Next Article in Journal
Characteristics of Droughts in South Africa: A Case Study of Free State and North West Provinces
Next Article in Special Issue
Water Governance, Stakeholder Engagement, and Sustainable Water Resources Management
Previous Article in Journal
Domestic Wastewater Depuration Using a Horizontal Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetland and Theoretical Surface Optimization: A Case Study under Dry Mediterranean Climate
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modes and Approaches of Groundwater Governance: A Survey of Lessons Learned from Selected Cases across the Globe
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2016, 8(10), 437; doi:10.3390/w8100437

Re-Linking Governance of Energy with Livelihoods and Irrigation in Uttarakhand, India

1
School of Geography and Development, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
2
Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
3
People’s Science Institute, Dehra Dun, Uttarakhand 248006, India
4
The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), New Delhi, Delhi 110003, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 1 May 2016 / Accepted: 21 September 2016 / Published: 8 October 2016
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [5518 KB, uploaded 8 October 2016]   |  

Abstract

Hydropower is often termed “green energy” and proffered as an alternative to polluting coal-generated electricity for burgeoning cities and energy-insecure rural areas. India is the third largest coal producer in the world; it is projected to be the largest coal consumer by 2050. In the Himalayan state of Uttarakhand, India, over 450 hydroelectric power schemes are proposed or are under development. Hydropower projects ranging from micro hydro (run-of-the-river systems with generating capacity up to 100 kW) to large reservoirs (storage systems up to 2000 MW) such as the Tehri Dam are in various stages of planning, construction or implementation. Run-of-the-river hydropower projects are being developed in Uttarakhand in order to avoid some of the costs to local communities created by large dams. Stakeholders in this rapid hydropower expansion include multiple actors with often diverging sets of interests. The resulting governance challenges are centered on tradeoffs between local electricity and revenue from the sale of hydropower, on the one hand, and the impacts on small-scale irrigation systems, riparian-corridor ecosystem services, and other natural resource-based livelihoods, on the other. We focus on the Bhilangana river basin, where water dependent livelihoods differentiated by gender include farming, fishing, livestock rearing and fodder collection. We examine the contradictions inherent in hydropower governance based on the interests of local residents and other stakeholders including hydropower developers, urban and other regional electricity users, and state-level policymakers. We use a social justice approach applied to hydropower projects to examine some of the negative impacts, especially by location and gender, of these projects on local communities and then identify strategies that can safeguard or enhance livelihoods of women, youth, and men in areas with hydropower projects, while also maintaining critical ecosystem services. By assessing the Bhilangana basin case, we also offer hydropower–livelihoods–irrigation nexus lessons for headwater regions across the Himalayas and globally. View Full-Text
Keywords: hydropower; governance; livelihoods; gender; irrigation; ecosystem services hydropower; governance; livelihoods; gender; irrigation; ecosystem services
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Buechler, S.; Sen, D.; Khandekar, N.; Scott, C.A. Re-Linking Governance of Energy with Livelihoods and Irrigation in Uttarakhand, India. Water 2016, 8, 437.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top