Next Article in Journal
Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Alpine Precipitation and Their Vertical Differentiation: A Case Study from the Upper Shule River
Next Article in Special Issue
LCA Methodology for the Quantification of the Carbon Footprint of the Integrated Urban Water System
Previous Article in Journal
Large Differences between Glaciers 3D Surface Extents and 2D Planar Areas in Central Tianshan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Where to Find Water Pipes and Sewers?—On the Correlation of Infrastructure Networks in the Urban Environment
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Water 2017, 9(4), 285; doi:10.3390/w9040285

Urban Water Cycle Simulation/Management Models: A Review

1
Environmental Engineering Program, Universidad Santo Tomas, 110231426 Bogotá, Colombia
2
Institute of Water and Environmental Sciences, Universidad de Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig Route, s/n, 03690 Alicante, Spain
3
Civil Engineering Program, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 110231594 Bogotá, Colombia
4
Matanza Riachuelo Catchment Authority (ACUMAR), Esmeralda 255 PB, C1033AAJ Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 19 January 2017 / Revised: 8 April 2017 / Accepted: 16 April 2017 / Published: 19 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synergies in Urban Water Infrastructure Modeling)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1204 KB, uploaded 26 April 2017]   |  

Abstract

Urban water management is increasingly important given the need to maintain water resources that comply with global and local standards of quantity and quality. The effective management of water resources requires the optimization of financial resources without forsaking social requirements. A number of mathematical models have been developed for this task; such models account for all components of the Urban Water Cycle (UWC) and their interactions. The wide range of models entails the need to understand their differences in an effort to identify their applicability, so academic, state, and private sectors can employ them for environmental, economic, and social ends. This article presents a description of the UWC and relevant components, a literature review of different models developed between 1990 and 2015, and an analysis of several case studies (applications). It was found that most applications are focused on new supply sources, mainly rainwater. In brief, this article provides an overview of each model’s use (primarily within academia) and potential use as a decision-making tool. View Full-Text
Keywords: urban water cycle; integrated management of urban water; computational models urban water cycle; integrated management of urban water; computational models
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Peña-Guzmán, C.A.; Melgarejo, J.; Prats, D.; Torres, A.; Martínez, S. Urban Water Cycle Simulation/Management Models: A Review. Water 2017, 9, 285.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top