Next Article in Journal
On-Farm Demonstrations with a Set of Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) Proved Cost-Effective in Reducing Pre-Harvest Aflatoxin Contamination in Groundnut
Previous Article in Journal
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Agronomy in 2017
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Agronomy 2018, 8(2), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8020009

Diversity of Maize Kernels from a Breeding Program for Protein Quality III: Ionome Profiling

1
USDA-ARS and Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, 803 Iowa Ave., Morris, MN 56267, USA
2
Mandaamin Institute, W2331 Kniep Road, Elkhorn, WI 53121, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 27 November 2017 / Revised: 8 January 2018 / Accepted: 15 January 2018 / Published: 23 January 2018
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [4437 KB, uploaded 23 January 2018]   |  

Abstract

Densities of single and multiple macro- and micronutrients were estimated in the mature kernels of 1348 accessions in 13 maize genotypes. The germplasm belonged to stiff stalk (SS) and non-stiff stalk (NS) heterotic groups (HGs) with one (S1) to four (S4) years of inbreeding (IB), or open pollination (OP), and with opaque or translucent endosperm (OE and TE, respectively). Indices were calculated for macronutrients (M-Index), micronutrients (m-Index) and an index based on Fe and Zn densities (FeZn-Index). The objectives were to (1) build predictive models and quantify multivariate relationships between single and multiple nutrients with physical and biochemical constituents of the maize kernel; (2) quantify the effects of IB stages and endosperm textures, in relation to carbon and nitrogen allocation, on nutrients and their indices; and (3) develop and test the utility of hierarchical multi-way classification of nutrients with kernel color space coordinates. Differences among genotypes and among IB stages accounted for the largest amount of variation in most nutrients and in all indices, while genotypic response to IB within HGs explained 52.4, 55.9, and 76.0% of variation in the M-Index, m-Index, and FeZn-Index, respectively. Differences in C and N allocation among HGs explained more variation in all indices than respective differences in allocation among endosperm (E) textures, while variation decreased with sequential inbreeding compared to OP germplasm. Specific color space coordinates indicated either large macronutrient densities and M-Index, or large micronutrient densities, m-Index, and FeZn-Index. These results demonstrated the importance of genotypes and the C:N ratio in nutrient allocation, as well as bivariate and multiple interrelationships. View Full-Text
Keywords: essential micronutrients; genetic resource; heterotic groups; ionome; opaque endosperm essential micronutrients; genetic resource; heterotic groups; ionome; opaque endosperm
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Jaradat, A.A.; Goldstein, W. Diversity of Maize Kernels from a Breeding Program for Protein Quality III: Ionome Profiling. Agronomy 2018, 8, 9.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Agronomy EISSN 2073-4395 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top