- freely available
Polymers 2014, 6(4), 1008-1025; doi:10.3390/polym6041008
Abstract: This paper evaluates the role of minor component polybenzoxazine (PB) on shape-memory properties of polyurethanes (PU) with glassy and crystalline soft segments. The polymer compounds were prepared in two steps. In the first step, benzoxazine, polyurethane pre-polymer, and chain extender butanediol (BD) were mixed into a solution followed by chain-extension of the pre-polymer with BD. In the second step, benzoxazine was polymerized at 180 °C for 3 h to obtain shape memory polymer compounds. The atomic force microscopy images revealed that the PB-phase formed uniform dispersions in PU. The presence of PB-phase induced shape-memory behavior in non-shape memory PU with amorphous soft segment and significantly improved the values of shape fixity, recovery ratio, and recovery stress in shape memory polyurethane with crystalline soft segment.
Shape-memory polymers (SMPs) gained considerable attention from academia and industry as smart materials due to their low cost, good processability, and light weight [1,2,3,4,5,6]. They have the capability of fixing in one or multiple temporary shapes, and return to the original shape upon application of an external stimulus [2,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Shape-memory polyurethanes (SMPUs) attract particular interest because of their biocompatibility, biodegradability, inexpensive raw materials, and high potential for commercialization [14,15,16,17,18,19]. The excellent properties of SMPUs are derived from the microphase-separated structures resulting from the thermodynamic incompatibility between the blocks of hard and soft segments . Note that SMPs should possess two structural entities to exhibit shape-memory effects (SME): (1) a mechanically strong cross-linked network structure to fix the permanent shape, and (2) a reversible domain to undergo shape fixation and shape recovery. In thermoplastic PUs, the physical cross-links ramified by hydrogen bonds between the hard segments meet the first requirement. The second requirement is met by soft segment domains. Most SMPUs rely on thermal transition of the soft segment phase for shape-memory actuation. The transition temperature can either be a glass transition (Tg) or melting temperature (Tm), respectively, for SMPU with amorphous and crystalline soft segments [21,22,23,24,25,26].
SMPUs suffer from several shortcomings [2,5], such as low recovery stress, slow recovery rate, and low values of shape fixity and recovery ratio. The shape memory performance improves with the introduction of nanofillers, such as multiwall carbon nanotubes and nanofibers [27,28,29,30,31,32,33], functionalized graphene, and nanoclay [34,35], silicon carbide  and with organic components, such as poly(oxyethylene) , poly(vinyl chloride) , and soy protein . These additives contribute to improvements in shape-memory properties via physical interactions with PU chains. Specifically, the extent of phase separation of the hard segment domains in PU reduces significantly in the presence of physically interacting filler particles . This study considered polymeric chemical additive polybenzoxazine (PB) for augmentation of shape memory properties. It was anticipated that PB would produce physical interactions via hydrogen bonds, form covalent chemical bonds with PU chains, and act as fixed phase due to much higher glass transition temperature than PU.
PB is a thermosetting resin with high Tg, near-zero volume shrinkage upon curing, low water absorption, and high mechanical integrity [41,42,43,44]. The monomer of this resin, benzoxazine (BA-a), is synthesized by a solventless method from bisphenol-A, aniline, and paraformaldehyde. The benzoxazine is polymerized into PB by thermally-induced ring opening polymerization via cationic bond cleavage at elevated temperatures. Studies on PB-urethane polymer alloys have focused on improvement of the properties of PB by incorporating urethanes [44,45,46,47,48]. Numan and Jana  reported synthesis and properties of shape-memory polyurethane-polybenzoxazine compounds where the focus was to obtain further increases in shape-memory performance by introduction of PB. It was established that PB provided additional hard domains and led to large enhancements in shape recovery force, speed of shape recovery, and greater recovery ratio than the base case shape memory PU with amorphous soft segment.
The present work is divided into two parts. In the first part, the SME was induced at room temperature in a non-shape memory PU with amorphous soft segment. The non-shape memory PU had a soft segment with glass transition temperature close to room temperature and had lower hard segment contents (HSC) than what was considered by Erden and Jana . In this context, one should note that the shape recovery ratio is strongly dependent on the hard segment content [18,49]. In this work, the minor component PB was expected to add the following attributes: (1) increase the Tg and increase the modulus and (2) integrate the hard domain structures by covalent bonding between PB and PU chains. The second part of the study considered compounds of PB and shape memory PU with crystalline soft segments and evaluated how inclusion of PB improved the shape memory properties. Note that PB domains can hinder phase separation of urethane hard segments  and the inclusion of nanoparticles has detrimental effects on crystallization of PU soft domains [35,36,40]. In view of these, this study also focused on in the influence of PB domains on the crystallinity of PU soft domains.
2. Experimental Section
SMPU with amorphous soft-segment was synthesized from 4,4′-methylenebis (phenyl isocyanate) (MDI), poly(tetramethylene)glycol (PTMG), and chain extender 1,4-butanediol (BD). SMPU with crystalline soft-segment was synthesized from MDI, poly(caprolactone)diol (PCL), and BD. MDI of molecular weight (Mw) ≈ 250 g mol−1, PTMG of Mw ≈ 650 g mol−1, and BD of Mw ≈ 90 g mol−1 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Poly(caprolactone)diol of Mw ≈ 4000 g mol−1 was obtained from Perstorp (Warrington, UK). The chain extension reaction was catalyzed by dibutyltin dilaurate (DABCO T120, Air Products Inc. Allentown, PA, USA). Benzoxazine monomer was synthesized from bisphenol-A of Mw ≈ 228.3 g mol−1, aniline of Mw ≈ 93.13 g mol−1, and paraformaldehyde. The materials were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
2.2. Preparation Method
2.2.1. Benzoxazine Monomer
Benzoxazine monomer was synthesized using a method reported by Ishida . Bisphenol A, aniline, and paraformaldehyde in molar ratio 1:2:4 were added in a preheated beaker and mixed at 110 °C for 20 min. The product was a yellowish viscous liquid that solidified quickly under room temperature. The solid was pulverized and stored in a cool place.
|Sample||MDI (mole)||PTMG (mole)||BD (mole)||Benzoxazine (mole)||HSC (%)||PB (wt%)|
2.2.2. SMPU with Amorphous Soft-Segment
SMPU was synthesized by a two-step polymerization method. First, the prepolymer was synthesized from MDI and PTMG in the molar ratio 3:1 at 75 °C for 2.5 h under nitrogen. Second, the chain extension was carried out in Brabender Plasticorder mixer (Model EPL 7752, C.W. Brabender, South Hackensack, NJ, USA). The prepolymer was mixed with BD and DABCO T120 at 80 °C for 3 min.
The SMPU-benzoxazine compounds were prepared in Brabender mixer. Figure 1 shows the timeline of the procedure. PU prepolymer was added to the mixer at 80 °C and mixed for 30 s before adding the benzoxazine powder of prescribed molar ratio (Table 1). The ingredients were mixed for 60 s to make sure that the mixture became clear. BD with catalyst was added into Brabender mixer to carry out the chain extension at 80 °C for 90 s.
2.2.3. SMPU with Crystalline Soft-Segment
In the first step of the two-step synthesis method, prepolymer of SMPU was synthesized from MDI and PCL in the molar ratio 5:1. This bulk polymerization was conducted at 80 °C for 2.5 h under nitrogen. Second, chain extension in Brabender mixer was carried out by mixing prepolymer, BD, and catalyst at 90 °C for approximately 5 min. The SMPU-benzoxazine compounds were prepared at 90 °C in Brabender mixer (Figure 1). Table 2 presents the molar ratio of ingredients in these samples.
|Sample||MDI (mole)||PCL (mole)||BD (mole)||Benzoxazine (mole)||HSC (%)||PB (wt%)|
2.2.4. Preparation of SMPU-PB Compounds
The solid products obtained from Brabender mixer was dried under vacuum at 40 °C before converting them into films (thickness ≈ 0.5 mm) by using compression molding machine at a pressure of 21–28 MPa. The temperature and time for compression molding were respectively 180 °C and 10 min. Note that the ring-opening polymerization of benzoxazine is typically achieved at temperatures 160–220 °C. In this case, the films were kept in vacuum oven at 180 °C for 3 h to carry out the polymerization of benzoxazine. The films of pristine PUs were also kept in the oven for the same duration to obtain the same heat history.
