Next Article in Journal
New Min-Max Approach to Optimal Choice of the Weights in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Problems
Next Article in Special Issue
Multi-Bit Data Hiding Scheme for Compressing Secret Messages
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Using a Random Secret Pre-Distribution Scheme to Implement Message Authentication in VANETs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on Sintering System of Calcium Barium Sulphoaluminate by XRD Quantitative Analysis

School of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2015, 5(4), 989-997; https://doi.org/10.3390/app5040989
Submission received: 18 August 2015 / Revised: 11 October 2015 / Accepted: 20 October 2015 / Published: 2 November 2015

Abstract

:
Calcium barium sulphoaluminate (CBSA), derived from calcium sulphoaluminate (CSA), has excellent cementitious properties. In this study, the sintering system of CBSA with a theoretical stoichiometric Ca3BaAl6SO16 was investigated. Rietveld refinement was performed using TOPAS 4.2 software to quantitatively calculate the content of CBSA and the actual ionic site occupancy of Ba2+. The results indicate that the content of Ca4−xBaxAl6SO16 increases with increasing sintering temperature in the 1200–1400 °C ranges. When sintered at 1400 °C for 180 min, the content of CBSA reaches 88.4%. However, CBSA begins to decompose at 1440 °C, after which the content decreases. The replacement rate of Ba2+ was also enlarged by increasing sintering temperature and prolonged sintering time. Sintering at 1400 °C for 180 min is considered as the optimum when replacement rate of Ba2+ and the content of CBSA were taken into account. Ca3.2Ba0.8Al6SO16 with a content of 88.4% was synthesized.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Calcium barium sulphoaluminate (CBSA), derived from calcium sulphoaluminate (CSA), is the dominant mineral of sulphoaluminate cement and plays a decisive role in the performance of sulphoaluminate cement. The mineral properties of CBSA will be improved, and thereby the performance of cement will also improve, when Ca ions are replaced by the Ba ions [1,2,3,4]. With the improvement of testing techniques and analysis software, Rietveld refinement can be used to study the atomic site occupancy, changes of lattice parameters, crystal structures and crystal phases during the solid solution reaction [5]. The results showed that the calcium sulphoaluminate could be cubic [6,7], tetragonal [8] and orthorhombic [9,10]. Hargis et al. refined the three crystal systems separately by Rietveld refinement and showed that the fitting result of the orthorhombic is the best [11]. Cuesta et al. indicated that CSA mineral could be orthorhombic and that orthorhombic crystal sometimes would transform into the cubic at around 470 °C [12,13]. Andac et al. also showed that crystal system transition occurred at around 470 °C [14]. Pinazo quantitatively analyzed the sulphoaluminate cement with orthorhombic and cubic CSA using Rietveld refinement methods [15].
With Rietveld refinement and highly qualified XRD data, quantitative phase analysis of the sintered products and atomic occupancy of barium ions can be obtained. In this paper, 1 mol barium ions was prepared to replace the calcium ions in CSA mineral and the minerals were sintered at 1200 °C, 1300 °C, 1350 °C, 1400 °C and 1440 °C, respectively, for 90 min, 120 min, 150 min and 180 min. Phase identification was carried out using Diffract EVA software (Bruker AXS, Berlin, Germany). Rietveld refinement was performed using TOPAS 4.2 software (Bruker AXS, Berlin, Germany) to quantitatively calculate the content of CBSA and the ionic occupancy of Ba2+. The optimum sintering system of CBSA and the effects of which on ionic occupancy of Ba2+ were investigated.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Sample Preparation

Analytic chemical reagents calcium carbonate (CaCO3), anhydrite calcium sulfate (CaSO4), barium carbonate (BaCO3) and neutral alumina (Al2O3) were used as raw materials. Quantities of 2 mol CaCO3, 1 mol BaCO3, 3 mol Al2O3 and 1 mol anhydrous CaSO4 were mixed and ground for 10 min. Then the raw materials were pressed into round cakes (Ф 5 cm × 1 cm) and were put into a high temperature furnace for sintering. The target temperatures were 1200 °C, 1300 °C, 1350 °C, 1400 °C and 1440 °C, respectively. The prolonged sintering time for each temperature was 90 min, 120 min, 150 min and 180 min. The minerals were cooled rapidly using a fan to the room temperature and then were ground for analysis after being sintered.

2.2. Test Methods

2.2.1. XRD Measurement

XRD Measurements were carried out by a Bruker AXSD8 Advance (Bruker AXS, Berlin, Germany) with Davinci X-ray (λ = 1.5406 Å, 40 kV and 40 mA, scan interval 10°–60° 2θ, 0.01° and 1 s per step). The detector was lynxeye linear detector with an opening of 2.94°. The step size was 0.02° and the measurement time per step was 1 s. EVA software was used for phase determination.

2.2.2. Quantitative Phase Analysis and Atomic Site Occupancy Analysis

Rietveld refinement was employed by TOPAS 4.2 software for quantitative analysis and atomic site occupancy analysis. The Rietveld refinement strategy consisted of emission profile, background, instrument factors and zero error.
In the Rietveld refinement process, Rwp (radiation work permit) was used to evaluate the fitting results as shown in Equation (1). Generally, when Rwp is less than 15%, the result could be considered as reliable [16].
R wp = { W i [ ( y i ( obs ) y i ( cal ) ) 2 ] / w i [ y i ( obs ) 2 ] } 1 2
where, Rwp indicates radiation work permit; yi(obs) is the measured diffraction strength at the point 2θi in the diffraction pattern; yi(cal) presents the calculated diffraction strength at the point 2θi in the diffraction pattern and wi is weighting factor.
Lattice parameters, atomic coordinates, atomic site occupancy and temperature factors were considered in the refinement process.
Replacement rate (P) of Ba ions was introduced as Equation (2).
P = [ Ba c Ba c + Ca c ] × W c + [ Ba o Ba o + Ca o ] × W o
where, P presents the replacement rate of Ba ions; Bac and Cac are the occupancy rate of Ba ions and Ca ions in cubic yeelimite; Bao and Cao are the occupancy rate of Ba ions and Ca ions in orthorhombic yeelimite; Wc and Wo are the percentages of cubic yeelimite and orthorhombic yeelimite, respectively.
The replacement rate R (%) is defined as Equation (3).
R = ( P × 4 ) × 100 %
where, R presents the replacement rate of Ba ion; P is the ionic site occupancy of Ba ion; 4 and 1 present the total cation and the number of Ba ion in theoretical Ca3BaAl6SO16.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Qualitative Analysis of Minerals

The minerals sintered at 1200 °C, 1300 °C, 1350 °C, 1400 °C and 1440 °C for different times were analyzed by EVA software. The XRD patterns sintered for 180 min are shown in Figure 1 and the corresponding COD codes are listed in Table 1.
The diffraction peaks of CaO, BaSO4, Ca3Al2O6, CaAl2O4, Ca12Al14O33, BaAl2O4, CaSO4 are obvious. When the sintering temperature is higher than 1100 °C, mesophases such as C12A7, CA, C4A3 could be formed in the sintering process [17,18]. The samples sintered at 1200 °C (Figure 2) show relatively messy peaks. The characteristic diffraction peaks of CBSA sintered at 1300 °C are relatively obvious and the characteristic peaks of mesophases decreased. The characteristic peaks of CBSA sintered at 1350 °C and 1400 °C are further strengthened and the mesophases reduced. The characteristic peaks of CBSA sintered at 1440 °C are obvious; however, the characteristic peaks of mesophases begin to increase due to the decomposition of CBSA.
Table 1. Phase and COD code.
Table 1. Phase and COD code.
PhaseCOD codePhaseCOD code
CAS-Cubic9009938CA23500014
CAS-Orthorhombic4001772C4A39002486
BA1010630C12A74308078
10105429004096
CA1528679C1011094
Figure 1. XRD Patterns of calcium barium sulphoaluminate (CBSA) samples sintered at different temperature for 180 min.
Figure 1. XRD Patterns of calcium barium sulphoaluminate (CBSA) samples sintered at different temperature for 180 min.
Applsci 05 00989 g001

