Next Article in Journal
Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen Infused Compressed Air Foam for Depopulation of Caged Laying Hens
Next Article in Special Issue
A Case Study in Citizen Science: The Effectiveness of a Trap-Neuter-Return Program in a Chicago Neighborhood
Previous Article in Journal
Private Animal Welfare Standards—Opportunities and Risks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Attitudes of Veterinary Teaching Staff and Exposure of Veterinary Students to Early-Age Desexing, with Review of Current Early-Age Desexing Literature
Article Menu
Issue 1 (January) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Animals 2018, 8(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8010005

Search Methods Used to Locate Missing Cats and Locations Where Missing Cats Are Found

1
Gatton Campus, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4343, Australia
2
Australian Pet Welfare Foundation, Kenmore, Queensland 4069, Australia
3
Jemora Pty Ltd., Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia
4
Missing Pet Partnership, Cloverdale, CA 6105, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 19 November 2017 / Revised: 10 December 2017 / Accepted: 20 December 2017 / Published: 2 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Animal Sheltering)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1842 KB, uploaded 23 January 2018]   |  

Simple Summary

A least 15% of cat owners lose their pet in a five-year period and some are never found. This paper reports on data gathered from an online questionnaire that asked questions regarding search methods used to locate missing cats and locations where missing cats were found. The most important finding from this retrospective case series was that approximately one third of cats were recovered within 7 days. Secondly, a physical search increased the chances of finding cats alive and 75% of cats were found within a 500 m radius of their point of escape. Thirdly, those cats that were indoor-outdoor and allowed outside unsupervised traveled longer distances compared with indoor cats that were never allowed outside. Lastly, cats considered to be highly curious in nature were more likely to be found inside someone else’s house compared to other personality types. These findings suggest that a physical search within the first week of a cat going missing could be a useful strategy. In light of these findings, further research into this field may show whether programs such as shelter, neuter and return would improve the chances of owners searching and finding their missing cats as well as decreasing euthanasia rates in shelters.

Abstract

Missing pet cats are often not found by their owners, with many being euthanized at shelters. This study aimed to describe times that lost cats were missing for, search methods associated with their recovery, locations where found and distances travelled. A retrospective case series was conducted where self-selected participants whose cat had gone missing provided data in an online questionnaire. Of the 1210 study cats, only 61% were found within one year, with 34% recovered alive by the owner within 7 days. Few cats were found alive after 90 days. There was evidence that physical searching increased the chance of finding the cat alive (p = 0.073), and 75% of cats were found within 500 m of the point of escape. Up to 75% of cats with outdoor access traveled 1609 m, further than the distance traveled by indoor-only cats (137 m; p ≤ 0.001). Cats considered to be highly curious were more likely to be found inside someone else’s house compared to other personality types. These findings suggest that thorough physical searching is a useful strategy, and should be conducted within the first week after cats go missing. They also support further investigation into whether shelter, neuter and return programs improve the chance of owners recovering missing cats and decrease numbers of cats euthanized in shelters. View Full-Text
Keywords: cat; pet; missing; lost; search; SNR; questionnaire cat; pet; missing; lost; search; SNR; questionnaire
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, L.; Coradini, M.; Rand, J.; Morton, J.; Albrecht, K.; Wasson, B.; Robertson, D. Search Methods Used to Locate Missing Cats and Locations Where Missing Cats Are Found. Animals 2018, 8, 5.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Animals EISSN 2076-2615 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top