The Political Contingency of Sex Discrimination Legislation: The Case of Australia
AbstractThere has been a marked shift away from social liberalism in many parts of the world which has profound ramifications for women, whose status remains contingent on the good graces of public institutions that remain resolutely masculinist. Neoliberalism, with its focus on the privatisation of public goods and promotion of the self within the market has become the dominant political ideology everywhere and is further undermining the interests of the majority of women. This essay will address the changing fortunes of sex discrimination legislation as a specific example of an initiative designed to improve the status of women. Australia will be used as a case study because of its passionate embrace of, first, social liberalism, and then, neoliberalism. Issues pertaining to affirmative action (positive action), intersection with human rights instruments, reporting requirements and incentives will also be addressed. Although Australia is a multi-jurisdictional federation, the essay will focus primarily on the federal arena in terms of legislative initiatives, policy and jurisprudence.
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Thornton, M. The Political Contingency of Sex Discrimination Legislation: The Case of Australia. Laws 2015, 4, 314-334.
Thornton M. The Political Contingency of Sex Discrimination Legislation: The Case of Australia. Laws. 2015; 4(3):314-334.Chicago/Turabian Style
Thornton, Margaret. 2015. "The Political Contingency of Sex Discrimination Legislation: The Case of Australia." Laws 4, no. 3: 314-334.