Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Recovery and Superelasticity of Columnar-Grained Cu–Al–Mn Shape Memory Alloy
Next Article in Special Issue
Design of U-Geometry Parameters Using Statistical Analysis Techniques in the U-Bending Process
Previous Article in Journal
Tribological Properties of Plough Shares Made of Pearlitic and Martensitic Steels
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design and Mechanical Properties Analysis of AA5083 Ultrafine Grained Cams
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Metals 2017, 7(4), 140; doi:10.3390/met7040140

Advanced Plasticity Modeling for Ultra-Low-Cycle-Fatigue Simulation of Steel Pipe

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
2
Department of Materials Engineering, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 44-Box 2450, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
3
Department of Computer Science, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200A, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
4
OnderzoeksCentrum voor de Aanwending van Staal, Technologiepark 935, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Myoung-Gyu Lee
Received: 5 March 2017 / Revised: 11 April 2017 / Accepted: 13 April 2017 / Published: 14 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Plastic Forming of Metals)

Abstract

Pipelines and piping components may be exposed to extreme loading conditions, for instance earthquakes and hurricanes. In such conditions, they undergo severe plastic strains, which may locally reach the fracture limits due to either monotonic loading or ultra-low cycle fatigue (ULCF). Aiming to investigate the failure process and strain evolution of pipes enduring ULCF, a lab-scale ULCF test on an X65 steel pipeline component is simulated with finite element models, and experimental data are used to validate various material modeling assumptions. The paper focuses on plastic material modeling and compares different models for plastic anisotropy in combination with various hardening models, including isotropic, linear kinematic and combined hardening models. Both isotropic and anisotropic assumptions for plastic yielding are considered. As pipes pose difficulty for the measurement of plastic properties in mechanical testing, we calibrate an anisotropic yield locus using advanced multi-scale simulation based on texture measurements. Moreover, the importance of the anisotropy gradient across thickness is studied in detail for this thick-walled pipeline steel. It is found that the usage of a combined hardening model is essential to accurately predict the number of the cycles until failure, as well as the strain evolution during the fatigue test. The advanced hardening modeling featuring kinematic hardening has a substantially higher impact on result accuracy compared to the yield locus assumption for the studied ULCF test. Cyclic tension-compression testing is conducted to calibrate the kinematic hardening models. Additionally, plastic anisotropy and its gradient across the thickness play a notable, yet secondary role. Based on this research, it is advised to focus on improvements in strain hardening characteristics in future developments of pipeline steel with enhanced earthquake resistance. View Full-Text
Keywords: plasticity modeling; kinematic hardening; plastic anisotropy; finite element simulation; ultra-low cycle fatigue; failure; strain evolution plasticity modeling; kinematic hardening; plastic anisotropy; finite element simulation; ultra-low cycle fatigue; failure; strain evolution
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, R.; Eyckens, P.; E, D.; Gawad, J.; Poucke, M.V.; Cooreman, S.; Bael, A.V. Advanced Plasticity Modeling for Ultra-Low-Cycle-Fatigue Simulation of Steel Pipe. Metals 2017, 7, 140.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Metals EISSN 2075-4701 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top