The Challenge of Oral Epic to Homeric Scholarship
AbstractThe epic is an intriguing genre, claiming its place in both oral and written systems. Ever since the beginning of folklore studies epic has been in the centre of interest, and monumental attempts at describing its characteristics have been made, in which oral literature was understood mainly as a primitive stage leading up to written literature. With the appearance in 1960 of A. B. Lord’s The Singer of Tales and the introduction of the oral-formulaic theory, the paradigm changed towards considering oral literature a special form of verbal art with its own rules. Fieldworkers have been eagerly studying oral epics all over the world. The growth of material caused that the problems of defining the genre also grew. However, after more than half a century of intensive implementation of the theory an internationally valid sociological model of oral epic is by now established and must be respected in cognate fields such as Homeric scholarship. Here the theory is both a help for readers to guard themselves against anachronistic interpretations and a necessary tool for constructing a social-historic context for the Iliad and the Odyssey. As an example, the hypothesis of a gradual crystallization of these two epics is discussed and rejected. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Jensen, M.S. The Challenge of Oral Epic to Homeric Scholarship. Humanities 2017, 6, 97.
Jensen MS. The Challenge of Oral Epic to Homeric Scholarship. Humanities. 2017; 6(4):97.Chicago/Turabian Style
Jensen, Minna S. 2017. "The Challenge of Oral Epic to Homeric Scholarship." Humanities 6, no. 4: 97.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.