber/polymer films after different degradation time by soil burial test.
Table 2. The weight loss of fiber/polymer films after different degradation time by soil burial test.
Type of FilmStart Time/Initial Weight (g)End Time/Weight (g)Weight Loss (%)Time, Months
Fiber/PVANov. 4/0.2578Nov. 18/0.206519.9%0.5 month
Nov. 4/0.2893Dec. 4/0.189634.5%1 month
Nov. 4/0.2697Dec. 18/0.05679.2%1.5 month
Fiber/PANov. 4/0.3448Dec. 4/0.289516.0%1 month
Fiber/STNov. 4/0.3527Dec. 4/0.163453.7%1 month
PE filmNov. 4/0.1050Dec. 4/0.10300%1 month

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tan, Z.; Yi, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhou, W.; Yang, Y.; Wang, C. Physical and Degradable Properties of Mulching Films Prepared from Natural Fibers and Biodegradable Polymers. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6050147

AMA Style

Tan Z, Yi Y, Wang H, Zhou W, Yang Y, Wang C. Physical and Degradable Properties of Mulching Films Prepared from Natural Fibers and Biodegradable Polymers. Applied Sciences. 2016; 6(5):147. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6050147

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tan, Zhijian, Yongjian Yi, Hongying Wang, Wanlai Zhou, Yuanru Yang, and Chaoyun Wang. 2016. "Physical and Degradable Properties of Mulching Films Prepared from Natural Fibers and Biodegradable Polymers" Applied Sciences 6, no. 5: 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6050147

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop