Next Article in Journal
Toward a Collaborative, Transformative Model of Non-Profit Leadership: Some Conceptual Building Blocks
Previous Article in Journal
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Administrative Sciences in 2013
Previous Article in Special Issue
Managing Relational Legacies: Lessons from British Columbia, Canada
Adm. Sci. 2014, 4(2), 73-86; doi:10.3390/admsci4020073
Article

It Does Matter How You Get to the Top: Differentiating Status from Reputation

1,* , 1
 and 2
Received: 30 September 2013; in revised form: 19 February 2014 / Accepted: 28 February 2014 / Published: 4 April 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organizations, Stakeholders and Public Affairs)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [156 KB, uploaded 4 April 2014]
Abstract: Status and reputation have long been recognized as important influences in management research and recently much attention has been paid to defining the two concepts and understanding how they are utilized by organizations. However, few strategic management studies have identified the different methods through which status and reputation are constructed. While reputation has been linked with a history of quality, and status has been identified as an externally assigned measure of social position, empirical studies have been highly idiosyncratic in their identification of the mechanisms used to obtain either construct. This paper attempts to rectify that gap in the literature by identifying two distinct methods used to obtain reputation and status. We argue that certification contests can be used to increase organizational reputation and tournament rituals can be used to increase organizational status. We build theoretical propositions regarding the use of certification contexts and tournament rituals to show how reputation and status are achieved through similar, but distinct, methods and further the research on teasing apart these two important and intertwined concepts.
Keywords: status; reputation; certification contests; tournament rituals status; reputation; certification contests; tournament rituals
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Patterson, K.D.W.; Cavazos, D.E.; Washington, M. It Does Matter How You Get to the Top: Differentiating Status from Reputation. Adm. Sci. 2014, 4, 73-86.

AMA Style

Patterson KDW, Cavazos DE, Washington M. It Does Matter How You Get to the Top: Differentiating Status from Reputation. Administrative Sciences. 2014; 4(2):73-86.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Patterson, Karen D.W.; Cavazos, David E.; Washington, Marvin. 2014. "It Does Matter How You Get to the Top: Differentiating Status from Reputation." Adm. Sci. 4, no. 2: 73-86.


Adm. Sci. EISSN 2076-3387 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert