Next Article in Journal
Constructions of Resilience: Ethnoracial Diversity, Inequality, and Post-Katrina Recovery, the Case of New Orleans
Next Article in Special Issue
Limits of Religious Analogy: The Example of Celebrity
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Paper Consumption: Exploring Behavioral Factors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interactions in Generalized Linear Models: Theoretical Issues and an Application to Personal Vote-Earning Attributes
Soc. Sci. 2013, 2(4), 284-297; doi:10.3390/socsci2040284
Article

Why an Unbiased External R&D Evaluation System is Important for the Progress of Social Sciences—the Case of a Small Social Science Community

Received: 20 October 2013; in revised form: 11 November 2013 / Accepted: 29 November 2013 / Published: 3 December 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Social Sciences)
Download PDF [164 KB, uploaded 3 December 2013]
Abstract: This article deals with the impact of external R&D evaluations as one of the institutional factors that can encourage (or discourage) the progress of the social sciences. A critical overview is presented of the increasing use of bibliometric indicators in the external R&D evaluation procedures employed by the Slovenian Research Agency, which is the leading research council for financing the public sector of social sciences in Slovenia. We attempt to establish that, in order to ensure a good external R&D evaluation practice for a small social science community, it is insufficient to only have reliable bibliometric meta-databases. It is argued that it is equally important to formulate very precise criteria to ascertain their validity.
Keywords: social sciences; external R&D evaluation; bibliometry; publication productivity; third-party funding; scientific impact social sciences; external R&; D evaluation; bibliometry; publication productivity; third-party funding; scientific impact
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Mali, F. Why an Unbiased External R&D Evaluation System is Important for the Progress of Social Sciences—the Case of a Small Social Science Community. Soc. Sci. 2013, 2, 284-297.

AMA Style

Mali F. Why an Unbiased External R&D Evaluation System is Important for the Progress of Social Sciences—the Case of a Small Social Science Community. Social Sciences. 2013; 2(4):284-297.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mali, Franc. 2013. "Why an Unbiased External R&D Evaluation System is Important for the Progress of Social Sciences—the Case of a Small Social Science Community." Soc. Sci. 2, no. 4: 284-297.


Soc. Sci. EISSN 2076-0760 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert