Next Article in Journal
Patients’ Perspectives on the Design of Hospital Outpatient Areas
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of House Rent Prices and Their Affordability in Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Buildings 2017, 7(4), 115; doi:10.3390/buildings7040115

A Systematic Method to Analyze Force Majeure in Construction Claims

1
Department of Civil Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2454, Riyadh 114, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Design and Physical Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 13 October 2017 / Revised: 19 November 2017 / Accepted: 30 November 2017 / Published: 5 December 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [2167 KB, uploaded 5 December 2017]   |  

Abstract

In construction delay claims, force majeure is normally recognized as an excusable risk that entitles contractors only to time extensions, but neither of the contracting parties is entitled to monetary compensation to recover delay damages. However, there are instances where contractors are entitled to both time and cost compensations, as evidenced by some court cases relating to force majeure claims. Such instances involve attributing the occurrence of the force majeure to the effect of other prior delay events that pushed project performance into the period of the force majeure. Existing delay analysis methods are not capable of addressing this issue, as none take the impact of other delays into consideration when analyzing force majeure claims. Stimulated by this gap, this study proposes an improved and sound method for fairly analyzing the responsibility of force majeure delay claims amongst contracting parties. This method was implemented on a case project to help demonstrate its application and also ascertain its practicability. The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, it has highlighted the situation of force majeure delay that can be compensable, creating more awareness among researchers and industry practitioners. The second is a proposed systematic process to appropriately analyze its responsibility, which equitably addresses claims from such delays with little or no chance of dispute ensuing. View Full-Text
Keywords: construction delays; force majeure; entitlement; delay claims; excusable non-compensable delay construction delays; force majeure; entitlement; delay claims; excusable non-compensable delay
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Alshammari, S.; Al-Gahtani, K.; Alhammad, I.; Braimah, N. A Systematic Method to Analyze Force Majeure in Construction Claims. Buildings 2017, 7, 115.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Buildings EISSN 2075-5309 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top