Next Article in Journal
Numerical Simulation of Soil Evaporation with Sand Mulching and Inclusion
Next Article in Special Issue
Improvement to the Huff Curve for Design Storms and Urban Flooding Simulations in Guangzhou, China
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Social Vulnerability to Flood in Urban Côte d’Ivoire Using the MOVE Framework
Previous Article in Special Issue
Large Differences between Glaciers 3D Surface Extents and 2D Planar Areas in Central Tianshan
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2017, 9(4), 276; doi:10.3390/w9040276

Comparison of IMERG Level-3 and TMPA 3B42V7 in Estimating Typhoon-Related Heavy Rain

1,2
,
1,2,* and 2,*
1
Department of Water Resources and Environment, School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
2
Guangdong Key Laboratory for Urbanization and Geo-simulation, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Ataur Rahman
Received: 17 January 2017 / Revised: 19 March 2017 / Accepted: 10 April 2017 / Published: 22 April 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [12919 KB, uploaded 26 April 2017]   |  

Abstract

Typhoon-related heavy rain has unique structures in both time and space, and use of satellite-retrieved products to delineate the structure of heavy rain is especially meaningful for early warning systems and disaster management. This study compares two newly-released satellite products from the Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG final run) and the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA 3B42V7) with daily rainfall observed by ground rain gauges. The comparison is implemented for eight typhoons over the coastal region of China for a two-year period from 2014 to 2015. The results show that all correlation coefficients (CCs) of both IMERG and TMPA for the investigated typhoon events are significant at the 0.01 level, but they tend to underestimate the heavy rainfall, especially around the storm center. The IMERG final run exhibits an overall better performance than TMPA 3B42V7. It is also shown that both products have a better applicability (i.e., a smaller absolute relative bias) when rain intensities are within 20–40 and 80–100 mm/day than those of 40–80 mm/day and larger than 100 mm/day. In space, they generally have the best applicability within the range of 50–100 km away from typhoon tracks, and have the worst applicability beyond the 300-km range. The results are beneficial to understand the errors of satellite data in operational applications, such as storm monitoring and hydrological modeling. View Full-Text
Keywords: IMERG final run; TMPA 3B42V7; typhoon; heavy rain; coastal region of China IMERG final run; TMPA 3B42V7; typhoon; heavy rain; coastal region of China
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, R.; Chen, J.; Wang, X. Comparison of IMERG Level-3 and TMPA 3B42V7 in Estimating Typhoon-Related Heavy Rain. Water 2017, 9, 276.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top