3.2. Quantitative Phase Analysis

According to the results of qualitative analysis, the structure documents of CaO, BaSO4, Ca3Al2O6, CaAl2O4, Ca12Al14O33, BaAl2O4, CaSO4 and Ca4−xBaxAl6SO16 were imported into TOPAS 4.2 software for quantitative analysis. All the phases and corresponding ICSD codes are listed in Table 2. Ca4−xBaxAl6SO16 is derived from Ca4Al6SO16 and there is only a little offset at the diffraction peaks compared with that of Ca4Al6SO16. The ICSD code of Ca4Al6SO16 was used to refine the structure of Ca4−xBaxAl6SO16. In the replacement process, the probability that Ca2+ at each position is replaced by Ba2+ is the same. The Rwp values are all less than 15, which indicate the quantitative analysis results are reliable.
Table 2. Phases and ICSD codes.
Table 2. Phases and ICSD codes.
PhaseICSD codePhaseICSD code
Ca4Al6SO16-Cubic9560CaAl4O716191
Ca4Al6SO16-Orthorhombic80361Ca12Al14O33261586
BaAl2O4246028CaSO4183919
BaO186427CaO261847
CaAl2O4180997--
The fitting effect of the sample sintered at 1400 °C for 180 min 1400 °C is presented in Figure 2. The result of raw data and fitting data has less error of fitting, it alligns nicely with the value of Rwp, which is 8.06. Unit cell parameters of CBSA samples sintered at 1200 °C, 1300 °C, 1350 °C, 1400 °C for 180 min are presented in Table 3. As Table 3 shows, result of unit cell parameters indicated that the lattice constant increased with increasing sintering temperature. This phenomena can be attributed to the incorporation of Ba ions into the CSA crystal lattice because the atomic radius of barium is bigger than that of calcium. The same phenomena occurs when the soaking time of the same sintering temperature is increased.
Figure 2. Fitting effect of CBSA samples sintered at 1400 °C for 180 min.
Figure 2. Fitting effect of CBSA samples sintered at 1400 °C for 180 min.
Applsci 05 00989 g002
Table 3. Unit cell parameters of CBSA samples.
Table 3. Unit cell parameters of CBSA samples.
PhaseParameter1200 °C-180 min1300 °C-180 min1350 °C-180 min1400 °C-180 min
CBSA-Oa13.0103213.020750813.027024713.0402404
b12.9248812.946958912.960042612.9981782
c9.216589.222449.224289.2330302
CBSA-Ca9.218969.224759.231099.23704
To illustrate the unit cell variation of different Ba incorporation, one pure CSA with full Ca content and a second one with half mole of Ba concentration were prepared. As Table 4 shows, d values of the main peak and the second peak were obtained. Phase analysis shows that the distance of crystal face of CBSA increase with the increasing of Ba ion implantation.
Table 4. d value of main peak and second peak.
Table 4. d value of main peak and second peak.
Ba ContentMain PeakSecond Peak
d valued value
03.747492.65358
0.53.753872.97368
1.03.786123.12588
The total amount of orthorhombic and cubic CBSA is marked as Ca4−xBaxAl6SO16 and the quantitative analysis results are presented in Figure 3.The total amount of Ca4−xBaxAl6SO16 is 40%–50% when the sintering temperature between 1200 °C and 1300 °C. With the increase of prolonged time, the amount of Ca4−xBaxAl6SO16 shows a negligible increase rate and the amounts of CaO, BaSO4, Ca3Al2O6, CaAl2O4, Ca12Al14O33, BaAl2O4, CaSO4 are relatively large with a total content of over 50%. Gypsum cannot react completely at 1200 °C and 1300 °C. When the sintering temperature is 1350 °C and 1400 °C, the proportion of Ca4−xBaxAl6SO16 is significantly increased; moreover, it increases with the increase of prolonged time, and the mesophases are rapidly reduced. When the prolonged time is 180 min at 1400 °C, Ca4−xBaxAl6SO16 accounts for approximately 88.4%. However, the amounts of Ca4−xBaxAl6SO16 decreased at 1440 °C due to the decomposition. The content of gypsum is less than 1% when sintered for 180 min at 1350 °C and 1400 °C. CaSO4, free BaO and CaO formed at 1440 °C due to the decomposition of CBSA.
Figure 3. Results of quantitative analysis.
Figure 3. Results of quantitative analysis.
Applsci 05 00989 g003
As is shown in Figure 4, the replacement rate of Ba2+ shows serious dependence on the sintering system. It maintained at less than 20% ignoring the increasing prolonged sintering time when sintered at 1200 °C and 1300 °C. At relatively low sintering temperature (1200 °C and 1300 °C), not all the Ba2+ can bound with CSA and the extra Ba2+ exists as other mesophases, such as BaAl2O4, BaSO4. The replacement rate of Ba2+ increases with increasing sintering temperature and prolonged sintering time in the 1350–1400 °C range. In this sintering range, both the content of Ca4−xBaxAl6SO16 and the replacement rate of Ba2+ increase rapidly. The replacement rate is about 80% when the sintered at 1400 °C for 180 min. The replacement rate also decreases due to the decomposition of Ca4−xBaxAl6SO16.
Figure 4. Replacement rate of Ba2+ at different sintering system.
Figure 4. Replacement rate of Ba2+ at different sintering system.
Applsci 05 00989 g004
From the correspondence between the content of Ca4−xBaxAl6SO16 and replacement rate of Ba2+, the two indexes arrived at the maximum under the same sintering system. Sintering at 1400 °C for 180 min is considered the optimum and Ca3.2Ba0.8Al6SO16 with a content of 88.4% was synthesized.

3.3. The Result of Strength

According to the water-cement ratio (w/c = 0.5), we mixed the clinker with the sintering temperature of 1350 °C and 1400 °C and put the paste into a 2 × 2 × 2 cm mold by vibration. The specimens are unmolded after being cured in more than 90% moist air at 20 °C for 1 day. Then the specimens are cured in standard conditions for measurement of the compressive strength of 3 days and 7 days. The results are shown in Figure 5. We can see that the compressive strength increases with the increase of sintering temperature and the prolonged time.
Figure 5. Compressive strength of 1350 °C and 1400 °C sintered clinkers.
Figure 5. Compressive strength of 1350 °C and 1400 °C sintered clinkers.
Applsci 05 00989 g005

4. Conclusions

(1) In the sintering process of calcium barium sulphoaluminate (CBSA) mineral, except for orthorhombic and cubic CBSA, there also exists mesophases including CaO, BaSO4, Ca3Al2O6, CaAl2O4, Ca12Al14O33, BaAl2O4, CaSO4. The content of CBSA shows serious dependence on the sintering system. When sintered at 1400 °C for 180 min, the content of CBSA reaches 88.4%. A higher sintering temperature will lead to the decomposition.
(2) Not all the Ba ions can be bounded with CSA in the sintering process. The replacement rate of Ba2+ increased with the increasing sintering temperature and prolonged sintering time and it reached the maximum when sintered at 1400 °C for 180 min.
(3) Considering the sintering content of CBSA and replacement rate of Ba2+, the best sintering system is a prolonged sintering time of 180min at 1400 °C. The sintering content of CBSA is 88.4% and the replacement rate of Ba2+ is 80%. Ca3.2Ba0.8 Al6SO16 was synthesized.

Acknowledgments

This work was financed by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51472041).

Author Contributions

Jun Chang put forward the main ideas of this paper and analyzed experimental results in theory. Xiaopeng Shang constituted and carried out the experiments; Shang also analyzed experimental results with software and wrote paper. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tereanu, I.; Munten, M.; Dragnea, I. Type 3(CaO·Al2O3)·Mx(SO4)y compounds and compatibility relations in CaO-CaO·A12O3-Mx(SO4)y system. Cement 1986, 83, 39–45. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yan, P. Hydration of Sr and Ba-bearing sulphoaluminates in the presence of sulphates. Adv. Cem. Res. 1993, 5, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chang, J. Study on new type Ba-bearing cement. Mater’s Thesis, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheng, X.; Chang, J.; Lu, L.; Liu, F.; Teng, B. Study of Ba-bearing calcium sulphoaluminate minerals and cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2000, 30, 77–81. [Google Scholar]
  5. Young, R.A. The Rietveld Method; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1993; pp. 21–22. [Google Scholar]
  6. Halstead, P.E.; Moore, A.E. The composition and crystallography of an anhydrous calcium aluminosulphate occurring in expanding cement. J. Appl. Chem. 1962, 12, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Saalfeld, H.; Depmeier, W. Silicon-free compounds with sodalite structure. Krist. Tech. 1972, 7, 229–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Calos, N.J.; Kennard, C.H.L.; Whittaker, A.K.; Davis, R.L. Structure of calcium aluminate sulfate Ca4Al6O16 S. J. Solid State Chem. 1995, 119, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, P.; Chen, Y.; Shi, P.; Wang, J. The crystal structure of C4A3S. In Proceedings of 9th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, New Delhi, India, 23–28 November 1992; 201–208.
  10. Krstanović, I.; Radaković, A.; Karanović, L. X-Ray Powder Data for Ca4Al6O12SO4. Powder Diffr. 1992, 7, 47–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hargis, C.W.; Moon, J.; Lothenbach, B.; Winnefeld, F.; Wenk, H.R.; Monterio, P.J. Calcium Sulfoaluminate Sodalite (Ca4Al6O12SO4) Crystal Structure Evaluation and Bulk Modulus Determination. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 97, 892–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cuesta, A.; de La Torre, A.G.; Losilla, E.R.; Peterson, V.K.; Rejmak, P.; Ayuela, A.; Aranda, M.A. Structure, atomistic simulations, and phase transition of stoichiometric yeelimite. Chem. Mater. 2013, 9, 1680–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cuesta, A.; de La Torre, A.G.; Losilla, E.R.; Santacruz, I.; Aranda, M.A. Pseudo cubic crystal structure and phase transition in doped yeelimite. Cryst. Growth Des. 2014, 10, 5158–5163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Andac, O.; Glasser, F.P. Polymorphism of calcium sulphoaluminate (Ca4 Al6O16SO3) and its solid solutions. Adv. Cem. Res. 1994, 22, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Álvarez-Pinazo, G.; Cuesta, A.; García-Maté, M.; Santacruz, I.; Losilla, E.R.; de La Torre, A.G.; Aranda, M.A. Rietveld quantitative phase analysis of Yeelimite-containing cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012, 7, 960–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jansen, E.; Schäfer, W.; Will, G. R values in analysis of powder diffraction data using Rietveld refinement. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1994, 4, 492–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ma, S.; Shen, X.; Huang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhong, B. Preparation and formation mechanism of calcium sulphoaluminate. J. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 1, 78–81. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang, W.; Ouyang, S.; Chen, Y. Study on the compound formation in system CaO-Al2O3-BaSO4 and the formation kinetics of 3CaO3·Al2O3·BaSO4. J. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2001, 4, 305–308. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, J.; Shang, X.; Zhao, J. Study on Sintering System of Calcium Barium Sulphoaluminate by XRD Quantitative Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2015, 5, 989-997. https://doi.org/10.3390/app5040989

AMA Style

Chang J, Shang X, Zhao J. Study on Sintering System of Calcium Barium Sulphoaluminate by XRD Quantitative Analysis. Applied Sciences. 2015; 5(4):989-997. https://doi.org/10.3390/app5040989

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Jun, Xiaopeng Shang, and Jiuye Zhao. 2015. "Study on Sintering System of Calcium Barium Sulphoaluminate by XRD Quantitative Analysis" Applied Sciences 5, no. 4: 989-997. https://doi.org/10.3390/app5040989

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop