Next Article in Journal
Where There Is No History: How to Create Trust and Connection in Learning for Transformation in Water Governance
Previous Article in Journal
SPH Simulations of Solute Transport in Flows with Steep Velocity and Concentration Gradients
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2017, 9(2), 129;

Structuring Climate Adaptation through Multiple Perspectives: Framework and Case Study on Flood Risk Management

UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, 2611 AX Delft, The Netherlands
Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Athanasios Loukas
Received: 24 September 2016 / Revised: 2 February 2017 / Accepted: 4 February 2017 / Published: 19 February 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [741 KB, uploaded 22 February 2017]   |  


Adaptation to climate change is being addressed in many domains. This means that there are multiple perspectives on adaptation; often with differing visions resulting in disconnected responses and outcomes. Combining singular perspectives into coherent, combined perspectives that include multiple needs and visions can help to deepen the understanding of various aspects of adaptation and provide more effective responses. Such combinations of perspectives can help to increase the range and variety of adaptation measures available for implementation or avoid maladaptation compared with adaptations derived from a singular perspective. The objective of this paper is to present and demonstrate a framework for structuring the local adaptation responses using the inputs from multiple perspectives. The adaptation response framing has been done by: (i) contextualizing climate change adaptation needs; (ii) analyzing drivers of change; (iii) characterizing measures of adaptation; and (iv) establishing links between the measures with a particular emphasis on taking account of multiple perspectives. This framework was demonstrated with reference to the management of flood risks in a case study Can Tho, Vietnam. The results from the case study show that framing of adaptation responses from multiple perspectives can enhance the understanding of adaptation measures, thereby helping to bring about more flexible implementation practices. View Full-Text
Keywords: climate adaptation; flexibility; flood risk management; urban adaptation climate adaptation; flexibility; flood risk management; urban adaptation

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Radhakrishnan, M.; Pathirana, A.; Ashley, R.; Zevenbergen, C. Structuring Climate Adaptation through Multiple Perspectives: Framework and Case Study on Flood Risk Management. Water 2017, 9, 129.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top