Reading Alexander V. Choate Rightly: Now is the Time
AbstractWhatever happens to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) over the next few years, it is fair to assume that state Medicaid programs will be subjected to cost control measures. Despite the recent deployment of substantial arguments to the contrary, the belief still persists that the Supreme Court’s decision in Alexander v. Choate over thirty years ago stands for the proposition that disability anti-discrimination law does not impose requirements on the structure of Medicaid benefits. This belief is misleading at best. In this article, we challenge the access/content distinction and the straitened interpretation of Alexander v. Choate that has resulted from it. We then use cases drawn from education to point the way to a more robust analysis of meaningful access to health care and the constraints it places on the design of state Medicaid programs. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Francis, L.; Silvers, A. Reading Alexander V. Choate Rightly: Now is the Time. Laws 2017, 6, 17.
Francis L, Silvers A. Reading Alexander V. Choate Rightly: Now is the Time. Laws. 2017; 6(4):17.Chicago/Turabian Style
Francis, Leslie; Silvers, Anita. 2017. "Reading Alexander V. Choate Rightly: Now is the Time." Laws 6, no. 4: 17.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.