Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
What’s Special about Human Imitation? A Comparison with Enculturated Apes
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Can Rhesus Monkeys Learn Executive Attention?
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Behav. Sci. 2016, 6(2), 12; doi:10.3390/bs6020012

Categorization: The View from Animal Cognition

1
Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, 738 Urban Life Building, 140 Decatur St., Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
2
Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Park Hall Room 204, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA
3
Language Research Center, Georgia State University, 3401 Panthersville Rd, Decatur, GA 30034, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Jennifer Vonk
Received: 6 April 2016 / Revised: 21 May 2016 / Accepted: 31 May 2016 / Published: 15 June 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Animal Cognition)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [6188 KB, uploaded 15 June 2016]   |  

Abstract

Exemplar, prototype, and rule theory have organized much of the enormous literature on categorization. From this theoretical foundation have arisen the two primary debates in the literature—the prototype-exemplar debate and the single system-multiple systems debate. We review these theories and debates. Then, we examine the contribution that animal-cognition studies have made to them. Animals have been crucial behavioral ambassadors to the literature on categorization. They reveal the roots of human categorization, the basic assumptions of vertebrates entering category tasks, the surprising weakness of exemplar memory as a category-learning strategy. They show that a unitary exemplar theory of categorization is insufficient to explain human and animal categorization. They show that a multiple-systems theoretical account—encompassing exemplars, prototypes, and rules—will be required for a complete explanation. They show the value of a fitness perspective in understanding categorization, and the value of giving categorization an evolutionary depth and phylogenetic breadth. They raise important questions about the internal similarity structure of natural kinds and categories. They demonstrate strong continuities with humans in categorization, but discontinuities, too. Categorization’s great debates are resolving themselves, and to these resolutions animals have made crucial contributions. View Full-Text
Keywords: category learning; categorization; cognitive evolution; comparative cognition; animal cognition category learning; categorization; cognitive evolution; comparative cognition; animal cognition
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Smith, J.D.; Zakrzewski, A.C.; Johnson, J.M.; Valleau, J.C.; Church, B.A. Categorization: The View from Animal Cognition. Behav. Sci. 2016, 6, 12.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Behav. Sci. EISSN 2076-328X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top