Next Article in Journal
When Care and Concern Are Not Enough: School Personnel’s Development as Allies for Trans and Gender Non-Conforming Students
Next Article in Special Issue
Fat People of Color: Emergent Intersectional Discourse Online
Previous Article in Journal
Marriage Formation in Context: Four Decades in Comparative Perspective
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Soc. Sci. 2017, 6(1), 10; doi:10.3390/socsci6010010

The #nofilter Self: The Contest for Authenticity among Social Networking Sites, 2002–2016

Department of Media & Communication, Muhlenberg College, 2400 W. Chew St., Allentown, PA 18018, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Jenny L. Davis and David A. Banks
Received: 29 September 2016 / Revised: 7 January 2017 / Accepted: 12 January 2017 / Published: 20 January 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Social Media, Internet and Society)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [2661 KB, uploaded 20 January 2017]   |  


This study traces appeals to authenticity, over time, in the promotional material of leading social-networking sites (SNSs). Using the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, the public-facing websites of major SNS platforms—beginning with Friendster in 2002—were sampled at six-month intervals, with promotional language and visuals examined for authenticity claims. The authors tracked these appeals, with attention to changes in promotional copy, through to July 2016, among the most popular social media services (as determined by English-language web presence and active monthly user figures or, when unavailable, reported network size). The study found that nearly all SNSs invoked authenticity—directly or through language like “real life” and “genuine”—in their promotional materials. What stood out was the profoundly reactive nature of these claims, with new services often defining themselves, openly or implicitly, against legacy services’ inauthenticity. A recurring marketing strategy, in other words, has been to call out competitors’ phoniness by substituting (and touting) some other, differently grounded mode of authenticity. Since the affordances of social sites, even those touting evanescence or anonymity, make them vulnerable to similar charges, the cycle gets replayed with numbing regularity. View Full-Text
Keywords: authenticity; Facebook; self; Snapchat; social media; social networking; subjectivity; Twitter authenticity; Facebook; self; Snapchat; social media; social networking; subjectivity; Twitter

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Salisbury, M.; Pooley, J.D. The #nofilter Self: The Contest for Authenticity among Social Networking Sites, 2002–2016. Soc. Sci. 2017, 6, 10.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top