Next Article in Journal
Comparing Aedes vigilax Eggshell Densities in Saltmarsh and Mangrove Systems with Implications for Management
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Rice Seeding Rate on Efficacies of Neonicotinoid and Anthranilic Diamide Seed Treatments against Rice Water Weevil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Intraguild Predation Responses in Two Aphidophagous Coccinellids Identify Differences among Juvenile Stages and Aphid Densities

Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno 74, Perugia 06121, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2014, 5(4), 974-983; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects5040974
Submission received: 14 August 2014 / Revised: 24 November 2014 / Accepted: 26 November 2014 / Published: 8 December 2014

Abstract

:
(1) Intraguild predation (IGP) can occur among aphidophagous predators thus reducing their effectiveness in controlling crop pests. Among ladybirds, Coccinella septempunctata L. and Hippodamia variegata Goeze are the most effective predators upon Aphis gossypii Glov., which is an economically important pest of melon. Understanding their likelihood to engage in reciprocal predation is a key point for conservation of biological control. Here, we aim to investigate, under laboratory conditions, the level of IGP between the two above mentioned aphidophagous species. (2) Fourth-instars of the two species were isolated in petri dishes with combinations of different stages of the heterospecific ladybird and different densities of A. gossypii. The occurrence of IGP events was recorded after six hours. (3) C. septempunctata predated H. variegata at a higher rate than vice versa (70% vs. 43% overall). Higher density of the aphid or older juvenile stage of the IG-prey (22% of fourth instars vs. 74% of eggs and second instars) reduces the likelihood of predation. (4) To our knowledge, IGP between C. septempunctata and H. variegata was investigated for the first time. Results represent a baseline, necessary to predict the likelihood of IGP occurrence in the field.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Generalist predators, including coccinellids, are very effective in pest suppression [1]. In fact, they colonize agricultural fields early in the season by feeding on alternative prey [2] and thus increase their populations prior to the arrival of the pest [3]. However, coccinellids can, under certain conditions, engage in competitive interactions between members of the same trophic level [4]. Intraguild predation (IGP) occurs where a predator (IG-predator) consumes another species (IG-prey) that shares a common prey, and has been commonly reported among coccinellids [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Predation on guild members by a top predator has been implicated as the primary cause for displacement of some selected species [13] and, in some cases, to disrupt biological control [14].
Aphis gossypii Glov. has a worldwide distribution and is a major economically important pest of Cucurbitaceae, including melon [15,16]. As a consequence of its feeding activity, the aphid causes leaves to curl up, damaging seriously the vegetation and fruits. In addition, the aphid is a vector of plant pathogen viruses, such as the Cucumber Mosaic Virus [17]. Control measures include chemical treatments and the use of resistant varieties, but due to the ability of A. gossypii to develop resistance to insecticides [18,19] and to overcome plant genetic defenses, these two methods do not guarantee efficient control [20]. Among cultural methods, UV-absorbing films used in tunnels or mulching has been shown to partially protect the crop from A. gossypii infestations [21]. Previous studies [22,23,24,25] and our surveys conducted during 2013 in melon crop planted in Central Italy suggest that coccinellids, mostly Coccinella septempunctata L. and Hippodamia variegata (Goeze), may provide an efficient control over the population of this pest. However, before considering these natural enemies for conservation biological control purposes, it is necessary to determine their likelihood to establish intraguild interactions, with unpredictable consequences for disruption of aphid biological control (reviewed by [7,26]). Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine, under laboratory conditions, the likelihood of intraguild predation between different stages of the two ladybirds at different densities of their essential prey, A. gossypii. Coccinellids are vulnerable to IGP during their entire life cycle, but the risk of being IG-prey is stage-dependent and seems to be higher with low density of aphids (reviewed by [27]). In particular, we test the hypothesis that ladybird beetle eggs and early juvenile stages are more susceptible to IGP than older stages, and that the IGP levels are lower at higher aphid densities.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Insect Rearing and Experimental Set-Up

Coccinellid cultures were established from C. septempunctata and H. variegata adults collected from melon crop field in Central Italy and reared on an ad libitum diet of Aphis fabae Scopoli. Aphis gossypii winged females were collected from the field and populations were established in the laboratory on Hibiscus syriacus L. plants.
Fourth-instars of either C. septempunctata or H. variegata (within 8 h after ecdysis) were isolated in 15 mL glass test tubes (1.5 cm diameter), containing a strip of filter paper, closed with cotton wool and arranged horizontally. Larvae to be screened as IG-predator were starved for 12 h (water provided on cotton wool) to induce a constant level of hunger [28]. Subsequently, each coccinellid larva was randomly transferred to a clean petri arena (9 cm diameter), containing a moistened filter paper on the bottom, and allowed to feed on a combination of (i) one egg or (ii) a second-instar or (iii) a fourth-instar of a heterospecific coccinellid (i.e., H. variegata if the starved larva was C. septempunctata and vice versa) with, respectively, 0, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100 or 200 A. gossypii individuals. Filter papers were moistened in order to provide a good environment for larvae and to avoid insects from hiding below the paper. Whether or not each starved larva completely ate the IG-prey item was recorded after six hours. The larvae were further allowed to feed for additional 18 h to ensure they were able to entirely consume during this interval the amount of aphids provided. The experiment was replicated seven times for each combination of IG-predator, IG-prey and aphid density, with a total of 294 observations. Insect rearing and experiments were performed in a controlled environmental chamber at 25 ± 1 °C, 70% ± 5% RH, and 14 h L:10 h D photoperiod.

2.2. Data Analysis

Logistic regression was performed to analyze the relationship between IGP frequency and the variables: IG-predator species, IG-prey stage, initial aphid density, and the interactions between them. To account for data separation, logistic regression models were fitted by applying Firth’s correction [29,30,31], which allowed us to obtain finite parameter estimates for the predation response of C. septempunctata to eggs at different aphid densities. To identify the minimum adequate model, we used backward elimination, starting with a model that included the IG-predator species, initial aphid density and IG-prey stages and all the interactions between variables. Model selection was performed based on penalized likelihood ratio test [30]. All data analyses were performed under R statistical environment [32], with package “logistf” used to perform Firth’s penalized likelihood logistic regression [33].

3. Results and Discussion

The best-fitted model retained the principal effect of the IG-predator species, the IG-prey juvenile stage and the aphid density, without any interactions between them (Table 1).
Table 1. Regression coefficients, standard errors and significance for the variables retained in the best fitted models describing the relationship between the frequency of IGP and: (i) the IG-predator species (Coccinella septempunctata or Hippodamia variegata); (ii) the IG-prey stage (egg, second- or fourth-instar); (iii) the initial density of aphids.
Table 1. Regression coefficients, standard errors and significance for the variables retained in the best fitted models describing the relationship between the frequency of IGP and: (i) the IG-predator species (Coccinella septempunctata or Hippodamia variegata); (ii) the IG-prey stage (egg, second- or fourth-instar); (iii) the initial density of aphids.
Variable(Level)CoeffSE (Coeff)p-Value
Intercept 4.2080.530<0.001
IG-predator species(H. variegata)−1.8640.350<0.001
IG-prey stage(Second-instar)−2.1190.439<0.001
(Fourth-instar)−4.1820.507<0.001
Aphid density −0.0120.003<0.001
IGP probability was significantly higher with C. septempunctata (Figure 1A–C, overall 70% of replicates with IGP events), rather than with H. variegata (Figure 1D–F, IGP in 43% of replicates) and was significantly reduced with the increase of the initial aphid density (overall in more than 52% of replicates with less than 100 aphids provided). Eggs (Figure 1A,D) were more susceptible to IGP than larvae (overall 89% of predated eggs vs. 41% of larvae), with second-instars (Figure 1B,E) more likely to be predated upon than fourth-instars (Figure 1C,F). All individuals consumed the whole amount of aphids provided within 24 h.
Figure 1. Proportion of IGP events by Coccinella septempunctata L. (AC) and Hippodamia variegata (Goeze) (DF) upon egg (A,D), second-instar (B,E) and fourth-instar (C,F) of the IG-prey at different density of Aphis gossypii Glov. The symbols represent the proportion of the replicates in which IGP occurred, while the line indicates penalized maximum likelihood estimate of the logistic response function.
Figure 1. Proportion of IGP events by Coccinella septempunctata L. (AC) and Hippodamia variegata (Goeze) (DF) upon egg (A,D), second-instar (B,E) and fourth-instar (C,F) of the IG-prey at different density of Aphis gossypii Glov. The symbols represent the proportion of the replicates in which IGP occurred, while the line indicates penalized maximum likelihood estimate of the logistic response function.
Insects 05 00974 g001

4. Discussion

Our results revealed that C. septempunctata may act as a strong predator of H. variegata, in particular upon early juvenile stages, and this corroborates previous findings on other IG coccinellid preys (reviewed by [27]). Coccinella septempunctata larvae demonstrated asymmetric predation upon Adalia bipunctata (L.), both in petri arena [10] and in semi-field experiments [34]. Snyder, et al. [35], under laboratory conditions, reported that both Coccinella transversoguttata Brown and Hippodamia convergens Guérin-Méneville, dominant native species in agricultural fields in Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho, were often the prey of C. septempunctata.
The vulnerability of a species to IGP is dependent on size, with the largest species more likely to act as a IG-predator [27]. In our case the asymmetric predation of C. septempunctata upon H. variegata larvae could be explained by the higher dimension of larval instars of the former species, although other behavioral aspects should be studied (i.e., reciprocal attack and escape rates, defensive behavior [28,36]). Asymmetric predation upon eggs instead, could be explained by the different voracity of the two species [37] or by the different effectiveness of the defensive alkaloids they possess. Coccinellid eggs present chemical compounds, which might protect them from IGP [38,39]. In this respect, the ability of an IG-predator to detoxify heterospecific chemical compounds after the ingestion might, in part, explain its aggressive behavior [40] and further studies are needed to verify the different tolerance of C. septempunctata and H. variegata to heterospecific eggs’ consumption. Our results does not necessarily mean that H. variegata is more at risk in agricultural habitats as a result of the interactions with C. septempunctata, and our IGP experiments should be carefully interpreted before determining characteristics of predation in open field systems. In fact, in field conditions, behavioral mechanisms, such as escaping behavior or prey switching, may occur to prevent IGP [41]. Moreover in interpreting our results it is important to consider the different biology and ecology of the two coccinellid species. Coccinella septempunctata generally completes one or two generations with females that start to oviposit early in the season [42,43] by laying a huge amount of eggs on herbaceous crops. Hippodamia variegata, instead, is a multivoltine species, which completes two to three generations in Europe, thus its reproductive period exceed that of C. septempunctata and its population density increases over the season [44,45]. For that reason H. variegata seems more abundant in those crops that are harvested late, preventing IGP interactions to some extent. As an example, in Greece, Kavallieratos, et al. [46] revealed that C. septempunctata was the dominant species on durum wheat (during April–May), while H. variegata was predominant on cotton (in June–July). In addition to voltinism, the abundance of the two species could be explained for example by their fecundity (higher in C. septempunctata [47]), and by demographic regulation exhibited by natural enemies [48]. When co-occurring on the same plant, the coexistence of the two species could be fostered by a different choice of the oviposition site. Females of both species prefer to oviposit close to aphid’s colonies, however H. variegata prefers a more humid microclimate to lay eggs [49]. Moreover, C. septempunctata is more likely to oviposit over rough substrates, i.e., the lower page of the leaves [50]. Finally, to reduce the likelihood of IGP, ladybird ovipositing females have been shown to be able to detect semiochemicals released from potential competitors and reduce the amounts of eggs laid accordingly [51].
The useful and predictive potential of two-dimensional arena experiments has been demonstrated recently for another species, Harmonia axyridis (Pallas). This ladybird acted as asymmetric IG-predator under laboratory conditions [8,34,52,53,54,55,56,57] and demonstrated its aggressiveness also in field systems [58,59,60,61,62,63]. Whether or not the asymmetric predation revealed by C. septempunctata over H. variegata in small arenas might be predictive of field situations remains to be elucidated. In addition, our results suggest that IGP could be relevant also at higher aphid density. Recently it has been demonstrated that IGP among coccinellids could be common in nature even at high aphid densities [56], and our results on predation of eggs and young larval instars support this. In the context of biological control, considering that H. variegata has been proposed as a candidate for augmentative programs against A. gossypii [64,65], our results might predict low non-target risks for local C. septempunctata populations wherever the two ladybirds co-occur. Conservation approaches might consider the seasonal movement of C. septempunctata from arable to vegetable crops [66]. In this respect, the presence of wheat fields close to melon crops could favor the movement of new C. septempunctata adults in the vegetable early after the maturation of the cereal in June [67] and this might be useful for an early control upon the aphid colonies.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study has value in evaluating the potential of IGP between C. septempunctata and H. variegata when they share a common prey, the aphid A. gossypii. We are presently conducting field investigations on the predator guild that regulates A. gossypii populations in melon crop and we are developing molecular gut content analyses on field-collected individuals. In this respect, our results would represent a baseline to predict the likelihood of predation in the field and investigate trophic relationships in coccinellid assemblages and their role in pest suppression.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Luciana Bartoli for the support in rearing plants and aphid colonies. Gabriele Rondoni was supported by a project from Umbria Region entitled “Development and application of integrated pest management strategies against Aphis gossypii, a key pest of melon”.

Author Contributions

All authors significantly contributed to the research and to the manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Symondson, W.O.C.; Sunderland, K.D.; Greenstone, M.H. Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2002, 47, 561–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Harwood, J.D.; Desneux, N.; Yoo, H.J.S.; Rowley, D.L.; Greenstone, M.H.; Obrycki, J.J.; O’Neil, R.J. Tracking the role of alternative prey in soybean aphid predation by Orius insidiosus: A molecular approach. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16, 4390–4400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Landis, D.A.; van der Werf, W. Early-season predation impacts the establishment of aphids and spread of beet yellows virus in sugar beet. BioControl 1997, 42, 499–516. [Google Scholar]
  4. Snyder, W.E.; Ives, A.R. Generalist predators disrupt biological control by a specialist parasitoid. Ecology 2001, 82, 705–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dixon, A.F.G. Insect Predator-Prey Dynamics: Ladybird Beetles and Biological Control; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  6. Agarwala, B.K.; Dixon, A.F.G. Laboratory study of cannibalism and interspecific predation in ladybirds. Ecol. Entomol. 1992, 17, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lucas, E. Intraguild predation among aphidophagous predators. Eur. J. Entomol. 2005, 102, 351–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Michaud, J.P. Invasion of the Florida citrus ecosystem by Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and asymmetric competition with a native species, Cycloneda sanguinea. Environ. Entomol. 2002, 31, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Obrycki, J.J.; Giles, K.L.; Ormord, A.M. Interactions between an introduced and indigenous coccinellid species at different prey densities. Oecologia 1998, 117, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kajita, Y.; Takano, F.; Yasuda, H.; Evans, E.W. Interactions between introduced and native predatory ladybirds (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae): Factors influencing the success of species introductions. Ecol. Entomol. 2006, 31, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moser, S.E.; Obrycki, J.J. Competition and intraguild predation among three species of coccinellids (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2009, 102, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rondoni, G.; Onofri, A.; Ricci, C. Laboratory studies on intraguild predation and cannibalism among coccinellid larvae (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 2012, 109, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hemptinne, J.-L.; Magro, A.; Saladin, C.; Dixon, A.F.G. Role of intraguild predation in aphidophagous guilds. J. Appl. Entomol. 2012, 136, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Traugott, M.; Bell, J.R.; Raso, L.; Sint, D.; Symondson, W.O.C. Generalist predators disrupt parasitoid aphid control by direct and coincidental intraguild predation. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2012, 102, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Charaabi, K.; Carletto, J.; Chavigny, P.; Marrakchi, M.; Makni, M.; Vanlerberghe-Masutti, F. Genotypic diversity of the cotton-melon aphid Aphis gossypii (Glover) in Tunisia is structured by host plants. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2008, 98, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Carletto, J.; Lombaert, E.; Chavigny, P.; Brevault, T.; Lapchin, L.; Vanlerberghe-Masutti, F. Ecological specialization of the aphid Aphis gossypii Glover on cultivated host plants. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18, 2198–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martin, B.; Rahbé, Y.; Fereres, A. Blockage of stylet tips as the mechanism of resistance to virus transmission by Aphis gossypii in melon lines bearing the Vat gene. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2003, 142, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Toda, S.; Komazaki, S.; Izawa, H.; Nakada, K.; Kanazaki, S.; Souda, E.; Shigehara, T. Development of molecular diagnostics of the two point mutations in acetylcholinesterase gene associated with insecticide resistance in the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover, (Homoptera: Aphididae) and a survey of genotypic frequency in field populations. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2008, 43, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, K.Y.; Guo, Q.L.; Xia, X.M.; Wang, H.Y.; Liu, T.X. Resistance of Aphis gossypii (Homoptera: Aphididae) to selected insecticides on cotton from five cotton production regions in Shandong, China. J. Pestic. Sci. 2007, 32, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lopes, C.; Spataro, T.; Lapchin, L.; Arditi, R. Optimal release strategies for the biological control of aphids in melon greenhouses. Biol. Contr. 2009, 48, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Antignus, Y.; Mor, N.; Joseph, R.B.; Lapidot, M.; Cohen, S. Ultraviolet-absorbing plastic sheets protect crops from insect pests and from virus diseases vectored by insects. Environ. Entomol. 1996, 25, 919–924. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee, J.H.; Kang, T.J. Functional response of Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae) in the laboratory. Biol. Contr. 2004, 31, 306–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shrestha, R.B.; Parajulee, M.N. Potential cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii, population suppression by arthropod predators in upland cotton. Insect Sci. 2013, 20, 778–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yu, J.-Z.; Chi, H.; Chen, B.-H. Comparison of the life tables and predation rates of Harmonia dimidiata (F.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) fed on Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae) at different temperatures. Biol. Contr. 2013, 64, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ferrari, R.; Nicoli, G. Life cycle and natural enemies of Aphis gossypii Glover: Initial survey (in Italian). Informatore Fitopatol. 1994, 5, 59–62. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rosenheim, J.A.; Kaya, H.K.; Ehler, L.E.; Marois, J.J.; Jaffee, B.A. Intraguild predation among biological-control agents: Theory and evidence. Biol. Contr. 1995, 5, 303–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lucas, E. Intraguild interactions. In Ecology and Behaviour of the Ladybird Beetles (Coccinellidae); Hodek, I., van Emden, H.F., Honek, A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2012; pp. 343–374. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yasuda, H.; Kikuchi, T.; Kindlmann, P.; Sato, S. Relationships between attack and escape rates, cannibalism, and intraguild predation in larvae of two predatory ladybirds. J. Insect Behav. 2001, 14, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Heinze, G.; Schemper, M. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat. Med. 2002, 21, 2409–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bray, Y.; Devillard, S.; Marboutin, E.; Mauvy, B.; Peroux, R. Natal dispersal of European hare in France. J. Zool. 2007, 273, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lowe, M.R.; Wu, W.; Peterson, M.S.; Brown-Peterson, N.J.; Slack, W.T.; Schofield, P.J. Survival, growth and reproduction of non-native Nile tilapia II: fundamental niche projections and invasion potential in the northern Gulf of Mexico. PLoS One 2012, 7, e41580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  33. Heinze, G.; Ploner, M.; Dunkler, D.; Southworth, H. Logistf: Firth’s bias reduced logistic regression. R package version 1.21. Available online: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/logistf/index.html (accessed on 16 June 2014).
  34. Raak-van den Berg, C.L.; de Lange, H.J.; van Lenteren, J.C. Intraguild predation behaviour of ladybirds in semi-field experiments explains invasion success of Harmonia axyridis. PLoS One 2012, 7, e40681. [Google Scholar]
  35. Snyder, W.E.; Clevenger, G.M.; Eigenbrode, S.D. Intraguild predation and successful invasion by introduced ladybird beetles. Oecologia 2004, 140, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Rondoni, G.; Onofri, A.; Ricci, C. Differential susceptibility in a specialised aphidophagous ladybird, Platynaspis luteorubra (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), facing intraguild predation by exotic and native generalist predators. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2012, 22, 1334–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khan, A.A.; Mir, R.A. Functional response of four predaceous coccinellids, Adalia tetraspilota (Hope), Coccinella septempunctata L., Calvia punctata (Mulsant) and Hippodamia variegata (Goeze) feeding on green apple aphid, Aphis pomi De Geer (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. Biol. Control 2008, 22, 291–298. [Google Scholar]
