Stakeholder Perceptions of Welfare Issues and Indicators for Extensively Managed Sheep in Australia
AbstractAn online survey was designed to form the basis of a framework for the welfare assessment of extensively managed sheep in Australia. The survey focused on welfare compromise and useful welfare indicators. A total of 952 people completed the survey in its entirety, representing four stakeholder groups: Public (53.6%), Producer (27.4%), Scientist (9.9%), and Service provider (9.1%). Animal welfare was considered to be important by all participating groups in this survey (average score of 3.78/4). Respondents felt the welfare of grazing sheep was generally adequate but improvement was desired (2.98/5), with female members of the public rating sheep welfare significantly worse than other respondents (p < 0.05). Environmental issues were considered to pose the greatest risk to welfare (3.87/5), followed by heat stress (3.79), lameness (3.57) and husbandry practices (3.37). Key indicators recognised by all respondents were those associated with pain and fear (3.98/5), nutrition (4.23), mortality/management (4.27), food on offer (4.41) and number of illness/injures in a flock (4.33). There were gender and stakeholder differences in the perceived importance of both welfare issues and indicators with women and the public consistently rating issues (all p < 0.01) and indicators (all p < 0.05) to be of greater significance than other respondents. These results highlight the importance of including all stakeholders and an even balance of genders when developing a welfare framework that can address both practical and societal concerns. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Doughty, A.K.; Coleman, G.J.; Hinch, G.N.; Doyle, R.E. Stakeholder Perceptions of Welfare Issues and Indicators for Extensively Managed Sheep in Australia. Animals 2017, 7, 28.
Doughty AK, Coleman GJ, Hinch GN, Doyle RE. Stakeholder Perceptions of Welfare Issues and Indicators for Extensively Managed Sheep in Australia. Animals. 2017; 7(4):28.Chicago/Turabian Style
Doughty, Amanda K.; Coleman, Grahame J.; Hinch, Geoff N.; Doyle, Rebecca E. 2017. "Stakeholder Perceptions of Welfare Issues and Indicators for Extensively Managed Sheep in Australia." Animals 7, no. 4: 28.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.