Next Article in Journal
Divergent Roles of Autophagy in Virus Infection
Next Article in Special Issue
A Preliminary Evaluation of Lyophilized Gelatin Sponges, Enhanced with Platelet-Rich Plasma, Hydroxyapatite and Chitin Whiskers for Bone Regeneration
Previous Article in Journal
Functional Assessment of Pharmacological Telomerase Activators in Human T Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Redirection of Human Cancer Cells upon the Interaction with the Regenerating Mouse Mammary Gland Microenvironment

Cells 2013, 2(1), 67-82; doi:10.3390/cells2010067

Review
Cardiomyocyte Regeneration
Nanako Kawaguchi * and Toshio Nakanishi
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan; E-Mail: nakanishi@imcir.twmu.ac.jp
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: nanako.res@gmail.com.
Received: 3 September 2012; in revised form: 25 December 2012 / Accepted: 5 January 2013 /
Published: 15 January 2013

Abstract

: The heart was initially believed to be a terminally differentiated organ; once the cardiomyocytes died, no recovery could be made to replace the dead cells. However, around a decade ago, the concept of cardiac stem cells (CSCs) in adult hearts was proposed. CSCs differentiate into cardiomyocytes, keeping the heart functioning. Studies have proved the existence of stem cells in the heart. These somatic stem cells have been studied for use in cardiac regeneration. Moreover, recently, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) were invented, and methodologies have now been developed to induce stable cardiomyocyte differentiation and purification of mature cardiomyocytes. A reprogramming method has also been applied to direct reprogramming using cardiac fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes. Here, we address cardiomyocyte differentiation of CSCs and iPSCs. Furthermore, we describe the potential of CSCs in regenerative biology and regenerative medicine.
Keywords:
heart; cardiomyocyte; stem cell; TGF-β; differentiation; regenerative medicine; c-Kit; myocardial; infarct; cardiac stem cell

1. Introduction

Heart failure, which is one of the major causes of death worldwide [1,2], occurs mainly due to the dysfunction of cardiomyocytes. Cardiomyocytes are terminally differentiated cells. If there are no new cells to replace the damaged cells, transplantation is the only treatment to cure heart failure. Therefore, numerous studies have been conducted that focus on stem cells that can differentiate into cardiomyocytes. Around a decade ago, cardiomyocyte division was observed after myocardial infarction [3,4]. Several papers demonstrated that cardiac stem cells (CSCs) exist in the adult heart, and efforts were made to isolate these CSCs [5,6,7,8]. The major cell surface markers used for isolation were c-Kit and multi-drug resistance protein (MDR)-1 in various vertebrates [5,9,10,11], as well as stem cell antigen (Sca)-1 [6]. Side population (SP, positive to abcge-1) was also used as a marker [12,13,14]. Moreover, the morphology of the cardiosphere has been used for isolation [7,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Cardiosphere-derived CSCs and c-Kit-positive CSCs were recently used in clinical trials ([26] and [27], respectively). Transplantation of these stem cells has been successful for improving myocardial infarct (MI)-induced damage in animal models. Transplantation of bone marrow (BM) stem cells (BMCs) has also been used for a long time. The major effect of BMCs is not due to stem-cell differentiation into cardiomyocytes as previously expected, but rather in progressing angiogenesis.

Here, we address the possible roles of stem cells (derived from the heart and from other organs) for heart regeneration, including regeneration of the infarcted heart area. Furthermore, we address the potential of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes and direct reprogramming of somatic cells into cardiomyocytes, a strategy that has been rapidly and efficiently developed in recent years.

2. Stem Cells Used for Cardiomyocyte Regeneration

2.1. BMCs

The BM is the organ supplying hematopoietic stem cells in adult vertebrates. Stem cells from the BM circulate throughout the body. The early mesoderm can induce blood cells and cardiac cells [3,28]. The stem cells isolated as c-Kit positive cells from the BM were shown to differentiate into cardiomyocytes in an ischemic heart to regenerate a damaged heart [29]. Therefore, BMCs can contribute to the supply of stem cells for organ regeneration. BMCs have been tested for clinical use, and positive effects have been demonstrated overall as reviewed previously [30,31,32]. These positive effects are due to direct cardiomyocyte differentiation or paracrine effects on angiogenesis [33]. The differentiation into cardiomyocytes was questioned. It is rather due to the fusion of the stem cells into cardiomyocytes. [34]. The paracrine effects of angiogenesis thicken the infarcted area supplying energy and oxygen through new blood, brought from the cytokines released from the stem cells [33]. Because BM is rich in c-Kit positive cells that enter the circulation, it may be possible that BM-originating c-Kit positive cells participate in the recovery of the damaged heart.

Indeed, c-Kit positive stem cells were reported to induce angiogenesis [35], and research commenced to describe the mechanism of the recovery from infarcts using BM c-Kit positive cells [36]. The inflammatory reaction against tissue damage induces mobilization of c-Kit positive stem cells [37]. The c-Kit positive stem cells need to be activated by stem cell factor (SCF), a ligand of c-Kit [38]. If the c-Kit receptor is mutated, recovery is not observed after MI [39], suggesting that c-Kit is essential for recovery.

Recently, it was reported that the origin of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) affects the recovery of the infarct [40]. Although the molecular signatures of the MSCs from adipose tissue, umbilical cord blood (CB), and BM are similar, BM and cluster of differentiation (CD) 105+ purified CB perform better during cardiac regeneration, suggesting that the environment of stem cells can affect the regeneration.

However, the exact role of c-Kit has not yet been clarified.

2.1.1. Adult CSCs

Stem cells from the hearts of various vertebrates (mouse, rat, pig, and monkey) have been isolated. The major stem cells published around 2003 are c-Kit- and Sca-1-positive cells, cardiosphere-forming cells, and SP cells.

2.1.2. c-Kit Positive Cells

c-Kit positive stem cells appear promising for regenerative medicine because they reveal all of the stemness properties of CSCs and pluripotency. c-Kit positive stem cells have been well characterized [41,42]. However, according to the paper of Tallini et al., c-Kit positive cells work as cardiac progenitors until the neonatal phase but function to modify angiogenesis in adults [43]. Tallini et al. reported that c-Kit positive cells appeared in the cardiac region around embryonic day 14.5, peaked after 0-5 postnatal days in the atrioventricular region, and were rare in the adult rat heart. We speculate that there are different roles for high and low c-Kit positive populations, where the high-c-kit positive population might work as cardiac progenitors and the low-c-Kit population might work as MSCs [44]. We also characterized long-term cultured c-Kit positive cardiac cells to obtain “true” CSCs. The original paper described that the properties of the cells did not change during long-term culture. However, our results showed differential gene expression, for example in MSCs and cardiac lineages. Thus, although the primary isolated cells may be similar, the character of the cells can change during passages [45].

Another role of CSCs is enhancing cardiomyocyte survival [46]. Insulin growth factor (IGF)-1 enhances myocyte survival, inhibiting apoptosis [47] via Akt signaling [48]. From our previous paper, an in vitro co-culture ELISA assay suggested that IGF-1 contributed to cardiomyocyte survival because the IGF-1 antibody blocked this survival effect. However, the molecules released from the CSCs should be different from IGF-1 because IGF-1 was suggested to be induced by cardiomyocytes [49,50]. This inducer has not yet been identified [49,50].

2.2. Cardiosphere-Forming Cells

Spheres are ball-shaped aggregations of one or several types of cells and are observed with stem cells such as neural stem cells [51] and CSCs [4]. CSC spheres, called cardiospheres, have been well characterized and are used for isolation of CSCs [7,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Approximately 20% of the cells are c-Kit positive and have an effect on regenerating an ischemic heart. Andersen et al. opposed the existence of the cardiosphere cells and suggested that the differentiated and beating cardiomyocytes may be contaminated cardiomyocytes [52].

One of the c-Kit positive cardiac cells (CSC-21E) we obtained showed a strong ability to form spheres [44,53]. We were interested in the protein associated with this aggregation; therefore, we performed proteomic analysis, comparing cell extracts of substrate-attached cells and sphere-forming cells. We found that chaperone proteins were upregulated in substrate (dish)-attached cells. Interestingly, similar studies, using other kinds of stem cells such as embryonic stem cells, also suggested chaperone regulation concomitant with differentiation [53,54].

2.3. Other Stem Cells Relating to the Heart

Sca-1-positive CSCs differentiate into beating cardiac myocytes in vitro by treatment with oxytocin. Side population cells were found in the heart and were characterized. These cells can differentiate into cardiomyocytes in vitro and in vivo [6].

Wojakowski et al. [55] demonstrated that mononuclear cells in peripheral blood expressed CD34/chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) +, CD34/CD117 +, and c-met + stem cells (human); these cells could act as progenitors, expressing early cardiac myocyte-specific markers [GATA binding protein 4 (GATA4) and myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2C (MEF2C)], skeletal muscle progenitor markers [myogenic factor 5 (Myf5), myogenic differentiation (MyoD), and myogenin], and an endothelin-specific marker (VE-cadherin). In acute MI patients, CXCR4 receives a signal from SDF-1 in the BM through chemoattraction, and this signal is spread through the blood. These stem-like cells are thought to function by repairing the damage to infarcted hearts through differentiation into cardiomyocytes. Therefore, the cytokines that affect these cells, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1 [56], or the inflammatory cytokine, macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) [57], are also suggested to be important for inducing these signals.

Islet-1-positive cells are considered true cardiomyocyte progenitors and appear during embryogenesis [58,59]. However, it is unclear whether these cells exist in adults.

Uncommitted precursor cells (UPCs) were identified in neonatal and adult rat hearts that were octamer-binding transcription factor (Oct)-4 and stage-specific embryonic antigen (SSEA)-1 positive [60]. Oct-4 and SSEA-1 are stemness genes expressed in embryonic stem cells and iPSCs [61,62,63]. UPCs express cardiac genes such as myosin heavy chain (MHC) and smooth muscle alpha-actin in vitro.

Telocytes, which are similar to interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLCs), were found by electron microscopy of the mouse myocardium [64,65], mouse endocardium [66], and epicardium of autopsied human hearts [67]. The telocytes are extremely long cells that are speculated to nurse cardiomyocytes in the adult epicardium, likely providing cardiomyocyte progenitors (CMPs). Interestingly, telocytes are c-Kit and CD34 positive [65,66]. Furthermore, round and small CSCs as well as immature cardiomyocytes (assumed to be CMPs) were observed in the vein, near the aorta [67]. Telocytes may connect CSCs, CMPs, and cardiomyocytes.

2.4. Left-Atrium-Derived c-Kit Positive Cells

We isolated c-Kit positive cells from various parts of the heart, including the left atrium, right atrium, left ventricle, right ventricle, septum, and apex. Cells isolated from all parts proliferated. However, c-Kit positive cells isolated from the left atrium grew better and could be cultured for a longer period. A tiny fraction of these cells was myoD and GATA4 positive and differentiated into skeletal/cardiac myocytes when grown to confluence or when grown in myocyte differentiation medium [68]. Because these cells contain stem cells that can differentiate into many types of cells and express nestin and other neural markers (as determined by microarray), we named these cells left-atrium-derived pluripotent-like cells (LA-PCs). These cells could be differentiated into both cardiac and skeletal muscle cells in a methylcellulose-based MethoCult culture medium (Stem Cell Technologies) supplemented with interleukin (IL)-3, IL-6, and SCF. IL-3 and SCF, or a combination of these two factors, have been reported to contribute to myogenesis.

2.5. Similarity of LA-PCs to Other Stem Cells

Carcinogenic P19 cells show similar differentiation abilities and differentiate into cardiac/skeletal myocytes and adipocytes [69]. Mesoangioblasts, which can differentiate into skeletal myocytes, vascular cells, and other mesodermal cells, also exhibit similar characteristics. Interestingly, these mesoangioblasts are derived from the dorsal aorta or dorsal vessel and express c-Kit, CD34, and tyrosine kinase receptor for VEGF (Flk-1) (VEGF-1). LA-PCs and other CSC cultured as bulk (CSC-BCs) also express these genes, as determined by microarray analysis (unpublished results). Moreover, cardiac mesoangioblasts have been isolated from human cardiac myocyte biopsies [70]. These cardiac mesoangioblasts differentiate into three different cardiac lineages.

3. Signal Transduction of the Differentiation Switch Using LA-PCs

3.1. Microarray Analysis for Identification

LA-PCs comprise a mixed population, consisting of undifferentiated (UND) cells and progenitors for Adi and Myo (Figure 1). We performed microarray analyses of these three cell groups (UND, Adi, and Myo) to identify the signal transduction pathway or the signal molecule responsible for the differentiation switch between Adi and Myo. We observed that the striated muscle contraction signal was upregulated in Myo, while adipogenesis and fatty acid metabolism were upregulated in Adi [71]. Therefore, we confirmed that differentiation was observed. We also demonstrated the significance of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β pathway in signal transduction. Furthermore, we revealed that TGF-β1 simultaneously induced myogenesis and inhibited adipogenesis in a dose-dependent manner. These findings were supported by additional data. For example, TGF-R1 expression, measured by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), was inhibited in Adi, consistent with the positive effect of TGF-β1 on myogenesis and the negative effect of TGF-β1 on adipogenesis. Furthermore, using RT-PCR, we demonstrated that Fst expression was upregulated in Myo but downregulated in Adi (in accordance with the microarray data). Interestingly, in previous studies, TGF-β was up-regulated 3-6 days after MI. This up-regulation in vivo may be associated with the myogenesis switch we observed [31]. TGF-β is expressed during early cardiac development [72]. TGF-β that enhances cardiac myogenesis of adult primitive skeletal muscle-derived cells [73] may also support the fact that the TGF-β family can work as a differentiation switch in mesodermal cell differentiation.

Our data also revealed that the expression of frizzled (fzd) is downregulated in Adi, suggesting the involvement of a Wnt signal. Crosstalk between Wnt and TGF-β is possible [72,74]. Thus, a detailed investigation of the molecules involved in these differentiation pathways is required.

In contrast, Rho GTPase signaling has been reported to be involved in the switch between adipogenesis and myogenesis [75]. Rho GTPase was downregulated in both Myo and Adi in our microarray results [44]. However, a 2-fold decrease in Myo and an 8-fold decrease in Adi were observed by both 3D-Gene analysis (Toray, Tokyo, Japan) and Agilent chip analysis (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The magnitude of the expression can contribute to the switch.

Cells 02 00067 g001 1024
Figure 1. Left-atrium-derived pluripotent-like cells (LA-PCs) contain stem cells and progenitors of skeletal/cardiac myocytes (Myo) or adipocytes (Adi). Differentiated Myo was troponin I positive, and differentiated Adi was positively stained by oil red. The figure is reproduced from reference [71] with permission.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. Left-atrium-derived pluripotent-like cells (LA-PCs) contain stem cells and progenitors of skeletal/cardiac myocytes (Myo) or adipocytes (Adi). Differentiated Myo was troponin I positive, and differentiated Adi was positively stained by oil red. The figure is reproduced from reference [71] with permission.
Cells 02 00067 g001 1024

3.2. Noggin and Cardiac Myocytes

We previously used a MethoCult culture to obtain small portions of beating cardiac myocytes in vitro. However, we failed to acquire sufficient quantities of cardiac myocytes. Therefore, we selected other TGF-β superfamily members for regulation in our microarray experiments. We observed that noggin was downregulated and confirmed this observation by RT-PCR. Interestingly, when we added noggin to the MethoCult culture, we observed a significant effect on the induction of cardiac myocytes but not on the induction of skeletal myocytes. Noggin was previously reported to act as an activator of cardiac myogenesis [76]. Bone morphogenic protein (BMP)-2 and BMP-4, play key roles in mesoderm morphogenesis. Thus, noggin, BMP, and TGF-β are important for regulating mesoderm-originated cells. Moreover, the balance and timing of the treatment can greatly alter the cell phenotype.

Although our data are preliminary and collected using cells different from typical CSCs, our data are the first to identify the signal transduction involved in cardiomyocyte differentiation using CSCs.

4. iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes

We recently published a review article describing an in vitro heart disease model [77]. The differentiation of iPSCs to cardiomyocytes essentially follows the protocol of embryonic stem cell differentiation using embryonic bodies (EBs). Yang et al. showed that KDR(VEGFR-2)low/c-Kit negative EBs differentiate into cardiomyocyte lineages and become NK-2 transcription factor related locus 5 (NKX2.5), ISL1, T-box transcription factor (TBX5) positive but not KDRlow/c-Kit positive or KDR negative/c-Kit positive [78]. The combination of activin A, BMP4, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), VEGF, and Dickkopf homolog 1 (DKK1) in a serum-free medium was necessary for cardiomyogenesis. Likewise, addition of Wnt inhibitors to BMP4 enhanced cardiomyogenesis [79]. The activin/nodal and BMP signaling pathways promote cardiac differentiation in a stage-specific manner [80]. Flk-1+ cells from EB clusters are produced in embryonic stem cell cultures without LIF, and cardiac progenitors and cardiovascular cells are differentiated from these EB clusters [81,82]. Overall, cardiomyocytes obtained from iPSCs were functionally similar to embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes [83]. iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes have similar contraction as embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes, but the contraction behavior is significantly different from cardiomyocytes derived from native tissues of individuals with comparable ages [84].

Ascorbic acid robustly enhances cardiomyogenesis through proliferating cardiomyocyte progenitors [85]. Ascorbic acid [86], ribosomal S6 kinase activity [87], MAPK activity [88], and small molecules [89,90,91] are known to accelerate cardiomyogenesis. However, a more concise profiling of molecular signatures is necessary to evaluate maturity and function. A unique method to purify cardiomyocytes using the large number of mitochondria within cardiomyocytes has been reported [92,93]. In this method, genetic engineering such as adding the tag is not required, and cellular damage is decreased. An alternative method was established using signal-regulatory protein alpha (SIRPA), which can select immature cardiomyocytes with fewer mitochondria [94].

5. Direct Reprogramming to Induce Cardiomyocyte Differentiation

Three transcription factors (TFs), GATA4, Mef2c, and Tbx5, are essential for cardiac myocyte differentiation for direct reprogramming of heart fibroblasts to cardiomyocyte formation in vitro [95]. Recently, it was shown that these TFs induce cardiomyocyte formation not only in vitro but also in vivo [96]. Furthermore, the formation of cardiomyocytes improved MI [96]. Other research groups reported that another combination of TFs (GATA4, HAND2, MEF2C, and TBX5) induces cardiomyocyte formation in vivo, also improving MI [97]. Although the cardiomyocyte gene expression profiles are different from the expression profiles of native cardiomyocytes, and although a retrovirus has to be used, this technique is another promising method for cardiac regeneration. If we can avoid retroviral infection and develop safer gene introduction methods, direct reprogramming is the most effective method to regenerate cardiomyocytes.

The cell source of the direct reprogramming is the cardiac fibroblast. There are many cell types in the heart, and there are likely numerous fibroblasts that remain to be characterized. Myo-fibroblasts are induced by TGF-β, suggesting that the fibroblast cell population includes CSC-like cells and other kind of mesodermal stem cells. Characterization of the cardiac fibroblasts may lead to effective use of these cells.

For cardiac conduction, inhibitor of differentiation (Id) 2, Tbx5, and Nkx2.5 were deemed necessary by microdissection and transcriptional profiling [98]. A combination of these TFs may induce more functional beating myocytes.

6. Regenerative Medicine Using Stem Cells

The stem cells described above have potential application for regeneration of the heart and other organs because of the differentiation ability and paracrine effects (such as IGF-1 stimulation) of stem cells. Stem cells from adipose tissue also have potential application for cardiac recovery [99,100]. The combination of stem cells and materials, e.g., stem cells attached to collagen scaffolds, can make stem cells or CMPs/cardiomyocytes attach and settle. Implantation of the scaffold in which stem cells are embedded to the damaged tissue, to develop a cardiac tissue, represents another possibility for regenerative medicine [101]. The concept of regenerative medicine is summarized in Figure 2.Not only scaffold but also other materials have been studied for use in regenerative medicine, such as cell sheet [102,103] and synthetic polymer, hydrogel [104] and elastomers [105]. The advantage of the polymer is that the shape can be made as desired, and is easier to handle compared to scaffolds and cell sheets. However, the materials for this purpose are discussed elsewhere.

Cells 02 00067 g002 1024
Figure 2. The concept of regenerative medicine. Endogenous cardiac stem cells (CSCs) are expected to differentiate into cardiac progenitors and/or cardiomyocytes, but not to other cell types such as adipocytes in the presence of cytokines, e.g., TGF-β and noggin. The CSCs can also be used as a material for transplantation with scaffold or other materials. Materials with or without CSCs that release cytokines for cardiomyocyte survival are another option.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 2. The concept of regenerative medicine. Endogenous cardiac stem cells (CSCs) are expected to differentiate into cardiac progenitors and/or cardiomyocytes, but not to other cell types such as adipocytes in the presence of cytokines, e.g., TGF-β and noggin. The CSCs can also be used as a material for transplantation with scaffold or other materials. Materials with or without CSCs that release cytokines for cardiomyocyte survival are another option.
Cells 02 00067 g002 1024

7. Conclusion

Resident stem cells and circulating stem cells are involved in cardiomyogenesis or angiogenesis in damaged regions of the heart, via direct differentiation or by inducing paracrine effects. These stem cells can be used for regenerative medicine. BMCs and CSCs (c-Kit positive cells and cardiosphere-forming cells) are now being employed in clinical trials. The signal transduction of cardiomyocyte differentiation is also important to guide the stem cells to cardiomyogenesis, generating a cardiac lineage and no other cell types. iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and directly reprogrammed cardiomyocytes are important not only to replace damaged hearts, but also as they represent an in vitro disease model for drug discovery.

References

  1. Braunwald, E.; Bristow, M. Congestive heart failure: Fifty years of progress. Circulation 2000, 102, IV14–IV23. [Google Scholar]
  2. Braunwald, E.; Pfeffer, M. Ventricular enlargement and remodeling following acute myocardial infarction: Mechanisms and management. Am. J. Cardiol. 1991, 68, D1–D6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Leri, A.; Kajstura, J.; Anversa, P.; Frishman, W.H. Myocardial regeneration and stem cell repair. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2008, 33, 91–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Beltrami, A.P.; Urbanek, K.; Kajstura, J.; Yan, S.M.; Finato, N.; Bussani, R.; Nadal-Ginard, B.; Silvestri, F.; Leri, A.; Beltrami, C.A.; et al. Evidence that human cardiac myocytes divide after myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 1750–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Beltrami, A.P.; Barlucchi, L.; Torella, D.; Baker, M.; Limana, F.; Chimenti, S.; Kasahara, H.; Rota, M.; Musso, E.; Urbanek, K.; et al. Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell 2003, 114, 763–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Matsuura, K.; Nagai, T.; Nishigaki, N.; Oyama, T.; Nishi, J.; Wada, H.; Sano, M.; Toko, H.; Akazawa, H.; Sato, T.; et al. Adult cardiac Sca-1-positive cells differentiate into beating cardiomyocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 11384–11391. [Google Scholar]
  7. Messina, E.; De Angelis, L.; Frati, G.; Morrone, S.; Chimenti, S.; Fiordaliso, F.; Salio, M.; Battaglia, M.; Latronico, M.V.; Coletta, M.; et al. Isolation and expansion of adult cardiac stem cells from human and murine heart. Circ. Res. 2004, 95, 911–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Oh, H.; Bradfute, S.B.; Gallardo, T.D.; Nakamura, T.; Gaussin, V.; Mihina, Y.; Pocius, J.; Michael, L.H.; Behringer, R.R.; Garry, D.J.; et al. Cardiac progenitor cells from adult myocardium: homing, differentiation, and fusion after infarction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 12313–12318. [Google Scholar]
  9. Linke, A.; Müller, P.; Nurzynska, D.; Casarsa, C.; Torella, D.; Nascimbene, A.; Castaldo, C.; Cascapera, S.; Böhm, M.; Quaini, F.; et al. Stem cells in the dog heart are self-renewing, clonogenic, and multipotent and regenerate infarcted myocardium, improving cardiac function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 8966–8971. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bearzi, C.; Rota, M.; Hosoda, T.; Tillmanns, J.; Nascimbene, A.; Angelis, A.D.; Yasuzawa-Amano, S.; Trofimova, I.; Siggins, R.W.; LeCaptitaine, N.; et al. Human cardiac stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 14068–14073. [Google Scholar]
  11. Urbanek, K.; Torella, D.; Sheikh, F.; Angelis, A.D.; Nurzynska, D.; Silvesti, F.; Beltrami, C.A.; Bussani, R.; Beltrami, A.P.; Quaini, F. Myocardial regeneration by activation of multipotent cardiac stem cells in ischemic heart failure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 8692–8697. [Google Scholar]
  12. Martin, C.; Meeson, A.; Robertson, S.M.; Hawke, T.J.; Richardson, J.A.; Bates, S.; Goetsch, S.C.; Gallardo, T.D.; Garry, D.J. Persistent expression of the ATP-binding cassette transporter Abcg2 identifies cardiac SP cells in the developing and adult heart. Dev. Biol. 2004, 265, 262–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pfister, O.; Oikonomopoulos, A.; Sereti, K.I.; Sohn, R.L.; Cullen, D.; Fine, G.C.; Monquet, F.; Westerman, K.; Liao, R. Role of the ATP binding cassette transporter Abcg2 in the phenotype and function of cardiac side population cells. Circ. Res. 2008, 103, 825–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Oyama, T.; Nagai, T.; Wada, H.; Naito, A.T.; Matsuura, K.; Iwanaga, K.; Takahashi, T.; Goto, M.; Mikami, Y.; Yasuda, N.; et al. Cardiac side population cells have a potential to migrate and differentiate into cardiomyocytes in vitro and In vivo. J. Cell. Biol. 2007, 176, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Smith, R.R.; Barile, L.; Cho, H.C.; Leppo, M.K.; Hare, J.M.; Messina, E.; Giacomello, A.M.; Abraham, R.; Marbán, E. Regenerative potential of cardiosphere-derived cells expanded from percutaneous endomyocardial biopsy specimens. Circulation 2007, 115, 896–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Davis, D.R.; Zhang, Y.; Smith, R.R.; Cheng, K.; Terrovitis, J.; Malliaras, K.; Li, T.-S.; White, A.; Makker, R.; Marbán, E. Validation of the cardiosphere method to culture cardiac progenitor cells from myocardial tissue. PLoS One 2009, 4, e7195. [Google Scholar]
  17. Davis, D.R.; Kizana, E.; Terrovitis, J.; Barth, A.S.; Zhang, Y.; Smith, R.R.; Miake, J.; Marbán, E. Isolation and expansion of functionally-competent cardiac progenitor cells directly from heart biopsies. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2010, 49, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Johnston, P.V.; Sasano, T.; Mills, K.; Evers, R.; Lee, S.-T.; Smith, R.R.; Lardo, A.C.; Lai, S.; Steenbergen, C.; Gertenblith, G.; et al. Engraftment, differentiation, and functional benefits of autologous cardiosphere-derived cells in porcine ischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2009, 120, 1075–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chimenti, I.; Smith, R.R.; Li, T.-S.; Gerstenblith, G.; Messina, E.; Giacomello, A.; Marbán, E. Relative roles of direct regeneration versus paracrine effects of human cardiosphere-derived cells transplanted into infracted mice. Circ. Res. 2010, 106, 971–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cheng, K.; Li, T.-S.; Malliaras, K.; Davis, D.R.; Zhang, Y.; Marbán, E. Magnetic targeting enhances engraftment and functional benefit of iron-labeled cardiosphere-derived cells in myocardial infarction. Circ. Res. 2010, 106, 1570–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Malliaras, K.; Li, T.-S.; Luthringer, D.; Terrovitis, J.; Cheng, K.; Chakravarty, T.; Galang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Schoenhoff, F.; Eyk, J.V.; et al. Safety and efficacy of allogenic cell therapy in infarcted rats transplanted with mismatched cardiosphere-derived cells. Circulation 2012, 125, 100–112. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee, S.-T.; White, A.J.; Matsushita, S.; Malliaras, K.; Steenbergen, C.; Zhang, Y.; Li, T.-S.; Terrovitis, J.; Yee, K.; Simsir, S.; et al. Intramyocardial injection of autologous cardiospheres or cardiosphere-derived cells preserves function and minimizes adverse ventricular remodeling in pigs with heart failure post-myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 57, 455–465. [Google Scholar]
  23. White, A.J.; Smith, R.R.; Matsushita, S.; Chakravarty, T.; Czer, L.S.C.; Burton, K.; Schwarz, E.R.; Davis, D.R.; Wang, Q.; Reinsmoen, N.L.; et al. Intrinsic cardiac origin of human cardiosphere-derived cells. Eur. Heart J. 2011, 172, 68–75. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lautamki, R.; Terrovitis, J.; Bonios, M.; Yu, J.; Tsui, B.M.; Abraham, M.R.; Bengel, F.M. Perfusion defect size predicts engraftment but not early retention of intra-myocardially injected cardiosphere-derived cells after acute myocardial infarction. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2011, 106, 1379–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Carr, C.A.; Stuckey, D.J.; Tan, J.J.; Tan, S.C.; Gomes, R.S.M.; Camelliti, P.; Messina, E.; Giacomello, A.; Ellison, G.M.; Clarke, K. Cardiosphere-derived cells improve function in the infarcted rat heart for at least 16 weeks-an MRI study. PLoS One 2011, 6, e25669. [Google Scholar]
  26. Makker, R.R.; Smith, R.R.; Cheng, K.; Malliaras, K.; Thomson, L.E.J.; Berman, D.; Czer, L.S.C.; Marban, L.; Mendizabal, A.; Johnston, P.V.; et al. Intracoronary cardiosphere-derived cells for heart regeneration after myocardial infarction (CADUCEUS): A prospective, randomized phase 1 trial. Lancet 2012. in press. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bolli, R.; Chugh, A.R.; D’Amario, D.; Loughran, J.H.; Stoddard, M.F.; Ikram, S.; Beache, G.M.; Wagner, S.G.; Leri, A.; Hosoda, T.; et al. Cardiac stem cells in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO): Initial results of a randomized phase 1 trial. Lancet 2011, 378, 1847–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Eisenberg, J.M.; Burns, L.; Eisenberg, C.A. Hematopoietic cells from bone marrow have the potential to differentiate into cardiomyocytes in vitro. Anat. Rec. A Discov. Mol. Cell Evol. Biol. 2003, 274, 870–882. [Google Scholar]
  29. Orlic, D.; Kajstura, J.; Chimenti, S.; Jakonik, I.; Anderson, S.M.; Li, B.; Pickel, J.; Mckay, R.; Nadal-Ginard, B.; Bodine, D.M. Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature 2001, 410, 701–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Psaltis, P.J.; Zannettino, A.C.W.; Worthley, S.G.; Gronthos, S. Concise review: Mesenchymal stromal cells: Potential for cardiovascular repair. Stem Cells 2008, 26, 2201–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abarbanell, A.M.; Coffey, A.C.; Fehrenbacher, J.W.; Beckman, D.J.; Herrmann, J.L.; Weil, B.; Meldrum, D.R. Proinflammatory cytokine effects on mesenchymal stem cell therapy for the ischemic heart. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009, 88, 1036–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pittenger, M.F.; Martin, B.J. Mesenchymal stem cells and their potential as cardiac therapeutics. Circ. Res. 2004, 95, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Uemura, R.; Xu, M.; Ahmad, N.; Ashraf, M. Bone marrow stem cells prevent left ventricular remodeling of ischemic heart through paracrine signaling. Circ. Res. 2006, 98, 1414–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Murry, C.; Soonpaa, M.; Reinecke, H.; Nakajima, H.; Nakajima, H.O.; Rubart, M.; Pasumarthi, K.B.; Virag, J.I.; Bartelmez, S.H.; Poppa, V.; et al. Hematopoietic stem cells do not differentiate into cardiac myocytes in myocardial infarcts. Nature 2004, 428, 664–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fazel, S.; Cimini, M.; Chen, L.; Li, S.; Angoulvant, D.; Fedak, P.; Verma, S.; Weisel, R.D.; Keating, A.; Li, R. Cardioprotective c-kit+ cells are from the bone marrow and regulate the myocardial balance of angiogenic cytokines. J. Clin. Invest. 2006, 116, 1865–1877. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chein, K.R. Lost and found: cardiac stem cell therapy revisited. J. Clin. Invest. 2006, 116, 1838–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sun, J.; Li, S.; Liu, S.; Wu, J.; Weisel, R.D.; Zhuo, Y.; Yau, F.M.; Li, R.; Fazel, S.S. Improvement in cardiac function after bone marrow cell therapy is associated with increase in myocardial inflammation. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2009, 296, H43–H50. [Google Scholar]
  38. Fazel, S.S.; Chen, L.; Angoulvant, D.; Li, S.; Weisel, R.D.; Keating, A.; Li, R. Activation of c-kit is necessary for mobilization of reparative bone marrow progenitor cells in response to cardiac injury. FASEB J. 2008, 22, 930–940. [Google Scholar]
  39. Cimini, M.; Fazel, S.; Zhuo, S.; Xaymardan, M.; Fujii, H.; Weisel, R.D.; Li, R. c-Kit dysfunction impairs myocardial healing after infarction. Circulation 2007, 116, I77–I82. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gaebel, R.; Furlani, D.; Sorg, H.; Polchow, B.; Frank, J.; Bieback, K.; Wang, W.; Klopsch, C.; Ong, L.; Li, W.; et al. Cell origin of human mesenchymal stem cells determines a different healing performance in cardiac regeneration. PLoS One 2011, 6, e15652. [Google Scholar]
  41. Anversa, P.; Kajstura, J.; Leri, A.; Bolli, R. Life and death of cardiac stem cells. A paradigm shift in cardiac biology. Circulation 2006, 113, 1451–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hosoda, T.; Kajstura, J.; Leri, A.; Anversa, P. Mechanism of myocardial regeneration. Circ. J. 2010, 74, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tallini, Y.; Greene, K.; Craven, M.; Spealman, A.; Breitbach, M.; Smith, J.; Fisher, P.J.; Steffey, M.; Hesse, M.; Doran, R.M.; et al. c-Kit expression identifies cardiovascular precursors in the neonatal heart. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 1808–1813. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kawaguchi, N. Stem cells for cardiac regeneration and possible roles of the transforming growth factor family. Biomol. Concept. 2012, 3, 99–106. [Google Scholar]
  45. Miyamoto, S.; Kawaguchi, N.; Ellison, G.M.; Shin’oka, T.; Matsuoka, R.; Kurosawa, H. Characterization of long-term cultured cardiac stem cells (CSCs) derived from adult rat hearts. Stem Cells Dev. 2010, 19, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Torella, D.; Rota, M.; Nurzynska, D.; Musso, E.; Monsen, A.; Shiraishi, I.; Zias, E.; Walsh, K.; Rosenzweig, A.; Sussman, M.A.; et al. Cardiac stem cell and myocyte aging, heart failure, and insulin-like growth factor-1 overexpression. Circ. Res. 2004, 94, 514–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, L.; Ma, W.; Markovich, R.; Chen, J.W.; Wang, P.H. Regulation of cardiomyocyte apoptotic signaling by insulin-like growth factor I. Circ. Res. 1998, 83, 516–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fujio, Y.; Nguyen, T.; Wencker, D.; Kitsis, R.N.; Walsh, K. Akt promotes survival of cardiomyocytes in vitro and protects against ischemia-reperfusion injury in mouse heart. Circulation 2000, 101, 660–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kawaguchi, N.; Smith, A.J.; Waring, C.D.; Hasan, M.K.; Miyamoto, S.; Matsuoka, R.; Ellison, G.M. c-Kit pos GATA-4 high rat cardiac stem cells foster adult cardiomyocyte survival through IGF-1 paracrine signalling. PLoS One 2010, 5, e14297. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kawaguchi, N. Adult cardiac-derived stem cells: Differentiation and survival regulators. In Vitamins and Hormones; Litwack, G., Ed.; Academic Press Elsevier Inc.: Oxford, UK, 2011; Volume 87, pp. 111–125. [Google Scholar]
  51. Suslov, O.; Kukekov, V.; Ignatova, T.; Steindler, D. Neural stem cell heterogeneity demonstrated by molecular phenotyping of clonal neurospheres. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 14506–11451. [Google Scholar]
  52. Andersen, D.C.; Andersen, P.; Schneider, M.; Jensen, H.B.; Sheikh, S.P. Murine “cardiospheres” are not a source of stem cells with cardiomyogenic potential. Stem Cells 2009, 27, 1571–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Machida, M.; Takagaki, Y.; Matsuoka, R.; Kawaguchi, N. Proteomic comparison spherical aggregates and adherent cells of cardiac stem cells. Int. J. Cardiol. 2011, 153, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fathi, A.; Pakzad, M.; Taei, A.; Brink, T.C.; Pirhaji, L.; Ruiz, G.; Bordbar, M.S.T.; Gourabi, H.; Adjaye, J.; Baharvand, H.; et al. Comparative proteome and transcriptome analyses of embryonic stem cells during embryoid body-based differentiation. Proteomics 2009, 9, 4859–4870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wojakowski, W.; Tendera, M.; Michalowska, A.; Majka, M.; Kucia, M.; Malanskiewicz, K.; Wyderka, R.; Ochala, A.; Ratajczak, M.Z. Mobilization of CD34/CXCR4 +, CD34/CD117 +, c-met + stem cells, and mononuclear cells expressing early cardiac, muscle, and endothelin markers into peripheral blood in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2004, 110, 3213–3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tang, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, F.; Yang, J.; Kong, X.; Guo, L.; Chen, L.; Huang, Y.; Wan, Y.; et al. VEGF/SDF-1 promotes cardiac stem cell mobilization and myocardial repair in infarcted heart. Cadiovasc. Res. 2011, 91, 402–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Morimoto, H.; Takahashi, M.; Shiba, Y.; Izawa, A.; Ise, H.; Hongo, M.; Hatake, K.; Motoyoshi, K.; Ikeda, U. Bone marrow-derived CXCR4+ cells mobilized by macrophages colony-stimulating factor participate in the reduction of infarct area and improvement of cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction in mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2007, 171, 755–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Laugwitz, K.; Moretti, A.; Lam, J.; Gruber, P.; Chen, Y.; Woodard, S.; Lin, L.Z.; Cai, C.L.; Lu, M.M.; Reth, M.; et al. Postnatal isl1 + cardioblasts enter fully differentiated cardiomyocyte lineages. Nature 2005, 433, 647–653. [Google Scholar]
  59. Moretti, A.; Caron, L.; Nakano, A.; Lam, J.T.; Bernshausen, A.; Chen, Y.; Qyang, Y.; Bu, L.; Sasaki, M.; Martin-Puig, S.; et al. Mtipotent embryonic isl1 + progenitor cells lead to cardiac smooth muscle and endothelial cell diversification. Cell 2006, 127, 1151–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ott, H.C.; Matthiesen, T.S.; Brechtken, J.; Grindle, S.; Goh, S.K.; Nelson, W.; Tayler, D.A. The adult human as a source for stem cells: Repair strategies with embryonic-like progenitor cells. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med. 2007, 4, S27–S39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Takahashi, K.; Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006, 126, 663–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Takahashi, K.; Tanabe, K.; Ohnuki, M.; Narita, M.; Ichisaka, T.; Tomoda, K.; Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 2007, 131, 861–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Park, I.H.; Zhao, R.; West, J.A.; Yabuuchi, A.; Huo, H.; Ince, T.A.; Lerou, P.H.; Lensch, M.W.; Daley, G.Q. Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature 2008, 451, 141–146. [Google Scholar]
  64. Hinescu, M.E.; Popescu, L.M. Interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLC) in human atrial myocardium. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2005, 9, 972–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kostin, S.; Popescu, L.M. A distinct type of cell in myocardium: Interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLC). J. Cell Mol. Med. 2009, 13, 295–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gherghiceanu, M.; Manole, C.G.; Popescu, L.M. Telocytes in endocarium: Electron microscope evidence. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2010, 14, 2330–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Popescu, L.M.; Manole, C.G.; Gherghiceanu, M.; Aedelean, A.; Nicolescu, M.I.; Hinescu, M.E.; Kostin, S. Telocytes in human epicardium. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2010, 14, 2085–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hasan, M.K.; Komoike, Y.; Tsunesumi, S.; Nakao, R.; Nagao, H.; Matsuoka, R.; Kawaguchi, N. Myogenic differentiation in atrium derived adult cardiac pluripotent cells and the transcriptional regulation of GATA4 and myogenin on ANP promoter. Genes Cells 2010, 15, 439–453. [Google Scholar]
  69. Danalache, B.; Paquin, J.; Donghao, W.; Gyrgorczyk, R.; Moore, J.C.; Mummery, C.L.; Gutkowska, J.; Jankowski, M. Nitric oxide signaling in oxytocin-mediated cardiomyogenesis. Stem Cells 2007, 25, 679–688. [Google Scholar]
  70. Minasi, M.G.; Riminucci, M.; De Angelis, L.; Borello, U.; Berarducci, B.; Innocenzi, A.; Caprioli, A.; Sirabella, D.; Baiocchi, M.; De Maria, R.; et al. The meso-angioblast: A multipotent, self-renewing cell that originates from the dorsal aorta and differentiates into most mesodermal tissues. Development 2002, 129, 2773–2783. [Google Scholar]
  71. Kawaguchi, N.; Nakao, R.; Yamaguchi, M.; Ogawa, D.; Matsuoka, R. TGF-β superfamily regulates a switch that mediates differentiation either into adipocytes or myocytes in left atrium derived pluripotent cells (LA-PCS). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 396, 619–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gilbert, S.F. Developmental Biology, 7th ed.; Sinauer Associates Inc.: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  73. Abdel-Latif, A.; Zuba-Surma, E.K.; Case, J.; Tiwari, S.; Hunt, G.; Ranjan, S.; Vincent, R.J.; Srour, E.F.; Bolli, R.; Dawn, B. TGF-β1 enhances cardiomyogenic differentiation of skeletal muscle-derived adult primitive cells. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2008, 103, 514–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Singh, R.; Bhasin, S.; Braga, M.; Artaza, J.N.; Pervin, S.; Taylor, W.E.; Krishnan, V.; Sinha, S.K.; Rajavashisth, T.B.; Jasuja, R. Regulation of myogenic differentiation by androgens: Cross talk between androgen receptor/β-catenin and follistatin/transforming growth factor-β signaling pathways. Endocrinology 2009, 150, 1259–1268. [Google Scholar]
  75. Sordella, R.; Jiang, W.; Chen, G.; Curto, M.; Settleman, J. Modulation of Rho GTPase signalling regulates a switch between adipogenesis and myogenesis. Cell 2003, 113, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yuasa, S.; Itabashi, Y.; Koshimizu, U.; Tanaka, T.; Sugimura, K.; Kinoshita, M.; Hattori, F.; Fukami, S.; Shimazaki, T.; Ogawa, S.; et al. Transient inhibition of BMP signaling by noggin induces cardiomyocyte differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 607–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kawaguchi, N.; Hayama, E.; Furutani, Y.; Nakanishi, T. Prospective in vitro models of channelopathies and cardiomyopathies. Stem Cell Int. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yang, L.; Soonpaa, M.H.; Adler, E.D.; Roepke, T.K.; Kattman, S.J.; Kennedy, M.; Henckaerts, E.; Bonham, K.; Abbott, G.W.; Linden, R.M.; et al. Human cardiovascular progenitor cells develop from a KDR+ embryonic-stem-cell-derived population. Nature 2008, 453, 524–529. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ren, Y.; Lee, M.Y.; Schliffke, S.; Paavola, J.; Amos, P.J.; Ge, X.; Ye, M.; Zhu, S.; Senyei, G.; Lum, L.; et al. Small molecule Wnt inhibitors enhance the efficiency of BMP-4-directed cardiac differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2011, 51, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kattman, S.J.; Witty, A.D.; Gagliardi, M.; Dubois, N.C.; Niapour, M.; Hotta, A.; Ellis, J.; Keller, G. Stage-specific optimization of activin/nodal and BMP signaling promotes cardiac differentiation of mouse and human pluripotent stem cell lines. Cell Stem Cell 2011, 8, 228–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Freund, C.; Mummery, C.L. Prospects for pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in cardiac cell therapy and as disease models. J. Cell. Biochem. 2008, 107, 592–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yamashita, J.K. ES and iPS cell research for cardiovascular regeneration. Exp. Cell Res. 2010, 316, 2555–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhang, J.; Wilson, G.F.; Soerens, A.G.; Koonce, C.H.; Yu, J.; Palecek, S.P.; Thomson, J.A.; Kamp, T.J. Functional cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Circ. Res. 2009, 104, e30–e41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Khalil, J.; Xi, M.; Shishechian, N.; Hannes, T.; Pfannkuche, K.; Liang, H.; Fatima, A.; Haustein, M.; Suhr, F.; Bloch, W.; et al. Comparison of contractile behavior of native murine ventricular tissue and cardiomyocytes derived from embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells. FASEB J. 2010, 24, 2739–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Burridge, P.W.; Thompson, S.; Millrod, M.A.; Weinberg, S.; Yuan, X.; Peters, A.; Mahairaki, V.; Koliatsos, V.E.; Tung, L.; Zambidis, E.T. A universal system for highly efficient cardiac differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells that eliminates interline variability. PLoS One 2011, 6, e18293. [Google Scholar]
  86. Cao, N.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Z.; Wang, J.; Chen, T.; Zhao, X.; Ma, Y.; Qin, L.; Kang, J.; Wei, B.; et al. Ascorbic acid enhances the cardiac differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells through promoting the proliferation of cardiac progenitor cells. Cell Res. 2012, 22, 219–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Li, L.; Larabee, S.M.; Chen, S.; Basiri, L.; Yamaguchi, S.; Zakaria, A.; Gallicano, G.I. Novel 5′TOP mRNAs regulated by ribosomal S6 kinase are important for cardiomyocyte development: S6 kinase suppression limits cardiac differentiation and promotes pluripotent cells toward a neural lineage. Stem Cells Dev. 2011, 1, 1538–1548. [Google Scholar]
  88. Kempf, H.; Lecina, M.; Ting, S.; Zweigerdt, R.; Oh, S. Distinct regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase activities is coupled with enhanced cardiac differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Res. 2011, 7, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sachinidis, A.; Schwengberg, S.; Hippler-Altenburg, R.; Mariappan, D.; Kamisetti, N.; Seelig, B.; Berkessel, A.; Hescheler, J. Identification of small signaling molecules promoting cardiac-specific differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2006, 18, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hao, J.; Daleo, M.A.; Murphy, C.K.; Yu, P.B.; Ho, J.N.; Hu, J.; Peterson, R.T.; Hatzopoulos, A.K.; Hong, C.C. Dorsomorphin, a selective small molecule inhibitor of BMP signaling, promotes cardiomyogenesis in embryonic stem cell. PLoS One 2008, 3, e2094. [Google Scholar]
  91. Wang, H.J.; Hao, J.; Hong, C.C. Cardiac induction of embryonic stem cells by a small molecule inhibitor of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. ACS Chem. Biol. 2011, 6, 92–197. [Google Scholar]
  92. Hattori, F.; Chen, H.; Yamashita, H.; Tohyama, S.; Satoh, Y.S.; Yuasa, S.; Li, W.; Yamakawa, H.; Tanaka, T.; Onitsuka, T.; et al. Nngenetic method for purifying stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Egashira, T.; Yuasa, S.; Fukuda, K. Induced pluripotent stem cells in cardiovascular medicine. Stem Cells Int. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Dubois, N.C.; Craft, A.M.; Sharma, P.; Elliott, D.A.; Stanley, E.G.; Elefanty, A.G.; Gramolini, A.; Keller, G. SIRPA is a specific cell-surface marker for isolating cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 1011–1018. [Google Scholar]
  95. Ieda, M.; Fu, J.; Delgado-Olguin, P.; Vadantham, V.; Hayashi, Y.; Bruneau, B.G.; Srivastava, D. Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by defined factors. Cell 2010, 142, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Qian, L.; Huang, Y.; Spencer, C.J.; Foley, A.; Vedantham, V.; Liu, L.; Conway, S.J.; Fu, J.-D.; Srivastava, D. In vivo reprogramming of murine cardiac fibroblasts into induced cardiomyocytes. Nature 2012, 485, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Song, K.; Nam, Y.-J.; Luo, X.; Qi, X.; Tan, W.; Huang, G.N.; Acharya, A.; Smith, C.L.; Tailquist, M.D.; Neilson, E.G.; et al. Heart repair by reprogramming non-myocytes with cardiac transcription factors. Nature 2012, 485, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Moskowitz, I.P.G.; Kim, J.B.; Moore, M.L.; Wolf, C.M.; Peterson, M.A.; Shendure, J.; Nobrega, M.A.; Yokota, Y.; Berul, C.; Izumo, S.; et al. A molecular pathway including Id2, Tbx5, and Nkx2-5 required for cardiac conduction system development. Cell 2007, 129, 1365–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gimble, J.; Katz, A.; Bunnell, B. Adipose-derived stem cells for regenerative medicine. Circ. Res. 2007, 100, 1249–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Madonna, R.; Geng, Y.; De Caterina, R. Adipose tissue-derived stem cells: characterization and potential for cardiovascular repair. Arterioscler Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2009, 29, 1723–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Hosseinkhani, H.; Hosseinkhani, M.; Hattori, S.; Matsuoka, R.; Kawaguchi, N. Micro and nano-scale in vitro 3D culture system for cardiac stem cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2010, 94, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  102. Sekine, H.; Shimizu, T.; Dobashi, I.; Matsuura, K.; Hagiwara, H.; Takahashi, M.; kobayashi, E.; Yamato, M.; Okano, T. Cardiac cell sheet transplantation improves damaged heart function via superior cell survival in comparison with dissociated cell injection. Tissue Eng. Part A 2011, 17, 2973–2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Matsuura, K.; Masuda, S.; Haraguchi, Y.; Yasuda, N.; Shimizu, T.; Hagiwara, N.; Zandstra, P.W.; Okano, T. Creation of mouse embryonic stem cell-derived cardiac cell sheets. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 7355–7362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Jiang, X.; Wang, T.; Li, X.; Wu, D.; Zheng, X.; Chen, J.; Peng, B.; Jiang, H.; Huang, C.; Zhang, X. Injection of a novel synthetic hydrogel preserves left ventricle function after myocardial infarction. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2009, 90, A472–A477. [Google Scholar]
  105. Chen, Q.; Ishii, H.; Thouas, G.A.; Lyon, A.R.; Wright, J.S.; Blaker, J.J.; Chrzanowski, W.; Boccaccini, A.R.; Ali, N.N.; Knowles, J.C.; et al. An elastomeric patch derived from poly(glycerol sebacate) for delivery of embryonic stem cells to the heart. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 3883–3893. [Google Scholar]
Cells EISSN 2073-4409 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert