Next Article in Journal
Landslide Change Detection Based on Multi-Temporal Airborne LiDAR-Derived DEMs
Previous Article in Journal
Realistic Paleobathymetry of the Cenomanian–Turonian (94 Ma) Boundary Global Ocean
Article Menu
Issue 1 (January) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Geosciences 2018, 8(1), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8010022

Applying the Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS) to Nearshore Habitats in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico

Coastal and Marine Laboratory, Florida State University, St. Teresa, FL 32358, USA
Current Address: Marine Sciences Programme, University of Trinidad and Tobago, Chaguaramas, Trinidad and Tobago, West Indies.
Received: 13 November 2017 / Revised: 10 January 2018 / Accepted: 12 January 2018 / Published: 16 January 2018
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [780 KB, uploaded 17 January 2018]   |  

Abstract

Many countries have classification standards for their environmental resources including criteria for classifying coastal and marine ecosystems. Until 2012, the United States just had a nationwide protocol for classifying terrestrial and aquatic habitats with no national standard for marine and most coastal habitats. In 2012 the Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS) was implemented to address this need. In the past, coastal and marine classifications were developed at the regional or local level. Since its inception, the CMECS has not been applied in many geographic areas. My study was one of the first to apply the CMECS to the benthic habitats in the nearshore Northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Sidescan sonar mapping and dive surveys were completed at 33 sites at depths 10–23 m. Hardbottom and sand habitats characterized the study area, and the underwater surveys revealed hard corals, sponges, and macroalgae as the dominant taxa on the hardbottom. The CMECS was applied to the overall study area rather than each individual site or groups of similar sites because habitat and environmental characteristics, primarily outside the context of the CMECS, appeared to influence the distribution of taxa across sites more than the CMECS geoform, substrate, and water column components. The CMECS worked well for classifying the entire study area, but was not adequate for classifying the complex fine-scale habitats and temporal variations observed; modifications to the CMECS could help resolve these issues. View Full-Text
Keywords: Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard; marine habitat classification; Gulf of Mexico; hardbottom Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard; marine habitat classification; Gulf of Mexico; hardbottom
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kingon, K. Applying the Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS) to Nearshore Habitats in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Geosciences 2018, 8, 22.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Geosciences EISSN 2076-3263 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top