  38. Daloze, D.; Braekman, J.-C.; Pasteels, J.M. Ladybird defence alkaloids: Structural, chemotaxonomic and biosynthetic aspects (Col.: Coccinellidae). Chemoecology 1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hemptinne, J.-L.; Lognay, G.; Gauthier, C.; Dixon, A.F.G. Role of surface chemical signals in egg cannibalism and intraguild predation in ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Chemoecology 2000, 10, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kajita, Y.; Obrycki, J.J.; Sloggett, J.J.; Haynes, K.F. Intraspecific alkaloid variation in ladybird eggs and its effects on con- and hetero-specific intraguild predators. Oecologia 2010, 163, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Latham, D.R.; Mills, N.J. Quantifying insect predation: A comparison of three methods for estimating daily per capita consumption of two aphidophagous predators. Environ. Entomol. 2009, 38, 1117–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nedved, O.; Honek, A. Life history and development. In Ecology and Behaviour of the Ladybird Beetles (Coccinellidae); Hodek, I., van Emden, H.F., Honek, A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2012; pp. 54–109. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hodek, I. Diapause/dormancy. In Ecology and Behaviour of the Ladybird Beetles (Coccinellidae); Hodek, I., van Emden, H.F., Honěk, A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester, UK, 2012; pp. 275–342. [Google Scholar]
  44. Honek, A. Distribution and habitats. In Ecology and Behaviour of the Ladybird Beetles (Coccinellidae); Hodek, I., van Emden, H.F., Honek, A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2012; pp. 110–140. [Google Scholar]
  45. Honek, A.; Martinkova, Z.; Kindlmann, P.; Ameixa, O.M.C.C.; Dixon, A.F.G. Long-term trends in the composition of aphidophagous coccinellid communities in Central Europe. Insect Conserv. Diver. 2014, 7, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kavallieratos, N.G.; Stathas, G.J.; Athanassiou, C.G.; Papadoulis, G.T. Dittrichia viscosa and Rubus ulmifolius as reservoirs of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) and the role of certain coccinellid species. Phytoparasitica 2002, 30, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hodek, I.; Michaud, J.P. Why is Coccinella septempunctata so successful? (A point-of-view). Eur. J. Entomol. 2008, 105, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ceryngier, P.; Roy, H.E.; Poland, R.L. Natural enemies of ladybird beetles. In Ecology and Behaviour of the Ladybird Beetles (Coccinellidae); Hodek, I., van Emden, H.F., Honěk, A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2012; pp. 375–443. [Google Scholar]
  49. Hodek, I.; Honek, A. Ecology of Coccinellidae; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  50. Iperti, G. Biodiversity of predaceous coccinellidae in relation to bioindication and economic importance. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1999, 74, 323–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Agarwala, B.K.; Yasuda, H.; Kajita, Y. Effect of conspecific and heterospecific feces on foraging and oviposition of two predatory ladybirds: Role of fecal cues in predator avoidance. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29, 357–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ware, R.L.; Majerus, M.E.N. Intraguild predation of immature stages of British and Japanese coccinellids by the invasive ladybird Harmonia axyridis. BioControl 2008, 53, 169–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pell, J.K.; Baverstock, J.; Roy, H.E.; Ware, R.L.; Majerus, M.E.N. Intraguild predation involving Harmonia axyridis: A review of current knowledge and future perspectives. BioControl 2008, 53, 147–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Yasuda, H.; Evans, E.W.; Kajita, Y.; Urakawa, K.; Takizawa, T. Asymmetric larval interactions between introduced and indigenous ladybirds in North America. Oecologia 2004, 141, 722–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Burgio, G.; Santi, F.; Maini, S. On intra-guild predation and cannibalism in Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) and Adalia bipunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Biol. Contr. 2002, 24, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gardiner, M.M.; Landis, D.A. Impact of intraguild predation by adult Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on Aphis glycines (Hemiptera: Aphididae) biological control in cage studies. Biol. Contr. 2007, 40, 386–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ingels, B.; Aebi, A.; Hautier, L.; van Leeuwen, T.; de Clercq, P. Molecular analysis of the gut contents of Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) as a method for detecting intra-guild predation by this species on aphidophagous predators other than coccinellids. Eur. J. Entomol. 2013, 110, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Thomas, A.P.; Trotman, J.; Wheatley, A.; Aebi, A.; Zindel, R.; Brown, P.M.J. Predation of native coccinellids by the invasive alien Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): Detection in Britain by PCR-based gut analysis. Insect Conserv. Diver. 2013, 6, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Brown, P.M.J.; Ingels, B.; Wheatley, A.; Rhule, E.L.; de Clercq, P.; van Leeuwen, T.; Thomas, A. Intraguild predation by Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on native insects in Europe: Molecular detection from field samples. Entomol. Sci. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rondoni, G.; Athey, K.J.; Harwood, J.D.; Conti, E.; Ricci, C.; Obrycki, J.J. Development and application of molecular gut-content analysis to detect aphid and coccinellid predation by Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in Italy. Insect. Sci. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gagnon, A.-È.; Heimpel, G.E.; Brodeur, J. The ubiquity of intraguild predation among predatory arthropods. PLoS One 2011, 6, e28061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hautier, L.; San Martin, G.; Callier, P.; de Biseau, J.-C.; Grégoire, J.-C. Alkaloids provide evidence of intraguild predation on native coccinellids by Harmonia axyridis in the field. Biol. Invas. 2011, 13, 1805–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Roy, H.E.; Adriaens, T.; Isaac, N.J.B.; Kenis, M.; Onkelinx, T.; Martin, G.S.; Brown, P.M.J.; Hautier, L.; Poland, R.; Roy, D.B.; et al. Invasive alien predator causes rapid declines of native European ladybirds. Divers. Distrib. 2012, 18, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Madadi, H.; Mohajeri Parizi, E.; Allahyari, H.; Enkegaard, A. Assessment of the biological control capability of Hippodamia variegata (Col.: Coccinellidae) using functional response experiments. J. Pest Sci. 2011, 84, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. El-Habi, M.; Sekkat, A.; El-Jadd, L.; Boumezzough, A. Biology of Hippodamia variegata Goeze (Col., Coccinellidae) and its suitability against Aphis gossypii Glov (Hom., Aphididae) on cucumber under greenhouse conditions. J. Appl. Entomol. 2000, 124, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Burgio, G.; Ferrari, R.; Boriani, L.; Pozzati, M.; van Lenteren, J. The role of ecological infrastructures on Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) and other predators in weedy field margins within northern Italy agroecosystems. Bull. Insectol. 2006, 59, 59–67. [Google Scholar]
  67. Ferrari, R.; Burgio, G.; Nicoli, G. Coccinellidae as natural control of aphids in vegetable crops. Bull. IOBC/WPRS 1994, 17, 181–183. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rondoni, G.; Ielo, F.; Ricci, C.; Conti, E. Intraguild Predation Responses in Two Aphidophagous Coccinellids Identify Differences among Juvenile Stages and Aphid Densities. Insects 2014, 5, 974-983. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects5040974

AMA Style

Rondoni G, Ielo F, Ricci C, Conti E. Intraguild Predation Responses in Two Aphidophagous Coccinellids Identify Differences among Juvenile Stages and Aphid Densities. Insects. 2014; 5(4):974-983. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects5040974

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rondoni, Gabriele, Fulvio Ielo, Carlo Ricci, and Eric Conti. 2014. "Intraguild Predation Responses in Two Aphidophagous Coccinellids Identify Differences among Juvenile Stages and Aphid Densities" Insects 5, no. 4: 974-983. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects5040974

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop