Next Article in Journal
Preparation and Identification of Optimal Synthesis Conditions for a Novel Alkaline Anion-Exchange Membrane
Previous Article in Journal
Host–Guest Polymer Complexes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/polym10080912
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Pyridinium Type Poly(Ionic Liquids) as Membranes for CO2 Separation

by
Aristofanis Vollas
1,
Thanasis Chouliaras
1,
Valadoula Deimede
1,*,
Theophilos Ioannides
2 and
Joannis Kallitsis
1,2
1
Department of Chemistry, University of Patras, GR-26504 Patras, Greece
2
Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences (FORTH/ICE-HT), GR-26504 Patras, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2018, 10(8), 912; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10080912
Submission received: 8 June 2018 / Revised: 7 August 2018 / Accepted: 9 August 2018 / Published: 13 August 2018
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
New pyridinium based PILs have been prepared by modification of their precursors based on high molecular weight aromatic polyethers bearing main chain pyridine units. The proposed methodology involves the conversion of the precursors to their ionic analogues via N-methylation reaction, followed by anion exchange methathesis reaction to result in PILs with the desirable anions (tetrafluoroborate and bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide). These PILs show excellent thermal stability, excellent mechanical properties, and most importantly can form very thin, free standing films with minimum thickness of 3 μm. As expected, the PIL containing the TFSI− anion showed improved CO2 and CH4 permeabilities compared to its analogue containing the BF4−. PIL-IL composites membranes have also been prepared using the same PIL and different percentages of pyridinium based IL where it was shown that the membrane with the highest IL weight percentage (45 wt %) showed the highest CO2 permeability (11.8 Barrer) and a high CO2/CH4 ideal selectivity of 35 at room temperature.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Increasing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the environment have contributed to global warming and climate changes [1], which are issues of paramount importance. As fossil-fuel power plants are currently the largest point sources of anthropogenic CO2 emissions, the efficient and economical removal of CO2 from power plant flue gas streams (CO2/N2) constitutes a key technical, financial and environmental challenge [2]. Removal of CO2 form natural gas and biogas can be also viewed in a similar context. Various separation technologies are being developed for the aforementioned processes including absorption with amines, pressure swing adsorption using porous solids and cryogenic separation [3]. Membrane gas separation technology based on polymeric materials is also one of the most widely studied and fast growing separation methods. It offers several advantages over the abovementioned technologies including low energy consumption and operating costs, easy scale up and adaptation into the existing processes [4,5].
Polymeric ionic liquids or poly(ionic liquid)s (PILs) as CO2 separation membrane materials have become an emerging field with great potential in recent years, offering the advantage of better stability compared to supported ionic liquid membranes (SILMs) while preserving most of their properties associated with their ionic liquid (IL) character [6,7,8]. PILs combine the highly tunable nature of ILs, with the improved mechanical stability of the polymers, paving the way to a new generation of functional materials with plethora of applications in diverse fields such as energy (lithium ion batteries, solar cells, fuel cells), environment (water treatment, ion exchange resins), catalysis, microelectronics, bio related applications [9,10,11,12,13]. The mechanism governing gas transport through PIL dense membranes is the one of solution-diffusion [14], thus, CO2 solubility is one of the key factors determining the separation performance of PIL membranes. In addition, both the polymer backbone and the type of ions affect the CO2 sorption capacity [12]. For PILs several studies demonstrate that the chemical composition of both cationic pendants and anions influence the CO2 sorption [9,15,16,17,18].
One of the identified critical challenges for developing polymeric membranes for gas separation is to deal with the “trade off” behavior [19,20]: highly permeable membranes lack selectivity and vice versa. Thus, PILs with varying configurations have been proposed including neat PILs membranes, PIL/IL composite membranes, PIL/IL mixed matrix-based membranes. Neat PILs composed of alkyl imidazolium cations tethered to a polystyrene, polyvinyl or polyacrylate backbone, with NTf2− anions as counter ions are the most well known PILs based membranes that were synthesized via free radical polymerization [17,21,22,23,24]. Alternative IL cation moieties such as ammonium [17,25,26,27], pyridinium [17], pyrrolidiniuum [28,29] based PILs membranes for CO2 separation have also been developed. However, the majority of these PILs show poor mechanical stability due to the combination of low molecular weights and low glass transition temperature (Tg) [30], and therefore could not be formed into robust membranes.
An alternative solution to overcome this problem is the development of PILs based on rigid and fully aromatic backbones with cationic moieties in the main chain or as side chains via condensation reaction. Synthesis of these PILs is usually conducted either by condensation of the respective ionic monomers or via polymer modification. The first route involves complex preparation and purification steps, while the second one enables the facile conversion of commercially available polymers with high molecular weights to their corresponding PILs. Very recently, PILs based on polybenzimidazole (PBI) [31,32,33], polyurethanes [34], polyimides (PI) bearing benzimidazole or quinuclidine units have been also proposed [30]. Aromatic polyethers are generally characterized by excellent mechanical strength as well as chemical and thermal stability. Due to these advantageous characteristics, aromatic polyethers bearing main chain pyridine units can be employed as precursors for the preparation of CO2 gas separation membranes. Aromatic polyethers bearing pyridine units in the main chain synthesized via polycondensation [35,36,37,38] and used as high temperature polymer electrolytes for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFC) as well as their respective N-methyl pyridinium derivatives [39] used in alkaline electrolyte Fuel Cells (FCs) have already been reported by our group.
This work is focused on the conversion of aromatic polyethers bearing main chain pyridine groups to their novel pyridinium based PILs that can form very thin, free standing films with thickness ranging from 3 to 25 μm via a conventional solution casting method. The effect of the counter anion on film forming ability, thermal stability, as well as on the gas permeation properties was investigated. In parallel, and in order to further improve the CO2 permeability, PIL/IL composite membranes containing the TFSI− anion (in both IL and PIL) were also prepared. Different amounts (30, 40, 45 wt %) of a pyridinium based IL were blended with PILs (PIL and IL have the same cation) to evaluate the effect of the free IL on the CO2 permeability and selectivity as well as on film forming ability. Blend membranes were also fabricated by blending different alkyl substituted imidazolium based ILs with PILs to study the IL cation influence on gas separation properties.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Aromatic polyethers bearing main chain pyridine units (Py-APE, Mn 60,000 g/mol), were synthesized according to a previously reported procedure [38]. Dimethyl Sulfate (DMSA, ≥99%), N,N-Dimethylacetamide (DMAc, anhydrous, 99.8%), N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF, anhydrous, 99.8%), Toluene (99.7%), K2CO3 (99%+), Lithium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI, ≥99%), 1-Butyl-4 methyl pyridinium chloride ([bmpy][Cl], 97%) and dichloromethane (DCM, 99.9%) were purchased from Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The ionic liquids 1-hexyl-3-methyl-imidazolium (trifluoromethylsulfonyl) imide ([c6mim][TFSI], >98%) and 1-dodecyl-3-methyl-imidazolium (trifluoromethylsulfonyl) imide ([c12mim][TFSI], 99%) were supplied from IoLitech GmbH (Heilbronn, Germany). The exchange of chloride anion of 1-Butyl-4 methyl pyridinium chloride ([bmpy][Cl]) to the TFSI− anion was performed following a previous work [32]. Sodium tetrafluoroborate (NaBF4, 97%) was supplied by Alfa Aesar (Karlsruhe, Germany). All other solvents were used as received. Before use, ionic liquids were dried under vacuum (10−3 kPa) at a moderate temperature of 45 °C overnight in order to reduce the water and other volatile substances. Single gases, He, CO2, CH4, N2 were supplied by Air Liquid with at least 99.99% purity.

2.2. Synthesis of PILs

PILs have been prepared via conversion of precursor polymers based on high molecular weight aromatic polyethers bearing main chain pyridine units to their ionic analogues via N-methylation reaction [39], followed by anion exchange metathesis reaction using the desirable salts NaBF4 and LITFSI (Scheme 1).

2.2.1. Synthesis of Precursor Py-APE

The synthesis of precursor aromatic polyethers bearing main chain pyridine units (Py-APE) was reported earlier by our group [38]. Polycondensation reaction of the tetramethyl biphenyl diol with 2,5 diphenyl substituted pyridine diol and diphenyl sulfone difluoride took place at 160 °C for 24 and 6 h at 180 °C using DMF/Toluene as solvents and K2CO3 as base. The viscous solution was precipitated in an excess of MeOH/H2O 2/1, washed with water and hexane and dried at 80 °C under vacuum. The 60/40 molar ratio was chosen since this ratio combines the high pyridine content with solubility, thus resulting in Py-APE copolymers with high molecular weights (Mn = 60,000 g/mol, Mw = 125,000 g/mol, PDI = 2.1).

2.2.2. N-Quaternization of Py-APE

In a 100 mL flask, 1 g of Py-APE and 40 mL of dimethylsulfate was added slowly over a period of 10 min while stirring, under argon atmosphere. The temperature was gradually raised to 110 °C and the reaction mixture was left stirring for 24 h. The deep yellow reaction mixture was cooled down to ambient temperature and was precipitated in an excess of deionized water, filtered and washed with water until neutral pH. The obtained polymer was dried in vacuum oven at 60 °C for 2 days and stored in a desiccator until use.

2.2.3. MeSO4− Exchange of N-Quaternized Py-APE

Typically, in a 50 mL flask, 1 g of N-quaternized Py-APE was dissolved in 15 mL of DMAc. After the complete dissolution, 5 eq (2.63 g) of LiTFSI was added while stirring. During the addition of the LITFSI salt the formed LiMeSO4 salt as well as the anion exchange polymer remained dissolved in DMA. The reaction mixture left stirring for 24 h at room temperature in order to ensure the complete exchange by TFSI− anions. The obtained PIL-TFSI was precipitated in water, filtered and thoroughly washed with water and methanol in order to remove the excess of LiTf2N and LiMeSO4. It was further purified by dissolving in DMA (5% w/v), reprecipitation in water and drying at 60 °C in a vacuum oven for 24 h. The same procedure was followed for BF4− using NaBF4 salt.

2.3. Membrane Preparation

The neat PIL membranes were prepared by the solution casting method on a flat glass surface using 3% (w/v) PIL solution in DMAc at 80 °C for 24 h under dry conditions. After solvent evaporation, the formed membrane was peeled off and dried in a vacuum oven at 80 °C (usually 2 days) until constant weight was achieved.
The PIL-IL membranes were also prepared using the solution casting method. In specific, different amounts (wt %) of ILs ([bmpy][TFSI], [c6mim][TFSI] and [c12mim][TFSI]) were added in a 5% (w/v) PIL-TFSI solution (DMAc is the solvent) in order to obtain solutions containing different weight percentages of free IL to the polymer matrix (Table 1 and Scheme 2). The solutions were magnetically stirred for 5 h at room temperature until both components were completely dissolved and a homogeneous solution was obtained. Then, the solutions were poured into a flat glass surface and left for slow evaporation of the solvent at 80 °C for 2 days. Finally, all the membranes were peeled off and dried in a vacuum oven at 80 °C (usually 2 days) until constant weight was achieved.
The thickness of PIL membranes (3–25 μm) as well as PIL-IL membranes (60–90 μm) was measured using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) microscopy (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), where average thickness was calculated from six measurements taken at different locations of each membrane sample. It should be mentioned that leaching of the free IL may take place more easily in the case of thin PIL-IL membranes (25–30 μm) with high IL content. Thus, thicker PIL-IL membranes were prepared compared to neat PIL membranes in order to avoid the undesirable possible leaching of the free IL.

2.4. Characterization

1H NMR spectra were obtained on an Advance DPX 400 MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe,, Germany). The samples were dissolved either in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) or dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO-d6) with tetramethylsilane (TMS) used as internal standard. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using a Labsys TG (Setaram Instrumentation, Caluire-et-Cuire, France). The samples were heated at 20 °C min−1 to 800 °C under nitrogen atmosphere. ATR-IR spectra were recorded on Platinum ATR spectrometer (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany). The surface and the cross-sectional morphology of the membranes were studied by SEM using a LEO Supra 35VP microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The specimens for the cross-section study were prepared by fracturing the membranes in liquid nitrogen. Differential Scanning Calorimetry analyses were performed on a DSC instrument from Perkin Elmer (DSC Q100, Waltham, MA, USA) over a temperature range from −100 to 300 °C (including heating and cooling cycles) under nitrogen flow at a scan rate of 10 °C/min. The first heating run was conducted in order to remove the thermal history and traces of absorbed water and residual solvents from the samples. The glass transition temperatures were recorded in the second heating run.

2.5. Gas Permeation Measurements

CO2 and CH4 permeation experiments (single-gas and in 50/50 vol % CO2/CH4 mixtures) were performed at room temperature employing the Wicke-Kallenbach method [40]. The measurement cell accommodated membranes in the shape of circular discs with diameter of 5 cm. Helium at a flow of 20 cm3 min−1 was employed as the purge gas in the permeate side which was maintained at a pressure of 1 atm. A gas chromatograph (GC-2014, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with thermal conductivity and flame ionization detectors and Carboxen and Porapak Q columns was used for analysis of CO2 and CH4 concentration in the helium permeate stream.
Gas transport through a homogeneous dense membrane follows a solution-diffusion mass transfer mechanism [14]. The permeability (P) was determined using Equation (1) [41]:
P = J Δ p l
where P is the permeability coefficient expressed in Barrer and Δp = p1 − p2, p1 and p2 are the feed and permeate side partial pressures of the measured gas (cm Hg), respectively. J is the steady-state gas flux (cm3/cm2 s) and l is the membrane thickness (cm).
The permeation measurements were repeated with 3 different membranes prepared under the same conditions. According to the solution-diffusion model, the permeability of a gas (P) can be also expressed as the product of gas diffusivity (D) and solubility (S) across the membrane Equation (2):
P = D × S
The ideal selectivity (αi/j), also known as permselectivity, was determined using the following equation, by dividing the permeability of the most permeable gas i (Pi) by the permeability of the least permeable gas j (Pj):
a i j = P i P j = ( D i D j ) × ( S i S j )
The separation factor, (SF), for CO2/CH4 mixtures was determined from the ratio of the concentrations of the more permeable gas species i and the less permeable gas species j in the permeate divided by the ratio of the same gases i and j in the feed stream from the following expression:
S F = y i / y j x i / x j
where yi and yj are the mole fractions of gas components i and j in the permeate and xi and xj are the fractions of components i and j in the feed. SF is also referred as mixed gas selectivity in the text.
At least 3 membrane samples of each type were prepared and used for the gas separation measurements in order to provide the corresponding error bars.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Pyridinium Based PILs

Novel pyridinium based PILs have been synthesized via modification of the precursor aromatic polyether copolymers bearing main chain pyridine units. Different alkyl and aryl groups (e.g., ethyl bromide, benzyl bromide) were used as reagents for performing the N-quaternization reaction, however, the substitution reaction of pyridine was not successful. Thus, a more reactive reagent—dimethyl sulfate (with the smallest sized methyl group)—was chosen to be used as solvent and methylating agent simultaneously for the quaternization reaction [39]. The successful N-quaternization reaction resulted in high purity PILs (≥98%) as confirmed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. In Figure 1 the 1H NMR spectra of precursor copolymer Py-APE and the corresponding N-methyl pyridinium PIL containing the methyl sulfate anion are illustrated (Figure 1b). It is evident that after treatment with dimethyl sulfate, two new peaks appear, the first at 9.6 ppm and the second at 4.2 ppm which correspond to the aromatic proton l close to the pyridinium, and to the methyl group m directly attached to pyridinium, respectively, thus confirming the successful N-quaternization reaction. However, the conversion of pyridine units of the precursor to their pyridinium analogues is not complete. Consequently, the synthesized PILs contain both pyridine and pyridinium units, as evidenced by the presence of the aromatic proton k’ close to the nitrogen of pyridine units which is located at 9.0 ppm. In order to achieve high N-quaternization degrees, different reaction times (24, 48 and 72 h) were followed. However, it was found that the same quaternization degree was obtained for all experiments (50%). The degree of N-substitution was estimated by comparing the aromatic protons at 9.0 and 9.6 ppm attributed to the k’ proton close to the nitrogen of pyridine units and the corresponding l of the methyl-substituted pyridinium PIL, respectively (Figure 1a,b). The relatively moderate degree of quaternization obtained could be attributed to the steric hindrance of the pyridine units to accommodate the N-methyl group.
Due to insolubility of PIL containing MeSO4− as counter anion in water, the ion exchange metathesis reactions using LITFSI and NaBF4 salts were carried out in DMAc. A larger excess of LITFSI or NaBF4 salt was necessary to achieve complete anion exchange in contrast to the synthesis of TFSI-based ILs [42]. Further evidence for the successful exchange to TFSI− and BF4− anions was collected by 19FNMR spectroscopy (ESI, Figures S1 and S2, respectively). In specific, a peak at −73.9 ppm appears which is assigned to the TFSI− anion (Figure S1), while the peak located at −143.5 ppm is attributed to the BF4− group (Figure S2).
The chemical structure of the synthesized PILs was verified through FTIR spectroscopy. A comparison of the PILs spectra with the precursor polymer are given in Figure 2. The precursor sample has two peaks located at 1471 and 1487 cm−1 corresponding to the C=C/C=N of pyridine ring. After modification, a broader, much stronger peak centered at 1482 cm−1 compared to the corresponding of precursor polymer and a shoulder located at 1468 cm−1 are observed. As 50% of the pyridine units were converted to pyridinium, the intensity of the sharp peak at 1471 cm−1 of the precursor was much reduced and became a shoulder in the pyridinium analogue. Moreover, a new peak appears in PILs spectra after methylation at 1609 cm−1 attributed to the stretching vibration of the newly formed C–N bond [39]. Thus, this evidence confirms the successful N-quaternization reaction. Moreover, the successful incorporation of the BF4− and TFSI− counter anions via anion exchange reactions was supported by the appearance of new peaks. In specific, in PILs possessing the BF4− anion, a new band appeared at ~1055 cm−1 which is attributed to the B–F stretching vibration [43]. In the case of PIL possessing the Tf2N− anion, bands at ~1349 cm−1 and in the range of 600–615 cm−1 are assigned to the asymmetric stretching and bending vibrations of SO2, respectively. In addition, the band at 787 cm−1 is attributed to the combination of the C–S and S–N stretching bands [44], while the bands in the range of 1138–1237 cm−1 correspond to the symmetric stretching vibrations of the C–F bond [45].
The thermogravimetric curves of precursor polymer Py-APE and its corresponding PILs with different counter anions are given in Figure 3. A closer inspection of TGA curves reveals that PIL-MeSO4 and PIL-BF4 lost 5% of their initial weight at temperatures up to 136 °C, while PIL-TFSI lost only 2.5%. This weight loss is attributed to absorbed water since MeSO4 and BF4 anions are more hydrophilic compared to the corresponding PIL containing the TFSI anion. Up to 210 °C, PIL-MeSO4 has a total weight loss of 7%, PIL-BF4 has 9% and PIL-TFSI only 4%. As these PILs were measured in film form and were prepared by solution casting using DMAc as solvent, the additional weight loss corresponds to residual DMAc solvent. Moreover, it is evident that all PILs exhibit multi step degradation in contrast to precursor polymer Py-APE which has only a single weight loss step, with an onset degradation temperature (TODT) at 340 °C. The multi step degradation behavior corresponds to the ionic nature of PILs [32]. In addition, the precursor polymer shows improved thermal stability compared to their corresponding PILs. This suggests that the induced ionic character of PILs results in lower thermal stability. The deterioration of thermal stability of quaternized polymers compared to their unquaternized counterparts was also reported by others [31,46]. The comparison of the PILs with BF4− and TFSI− as counter anions, showed that the latter possess increased thermal stability (TODT ~285 °C) which could be attributed to its reduced basicity. In specific, it is known that the thermal stability of ionic liquids increases with decreasing anion basicity [47].
Only the glass transition temperatures of precursor polymer and PIL containing the TFSI− anion could be detected in the DSC thermograms (Figure 4). Their glassy character was confirmed by their high Tg values. The conversion of the precursor polymer to its PIL analogue (PIL-TFSI−) led to a notable Tg decrease (from 258 to 214 °C, respectively). This behavior could be due to the incorporation of cation substituent as well as to the bulky TFSI− anion which both disrupt the close polymer packing, thus leading to a lower Tg [48,49].
The membrane morphology and thickness play a crucial role for their potential scale up and commercial use. Although a lot of new materials have been tested as gas separation membranes only very few could have been formed into films thin enough to achieve high fluxes. So far, most of the works report on the use of dense PIL based membranes for CO2 gas separation with thickness varying between 50 and 150 μm, while it is generally accepted that it is highly desirable to produce membranes with 0.1–1 μm of thickness in order to achieve much higher flux. In our case, we have successfully prepared by conventional solution casting method very thin, free-standing, homogeneous PIL membranes with a thickness from 3 up to 25 μm. The cross-sectional SEM micrograph of a dense, PIL membrane of just 2.8 μm of thickness is depicted in Figure 5. The excellent film forming ability of the prepared PILs in combination with their high Tg values make these materials potential candidates to be evaluated as membranes for natural gas purification (CH4/CO2).

3.2. Gas Separation Properties of Pyridinium Based PILs

Regarding the gas separation properties, the measured single gas permeability values for the precursor membrane (not quaternized polymer) and the corresponding PILs containing BF4− and TFSI− as counter anions are given in Table 2. The results show that both PIL membranes containing different anions show improved CO2 permeability compared to the precursor. In the case of PIL-TFSI membrane, the CO2 and CH4 permeabilities are about 3.5 times and 1.5 times higher than those of the precursor membrane, respectively. It appears that both the incorporation of the methyl group in the pyridine ring as well as the inclusion of the fluorinated TFSI anion enable a looser chain packing, thus leading to higher permeabilities. However, in the case of PIL-BF4, the CH4 permeability is lower in comparison to the one of the precursor polymer. As the BF4 anion is less bulky than TFSI, it can be speculated that the BF4 anion facilitates polymer packing via inter chain interactions, thus leading to more dense structures and consequently to lower permeabilities. The obtained CO2/CH4 ideal selectivities of the precursor membranes and the two PIL membranes are also shown in Table 2. It is evident that both PILs (regardless of the counter anion) show improved ideal selectivities compared to their not quaternized precursor membrane.
The effect of the anion on permeability is well documented [15,16] and it was also confirmed by the present measurements. More specifically, the permeability of both CO2 and CH4 was increased with increasing bulkiness of the anion based on their van der Waal’s increasing volume [50,51] (Vw-BF4− = 30.1 Å3 < Vw-TFSI− = 88.5 Å3). Interestingly, the PIL with the TFSI− anion not only exhibited higher CO2 permeability but also maintained comparable ideal selectivity as that of PIL possessing BF4− anion. Of course it should be mentioned that these PILs show much lower CO2 permeability compared with other rigid, PBI based PILs whereas the CO2 permeability values vary in the range of 2–25 Barrer by variation of the polycation substituent or the anion [33]. In the case of PIL based on polyimides containing TFSI as counter ion, CO2 permeability up to 28.9 Barrer and CO2/CH4 ideal selectivity of ~4 were obtained [30]. The low CO2 permeabilities of the prepared PIL membranes can be possibly associated with the close polymer chain packing. The incorporation of a small and not bulky group such as methyl probably does not contribute to the significant enhancement of the free volume, which could lead to a more loose polymer chain packing and consequently to higher permeability. The polymer chain packing is related to the degree of quaternization. Recently, A. S. Rewar et al. [32] reported that there is an optimum degree of quaternization (DQ = 13%) of PBI based PILs using a bulky 4-tert-butyl benzyl substituent where the CO2 and CH4 permeabilities showed maxima, implying the importance of bulky group substitution in retarding chain packing.
Finally, these PILs follow the conventional trade-off relationship, where the PIL-TFSI possessing the highest permeability showed the lowest ideal selectivity for CO2 and CH4 gases than that of PIL-BF4. The obtained CO2/CH4 ideal selectivities, varying in the range of 41–50, are quite favorable, however permeability has to be further improved as already mentioned.
Mixed gas separation measurements have also been carried out employing a 50/50 CO2/CH4 mixture (Table 2). The CO2 mixed gas permeability of PIL-BF4 membrane was found to increase by 45% from 2 to 2.9 Barrer accompanied by an increase in the separation factor to 72 compared to the ideal selectivity of 50. On the other hand, in the case of PIL-TFSI, the CO2 mixed gas permeability decreased from 4.1 to 3.4 Barrer while the separation factor (SF) does not change compared to corresponding ideal selectivity. It is evident that in the case of PIL-BF4, the mixed gas CO2 permeability increases while mixed gas CH4 permeability remains almost unchanged. It should be noted that CO2 permeability is not constant with the CO2 partial pressure and under certain circumstances could be higher in the low CO2 pressure range [52]. In the case of PIL-TFSI, the mixed gas permeability of both CO2 and CH4 appears to decrease to the same extent, which is attributed to a mutual inhibition of permeation for both gases.

3.3. Preparation and Characterization of PIL-IL Composite Membranes

Due to the very low CO2 permeabilities obtained, an additional direction was to prepare PIL-IL composite membranes as a means to boost CO2 permeability. This is a common strategy adopted by various groups since the incorporation of free IL generally leads to a significant increase of the gas permeabilities of the PIL based membranes [23,53,54]. PIL-IL composite membranes are blends that combine the permeation properties of the PIL with IL, where ILs have the ability to strongly interact with the charged backbone of the PILs through electrostatic interactions, thus leading to the free volume increase, and enhancement of the polymer chain mobility and consequently to CO2 permeability increase. Moreover, these strong electrostatic forces hold the IL into the PIL polymer matrix, thus preventing the leaching under high transmembrane pressure differentials.
Different amounts (30, 40, 45 wt %) of [bmpy][TFSI]-IL1 were blended with PILs containing the TFSI− anion (in both IL and PIL) to evaluate the effect of the free IL on the physicochemical and gas transport properties (Table 1 and Scheme 2).
In this case, the [bmpy][TFSI] was chosen due to its structural similarity with the pyridinium unit of the PIL. Homogeneous, free-standing PIL-IL1 composite membranes using the solution casting method have been obtained in all cases (Figure 6).
The thermal stability of the synthesized PIL and the PIL-IL1 composite membranes was assessed by TGA analysis (Figure 7). The effect of the IL content on the thermal stability of the prepared PIL-IL1 composite membranes was studied. It is evident that the addition of free IL1 increases the thermal stability of the PIL-IL1 composite membranes with respect to the pure PIL. The improved thermal behavior of the PIL-IL membranes compared to the neat PIL could be due to strong electrostatic interactions developed between the cationic polymer backbone and the free IL. The onset of thermal degradation for the three PIL-IL1 composite membranes appeared between 200 and 270 °C.
The thermal properties were further studied by DSC, as depicted in Figure 8. A substantial decrease in the Tg was observed upon increasing percentage of the free IL1 contained in the PIL-IL1 composite membranes. In specific, the Tg of neat PIL containing TFSI− as counter anion is 214 °C while the pure free IL1 shows a Tg at −75 °C which is close with the Tg value (−80 °C) observed by Papaiconomou et al. [55]. The Tgs of PIL-IL1 composite membranes with 40 and 45 wt % of IL1 are 54 and 49 °C, respectively.

3.4. Gas Separation Properties of PIL-IL Composite Membranes

Regarding the study of the gas separation properties of PIL-IL1 composite membranes, it was observed that both CO2 and CH4 single gas permeabilities increased by increasing the amount of free IL incorporated in the polymer matrix, as illustrated in Figure 9. The permeability enhancement with increasing the IL1 percentage is related to the increase of the free volume of the PIL-IL composite membranes resulting in higher polymer chain mobility due to the presence of free IL ion pairs. More specifically, the incorporation of free ILs into the PIL matrix, where the ILs serve as a plasticizer results in gas diffusivity increase as reported by Bara et al. [53]. Since CO2 diffuses much faster in the IL phase than in the solid PIL phase, it can be assumed that most of the CO2 permeability increase is governed by the amount of free IL in the PIL-IL composite membranes [56]. This behavior was also observed for other PIL-IL composite membranes [28,34,57,58,59,60,61,62]. The composite membrane with 55/45 composition showed the highest CO2 single gas permeability (11.8 Barrer) and high CO2/CH4 ideal selectivity (α CO2/CH4 = 35), as shown in Table 3. In comparison to pure PIL-TFSI, the former exhibits 3 times higher CO2 single gas permeability and comparable ideal selectivity.
In addition, composite membranes bearing the same PIL-TFSI and different IL cations containing the TFSI− anion (IL2 and IL3 containing hexyl and dodecyl imidazolium, respectively) were also prepared to study the influence of the IL cation and IL cation substitution on the gas separation properties (Table 1). In fact, homogeneous, free standing membranes with 30% of [c4mim][TFSI]-IL2 (PIL- 30 IL2 membrane) and 30% of [c12mim][TFSI]-IL3 (PIL- 30 IL3 membrane) have been successfully obtained (Figure 6).
In what concerns the IL cation effect, PIL-IL2 membrane with composition 70/30 was compared with the corresponding PIL-IL1 with the same composition. The membrane prepared with IL1 exhibited improved CO2 and CH4 single gas permeabilities than its analogue prepared with IL2 probably due to similar structures of PIL and IL1 (Figure 9 and Table 3).
The study of the effect of the alkyl substituent of imidazolium-based free ILs (IL-2 and IL-3 are composed of hexyl and dodecyl imidazolium-based IL, respectively) on the gas separation properties was made by comparing the PIL-IL2 and PIL-IL3 composite membranes with composition 70/30. It was shown that the alkyl substituent has almost no effect on CO2 and CH4 single gas permeabilities as well as on CO2/CH4 ideal selectivities (Figure 9 and Table 3).
Regarding the mixed gas separation measurements for PIL-IL1 composite membranes, it is generally observed that the separation factor for PIL-IL membranes containing 30 and 40 wt % of IL1 is smaller than the corresponding ideal selectivity while the CO2 mixed gas permeability increases slightly (Table 3). In the case of PIL-45IL1 (45 wt % IL1), the CO2 mixed gas permeability remains almost unchanged compared to the corresponding CO2 single gas case. The presence of IL1 appears to facilitate the permeation of both gases with CH4 being slightly favored over CO2. To the best of our knowledge, it should be noted that there are no literature data concerning mixed gas permeation of the employed pyridinium type IL and, as a result, no comparison can be made with previous reports.
Comparison of the data of this work regarding the CO2/CH4 separation performance with those reported in the literature for other PIL-IL as well as PIL membranes comprising the TFSI anion are illustrated in a Robeson plot [20] (Figure 10). This plot is used to benchmark the gas separation performance of different membrane materials and the “upper bound” line has been adapted from the corresponding figure in Ref. [20]. The Robeson plot in Figure 10 indicates that the prepared PIL-IL membranes lie below the upper bound limit on the left part of the plot characterized by lower permeabilities and higher selectivities compared to other reported PIL-IL membranes. The prepared PIL membranes are placed northwest of other rigid PILs reported in the literature (e.g., PBI based and PI based PILs). Evidently, progress should be made in improving the permeability of the family of membranes studied in the present work. However, it should be mentioned that the novel aspect of the present work lies in the new PIL structure that was successfully synthesized, and has led to robust, very thin membranes down to 3 μm thickness. This PIL was also served as a matrix for the incorporation of high amounts of free ionic liquids resulting still in mechanically stable PIL-IL membranes with improved CO2 permeability. At the same time, although the specific PIL and its respective PIL-IL blend membranes do not lead to sufficiently high CO2 permeability for practical applications, nevertheless, the detailed study of their gas transport properties is important to understand how the PIL structure affects the gas permeability and to provide useful guidelines for further designing new PILs and PIL-IL membranes with improved permeability and stability.
The design and synthesis of new, cross-linked PIL-IL membranes that combine the high IL loadings, which can boost CO2 permeability with the increased stability via the formation of a network that prevents the leaching of the IL, is a topic that we are currently working in order to further develop novel polymeric structures with the desirable transport properties and stability.

4. Conclusions

Novel pyridinium based PILs have been synthesized through conversion of high molecular weight aromatic polyethers bearing main chain pyridine groups to their ionic analogues via N-methylation reaction, followed by anion exchange methathesis reaction. The prepared PILs show high Tg values, high thermal stability and have the ability to form very thin, free standing films with thickness ranging from 3 to 25 μm via a conventional solution casting method. PIL containing the TFSI anion showed higher CO2 and CH4 permeability compared to its analogue containing the BF4 anion, denoting the important role of anion in gas transport properties. PIL-IL composite membranes containing the TFSI− anion (in both IL and PIL) were also prepared by blending PIL with different amounts (30, 40, 45 wt %) of a pyridinium based IL. The addition of the IL into the PIL matrix resulted in the enhancement of both CO2 and CH4 permeabilities of the PIL-IL composite membranes compared to the neat PIL. Moreover, both CO2 and CH4 permeabilities of the PIL-IL composite membranes were increased by increasing the IL content. Composite membranes comprised of PILs and different imidazolium-based IL cations were fabricated and it was shown that PIL-IL membrane containing the pyridinium based IL showed improved CO2 and CH4 permeabilities compared to its analogues containing the imidazolium-based ILs sharing the same composition, probably due to the structural similarity.
Although, it is evident from the obtained results that the prepared pyridinium based PILs and their corresponding PIL/IL composite membranes cannot satisfy the high permeabilities required for e.g., CO2/CH4 separation, however, the knowledge gained through the new PIL and PIL-IL membranes developed could be used for the preparation of ultra thin film composite membranes targeting to much higher CO2 permeance.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/10/8/912/s1, Figure S1: 19FNMR spectrum for PIL containing TFSI− as anion, Figure S2: 19FNMR spectrum for PIL containing BF4− as anion.

Author Contributions

V.D., J.K. and T.I. conceived and designed the experiments; A.V. and T.C. performed the experiments; V.D. wrote the paper.

Funding

This research was funded by the [Operational Programme Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation (NSRF 2014-2020) and co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund)], grant number [MIS 5002556].

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support of this work by the project “Materials and Processes for Energy and Environment Applications” (MIS 5002556) which is implemented under the “Action for the Strategic Development on the Research and Technological Sector”, funded by the Operational Programme “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation” (NSRF 2014-2020) and co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jacobson, M.Z. Review of Solutions to Global Warming, Air Pollution, and Energy Security. Energy Environ. Sci. 2009, 2, 148–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kenarsari, S.D.; Yang, D.; Jiang, G.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Russell, A.G.; Wei, Q.; Fan, M. Review of recent advances in carbon dioxide separation and capture. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 22739–22773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. D’Alessandro, D.M.; Smit, B.; Long, J.R. Carbon Dioxide Capture: Prospects for New Materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6058–6082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Baker, R.W. Membrane Technology and Applications, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ghosal, K.; Freeman, B.D. Gas separation using polymer membranes: An overview. Polym. Technol. 1994, 5, 673–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Blanchard, L.A.; Hancu, D.; Eric, J.; Brennecke, J.F. Green processing using ionic liquids and CO2. Nature 1999, 399, 28–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Camper, D.; Bara, J.E.; Gin, D.L.; Noble, R.D. Room-Temperature Ionic Liquid-Amine Solutions: Tunable Solvents for Efficient and Reversible capture of CO2. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2008, 47, 8496–8498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dai, Z.; Noble, R.D.; Gin, D.L.; Zhang, X.; Deng, L. Combination of ionic liquids with membrane technology: A new approach for CO2 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 497, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tomé, L.C.; Marrucho, I.M. Ionic liquid-based materials: A platform to design engineered CO2 separation membranes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 2785–27824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yuan, J.; Mecerreyes, D.; Antonietti, M. Poly(ionic liquids): An Update. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 1009–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mecerreyes, D. Polymeric ionic liquids: Broadening the properties and applications of polyelectrolytes. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 1629–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Green, O.; Grubjesic, S.; Lee, S.; Firestone, M.A. The design of Polymeric Ionic Liquids for the preparation of functional Materials. J. Macromol. Sci. Part C Polym. Rev. 2009, 49, 339–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yuan, J.; Antonietti, M. Poly(ioniq liquid)s: Polymers expanding classical property profiles. Polymer 2011, 52, 1469–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Baker, R.W.; Low, B.T. Gas Separation Membrane Materials: A Perspective. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 6999–7013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zulficar, S.; Sarwar, M.I.; Mecerreyes, D. Polymeric ionic liquids for CO2 capture and separation: Potential, progress and challenges. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 6435–6451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mineo, P.G.; Livoti, L.; Schiavo, S.L.; Cardiano, P. Fast and reversible CO2 quartz crystal microbalance response of vinylimidazolium-based poly (ionic liquid)s. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2012, 23, 1511–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tang, J.; Shen, Y.; Radosz, M.; Sun, W. Isothermal Carbon Dioxide Sorption in Poly(ionic liquid)s. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 9113–9118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Privalova, E.I.; Karjalainen, E.; Nurmi, M.; Mäki-Arvela, P.; Eränen, K.; Tenhu, H.; Murzin, D.Y.; Mikkola, J.P. Imidazolium-Based Poly(ionic liquid)s as New Alternatives for CO2 capture. ChemSusChem 2013, 6, 1500–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Park, H.B.; Kamcev, J.; Robeson, L.M.; Elimelech, M.; Freeman, B.D. Maximizing the right stuff: The trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity. Science 2017, 356, eaab0530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Robeson, L.M. The upper bound revisited. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bara, J.E.; Gabriel, C.J.; Hatakeyama, E.S.; Carlisle, T.K.; Lessmann, S.; Noble, R.D.; Gin, D.L. Improving CO2 selectivity in polymerized room-temperature ionic liquid gas separation membranes through incorporation of polar substituents. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 321, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bara, J.E.; Lessmann, S.; Gabriel, C.J.; Hatakeyama, E.S.; Noble, R.D.; Gin, D.L. Synthesis and performance of polymerizable Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids as Gas separation Membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 5397–5404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, P.; Paul, D.R.; Chung, T.-S. High Performance membranes based on ionic liquid polymers for CO2 separation from flue gas. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 1052–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Carlisle, T.K.; Wiesenauer, E.F.; Nicodemus, G.D.; Gin, D.L.; Noble, R.D. Ideal CO2/Light Gas separation Performance of Poly(vinylimidazolium) Membranes and Poly(vinylimidazolium)-Ionic Liquid Composite Films. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 1023–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tang, J.; Tang, H.; Sun, W.; Radoz, M.; Shen, Y. Low-pressure CO2 sorption in ammonium-based poly(ionic liquid)s. Polymer 2005, 46, 12460–12467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tang, J.; Tang, H.; Sun, W.; Plancher, H.; Radosz, M.; Shen, Y. Poly (ionic liquid)s: A new material with enhanced and fast CO2 absorption. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3325–3327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nikolaeva, D.; Azcune, I.; Sheridan, E.; Sandru, M.; Genua, A.; Tanczyk, M.; Jaschik, M.; Warmuzinski, K.; Jansen, J.S.; Vankelecom, I.J.F. Poly(vinylbenzyl chloride)-based poly(ionic liquids) as membranes for CO2 capture from flue gas. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 19808–19820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tomé, L.C.; Aboudzadeh, M.A.; Rebelo, L.P.; Freire, C.S.R.; Mecerreyes, D.; Marrucho, I.M. Polymeric ionic liquids with mixtures of counter-anions: A new straightforward strategy for designing pyrrolidinium-based CO2 separation membranes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 10403–10411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bhavasar, R.S.; Kumbharkar, S.C.; Kharul, U.K. Polymeric ionic liquids (PILs): Effect of anion variation on their CO2 sorption. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 389, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shaplov, A.S.; Morozova, S.M.; Lozinskaya, E.I.; Vlasov, P.S.; Gouveia, A.S.L.; Tomé, L.C.; Marrucho, I.M.; Vygodskii, Y.S. Turning into poly(ionic liquid)s as a tool for polyimide modification: Synthesis, characterization and CO2 separation properties. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 580–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bhavasar, R.S.; Kumbharkar, S.C.; Rewar, A.S.; Kharul, U.K. Polybenzimidazole based film forming polymeric ionic liquids: Synthesis and effects of cation-anion variation on their physical properties. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 4083–4096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rewar, A.S.; Bhavasar, R.S.; Sreekumar, K.; Kharul, U.K. Polybenzimidazole based polymeric ionic liquids (PILs): Effect of controlled degree of N-quaternization on physical and gas permeation properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 481, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shaligram, S.V.; Wadgaonkar, P.P.; Kharul, U.K. Polybenzimidazole based polymeric ionic liquids (PILs): Effect of ‘substitution asymmetry’ on CO2 permeation properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 493, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Magalhães, T.O.; Aquino, A.S.; Vecchia, F.D.; Bernard, F.L.; Seferin, M.; Menezes, S.C.; Ligabue, R.; Einloft, S. Synthesis and characterization of new poly(ionic liquid)s designed for CO2 capture. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 18164–18170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Geormezi, M.; Deimede, V.; Kallitsis, J.K.; Neophytides, S. Polymer blends based on copolymers bearing both side and main chain pyridine units as proton exchange membranes for high temperature fuel cells. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 396, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gourdoupi, N.; Andreopoulou, A.K.; Deimede, V.; Kallitsis, J.K. Novel Proton-Conducting Polyelectrolyte Composed of an Aromatic Polyether Containing Main-Chain Pyridine Units for fuel Cell Application. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 5044–5050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Voege, A.; Deimede, V.; Kallitsis, J.K. Side chain crosslinking of aromatic polyethers for high temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell applications. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2012, 50, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pefkianakis, E.K.; Deimede, V.; Daletou, M.K.; Gourdoupi, N.; Kallitsis, J.K. Novel Polymer Electrolyte membrane based on pyridine containing poly(ether sulfone), for application in High-Temperature Fuel Cells. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2005, 26, 1724–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vöge, A.; Deimede, V.; Kallitsis, J.K. Synthesis and properties of alkaline stable pyridinium containing anion exchange membranes. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 45040–45049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ruthven, D.M. Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Processes; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1984; pp. 127–128. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yampolskii, Y.; Pinnau, I.; Freeman, B.D. (Eds.) Materials Science of Membranes for Gas and Vapor Separation; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 251–270. [Google Scholar]
  42. Huddleston, J.G.; Visser, A.E.; Reichert, W.M.; Willauer, H.D.; Broker, G.A.; Rogers, R.D. Characterization and comparison of hydrophilic and hydrophobic room temperature ionic liquids incorporating the imidazolium cation. Green Chem. 2001, 3, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Suarez, P.A.Z.; Dullius, J.E.L.; Einloft, S.; De Souza, R.F.; Dupont, J. The use of new ionic liquids in two phase catalytic hydrogenation reaction by rhodium complexes. Polyhedron 1996, 15, 1217–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pennarun, P.-Y.; Jannasch, P. Influence of the alkali metal salt on the properties of solid electrolytes derived from a Lewis acidic polyether. Solid State Ion. 2005, 176, 1849–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sylverstein, R.M. Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds, 4th ed.; John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  46. Chen, C.; Hess, A.R.; Jones, A.R.; Liu, X.; Wang, R.; Liu, S.L.; Pramoda, K.P. Effects of crosslinking modification on gas separation performance of Matrimid membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 225, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, C.; Cui, G.; Luo, X.; Xu, Y.; Li, H.; Dai, S. Highly Efficient and Reversible SO2 Capture by Tunable Azole-Based Ionic Liquids through Multiple-Site Chemical Absorption. Angew. Chem. 2011, 50, 4918–4922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Obadia, M.M.; Fagour, S.; Vygodskii, Y.S.; Vidal, F.; Serghei, A.; Shaplov, A.S.; Drockenmuller, E. Probing the Effect of Anion Structure on the Physical Properties of Cationic 1,2,3-Triazolium-Based Poly(ionic liquid)s. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2016, 54, 2191–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yoshizawa, M.; Ogihara, W.; Ohno, H. Novel polymer electrolytes prepared by copolymerization of ionic liquid monomers. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2002, 13, 589–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bondi, A. Van der Waals Volumes and Radii. J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Park, J.Y.; Paul, D.R. Correlating and prediction of gas permeability in glassy polymer membrane materials via a modified free volume based group contribution method. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 125, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Koros, W.J.; Chern, R.T. Separation of gaseous mixtures using polymer membranes. In Handbook of Separation Process Technology; Rousseau, R.W., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1987; pp. 862–953. [Google Scholar]
  53. Bara, J.E.; Hatakeyama, E.S.; Gin, D.L.; Noble, R.D. Improving CO2 permeability in polymerized room temperature ionic liquid gas separation membranes through the formation of a solid composite with a room-temperature ionic liquid. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008, 19, 1415–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, P.; Pramoda, K.P.; Chung, T.-S. CO2 separation from flue gas using polyvinyl-(Room temperature ionic liquid)-Room Temperature Ionic liquid Composite Membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 9344–9353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Papaiconomou, N.; Yakelis, N.; Salminen, J.; Bergman, R.; Prausnitz, J.M. Synthesis and properties of seven ionic liquids containing 1-Methyl-3 octylimidazolium or 1-Butyl-4-methylpyridinium Cations. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2006, 51, 1389–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Miller, A.I.; Carlisle, T.K.; Lafrate, A.I.; Voss, B.A.; Bara, J.E.; Hudiono, Y.C.; Wiesenauer, B.R.; Gin, D.L.; Noble, R.D. Design of functionalized room-temperature ionic liquid-based materials for CO2 separations and selective blocking of hazardous chemical vapors. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Carlisle, T.K.; Nicodemus, G.D.; Gin, D.L.; Noble, R.D. CO2/light gas separation performance of cross-linked poly(vinylimidazolium) gel membranes as a function of ionic liquid loading and cross-linker content. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 397–398, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Teodoro, R.M.; Tomé, L.C.; Mantione, D.; Mecerreyes, D.; Marrucho, I.M. Mixing poly(ionic liquid)s and ionic liquids with different cyano anions: Membrane forming ability and CO2/N2 separation properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 552, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tomé, L.C.; Isik, M.; Freire, C.S.R.; Mecerreyes, D.; Marrucho, I.M. Novel pyrrolidinium-based polymeric ionic liquids with cyano counter-anions: High performance membrane materials for post-combustion CO2 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 483, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tomé, L.C.; Gouveia, A.S.L.; Freire, C.S.R.; Mecerreyes, D.; Marrucho, I.M. Polymeric ionic liquid-based membranes: Influence of polycation variation on gas transport and CO2 selectivity properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 486, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tomé, L.C.; Mecerreyes, D.; Freire, C.S.R.; Rebelo, L.P.N.; Marrucho, I.M. Pyrrolidinium-based polymeric ionic liquid materials: New perspectives for CO2 separation membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 428, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. McDanel, W.M.; Cowan, M.G.; Barton, J.A.; Gin, D.L.; Noble, R.D. Effect of monomer structure on curing behavior, CO2 solubility and gas permeability of ionic liquid-based epoxy-amine resins and ion-gels. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 54, 4396–4406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 10 00912 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthetic route for the synthesis of pyridinium based PILs.
Scheme 1. Synthetic route for the synthesis of pyridinium based PILs.
Polymers 10 00912 sch001
Polymers 10 00912 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Chemical structures of the ionic liquids used to prepare PIL-IL composite membranes.
Scheme 2. Chemical structures of the ionic liquids used to prepare PIL-IL composite membranes.
Polymers 10 00912 sch002
Polymers 10 00912 g001 550
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectra (DMSO-d6) of precursor polymer Py-APE (a) and its corresponding PIL with counter anions (b) MeSO4−, (c) BF4− and (d) TFSI−.
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectra (DMSO-d6) of precursor polymer Py-APE (a) and its corresponding PIL with counter anions (b) MeSO4−, (c) BF4− and (d) TFSI−.
Polymers 10 00912 g001
Polymers 10 00912 g002 550
Figure 2. FT-IR spectra of precursor polymer Py-APE and its corresponding PILs with different counter anions.
Figure 2. FT-IR spectra of precursor polymer Py-APE and its corresponding PILs with different counter anions.
Polymers 10 00912 g002
Polymers 10 00912 g003 550
Figure 3. TGA curves of precursor polymer Py-APE and its corresponding PILs with different counter anions.
Figure 3. TGA curves of precursor polymer Py-APE and its corresponding PILs with different counter anions.
Polymers 10 00912 g003
Polymers 10 00912 g004 550
Figure 4. DSC curves of precursor copolymer and its corresponding PILs with different counter anions.
Figure 4. DSC curves of precursor copolymer and its corresponding PILs with different counter anions.
Polymers 10 00912 g004
Polymers 10 00912 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM image of PIL containing BF4− counter anion.
Figure 5. SEM image of PIL containing BF4− counter anion.
Polymers 10 00912 g005
Polymers 10 00912 g006 550
Figure 6. Images of the prepared (a) PIL-TFSI and PIL-IL composite membranes with (b) 30 wt % of IL1, (c) 40 wt % of IL1, (d) 45 wt % of IL1, (e) 30 wt % of IL2 and (f) 30 wt % of IL3.
Figure 6. Images of the prepared (a) PIL-TFSI and PIL-IL composite membranes with (b) 30 wt % of IL1, (c) 40 wt % of IL1, (d) 45 wt % of IL1, (e) 30 wt % of IL2 and (f) 30 wt % of IL3.
Polymers 10 00912 g006
Polymers 10 00912 g007 550
Figure 7. TGA curves of neat PIL and PIL-IL1 composite membranes.
Figure 7. TGA curves of neat PIL and PIL-IL1 composite membranes.
Polymers 10 00912 g007
Polymers 10 00912 g008 550
Figure 8. DSC curves of neat PIL and PIL-IL1 composite membranes.
Figure 8. DSC curves of neat PIL and PIL-IL1 composite membranes.
Polymers 10 00912 g008
Polymers 10 00912 g009 550
Figure 9. CO2 and CH4 single gas permeabilities of the prepared PIL-IL composite membranes at room temperature.
Figure 9. CO2 and CH4 single gas permeabilities of the prepared PIL-IL composite membranes at room temperature.
Polymers 10 00912 g009
Polymers 10 00912 g010 550
Figure 10. CO2/CH4 separation performance of the prepared membranes. Data are plotted on a log-log scale and the upper bound line is adapted from the respective Robeson plot [20]. Literature data reported for other PIL-IL composite membranes (∎) [30,60,61,62] and PIL membranes (✳) [30,33].
Figure 10. CO2/CH4 separation performance of the prepared membranes. Data are plotted on a log-log scale and the upper bound line is adapted from the respective Robeson plot [20]. Literature data reported for other PIL-IL composite membranes (∎) [30,60,61,62] and PIL membranes (✳) [30,33].
Polymers 10 00912 g010
Table
Table 1. Composition of the prepared PIL-IL composite membranes (PIL refers to the PIL containing TFSI as counter anion).
Table 1. Composition of the prepared PIL-IL composite membranes (PIL refers to the PIL containing TFSI as counter anion).
Composite MembranesILIL wt %Solvent
PIL-30 IL1IL1-[bmpy][TFSI]30DMAc
PIL-40 IL1IL1-[bmpy][TFSI]40DMAc
PIL-45IL1IL1-[bmpy][TFSI]45DMAc
PIL-30 IL2IL2-[c6mim][TFSI]30DMAc
PIL-30 IL3IL3-[c12mim][TFSI]30DMAc
Table
Table 2. Separation performance of the prepared polymer precursor Py-APE, PIL-BF4 and PIL-TFSI membranes at room temperature (1 Barrer =   10 − 10   cm 3 ( STP )   cm   cm − 2   s − 1   cm   Hg − 1 ).
Table 2. Separation performance of the prepared polymer precursor Py-APE, PIL-BF4 and PIL-TFSI membranes at room temperature (1 Barrer =   10 − 10   cm 3 ( STP )   cm   cm − 2   s − 1   cm   Hg − 1 ).
Polymeric MembraneSingle Gas PermeabilityIdeal SelectivityMixed Gas PermeabilityMixed Gas Selectivity
CompoundCO2 (Barrer)CH4 (Barrer)α CO2/CH4CO2 (Barrer)SF CO2/CH4
Py-APE1.2 ± 0.10.07 ± 0.0117--
PIL-BF42.0 ± 0.20.04 ± 0.01502.9 ± 0.172
PIL-TFSI4.1 ± 0.10.10 ± 0.01413.4 ± 0.140
Table
Table 3. Separation performance of the prepared PIL-TFSI and PIL-IL membranes at room temperature (1 Barrer =   10 − 10   cm 3 ( STP )   cm   cm − 2   s − 1   cm   Hg − 1 ).
Table 3. Separation performance of the prepared PIL-TFSI and PIL-IL membranes at room temperature (1 Barrer =   10 − 10   cm 3 ( STP )   cm   cm − 2   s − 1   cm   Hg − 1 ).
CompoundCO2 Single Gas Permeability (Barrer)α CO2/CH4 (Ideal Selectivity)CO2 Mixed Gas Permeability (Barrer)SF CO2/CH4 (Mixed Gas Selectivity)
PIL-TFSI4.1 ± 0.1413.4 ± 0.140
PIL-30IL17.3 ± 0.4669.0 ± 0.260
PIL-40IL18.7 ± 0.12610.0 ± 0.225
PIL-45IL111.8 ± 0.13511.1 ± 0.226
PIL-30IL25.4 ± 0.252--
PIL-30IL36.0 ± 0.447--

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vollas, A.; Chouliaras, T.; Deimede, V.; Ioannides, T.; Kallitsis, J. New Pyridinium Type Poly(Ionic Liquids) as Membranes for CO2 Separation. Polymers 2018, 10, 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10080912

AMA Style

Vollas A, Chouliaras T, Deimede V, Ioannides T, Kallitsis J. New Pyridinium Type Poly(Ionic Liquids) as Membranes for CO2 Separation. Polymers. 2018; 10(8):912. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10080912

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vollas, Aristofanis, Thanasis Chouliaras, Valadoula Deimede, Theophilos Ioannides, and Joannis Kallitsis. 2018. "New Pyridinium Type Poly(Ionic Liquids) as Membranes for CO2 Separation" Polymers 10, no. 8: 912. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10080912

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop