Insects 2012, 3(3), 692-708; doi:10.3390/insects3030692
Article

Incidence of Non-Immunological Defenses of Soil White Grubs on Parasitism Success of Mallophora ruficauda Larva (Diptera: Asilidae)

Group of Investigation in Ecophysiology of Parasitoids (GIEP), CONICET-IEGEBA, Department of Ecology, Genetics and Evolution, Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, University of Buenos Aires, University City, Building II, 4th floor, lab. 99, Buenos Aires C1428EHA, Argentina
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 24 May 2012; in revised form: 7 July 2012 / Accepted: 10 July 2012 / Published: 26 July 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insect Immunity)
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [191 KB, uploaded 26 July 2012 14:57 CEST]
Abstract: White grubs are larvae of Coleoptera of the family Scarabaeidae. They are known because of their intensive feeding habits on crop roots. Mallophora ruficauda (Diptera: Asilidae) is a dipteran parasitoid whose larva is a natural enemy for white grubs. This species is a solitary ectoparasitoid, where both female and larva realize different steps in the host location process. Female place its eggs in high grasslands and then, the larva finds and parasitizes the host in the ground. There are nine potential hosts in the area of action of this parasitoid; however a high preference for Cyclocephala signaticollis has been observed (87% of field parasitism). It is known that many insects have developed defensive and immunological mechanisms when attacked by a parasitoid, which can be behavioral, physiological, chemical or genetic. The objectives of this work were to investigate what kind of defense and non-immunological associated mechanisms the white grubs have against this parasitoid and to understand why M. ruficauda have such a high preference for masked chafer grubs or Cyclocephala species. In particular, for each white grub species, we asked: (1) If there is a differential behavioral reaction when a parasitoid attack is simulated; (2) If body attributes of white grubs species have influence on defense behavior, and particularly for the masked chafer C. signaticollis; and (3) Why this species is the most selected by M. ruficauda. It was found that behavioral defenses of white grubs would explain the parasitism pattern of M. ruficauda larvae and its preference for C. signaticollis.
Keywords: Scarabaeidae; host vulnerability; parasitoids

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Castelo, M.K.; Crespo, J.E. Incidence of Non-Immunological Defenses of Soil White Grubs on Parasitism Success of Mallophora ruficauda Larva (Diptera: Asilidae). Insects 2012, 3, 692-708.

AMA Style

Castelo MK, Crespo JE. Incidence of Non-Immunological Defenses of Soil White Grubs on Parasitism Success of Mallophora ruficauda Larva (Diptera: Asilidae). Insects. 2012; 3(3):692-708.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Castelo, Marcela K.; Crespo, José E. 2012. "Incidence of Non-Immunological Defenses of Soil White Grubs on Parasitism Success of Mallophora ruficauda Larva (Diptera: Asilidae)." Insects 3, no. 3: 692-708.

Insects EISSN 2075-4450 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert