Next Article in Journal
Unconventional Cadherin Localization in Honey Bee Gonads Revealed Through Domain-Specific Apis mellifera E- and N-Cadherin Antibodies Indicates Alternative Functions
Previous Article in Journal
Biologically Based Methods for Pest Management in Agriculture under Changing Climates: Challenges and Future Directions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neotenic Phenotype and Sex Ratios Provide Insight into Developmental Pathways in Reticulitermes flavipes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Myosin Gene Expression and Protein Abundance in Different Castes of the Formosan Subterranean Termite (Coptotermes formosanus)

1
United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics and Physiology Laboratory, 1157 Ben Hur Road, Baton Rouge, LA 70820, USA
2
United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center Cotton Fiber Bioscience Unit, 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd., New Orleans, LA 70124, USA
3
United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center Food Processing and Sensory Quality Unit, 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd., New Orleans, LA 70124, USA
4
United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center Formosan Subterranean Research Unit, 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd., New Orleans, LA 70124, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2012, 3(4), 1190-1199; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects3041190
Submission received: 13 September 2012 / Revised: 6 November 2012 / Accepted: 7 November 2012 / Published: 16 November 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers 2012)

Abstract

:
The Formosan subterranean termite (Coptotermes formosanus) is an important worldwide pest, each year causing millions of dollars in structural damage and control costs. Termite colonies are composed of several phenotypically distinct castes. Termites utilize these multiple castes to efficiently perform unique roles within the colony. During the molting/caste differentiation process, multiple genes are believed to be involved in the massive reorganization of the body plan. The objective of this research was to analyze the muscle gene, myosin, to further understand the role it plays in C. formosanus development. We find that comparing worker vs. solider caste myosin gene expression is up-regulated in the soldier and a myosin antibody-reactive protein suggests changes in splicing. Comparison of body regions of mature soldier and worker castes indicates a greater level of myosin transcript in the heads. The differential expression of this important muscle-related gene is anticipated considering the large amount of body plan reorganization and muscle found in the soldier caste. These results have a direct impact on our understanding of the downstream genes in the caste differentiation process and may lead to new targets for termite control.

1. Introduction

The Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus, is a particularly destructive urban pest. Since its initial discovery in the United States (U.S.) it has spread to several states, and the damage and control costs associated with this pest are estimated at over $20 billion annually [1,2].
Termites are social insects living in a colony system, and multiple complex phenotypes have evolved. The three main phenotypic/behavioral castes are workers, soldiers and reproductives. Individuals with the same genetic background can express various phenotypes depending on intrinsic factors such as pheromone/hormone response and extrinsic factors such as environmental conditions [3,4,5,6].
Previous research has identified genes, which are differentially expressed among the termite castes and have led to the identification of a number of other genes that may play a role in caste differentiation [7]. A number of the genes identified have been shown to play a role in cytoskeletal/body plan rearrangement [3,8]. The dramatic rearrangement of the termite body plan during caste differentiation would require the coordinated expression of multiple genes. One specific gene identified in past research is the muscle related gene, myosin.
Myosins play major roles in morphology across phyla by affecting cell shape and cellular movement (non-muscle myosins) or development of musculature (muscle myosin) by association with actin in sarcomeres [9]. Myosin function in insects, particularly during metamorphosis and the transformation to adult tissues, has been well documented. For instance, in Drosophila, the transformation from larval to adult indirect flight muscles requires the remodeling of larval longitudinal oblique muscles into the dorso-longitudinal muscles [10]. Tissue reorganization requires re-establishment of muscle filaments and sarcomeres derived from larval structures. Proper function of adult structures requires accurate spatial and temporal gene expression, including the appropriate myosin splice variants [11].
Drosophila myosin is encoded by a single gene, yet it can be alternatively spliced into 480 distinct isoforms [12,13]. While the C. formosanus transcriptome is incomplete, it can be expected that the tight regulation of myosin isoform expression would play an important role in the overall body plan reorganization and muscle development in a similar manner to Drosophila. In fact, the additional reorganizations that occur during termite caste differentiation may require an even more fastidious regulatory system.
Previous research investigating gene expression in the Eastern subterranean termite Reticulitermes flavipes has shown an increase in myosin gene expression in relationship to worker-to-soldier differentiation [6,14]. Scharf et al. [14] saw an increase in soldier myosin gene expression compared to workers. Similarly, results from Tarver et al. [6] showed a significant increase in myosin gene expression in worker termites during the worker to soldier caste differentiation process.
The objective of this current study was to analyze the muscle gene, myosin, to further understand the role it plays in C. formosanus differentiation and development. Specifically we (1) obtained C. formosanus myosin cDNA sequence and compared its homology with other closely related species, (2) determined the effect of caste and tissue on myosin transcript abundance and (3) identified myosin protein variation in relationship to caste differentiation. Overall, this research is important in understanding myosin gene and protein characterization in C. formosanus. Application of these findings could lead to the identification of new targets for future pest management tools.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Termites

Coptotermes formosanus were collected from in-ground traps located in New Orleans City Park, New Orleans, LA. Colonies were kept in the laboratory for at least two weeks, but not longer than three months before use in experiments. Colonies were identified as C. formosanus by 16s mitochondrial rDNA sequencing (colonies 1756, 1732, 1559) [15]. For the body region transcript analysis groups of 10 termites (colonies 1756) were dissected and used for each treatment (body region + caste; worker: head, gut, carcass; soldier: head, gut, carcass). This was replicated four times (worker head 1–4, worker gut 1–4, worker carcass 1–4; soldier head 1–4, soldier gut 1–4, soldier carcass 1–4). All the termite dissections from each treatment were collected and immediately frozen at −80 °C.

2.2. Cloning and Sequencing

A preliminary myosin gene coding sequence (522 bp) was identified from expressed sequence tag (EST) projects done in collaboration with J. Craig Venter Institute (JCVI), Rockville, MD. An additional myosin sequence was obtained from workers (colonies 1756, 1732, 1559) using the following primers: TcF1-GAACTCGACGCCAGCCAGAAGGAATG and CfRev3-CCTGAGGCACAGGGC. The sequence of these primers was based upon sequence conservation with published myosin sequences from Tribolium castaneum (XM_001813544), Apis mellifera (XM_393334.4), and Drosophila melanogaster (NM_165189.2), and they were used to expand the termite sequence to the current, but still incomplete, length of 1,420 bp including the terminal primer sequences listed above. Myosin sequences were isolated by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and cloned into PGEM-T vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and sequenced (Functional Biosciences, Madison, WI, USA).

2.3. RNA and cDNA

Total RNA was isolated from the frozen samples using a SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The amount of RNA extracted and its purity were quantified by using a NanoDrop (NanoDrop, Wilmington, DE, USA). Equal amounts of RNA (300 μg) were used in cDNA synthesis reactions. cDNA synthesis was accomplished using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, La Jolla, CA, USA).

2.4. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to determine the expression patterns of the myosin target gene (Myosin F-ATCACCATGTAATTTCAACT, R-ATGTCCATCTGTAGCAAT) (Bio-Rad CFX96 real time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) using the fast protocol with iTaq™ Fast SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Three technical replicates were used for each biological replicate of the multiple treatments. In both expression experiments, the data were first normalized to the expression data from one reference gene (RPL32 Ribosomal protein L7 F-ATTGACAACAGAGTTCGTAGGC, R-CGTTATGCACCAGTACCTTCC [16] and then normalized to the expression data from the control treatment (in the body region experiment: worker gut) using the 2-ΔCtΔCt method (ABI Prism User Bulletin#2 and Livak & Schmittgen, 2001) [17]. In order to identify which treatments were significant, expression values normalized to the reference gene (RPL32; ΔCt) [18] were analyzed using JMP (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) with a nested ANOVA testing for treatment and colony effects. Treatment means were separated using a student t-test (p < 0.05). Biological replicates and not technical replicates were used in statistical analysis.

2.5. Protein

A total of 75 heads were collected from each worker and soldier caste, 600 μL of PBS was added to each tube, and the samples were ground using a polypropylene pestle. Following centrifugation at 18,000 g, the supernatant was removed and the protein concentration was measured using a NanoDrop.
For the myosin protein abundance experiments, all the termites from each treatment were collected and immediately frozen at −80 °C. Each sample was ground in 600 μL of PBS and was then spun at 18,000 g for 10 min. and the supernatant fraction was collected and saved. Total protein levels were estimated using a Bradford Assay normalized to bovine serum albumin (BSA) standards included in the kit (BioRad). An aliquot of 10 μg of total protein was reduced using 1× Reducing Agent (Invitrogen) and loaded into each well of sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gels (Invitrogen NuPAge 4%–12% gradient). The gel was run in an Invitrogen X-cell SureLock Mini-Cell system using NuPage 1× MOPS-SDS (Invitrogen) as running buffer. Each gel was run with in-gel BSA standards at concentrations ranging from 0.125 to 0.50 [4]. The standards were included to allow in-gel comparisons using densitometry analysis of target proteins. Gels were stained using SimplyBlue SafeStain according to manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen). After staining, gels were scanned and protein bands of interest were compared to the in-gel standards for abundance (TotalLab Quant).

2.6. Proteomics and Immunochemistry

The protein sequence was analyzed by LC/MS/MS (Agilent 1260 LC system, an Agilent Chip-cube interface and an Agilent 6520 Q-TOF tandem mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) as previously described [18]. The raw MS/MS data files were extracted, sequenced, and searched against the TrEMBL database. Data was obtained from the TrEMBl Database Release 2010_11.
For immunochemistry, following SDS-PAGE, protein was transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane and blocked in blocking buffer containing 5% BSA. Following incubation with primary antibody rat anti-myosin monoclonal antibody, MAC#147 (Abcam ab51098) using a 1:5,000 dilution, membranes were washed extensively, and incubated with a 1:20,000 dilution of secondary antibody (goat polyclonal anti-rat antibody-alkaline phosphatase conjugate (Abcam ab6846)). Membranes were washed and a signal was developed using the Western Blue stabilized alkaline phosphatase substrate (Promega). The MAC#147 antibody was generated against flight muscle myosin purified from Lethocerus indicus (water bug) and has been shown to cross react with Drosophila heavy chain myosin II.

3. Results and Discussion

Myosin proteins are actin-based motor proteins that convert chemical energy from ATP into mechanical force [19]. In termites, myosin is expected to be needed for the large structural muscles needed for the movement of the mandibles for digestion and defense in workers and soldiers, respectively, as well as during the large body plan reorganization during caste differentiation.
In this research further characterization of a myosin transcript, its homology to other arthropods, myosin protein variation between caste and body location, and potential splice variation were examined. When comparing the gene homology between segments of C. formosanus (partial sequence of 1,420 bp retrieved using degenerate primers) and red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum), myosin heavy chain mRNA (XM_001813544) showed a 78% identity between the two species (Figure 1A). Additional comparison between other arthropoda species also indicated there was a high degree of relatedness (not shown).
Protein sequence analyzed by LC/MS/MS provided 23% (452/1960 AA’s) identical residues compared to the Tribolium myosin gene (Figure 1B). Also, the termite protein sequence had 24% (485/1962 AA’s) identities to the Drosophila melanogaster myosin heavy chain (Acc# 157892) (results not shown). The high percentage of protein sequence coverage is likely due to the length and amount of myosin in termites.
The predicted C. formosanus protein sequence contained within the available sequence was aligned and compared to multiple other insect species. This region of the myosin heavy chain contains the putative conserved myosin tail domain. As with the gene sequence alignments, protein alignments show a high amount of conservation between the termite myosin sequence and the sequence of other insects (Apis, Tribolium, and Drosophila) (Figure 2). The gene and protein sequence homology comparison suggests that myosin is highly conserved between these different arthropod species.
Figure 1. Myosin cDNA and protein sequence (A) Sequence of the Formosan termite (Coptotermes formosanus) and red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum) myosin heavy chain mRNA show 78% identity within the recovered segment. Partial C. formosanus myosin heavy chain cDNA sequence (1,420 bp, top strand) was aligned with residues 4396–5815 of the predicted T. castaneum myosin heavy chain I transcript variant 3 mRNA (bottom strand, full-length 1-6248, XM_001813544) using the Wilbur-Lipman DNA alignment program with a 20 residue window and a gap penalty of three. Conserved residues are shown in blue and mis-match residues are shown in red. (B) The termite peptides matching T. castaneum myosin heavy chain peptides with high confidence are shown in red, cysteine residues in bold, and potential glycosylation sites (NXX) are shown in green.
Figure 1. Myosin cDNA and protein sequence (A) Sequence of the Formosan termite (Coptotermes formosanus) and red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum) myosin heavy chain mRNA show 78% identity within the recovered segment. Partial C. formosanus myosin heavy chain cDNA sequence (1,420 bp, top strand) was aligned with residues 4396–5815 of the predicted T. castaneum myosin heavy chain I transcript variant 3 mRNA (bottom strand, full-length 1-6248, XM_001813544) using the Wilbur-Lipman DNA alignment program with a 20 residue window and a gap penalty of three. Conserved residues are shown in blue and mis-match residues are shown in red. (B) The termite peptides matching T. castaneum myosin heavy chain peptides with high confidence are shown in red, cysteine residues in bold, and potential glycosylation sites (NXX) are shown in green.
Insects 03 01190 g001
Figure 2. The predicted translation of available C. formosanus myosin heavy chain cDNA (arbitrarily designated residues 1-491) was aligned against myosin heavy chain protein sequences from Apis mellifera isoform 1 (XP_393334, residues 1688-2248), Tribolium castaneum (XP_001814139, residues 1793-2287), and Drosophila melanogaster (NP_724007, residues 1465-1962) using the Clustal W program [20]. Shading with purple background correlates with conservation (purple, identical; light purple; semi-conserved).
Figure 2. The predicted translation of available C. formosanus myosin heavy chain cDNA (arbitrarily designated residues 1-491) was aligned against myosin heavy chain protein sequences from Apis mellifera isoform 1 (XP_393334, residues 1688-2248), Tribolium castaneum (XP_001814139, residues 1793-2287), and Drosophila melanogaster (NP_724007, residues 1465-1962) using the Clustal W program [20]. Shading with purple background correlates with conservation (purple, identical; light purple; semi-conserved).
Insects 03 01190 g002
When comparing body region gene expression, transcript levels of the myosin gene were higher in both worker and soldier heads compared to other body regions (ANOVA whole model d.f. 8,23 F ratio 137.58 p < 0.0001; body region d.f. 5 F ratio 219.37 p < 0.0001; rep d.f. 3 F ratio 1.27 p = 0.32). We also observed higher transcript abundance in the soldier carcass compared to the soldier gut and worker gut and carcass (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Myosin transcript abundance in relation to caste and body region. Expression values for target genes were normalized to the expression values from the reference gene (RPL32) and then to the target genes for worker guts. A two-way ANOVA was used to separate significant expression differences with a Tukeys HSD test for separating means by treatment for each caste and body region (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Myosin transcript abundance in relation to caste and body region. Expression values for target genes were normalized to the expression values from the reference gene (RPL32) and then to the target genes for worker guts. A two-way ANOVA was used to separate significant expression differences with a Tukeys HSD test for separating means by treatment for each caste and body region (p < 0.05).
Insects 03 01190 g003
Myosin protein levels were compared in worker and soldier head samples. Myosin protein was analyzed with an anti-flight muscle myosin purified from Lethocerus indicus (water bug) that has been shown to cross-react with Drosophila heavy chain myosin II. Immunoblotting indicated a change in the banding pattern of myosin recognized by this antibody in the soldier vs. worker caste (Figure 4). It seems likely that the change in banding pattern could be due to a prolonged up-regulation of the transcript combined with the altered translation into protein suggesting that the modulated myosin requirement in soldiers extends beyond the initial body plan rearrangement and mandibular development in the caste. These data further strengthen previous research [18] that describes differential temporal myosin protein levels and the possible implications during caste differentiation. These current results correlate with previous experiments that show increased myosin transcript abundance as workers begin to change to soldiers in R. flavipes [6,14].
Our immunoblot results indicated that the anti-myosin antibody from Lethocerus indicus might be used in termites as a new tool for characterizing caste differentiation. The distinct banding pattern between workers and soldiers with this antibody suggests that alternative splice variants are expressed during the differentiation process. While not within the scope of this project, sequencing and expression analysis of a library of temporally and spatially distinct myosin isoforms could elucidate the role of the gene during the life cycle of termites. Another explanation for the identification of different bands with our immunoblot could be that the antibody recognizes multiple termite myosin gene products.
Figure 4. Total protein was extracted from the worker and soldier head tissue samples and subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), one gel was stained with SimplyBlue (Invitrogen), left, and the other was transferred to a membrane and immunoblotted for myosin heavy chain, right. Lanes from left to right are as follows: molecular weight ladder (LD; 250, 148 and 98 kDa), worker (W), and soldier (S).
Figure 4. Total protein was extracted from the worker and soldier head tissue samples and subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), one gel was stained with SimplyBlue (Invitrogen), left, and the other was transferred to a membrane and immunoblotted for myosin heavy chain, right. Lanes from left to right are as follows: molecular weight ladder (LD; 250, 148 and 98 kDa), worker (W), and soldier (S).
Insects 03 01190 g004

4. Conclusions

Overall, there is goof conservation for the myosin gene/protein between C. formosanus and other arthropods is highly conserved, suggesting shared functions. Comparison of body regions indicates that the majority of the myosin transcript is located in the termite head. Higher abundance of myosin in the head is expected because of the large mandibles that are used for feeding in workers and defense in soldiers. The higher expression of myosin in soldiers is likely due to the increased need for a larger mandible size. The variation in the migration pattern suggests worker and soldier specific myosin isoforms. The results presented here support previous research [18] indicating that the differentiation of workers to soldiers requires a modulation in myosin gene expression and protein production to allow proper body plan reorganization in anticipation of and during the change between castes.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Drs. Kate Aronstein and Amit Sethi for their helpful suggestions. Mention of trade names, commercial products, or companies in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

References and Notes

  1. Su, N.Y. Novel technologies for subterranean termite control. Sociobiology 2002, 40, 95–101. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pimentel, D.; Zuniga, R.; Morison, D. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 52, 273–288. [Google Scholar]
  3. Koshikawa, S.; Cornette, R.; Hojo, M.; Maekawa, K.; Matsumoto, T.; Miura, T. Screening of genes expressed in developing mandibles during soldier differentiation in the termite Hodotermopsis sjostedti. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 1365–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Scharf, M.E.; Buckspan, C.E.; Grzymala, T.F.; Zhou, X. Regulation of polyphenic differentiation in the termite Reticulitermes flavipes by interaction of intrinsic and extrinsic factors. J. Exp. Biol. 2007, 24, 4390–4398. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhou, X.; Tarver, M.R.; Scharf, M.E. Hexamerin-based regulation of juvenile hormone-dependent gene expression underlies phenotypic plasticity in a social insect. Development 2007, 134, 601–610. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tarver, M.R.; Zhou, X.; Scharf, M.E. Socio-environmental and endocrine influences on developmental and caste-regulatory gene expression in the eusocial termite Reticulitermes flavipes. BMC Mol. Biol. 2010, 11, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ishikawa, Y.; Okada, Y.; Ishikawa, A.; Miyakawa, H.; Koshikawa, S.; Miura, T. Gene expression changes during caste-specific neuronal development in the damp-wood termite Hodotermopsis sjostedti. BMC Genomics 2010, 11, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Miura, T.; Scharf, M.E. Molecular basis underlying caste differentiation in termites. In Biology of Termites: A Modern Synthesis; Bignell, D.E., Roisin, Y., Lo, N., Eds.; Springer: Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2011; pp. 211–253. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bullard, B.; Pastore, A. Regulating the contraction of insect flight muscle. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motil. 2011, 32, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fernandes, J.J.; Keshishian, H. Patterning the dorsal longitudinal flight muscles (dlm) of Drosophila: Insights from the ablation of larval scaffolds. Development 1996, 122, 3755–3763. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang, C.; Kaplan, C.N.; Thatcher, M.L.; Swank, D.M. The influence of myosin converter and relay domains on cross-bridge kinetics of drosophila indirect flight muscle. Biophys. J. 2010, 99, 1546–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. George, E.L.; Ober, M.B.; Emerson, C.P., Jr. Functional domains of the Drosophila melanogaster muscle myosin heavy-chain gene are encoded by alternatively spliced exons. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1989, 9, 2957–2974. [Google Scholar]
  13. Odronitz, F.; Kollomar, M. Comparative genomic analysis of the arthropod muscle myosin heavy chain genes allows ancestral gene reconstruction and reveals a new type of “partially” processed pseudogene. BMC Mol. Biol. 2008, 9, 21. [Google Scholar]
  14. Scharf, M.E.; Wu-Scharf, D.; Pittendrigh, B.R.; Bennett, G.W. Caste- and development-associated gene expression in a lower termite. Genome Biol. 2003, 4, R62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Szalanski, A.L.; Austin, J.W.; Owens, C.B. Identification of Reticulitermes spp. (isoptera: Reticulitermatidae) from south central united states by pcr-rflp. J. Econ. Entomol. 2003, 96, 1514–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tarver, M.R.; Mattison, C.P.; Florane, C.B.; Hinchliffe, D.; Zhang, D.; Lax, A.R. Screening of multiple potential control genes for use in caste and body region comparisons using RT-qPCR in Coptotermes formosanus. Sociobiology 2012, 59, 81–96. [Google Scholar]
  17. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative pcr and the 2-delta delta ct method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tarver, M.R.; Florane, C.B.; Zhang, D.; Grimm, C.; Lax, A.R. Juvenoid and temperature effects on caste differentiation and protein composition in the Formosan termite, Coptotermes formosanus. J. Insect Sci. 2012, 12, 18. [Google Scholar]
  19. Harrington, W.F.; Rodgers, M.E. Myosin. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1984, 53, 35–73. [Google Scholar]
  20. Clustal, W. ClustalW2 - Multiple Sequence Alignment. Available online: www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/ (accessed on 5 November 2012).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tarver, M.R.; Florane, C.B.; Mattison, C.P.; Holloway, B.A.; Lax, A. Myosin Gene Expression and Protein Abundance in Different Castes of the Formosan Subterranean Termite (Coptotermes formosanus). Insects 2012, 3, 1190-1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects3041190

AMA Style

Tarver MR, Florane CB, Mattison CP, Holloway BA, Lax A. Myosin Gene Expression and Protein Abundance in Different Castes of the Formosan Subterranean Termite (Coptotermes formosanus). Insects. 2012; 3(4):1190-1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects3041190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tarver, Matthew R., Christopher B. Florane, Christopher P. Mattison, Beth A. Holloway, and Alan Lax. 2012. "Myosin Gene Expression and Protein Abundance in Different Castes of the Formosan Subterranean Termite (Coptotermes formosanus)" Insects 3, no. 4: 1190-1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects3041190

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop