The Arts of Energy: Between Hoping for the Stars and Despairing in the Detritus
AbstractFossil fueled energy production and consumption are the basis of global industrialised societies, with the deleterious biophysical effects of such production and consumption also forming the basis of the advent of Anthropocene. In the context of science and environmental policy, hope denotes rapid decarbonisation across the globe. Meanwhile, in art and the humanities, the study of such energy and decarbonisation remains nascent and nebulous. To account for these discrepancies, this article outlines the scale of the biophysical challenges by first establishing the relationship between outspoken climate scientists and international organisations determining climate and energy policy. This relationship—between marginalised and mainstream—is used to frame the analogous challenges for two cultural fields that have recently emerged in direct response: energy humanities and the arts of energy. The discussion centers on the challenge common to all fields—between the outspoken marginal and the orthodox mainstream—to speculate on how the arts of energy may recalibrate a context-contingent hope for energy futures, drawing on case studies of ISEA Bright Future and Facing Futures Free From Fear, two installations simultaneously staged by the author in 2013 about the relationship between energy and climate change. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Wodak, J. The Arts of Energy: Between Hoping for the Stars and Despairing in the Detritus. Humanities 2016, 5, 38.
Wodak J. The Arts of Energy: Between Hoping for the Stars and Despairing in the Detritus. Humanities. 2016; 5(2):38.Chicago/Turabian Style
Wodak, Josh. 2016. "The Arts of Energy: Between Hoping for the Stars and Despairing in the Detritus." Humanities 5, no. 2: 38.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.