Next Article in Journal
A Multi-Level Analysis on School Connectedness, Family Support, and Adolescent Depression: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, 1995–1996
Next Article in Special Issue
Sense of Belonging in Computing: The Role of Introductory Courses for Women and Underrepresented Minority Students
Previous Article in Journal
A Corpus-Based Study on Cross-Cultural Divergence in the Use of Hedges in Academic Research Articles Written by Vietnamese and Native English-Speaking Authors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gender Disparities in Faculty Rank: Factors that Affect Advancement of Women Scientists at Academic Medical Centers
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Soc. Sci. 2018, 7(5), 71; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7050071

How the Demographic Composition of Academic Science and Engineering Departments Influences Workplace Culture, Faculty Experience, and Retention Risk

1
Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
2
Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 15 December 2017 / Revised: 4 April 2018 / Accepted: 10 April 2018 / Published: 24 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Women in Male-Dominated Domains)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1460 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]   |  

Abstract

Although on average women are underrepresented in academic science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) departments at universities, an underappreciated fact is that women’s representation varies widely across STEM disciplines. Past research is fairly silent on how local variations in gender composition impact faculty experiences. This study fills that gap. A survey of STEM departments at a large research university finds that women faculty in STEM are less professionally satisfied than male colleagues only if they are housed in departments where women are a small numeric minority. Gender differences in satisfaction are largest in departments with less than 25% women, smaller in departments with 25–35% women, and nonexistent in departments approaching 50% women. Gender differences in professional satisfaction in gender-unbalanced departments are mediated by women’s perception that their department’s climate is uncollegial, faculty governance is non-transparent, and gender relations are inequitable. Unfavorable department climates also predict retention risk for women in departments with few women, but not in departments closer to gender parity. Finally, faculty who find within-department mentors to be useful are more likely to have a favorable view of their department’s climate, which consequently predicts more professional satisfaction. Faculty gender and gender composition does not moderate these findings, suggesting that mentoring is equally effective for all faculty. View Full-Text
Keywords: gender; STEM; climate; retention; faculty gender; STEM; climate; retention; faculty
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Griffith, E.E.; Dasgupta, N. How the Demographic Composition of Academic Science and Engineering Departments Influences Workplace Culture, Faculty Experience, and Retention Risk. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 71.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top