Next Article in Journal
Understanding Collaboration in Integrated Forms of Project Delivery by Taking a Risk-Uncertainty Based Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Successful Control of Major Project Budgets
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Adm. Sci. 2016, 6(3), 9; doi:10.3390/admsci6030009

Strengthening the Energy Policy Making Process and Sustainability Outcomes in the OECD through Policy Design

Graduate School of Energy Science, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
These authors contributed equally to this work.
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Falih M. Alsaaty
Received: 27 May 2016 / Revised: 8 July 2016 / Accepted: 20 July 2016 / Published: 26 July 2016
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1115 KB, uploaded 26 July 2016]   |  

Abstract

This study investigates the nature of the energy policy making process and policy priorities within the OECD in order to identify opportunities for improvement in these processes and to improve sustainability outcomes. The Qualitative Content Analysis methodology is used, investigating governance and energy policy making alongside energy policy goals and priorities within eight OECD nations. A congruous energy policy making process (policy cycle) is discovered across the assessed nations, including the responsible bodies for each stage of the policy cycle and the current energy policy priorities. A key weakness was identified as a disconnect between the early stages of the policy cycle, issue identification and policy tool formulation, and the latter stages of implementation and evaluation. This weakness has meant that the social aspects of sustainability goals have been less developed than environmental and economic aspects and a heavy burden has been placed on the evaluation phase, risking a break down in the policy cycle. An additional “policy design” stage is proposed including a sustainability evaluation process prior to decision making and implementation, in order to remedy these identified shortcomings. View Full-Text
Keywords: energy; policy; policy cycle; OECD; sustainability energy; policy; policy cycle; OECD; sustainability
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Chapman, A.; McLellan, B.; Tezuka, T. Strengthening the Energy Policy Making Process and Sustainability Outcomes in the OECD through Policy Design. Adm. Sci. 2016, 6, 9.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Adm. Sci. EISSN 2076-3387 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top