2.3.1. Thermal Properties
SMPU with amorphous soft-segment. The melting transition of hard segments was determined from differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) using a TA Instrument differential calorimeter (Model: Q200, TA Instruments Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The thermal scans were carried out with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 from room temperature to 275 °C under nitrogen atmosphere.
SMPU with crystalline soft-segment. The melting temperature (Tm) of soft and hard segments was obtained from DSC. The samples were first equilibrated at 20 °C and then heated at 10 °C min−1 to 250 °C under nitrogen atmosphere.
2.3.2. Thermo-Mechanical Characterization
The thermo-mechanical properties were evaluated by conducting experiments in a ‘multi-frequency, strain’ mode in a TA Instrument, dynamical mechanical analyzer (DMA; Model: Q800, TA Instruments Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA) at a frequency of 1 Hz. The samples were cut so that the length-to-width ratio mounted between the grips was around 2; the thickness of specimen was varied from 0.3–0.5 mm. The rectangular samples were heated at a rate of 4 °C min−1 from −50–150 °C. The values of storage modulus and shift angle were recorded as functions of temperature.
2.3.3. Surface Morphology
Tapping-mode atomic force microscopy (AFM; Model: MMAFM-2, Digital Instruments Inc., Tonawanda, NY, USA) was used to obtain the phase information from the images of smooth surfaces of sample specimens. The phase angle was 30° for SMPU specimens with amorphous soft-segments and 120° for SMPU specimens with crystalline soft-segment. These produced enough contrast between the mechanical properties of soft-segment, urethane hard-segment, and PB domains. The light spots on the phase images imply hard domains and the dark ones imply soft domains.
2.3.4. Fourier Transform Infra-Red Analysis
Perkin Elmer attenuated total reflectance (ATR; Model: Nicolet 380, Thermo Electron corporation, Marietta, OH, USA) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR; Model: Nicolet 380, Thermo Electron Corporation, Marietta, OH, USA) spectroscopy methods with a resolution of 4 cm−1 in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 were used to determine the extent of hydrogen-bonded and free urethane carbonyl groups.
2.3.5. Shape-Memory Properties
Shape-memory properties were characterized using DMA and Instron tensile testing machine (Model: 5567, Instron, Norwood, MA, USA) with temperature-controlled chamber. A typical shape-memory cycle consists of four successive steps. (1) Deformation: The rectangular sample of original length L0 was heated to its transformation temperature (Ttrans) before a force was imposed on it and elongated to a length Ls. The values of Ttrans of SMPU with amorphous soft-segment are listed in Table 3. The value of Ttrans for SMPU with crystalline soft-segment was 60 °C. (2) Cooling: The specimen with the load applied was cooled down to room temperature. (3) Fixing: The tensile load was released and an instantaneous shrinkage of the length occurred from Ls to Lf. (4) Recovery: The deformed sample was heated to its Ttrans to allow for the length to recover to L. The lengths of specimens in different stages are used to define shape fixity (SF) and recovery ratio (RR), as follows:
A value of SF close to 100% indicates no shrinkage after the load is removed, while a 100% RR implies that the specimen is able to recover its original length. The values of shape recovery stress (RS; σ) were also determined by DMA. In this case, the stretched specimen was fixed between the grips and the stress σ required to keep the sample from recovery was monitored as a function of temperature and time.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. SMPU with Amorphous Soft-Segment
3.1.1. Glass Transition and Melting
The value of soft segment Tg is needed to determine a suitable value of Ttrans, such that Ttrans > Tg. Figure 2 shows the DSC traces of three specimens. These samples were heated from room temperature to 250 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. The curve for gPU (Table 1) shows two weak zones of glass transition with Tg at around 49 °C and 95 °C, attributed respectively to soft- and hard-segment rich domains. However, these two transitions do not appear in DSC traces of compounds gPUPB2 and gPUPB4, indicating that the PB domains probably promoted mixing between the hard and soft-segment phases as was seen in another study . Note that the Tg of PB is around 170 °C . Thus, phase mixing of PB with the soft and hard domains should increase their respective Tg values. The DSC traces of PU-PB compounds (gPUPB2 and gPUPB4) in Figure 2 show heat flow curves with small slope, implying that accurate values of Tg of PU-PB compounds cannot be computed from these DSC traces.
The DSC traces in Figure 2, however, show melting transitions of the crystalline domains. Sample gPU exhibits two melting peaks with a total heat of fusion of 26.88 J g−1, with the peak temperature respectively 200 °C and 218 °C. The melting peak due to crystalline hard segment also appeared in the DSC trace of gPUPB2 compound with peak temperatures of 161 °C, 183 °C, and 205 °C and the total heat of melting of 13.36 J g−1. The DSC trace of gPUPBZ4 compound, however, does not show the melting peak due to hard segment. The reduction of heat of melting observed in gPUPB2 compound and the absence of melting peaks in gPUPBZ4 compound together indicate that hard segment crystallization was hindered due to the presence of PB in these compounds.
3.1.2. Phase Mixing and PB Domain Size
Figure 3 shows the phase images of SMPU from atomic force microscopy scans. In Figure 3a, the dark and bright areas represent respectively the soft and hard domains of SMPU. Figure 3b,c also shows some extremely bright spots; these can be identified as the aggregates of PB. The typical size of PB domains inferred from Figure 3b is 150 nm, which grew to a size of 250 nm in Figure 3c due to an increase of the PB content from 6–12 wt%.
In view of the phase mixing seen in Figure 3, one can envisage that the PB domains are connected to PU chains by hydrogen bonding and covalent linkages. The hydrogen bonds form between the phenolic ‒OH groups on PB chains and the soft and hard segments of PU. The covalent bonds link the PB and PU chains via chemical reactions between the ‒NCO groups of PU and the phenolic ‒OH groups of PB chains. A comparison of the 13C NMR spectra of gPU and gPUPB4 presented in Figure 4 confirms the existence of covalent bonds between PU and PB chains. A new peak at around 146 ppm appearing in the NMR spectra of gPUPB4 matches with the 13C NMR signature of the carbon on the benzene ring of PB and adjacent to the oxygen connected with PU chains. The unique carbon atoms are labeled in the chemical structure of PU-PB chains and presented in Figure 4. However, the peak at 146 ppm is relatively weak, apparently due to small concentration of PB chains in the system. This is in good agreement with the earlier reports [45,46,47,51]. The covalent bond formation between PU chains and PB and the AFM phase morphology in Figure 3 can now explain the absence of soft-segment glass transition in DSC traces and the reduction of heat of fusion of the hard segments in PU-PB compounds.
Further evidence of the reduction of microphase separation was obtained from FT-IR data. The values of hydrogen bonding index (α) were calculated from Equation (3) and the values are listed in Table 4.
The areas under the peaks at 1730 cm−1 due to free CO (AFCO), at 1710 cm−1 due to hydrogen-bonded CO (AaHCO) in amorphous hard domains and at 1703 cm−1 due to hydrogen-bonded CO (AcHCO) in crystalline hard domains were used to calculate the hydrogen bonding index, α. Two conclusions can be drawn from the data in Table 4: (1) the extent of phase separation in SMPU reduced due to the incorporation of PB and (2) the reduction of phase separation is due to loss of crystalline urethane hard segment domains.
3.1.3. Dynamic Mechanical Properties
The values of glass transition temperature can be inferred from tan δ vs. temperature curves, as listed in Table 3. The tan δ vs. temperature traces in Figure 5a reveal that all materials exhibit a single peak of tan δ, indicating the Tg of soft domains of gPU, gPUPB2, and gPUPB4, respectively, at 14°, 52°, and 60 °C. One can attribute such increases in Tg to mixing of PB domains.
Figure 5b shows the values of storage modulus as a function of temperature. The larger storage modulus of gPU than gPUPB2 and gPUPB4 above the glass transition temperature of the soft segment is attributed to greater quantity of crystalline PU hard segment. The values of storage modulus (E') at (Tg − 20 °C) and (Tg + 20 °C) and the ratio of E'(Tg − 20 °C) and E'(Tg + 20 °C) are listed in Table 5. The modulus ratios were 4 of gPU, 102 of gPUPB2, and 156 of gPUPB4. It was earlier proposed that a large difference of storage modulus above and below the glass transition temperature and a sharp glass to rubber transition are prerequisites for efficient shape recovery from the deformed state . Generally, the ratio of modulus in glassy and rubbery states of 20 indicates good shape memory performance. In view of this, the values of E'(Tg − 20 °C)/E'(Tg + 20 °C) reported in Table 5 imply the following: (1) The unmodified PU with amorphous soft-segment considered in this work cannot exhibit shape recovery as it cannot hold the temporary shape due to Tg value lower than the room temperature. (2) The two PU-PB compounds prepared in this work should show excellent shape-memory properties, as will be seen below.
|Sample||E'(Tg – 20 °C) (MPa)||E'(Tg + 20 °C) (MPa)||E'(Tg – 20 °C)/E'(Tg + 20 °C)|
3.1.4. Shape-Memory Properties
Shape fixity. A rectangular specimen was first stretched at Ttrans to 30% its original length and then cooled down to Tg − 40 °C at a cooling rate of 5 °C min−1 to obtain the temporary shape. The specimen dimension was measured at (Tg − 40) °C. The values of shape fixity are as follows: 97.2% for gPU, 95.3% for gPUPB2, and 92.8% for gPUPB4. Shape fixity refers to the unconstrained recovery of SMPs after the stretching load was removed. A value less than 100% indicates that an instantaneous shrinkage of the stretched polymer chains cannot preserve the imposed strain. Recall that the values of Tg of samples obtained from DMA were 14, 57 and 70 °C, respectively, for gPU, gPUPB2 and gPUPB4. Accordingly, the temporary shape was fixed at −26, 17 and 30 °C, respectively, for gPU, gPUPB2, and gPUPB4. Of the three materials, the compounds gPUPB2 and gPUPB4 were able to retain the deformed shapes at room temperature.
Recovery ratio. Figure 6 presents the shape recovery values of samples as a function of time. The test began with the material kept at the fixing temperature, e.g., at −26, 17 and 30 °C, respectively, for gPU, gPUPB2, and gPUPB4 and continued to Ttrans of each sample with a heating rate of 5 °C min−1 and kept isothermal for a period of 20 min. The maximum values of recovery ratio of samples are respectively 60% for gPU, 82% for gPUPB2, and 93% for gPUPB4. It is evident that incorporation of PB led to obvious enhancement in shape recovery ratio. The PB domains acted as the hard phase in the compounds with PU and strengthened the polymer networks, keeping the permanent shape of specimen via physical and chemical interactions with PU chains. The rate of recovery can also be inferred from Figure 6. The higher the values of modulus ratio E'(Tg − 20 °C)/E'(Tg + 20 °C), the higher is the recovery rate as is apparent from the greater slope seen in Figure 6. The specimen gPUPB4 shows the fastest recovery rate among three samples considered in this work.
3.2. SMPU with Crystalline Soft Segment
3.2.1. Thermal Transitions
Figure 7A,B shows DSC traces of samples heated from room temperature to 250 °C before and after 100% elongation, respectively. Table 6 summarizes the values of melting temperature (Tm) and heat of fusion (∆H) of crystalline soft domains of pristine PU and PU-PB compounds. Table 6 reveals that both Tm and ∆H of unstretched specimens decreased with an increase of PB content. One plausible explanation is that the hard PB aggregates mixed well with the PCL domains in the as-prepared compounds and consequently restricted the crystallization of PCL chains. However, such reduction is not observed in the case of stretched samples. Note that the samples were stretched after the crystals were all melted and then cooled to room temperature. In this context, some degree of strain-induced crystallinity of PCL domains quite possibly compensated for the loss due to interactions of PCL chains with PB domains. The DSC traces also show melting of hard domains. Note that the hard segment content of pristine PU in Table 2 was only 28.7%. In Figure 7B, the weak peaks were observed for all three traces and the peak temperature and the heat of melting were found to be, respectively, 215 °C and 6.4 J g−1, 206 °C and 5.8 J g−1 and 199 °C and 2.3 J g−1.
|Sample||Melting temperature (°C)||Heat of fusion (J g−1)|
|Before stretching||After stretching||Before stretching||After stretching|
3.2.2. Phase Mixing
The AFM phase images of SMPU with crystalline soft-segment are presented in Figure 8. The brighter regions seen in Figure 8b,c in comparison to Figure 8a are attributed to harder PB domains. It is also seen that an increase of PB content from 4.6–8.8 wt% resulted in larger sized PB domains.
3.2.3. Shape-Memory Properties
Shape fixity. The shape fixity of SMPU specimen with crystalline soft-segment was measured and the values are as follows: 95.8% for mPU, 95.8% for mPUPB5, and 96.2% for mPUPB10. It is evident that the shape fixity value does not depend on PB content. This is not surprising, as PCL crystalline domains are responsible for fixing the shape and the DSC data of stretched specimens showed earlier that PB content has no influence on PCL crystallinity. The small loss in shape fixity in this case can be attributed to immediate recovery of the amorphous polyurethane chains once the stretching load is released. It is noted that the Tg of PCL segments was around −50 °C, which indicates that the amorphous soft segment phase was in rubbery state at room temperature.
Recovery ratio. The sample specimen stretched earlier to 100% of original length and cooled down to room temperature to fix the shape were heated again from room temperature to 80 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 and the specimen length was measured as function of time. Figure 9 presents the values of recovery ratio as function of time. The specimens began recovery almost at the same time after a delay of ~2.5 min. It is seen that the recovery rate increased with an increase of temperature. The maximum values of recovery ratio were found to be 94.1% for mPU, 96.6% for mPUPB5, and 98.0% for mPUPB10, indicating that the recovery ratio of PU-PB compounds increases slightly with the PB-content.
Recovery stress. Figure 10 shows the representative plots of stress vs. time as sample specimen were heated in a DMA set up. In this case, the stress needed to keep the original length of the specimen fixed at a constant value was measured as function of temperature. It is apparent that recovery began at around 40 °C by which time some of the crystalline soft domains melted. As revealed in Figure 10, the stress increased with temperature and reached a maximum at around 65 °C. The maximum recovery stress was found to be 1.0 MPa for mPU, 1.4 MPa for mPUPB5, and 1.8 MPa for mPUPB10, which are less than the stress imposed on the materials during tensile deformation, e.g., 1.1 ± 0.07 MPa for mPU, 1.7 ± 0.04 MPa for mPUPB5, and 2.2 ± 0.03 for mPUPB10. The lesser values of recovery stress compared to the stress imposed during tensile deformation can be attributed to stress relaxation during cooling of the deformed specimens and heating in stress recovery experiments. This data indicates that an increase of 80% in recovery stress can be obtained with 8.8 wt% PB. Such large increases in recovery stress was also observed in SMPU system with amorphous soft segment .
Several conclusions can be drawn from the study. First, polyurethanes with no shape memory properties at room temperature can be converted into shape memory materials by reactively blending with small quantities of PB. Specifically, the phase-mixing of PB with the amorphous soft segment in PU is able to bring up the glass transition temperature from 14 °C for the unmodified-PU to about 60 °C. Thus, although the unmodified PU with amorphous soft-segment is not a shape memory polymer, its compounds with PB can exhibit good shape memory properties due to an increase of Tg to well above the room temperature and due to the additional fixed phase provided by the PB domains. Second, in the case of SMPUs with crystalline soft segment, the introduction of PB as additional fixed phase produces large increases in shape recovery force, although shape fixity does not change much. Third, the presence of PB domains causes significant improvement in shape recovery rate in polyurethanes.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Sadhan C. Jana acknowledges Hatsuo Ishida of Case Western Reserve University for introducing him to the chemistry of polybenzoxazine.
- Wei, Z.G.; Sandstorm, R.; Miyazaki, S. Shape-memory materials and hybrid composites for smart systems: Part I Shape-memory materials. J. Mater. Sci. 1998, 33, 3743–3783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lendlein, A.; Kelch, S. Shape-memory polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2034–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Qin, H.; Mather, P.T. Review of progress in shape-memory polymers. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 1543–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunes, S.I.; Jana, S.C. Shape memory polymers and their nanocomposites: A review of science and technology of new multifunctional materials. J. Nanosci. Nanotech. 2008, 8, 1616–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, C.; Rogers, C.A.; Malafeew, E. Investigation of shape memory polymers and their hybrid composites. J. Intel. Mat. Syst. Str. 1997, 8, 380–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mather, P.T.; Luo, X.; Rousseau, I.A. Shape memory polymer research. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2009, 39, 445–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.; Mather, P.T. Triple-shape polymeric composites (TSPCs). Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 2649–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, Y.; Laviguer, C.; Zhu, X.X. Multishape memory effect of norbornene-based copolymers with cholic acid pendant groups. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 1924–1930. [Google Scholar]
- Qin, H.; Mather, P.T. Combined One-Way and Two-Way Shape Memory in a Glass-Forming Nematic Network. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, T.; Xiao, X.; Cheng, Y.-T. Revealing triple-shape memory effect by polymer bilayers. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2009, 30, 1823–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, T. Tunable polymer multi-shape memory effect. Nature 2010, 464, 267–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Z.; Satarkar, N.; Xie, T.; Cheng, Y.-T.; Hilt, J.Z. Remote controlled multishape polymer nanocomposites with selective radiofrequency actuations. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3192–3196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Lv, H.; Lan, X.; Leng, J.; Du, S. Review of electro-active shape-memory polymer composite. Comp. Sci. Tech. 2009, 69, 2064–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayashi, S.; Kobayashi, K. Shape memory fibrous sheet and method of imparting shape memory property to fibrous sheet product. U.S. Patent 5,098,776, 24 March 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi, S.; Kobayashi, K. Woven fabric made of shape memory polymer. U.S. Patent 5,128,197, 7 July 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Gunatillake, P.A.; McCarthy, S.J.; Meijs, G.F.; Adhikari, R. Shape memory polyurethane or polyurethane-urea polymers. U.S. Patent 6,858,680, 22 February 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi, S.; Ishibashi, A.; Ikenoue, T. Heat insulator made of shape memory polymer foam. U.S. Patent 5,093,384, 3 March 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, J.R.; Chen, L.W. Study on shape-memory behavior of polyether-based polyurethanes. I. Influence of hard-segment content. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1998, 69, 1563–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.R.; Chen, L.W. Study on shape-memory behavior of polyether-based polyurethanes. II. Influence of soft-segment molecular weight. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1998, 69, 1575–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murarka, M.R.; Deanin, R.D. Structure and Properties of One-Shot Thermoplastic Polyurethane Elastomers; University of Lowell: Lowell, MA, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, B.K.; Lee, S.Y. Polyurethanes having shape memory effects. Polymer 1996, 37, 5781–5793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, F.; Zhang, X.; Hou, J.; Xu, M.; Ma, D.; Kim, B.K. Studies on Thermally Stimulated Shape Memory Effect of Segmented Polyurethanes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997, 64, 1511–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ji, F.L.; Hu, J.L.; Li, T.C.; Wong, Y.W. Morphology and shape memory effect of segmented polyurethanes. Part 1: With crystalline reversible phase. Polymer 2007, 48, 5133–5145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, W.W.; Pretsch, T. Hydrolytic aging of crystallizable shape memory poly(ester urethane): Effects on the thermo-mechanical properties and visco-elastic modeling. Eur. Polym. J. 2010, 46, 1745–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weng, S.; Xia, Z.; Chen, J.; Gong, L. Shape Memory Properties of Polycaprolactone-based Polyurethanes Prepared by Reactive Extrusion. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 127, 748–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bothe, M.; Emmerling, F.; Pretsch, T. Poly(ester urethane) with varying polyester chain length: Polymorphism and shape memory behavior. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2013, 214, 2683–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jimenez, G.; Jana, S.C. Composites of carbon nanofibers and thermoplastic polyurethanes with shape-memory properties prepared by chaotic mixing. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2009, 49, 2020–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunes, I.S.; Jimenez, G.; Jana, S.C. Carbonaceous fillers for shape memory actuation of polyurethane composites by resistive heating. Carbon 2009, 47, 981–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koerner, H.; Price, G.; Pearce, N.A.; Alexander, M.; Vaia, R.A. Remotely actuated polymer nanocomposites—Stress-recovery of carbon-nanotube-filled thermoplastic elastomers. Nat. Mater. 2004, 3, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gall, K.; Mikulas, M.; Munshi, N.A.; Beavers, F.; Tupper, M. Carbon fiber reinforced shape memory polymer composites. J. Intel. Mat. Syst. Str. 2000, 11, 877–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.S.; Ni, Q.Q.; Fu, S.Y. Electromagnetic interference shielding effect of nanocomposites with carbon nanotube and shape memory polymer. Compos. Sci. Tech. 2007, 67, 2973–2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leng, J.; Lv, H.; Liu, Y.; Du, S. Synergic effect of carbon black and short carbon fiber on shape memory polymer actuation by electricity. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 104, 104917:1–104917:4. [Google Scholar]
- Meng, Q.; Hu, J.; Zhu, Y. Shape-memory polyurethane/multiwalled carbon nanotube fibers. J. App. Poly. Sci. 2007, 106, 837–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pattanayak, A.; Jana, S.C. Thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites of reactive silicate clays: Effects of soft segments on properties. Polymer 2005, 46, 5183–5193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, F.; Jana, S.C. Nanoclay-tethered shape memory polyurethane nanocomposites. Polymer 2007, 48, 3790–3800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunes, I.S.; Cao, F.; Jimenez, G.; Jana, S.C. Evaluation of nanoparticulate fillers for development of shape memory polyurethane nanocomposites. Polymer 2008, 49, 2223–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurahashi, E.; Sugimoto, H.; Nakanishi, E.; Nagata, K.; Inomata, K. Shape memory properties of polyurethane/poly(oxyethylene) blends. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 496–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeong, H.M.; Song, J.H.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, B.K. Miscibility and shape memory property of poly(vinyl chloride)/thermoplastic polyurethane blends. J. Mater. Sci. 2001, 36, 5457–5463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madbouly, S.A.; Lendlein, A. Degradable Polyurethane/Soy Protein Shape-Memory Polymer Blends Prepared Via Environmentally-Friendly Aqueous Dispersions. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2012, 297, 1213–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunes, I.S.; Pérez-Bolivar, C.; Cao, F.; Jimenez, G.A.; Anzenbacher, P.; Jana, S.C. Analysis of non-covalent interactions between the nanoparticulate fillers and the matrix polymer as applied to shape memory performance. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 3467–3474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishida, H.; Allen, D.J. Physical and mechanical characterization of near-zero shrinkage polybenzoxazines. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 1996, 34, 1019–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishida, H.; Sanders, D.P. Regioselectivity and solid-state structure of alkyl-substituted aromatic amine-based polybenzoxazines. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 8149–8157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takeichi, T.; Kawauchi, T.; Agag, T. High-performance polymer alloys of polybenzoxazine and bismaleimide. Polymer 2008, 49, 1173–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Tian, G,; Tang, X. Synthesis and characterization of polyurethane/polybenzoxazine-based interpenetrating polymer networks (IPNs). Polym. Int. 2003, 52, 1246–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rimdusit, S.; Pirstpindvong, S.; Tanthapanichakoon, W.; Damrongsakkul, S. Toughening of polybenzoxazine by alloying with urethane prepolymer and flexible epoxy: A comparative study. Poly. Eng. Sci. 2005, 45, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takechi, T.; Guo, Y. Preparation and properties of poly(urethane-benzoxazine)s based on monofunctional benzoxazine monomer. Polym. J. 2001, 33, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takechi, T.; Guo, Y.; Agag, T. Synthesis and characterization of poly(urethane-benzoxazine) films as novel type of polyurethane/phenolic resin composites. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2000, 38, 4165–4176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erden, N.; Jana, S.C. Synthesis and Characterization of Shape-Memory Polyurethane–Polybenzoxazine Compounds. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2013, 214, 1225–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.H.; Kim, J.W.; Kim, B.K. Shape memory polyurethanes having crosslinks in soft and hard segments. Smart Mater. Struct. 2004, 13, 1345–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishida, H. Polybenzoxazine nanocomposites of clay and method for making same. U.S. Patent 6,323,270, 27 November 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Ishida, H.; Ning, X. Phenolic materials via ring-opening polymerization: Synthesis and characterization of bisphenol-A based benzoxazines and their polymers. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 1994, 32, 1121–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayashi, S. Properties and Applications of Polyurethane-Series Shape Memory Polymer. Int. Prog. Urethane 1993, 6, 90–115. [Google Scholar]
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).