Next Article in Journal
On the Importance of Both Dimensional and Discrete Models of Emotion
Previous Article in Journal
Neuroticism Predicts Subsequent Risk of Major Depression for Whites but Not Blacks
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessPerspective
Behav. Sci. 2017, 7(4), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7040065

Bystander Programs: Accommodating or Derailing Sexism?

1
Department of Campus Safety, McDaniel College, Westminster, MD 21157, USA
2
Department of Sociology, McDaniel College, Westminster, MD 21157, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 12 July 2017 / Revised: 6 September 2017 / Accepted: 23 September 2017 / Published: 27 September 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [206 KB, uploaded 27 September 2017]

Abstract

Bystander programs implemented to meet federal requirements to reduce sexual assaults on college campuses in the United States must include primary prevention. Survey data (n = 280) and interview data (n = 20) presented in this paper explore students’ hypothetical and actual willingness to intervene as bystanders. Although most students surveyed (57%) claim they would be very likely to intervene, fewer than half would be very suspicious of someone leading away an intoxicated individual at a party (45% of women and 28% of men: p < 0.01). Interview data reveal how students perceive risk factors at college parties and what types of bystander measures they attempt, including “distractions”, a nonconfrontational tactic in which bystanders avoid more direct but socially risky interventions. Subsumed in many current bystander programs is an invisible element of valorizing harmony. Condoning bystanders’ unwillingness to directly confront seemingly predatory individuals could make change seem out of reach and could also embolden offenders whose behavior is observed and only temporarily thwarted. View Full-Text
Keywords: bystander; sexual assault; college students; sexism; intoxication; prevention; gender roles bystander; sexual assault; college students; sexism; intoxication; prevention; gender roles
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Reid, A.; Dundes, L. Bystander Programs: Accommodating or Derailing Sexism? Behav. Sci. 2017, 7, 65.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Behav. Sci. EISSN 2076-328X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top