Next Article in Journal
Tax Evasion and Incomplete Tax Transparency
Previous Article in Journal
Here to Stay: The Evolution of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in International Human Rights Law
Previous Article in Special Issue
Paradigm Shift or Paradigm Paralysis? National Mental Health and Capacity Law and Implementing the CRPD in Scotland
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Towards Changing Compulsory Community Mental Health Treatment in New Zealand: Shining Light on How Community Treatment Orders Are Produced

Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 5 March 2018 / Revised: 3 August 2018 / Accepted: 6 August 2018 / Published: 14 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Concerns, Contradictions and Reality of Mental Health Law)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1703 KB, uploaded 14 August 2018]   |  

Abstract

In this paper, we use a constructed scenario to illustrate making a compulsory community treatment order in the New Zealand context. Drawing on publicly available documentation, we outline the existing mental health law framework that produces community treatment orders and emerging complex problems of their high, increasing and disproportionate use. We provide examples of human rights, indigenous and clinical effectiveness research that appear to be destabilising the existing mental health law framework. We argue assemblage theory (Deleuze & Guattari) is a useful theoretical tool to unpack the making and continued use of compulsory community treatment orders in the context of complex destabilising and stabilising influences. This is followed by an outline of the concept of assemblage with reference to the constructed scenario, focusing on processes, practices, places, types of knowledge, roles, documents and how they connect to produce certain effects that both enable and constrain participants’ actions. In the New Zealand context, we examine the potential for assemblage theory to generate new ways of thinking about compulsory mental health treatment in community settings by challenging perceived limitations and revealing opportunities for participants to act otherwise. We conclude with a proposal for further research shaped by this theory that explores the making of actual community treatment orders to reveal where there is potential to change existing relations towards more positive effects for participants. View Full-Text
Keywords: community mental health; compulsory treatment order; assemblage theory; mental health law; social policy; human rights community mental health; compulsory treatment order; assemblage theory; mental health law; social policy; human rights
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Schneller, A.; Thom, K.; Adams, P. Towards Changing Compulsory Community Mental Health Treatment in New Zealand: Shining Light on How Community Treatment Orders Are Produced. Laws 2018, 7, 30.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Laws EISSN 2075-471X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top