Next Article in Journal
Muscular Power during a Lifting Task Increases after Three Months of Resistance Training in Overweight and Obese Individuals
Previous Article in Journal
Relationships between Bat Swing Speed and Muscle Thickness and Asymmetry in Collegiate Baseball Players
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sports 2017, 5(2), 34; doi:10.3390/sports5020034

A Comparison of Implicit and Explicit Motor Sequence Learning in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Department of Physical Training, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Zabol, Zabol 009854, Iran
Academic Editors: Eling Douwe de Bruin and Alexander Nowicky
Received: 10 March 2017 / Revised: 17 May 2017 / Accepted: 23 May 2017 / Published: 7 June 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [335 KB, uploaded 7 June 2017]   |  

Abstract

This study tends to assess implicit and explicit types of motor learning in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and normal peers by means of a serial reaction time. Sample size was 15 for each group and Samples included 30 patients with MS and 30 normal peers and were assigned to implicit and explicit learning groups. A repeated measures ANOVA was used for measuring reaction time and response error, and a paired samples t-test was used to compare regular and irregular sequence data in each group. Comparison of these two types of learning in speed (response time) and accuracy (number of errors) showed the number of errors (P = 0.012) and response time (P = 0.012) in the implicit motor learning group of MS patients and the number of errors (P = 0.096) and response time (P = 0.954) in the explicit motor learning group of MS patients. Moreover, comparison showed the number of errors (P = 0.008) and response time (P = 0.05) in the implicit group of normal peers and the number of errors (P = 0.011) and response time (P = 0.442) in the explicit group of normal peers. The results showed that explaining and describing the task is less effective at training the motor sequence of MS patients and that these patients benefit more from implicit learning. View Full-Text
Keywords: multiple sclerosis; implicit learning; explicit learning multiple sclerosis; implicit learning; explicit learning
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Sarabandi, M. A Comparison of Implicit and Explicit Motor Sequence Learning in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Sports 2017, 5, 34.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sports EISSN 2075-4663 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top