Next Article in Journal
Regional Landslide Potential Mapping in Earthquake-Prone Areas of Kepahiang Regency, Bengkulu Province, Indonesia
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid GMPEs for Region-Specific PSHA in Southern Italy
Article Menu
Issue 6 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Geosciences 2018, 8(6), 218; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8060218

Application of Sensitivity Analysis for Process Model Calibration of Natural Hazards

Institute of Geography, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 15 May 2018 / Revised: 10 June 2018 / Accepted: 12 June 2018 / Published: 15 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Hazards)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [3737 KB, uploaded 15 June 2018]   |  

Abstract

Sensitivity analysis (SA) describes how varying inputs to a model subsequently varies its outputs. Its inclusion can support the systematic calibration of numerical models to back-calculate intensity properties of past torrent events that would otherwise be difficult or impossible to collect during their occurrence. Sensitivity analysis for model calibration is assessed with the back-calculation of a known torrent event. In particular, FLO-2D, a cell-based numerical model, is used to simulate the 2005 debris flow event that occurred in Brienz, Switzerland. Under 4000 simulations were completed with ranges of physically reasonable parameter values. Model results were compared in 3-dimensions with both sediment deposition extents (x, y) and estimated deposition heights (z) from available post-event images. The comparisons highlighted that more accurate input and validation data, namely the flow behavior of hazardous processes and post-event deposition heights, are required to produce stronger agreements between simulated and observed results. Furthermore, the application of SA for model calibration supports systematic exploration of large parameter spaces characteristic of complex phenomena like natural hazard events. These findings demonstrated how important model input factors can be identified, which provide guidance for future data collection efforts to capture both the rheology and the spatial distribution of hazards more accurately. View Full-Text
Keywords: sensitivity analysis; calibration; physical vulnerability; risk analysis; summary scalar variables sensitivity analysis; calibration; physical vulnerability; risk analysis; summary scalar variables
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Chow, C.; Ramirez, J.; Keiler, M. Application of Sensitivity Analysis for Process Model Calibration of Natural Hazards. Geosciences 2018, 8, 218.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Geosciences EISSN 2076-3263 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top