Immigration Federalism as Ideology: Lessons from the States
AbstractOver the last decade states passed hundreds of immigration bills covering a range of policy areas. This article considers the recent state legislative surge against scholarly treatments of immigration federalism, and identifies the symbolic politics in state lawmaking. The analysis combines a historical treatment of key court decisions that delineated boundaries of state and federal immigration roles with a legislative analysis of over 2200 immigration bills passed between 2006 and 2013, to identify the numerous ways in which national immigration policy shapes state measures. It argues that recent laws must be considered against symbolic federalism which privileges state sovereignty and justifies social policy devolution by advancing frames of intergovernmental conflict, state-level policy pragmatism, and federal ineffectiveness. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Newton, L. Immigration Federalism as Ideology: Lessons from the States. Laws 2015, 4, 729-754.
Newton L. Immigration Federalism as Ideology: Lessons from the States. Laws. 2015; 4(4):729-754.Chicago/Turabian Style
Newton, Lina. 2015. "Immigration Federalism as Ideology: Lessons from the States." Laws 4, no. 4: 729-754.