Next Article in Journal
Reconfigurable Shape Memory and Self-Welding Properties of Epoxy Phenolic Novolac/Cashew Nut Shell Liquid Composites Reinforced with Carbon Nanotubes
Next Article in Special Issue
The Coordination and Luminescence of the Eu(III) Complexes with the Polymers (PMMA, PVP)
Previous Article in Journal
Thermoresponsive Hydrogels and Their Biomedical Applications: Special Insight into Their Applications in Textile Based Transdermal Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modifying an Active Compound’s Release Kinetic Using a Supercritical Impregnation Process to Incorporate an Active Agent into PLA Electrospun Mats
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 10
Issue 5
10.3390/polym10050481
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation of PLGA/MWCNT Composite Nanofibers by Airflow Bubble-Spinning and Their Characterization

by
Yue Fang
,
Fujuan Liu
*,
Lan Xu
,
Ping Wang
and
Jihuan He
National Engineering Laboratory for Modern Silk, College of Textile and Engineering, Soochow University, 199 Ren-ai Road, Suzhou 215123, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2018, 10(5), 481; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10050481
Submission received: 6 April 2018 / Revised: 24 April 2018 / Accepted: 26 April 2018 / Published: 28 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrospinning of Nanofibres)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)/multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) composite nanofibers have been successfully fabricated via airflow bubble-spinning. In this work, a systematic study of the effects of solution concentration, relative humidity (RH), and composition on the morphology of PLGA nanofibers is reported. By comparing the distribution of fiber diameter, we found that the spinning effect was the best when the temperature was kept at 25 °C, the collecting distance 18 cm, the concentration 8 wt %, and the relative humidity 65%. MWCNTs used as added nanoparticles were incorporated into the PLGA nanofibers. The volatile solvents were used to achieve the purpose of producing nanoporous fibers. Besides, the rheological properties of solutions were studied and the PLGA or PLGA/MWCNT composite nanofibers with a nanoporous structure were also completely characterized using scanning electron microscope (SEM), a thermogravimetric analyzer(TGA), X-ray diffraction(XRD) and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. In addition, we compared the mechanical properties of the fibers. It was found that the addition of MWCNTs significantly enhanced the tensile strength and elasticity of composite nanofibers without compromising the nanoporous morphology. The results showed that the breaking strength of the composite fiber bundle was three times as strong as the pure one, and the elongation at the break was twice as great. This work provided a novel technique successfully not only to get rid of the potential safety hazards caused by unexpected static but also prepare oriented nanoporous fibers, which would demonstrate an impressive prospect for the fields of adsorption and filtration.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Electrospinning has been recognized as the best simple and efficient technique for the production of polymer nanofibers. Its main working principle is to use electric field force to overcome the surface tension of the Taylor cone of solution or melt in the high voltage electric field environment, and the spinning liquid that undergoes charge transfer is stretched and refined to form nanofibers. Due to the high surface area, high surface activity and high surface energy, electrospun nanofibers can be used in a wide variety of applications such as nonwoven fabrics [1], sensorics [2], photonics [3], filtration [4], composites [5], wound dressing [6], tissue engineering [7], fuel cells [8] and so on. However, due to the low production volume of conventional single-needle electrostatic spinning, the application of nanofibers in commercial production is inhibited, and its yield is usually 0.01–0.1 g/h [9]. Therefore, a new spinning process, bubble electrospinning, came into being.
Bubble electrospinning [10,11,12,13,14,15,16], as the initial stage of the bubble spinning process, was first invented in 2007 by Professor Jihuan He and his team (CHN Patent No. ZLGL2007030001). Similar to the electrospinning process, bubble electrospinning is also performed under a high-voltage electric field environment. It utilizes electric field force to overcome the surface tension of the polymer or melt gas bubbles and the film, instead of the traditional surface tension of electrospinning Taylor cones. Then the bubbles and the film are ruptured, eventually becoming nanofibers due to the electric field force. Compared with traditional single-needle spinning, the bubble electrospinning process is not only simpler and more effective, but also can significantly increase the production of nanofibers.
However, whether it is bubble electrospinning or traditional electrostatic spinning, thousands or even tens of thousands of volts are needed to provide the spinning power. Such a high voltage also brings an inevitable huge safety hazard, which challenges both laboratory and industrial production. The airflow bubble-spinning method [17,18] is used in this paper, which utilizes an external airflow with a certain temperature and speed for the surface tension of the film, polymer, and melt bubbles. This is different from the electric field force in bubble electrospinning. The airflow promotes the bursting of the bubble, and due to the bubble bursting, jets will be produced, stretching with the solvent evaporation and jet curing, and nanofibers will finally be formed on the collecting plate. This not only has the advantage of a high yield from the bubble spinning method, but also avoids the threat of high voltage static electricity.
The spinning material PLGA is a widely used biodegradable and biocompatible polymer. In recent years, with the development of electrospinning technology, PLGA nanofiber mats prepared by electrospinning have been widely utilized in the medical field, such as surgery, drug release devices and tissue engineering scaffolds [19,20,21,22]. In recent years, people’s attention has shifted from pure PLGA to nanocomposite materials, as for PLGA/MWCNT composite nanofibers. Qi and Rui-ling et al. have studied the release of doxorubicin from electrospun MWCNT/PLGA hybrid nanofibers [23]. Wang and Jing et al. have studied the effect of plasma treated PLGA/MWCNT-COOH composite nanofibers on nerve cell behavior [24]; and the effect of the porous microstructures of poly(lactic acid-co-glycolic acid)/carbon nanotube composites on the growth of fibroblast cells has been studied by Fujuan Liu et al. [25].
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) is one of the most lightweight materials to date, and it has excellent electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity. As a new generation of high performance reinforcements, it has unpredictable potential for development. In particular, the continuous carbon nanotube composites that are made of continuous carbon nanotubes fibers and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have been recognized as epoch-making third-generation advanced composites [26,27,28]. Moreover, there has been much research focused on the biological applications of CNTs at the cellular level recently. These studies clearly demonstrate that CNTs can be used as one of the most promising nanofibers to mimic the extracellular matrix. Early in this development process, Liu and her team successfully incorporated multi-walled carbon nanoparticles into polymers for electrospinning. The composite nanofibers are uniform and have excellent mechanical properties [29].
CNTs have good heat transfer performance and a large aspect ratio, thus the heat exchange performance in the length direction is high and the heat exchange performance in the vertical direction is relatively low. With proper orientation, the carbon nanotubes can synthesize highly anisotropic heat conduction materials. In addition, carbon nanotubes have high thermal conductivity. As long as the carbon nanotubes are doped in the composite material, the thermal conductivity of the composite material may be greatly improved [30].
This article utilized airflow bubble-spinning without high-voltage electrostatic hazards to fabricate PLGA/MWCNT composite nanofibers. Nanofibers with porous structure were also obtained. Additionally, we show that multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) can be incorporated into PLGA nanofibers under optimal spinning conditions. The composite nanofibers were expected to have superior mechanical properties when compared to the pure PLGA nanofibers. These PLGA or PLGA/MWCNT composite nanofibers were also characterized by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The PLGA or PLGA/MWCNTs composite nanofibers should be especially useful for the development of adsorption and filtration materials in the future.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

The poly(lactide-co-glycolide) acid (PLGA, Mw =113,000 g/mol) used in this experiment was purchased from Jinan Daigang Biological Engineering Co. Ltd. (Jinan, China). Chloroform (CF) (analytical reagent) was purchased from Shanghai Lingfeng Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All chemicals were used as received without further purification.
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) (10–20nm in diameter; 10–30μm in length) were purchased from Beijing Deke Island Gold Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China).
PLGA was dissolved in chloroform and then a magnetic stirrer (HJ-6A Gongyi to China Instrument Co. Ltd., Gongyi, China) was used to stir the obtained mixture for about 1.5 h at room ambient temperature, to prepare transparent solutions with concentrations of 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10 wt %, respectively. A total of 0.1 wt % MWCNTs was added into the 8 wt % solution, and then the mixed solution was subjected to ultrasonic oscillations of not less than thirty minutes using an ultrasonic cleaner (SL-5200DT, Nanjing Shunliu Instrument Co. Ltd., Nanjing, China).

2.2. The Apparatus of Airflow Bubble-Spinning

According to the principle of the airflow bubble-spinning method described above, the experimental set-up of the airflow bubble-spinning is indicated in Figure 1. As shown, the device is mainly composed of a foaming device, collecting device, and a blowing device. The foaming device consists of a liquid storage tube and a small air pump that can provide airflow for the generation of air bubbles. The blowing device consists of two blowers. The diameter of the liquid storage tube used in this experiment was 10 mm and the airflow rate used in this test was 500 L/min. The collecting distance D was 18 cm.
Figure 2 shows the collecting device schematic: (a) as the full collecting board is to receive nanofibers; and (b) as the row column collecting device is to receive nanofibers for the mechanical behavior test.
When we used the new airflow bubble-spinning method to spin, it was always easy to form large droplets on the collecting device. The droplets would fix the fibers and fiber bundles on the tin foil so that the spinning samples ware difficult to peel off from the foil. This is a big problem for sampling to test the mechanical properties. The full collecting board was used to collect the nanofibers for SEM characterization and the row column collecting device was used to intercept the fiber stretched in the air by the column net on the collecting device for the tensile performance test.

2.3. The Process of Airflow Bubble-Spinning

When the airflow bubble-spinning experiments were carried out, the prepared spinning solution was loaded into the liquid storage tube. The compressed air produced by the air pump causes the spinning solution to form continuous single bubble, and the blower blows out the airflow, causing the bubbles become large and eventually rupture. At the same time, the jets generated by the bubble are stretched. Accompanied by solvent evaporation, the jets will solidify and the PLGA nanoporous fibers will be deposited on the collecting plate. This process was repeated until the polymer bubble in the tube could not be generated. The relative humidity used in the experimental process was 65%.

2.4. Measurement and Characterization

The morphology of the PLGA or PLGA/MWCNT composite nanofibers was characterized using a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan). The samples were sputter-coated with a gold film before measurements. The fiber diameters were determined using Image J software (developed by the U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). At least 20 nanofibers in different SEM images were analyzed for each sample.
Rheological studies were run on a rheometer (TA Instruments, AR2000, New Castle, DE, USA) with a 40 mm cone plate (Ti, 40/1°). The normal force applied to the sample during the lowering of the top plate was limited to 0.1 N. The shear rate was linearly increased from 0.1 to 1000 1/s at 25 °C. All rheological measurements were repeated on at least two different samples.
The thermogravimetric analysis was carried out using the thermo-differential thermal analyzer (TG/DTA, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The samples were heated at 20 °C/min in a nitrogen atmosphere with a temperature control range from room temperature to 600 °C.
X-ray diffraction was performed by a fully automatic X-ray diffractometer (X’Pert-Pro MRD, Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The test conditions were CuKα rays, X-ray wavelength λ = 1.54076 Å, and a super-detection counter recording the X-diffraction intensity curve where 2θ is between 5° and 60°.
FTIR was measured using the infrared spectrometer (Nicolet 5700, Thermo Nicolet Company, Waltham, MA, USA). In this test, we needed to collect 1–2 mg fiber samples and cut them into powder. In order to crush the samples to the micron level, about 200 mg KBr powder were added to the samples. The mixture was fully ground and then became thin slices through the compression method. After the success of the tablet presses, it was again necessary to dry to reduce the interference of the water vapor absorption peak. Finally, the drying tablets were put into the infrared spectrometer for testing.
The mechanical properties were determined by equilibrating the fiber bundle for 24 h at a constant temperature and humidity (temperature 20 ± 2 °C, relative humidity 65 ± 2%) and then performing the test on an Instron 3365 Universal Power Meter (Instron, Norwood, MA, USA). The test conditions were a clamping length of 20 mm, with a pre-tension of 0.2 cN and a tensile rate of 10 mm/min, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of the Spinning Concentration on the Morphology of PLGA Fibers

Fiber morphology is closely associated with solution concentrations. In the ideal state, the chloroform solvent used in this experiment is highly volatile. When the solvent evaporation rate is greater than the jetting, holes will form on the fibers, which are nanoporous. Figure 3 shows the SEM micrographs and the diameter distribution histograms of the nanoporous fibers obtained with airflow bubble-spun PLGA solutions with different concentrations (from 6 to 10 wt %). When the solution concentration was lower than 5 wt %, there were no effective nanofibers obtainedon the tin foil paper (not shown in Figure 3). When the concentrations were kept at 6 and 7 wt %, the fibers were obtained on the collecting plate, but the porous effect was not obvious (Figure 3a,c). However, if the concentrations were increased to 8 and 10 wt %, the fiber surface showed clear porosity (Figure 3e,g).
The fiber diameters were also measured to be 459, 550, 527 and 1150 nm at concentrations of 6, 7, 8 and 10 wt %, respectively. The diameter of the fibers increased non-linearly with the concentration (Figure 4), which is consistent with results reported in the literature [29]. The diameter distribution histograms of the nanofibers formed under various concentrations show that the formed PLGA fibers are relatively uniform (Figure 3b,d,f,h).

3.2. Effect of Relative Humidity on the Morphology of PLGA Fibers

The formation of porous fibers is mainly based on the high volatility of the solvent, and the relative humidity is also an important parameter for the control of the morphology of the fibers [31]. Figure 5 exhibits SEM micrographs and the diameter distribution histograms of nanoporous fibers via airflow bubble-spun PLGA solutions with different relative humidities (from 70% to 85%). As shown in Figure 5, when the relative humidity is greater than 70%, the fiber porosity is more obvious. However, with the volatilization of the solvent and the air flow caused by the blower, the relative humidity of the surroundings would change in an interval constantly. Through adjusting experiments, it was finally concluded that the spinning effect could be best when the relative humidity was controlled during the 70–80%. From Figure 5, it can be seen that the nanofibers can be produced at various relative humidities. The fiber diameters were found to be 596, 684, 676 and 987 nm at a relative humidity of 70%, 75%, 80% and 85% respectively. From Figure 3f, it can be seen that the average diameter of PLGA nanofibers was 527 nm at RH = 65%. From Figure 6, it can be seen that the diameter of the fibers increases non-linearly with the increase inrelative humidity.

3.3. Effect of MWCNTs on the Structure and Properties of PLGA Nanofiber Bundles Prepared by Airflow Bubble-Spinning

3.3.1. Rheological Properties

The viscosity plays a key role in airflow bubble-spinning since the viscous polymer bubble is stretched under the force of the airflow and ruptures to rush forward to the collecting plate. Therefore, it is necessary to study the effect of the addition of MWCNTs on the viscosity of the PLGA spinning solution. Figure 5 displays the rheological behavior between the shear viscosity and shear rate of the PLGA/MWCNT and PLGA solutions. To the best of our knowledge, the viscosity of the solutions was dependent on the concentration. The viscosity rose with an increase in the solution concentration. It has been reported that the orientation of macromolecular chains was the major cause of shear thinning behavior [29]. With the increase in the shear rate, the number of oriented polymer segments increased, which can decrease the viscosity, greatly promoting the shear thinning behavior. From Figure 7 we can see that the addition of MWCNTs has little effect on the viscosity of the 8 wt % PLGA solution.

3.3.2. Morphology of the PLGA/MWCNT Composite Nanofibers

The morphology of the PLGA/MWCNT composite nanofibers is shown in Figure 8. From Figure 8, it can be seen that the average diameter of the PLGA/MWCNT nanoporous fibers was found to be 550 nm. From Figure 3f, it can be seen that the average diameter of the PLGA nanofibers was 527 nm. The data illustrated that, after the addition of MWCNTs, the diameter of the nanofibers not only became slightly thicker but also more even. These results are consistent with the data from the literature [29].

3.3.3. Thermo Gravimetric Analyzer (TGA)

The PLGA/MWCNTand PLGA nanofiberswere characterized using TGA (curves a and b in Figure 9). From Figure 9, it can be seen that the PLGA nanofibers begin to decompose at 325 °C and reach the maximum decomposition rate at 415 °C. When the temperature reach 420 °C, the residual mass becomes constant even if the temperature rises again. This means that the thermal decomposition of PLGA nanofibers was complete (Figure 9b). Compared to PLGA nanofibers, the PLGA/MWCNT composite nanofibers decompose at 330 °C and reach a maximum decomposition rate at 420 °C. Finally, the weight is kept constant,the same as for PLGA, at 420 °C. This shows that the multi-walled carbon nanotubes influence the thermal stability of PLGA, but the effect is weaker, which may be due to the small amount of MWCNTs that were added.

3.3.4. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

Figure 10 demonstrates the X-ray diffraction spectra of PLGA/MWCNTs and PLGA nanofibers. Many studies in the literature [32,33] show that the diffraction peaks of carbon nanotubes mainly occur around 26°. As shown in Figure 10, the diffraction peaks of pure PLGA mainly occur at 21°, while the diffraction peaks of PLGA/MWCNTs are mainly at 21.5°. The positions of the two diffraction peaks are basically the same, which further shows that there is almost no bonding reaction between PLGA and MWCNTs in PLGA/MWCNT nanofibers, and both of the components are physically combined.

3.3.5. Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

Figure 11 exhibits the infrared spectra of PLGA/MWCNT nanofibers (a) and PLGA nanofibers (b). As shown in Figure 11, below, the absorption peak corresponding to the carbon nanotube skeleton is the C=C contraction peak at 1640 cm−1, but due to the PLGA also having a C=C bond, s there is a superposition between these two peaks, which results in the presence of MWCNTs in the infrared spectrum is invisible observation.
In Figure 11, it can be see that there is no difference in peak position and peak intensity, and no new chemical bonds are formed, because both the MWCNT and PLGA macromolecules in the fibers are the only physical combination. This result is in agreement with the XRD data.

3.3.6. Mechanical Behavior

In a series of experimental verifications, it was found that the addition of carbon nanotubes can significantly improve the mechanical properties of the composites [29,34]. We expected that PLGA/carbon nanotube composite nanofibers will display excellent mechanical properties. Figure 12 shows the load-strain curves of PLGA/MWCNT composite nanofibers (a) and PLGA nanofibers (b). As shown in Figure 12, they are the typical load-strain curves of PLGA nanofibers with and without MWCNTs. From Table 1, it can be clearly seen that the breaking strength and the elongation at the break of the composite nanofibers were significantly enhanced even with only 0.1 wt% MWCNTs mixed with the PLGA. In addition, the composite PLGA/MWCNT nanofibers exhibited a much higher Young’s modulus (the slope of the initial straight-line part in Figure 12a,b) when compared to that of pure PLGA nanofibers. The enhanced mechanical properties of the composite PLGA/MWCNT nanofiber should be ascribed to the presence of MWCNTs uniformly dispersed in the PLGA matrix. MWCNTs also have a large length to diameter ratio, and are flexible. When they are well dispersed in the polymer and the interface bonding strength is appropriate and there is no agglomeration, they will be able to achieve the effect of enhancing the mechanical properties of the fibers.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we systematically studied the effect of solution concentration, relative humidity, and spinning composition on the morphology of PLGA nanofibers fabricated by airflow bubble-spinning. PLGA or PLGA/MWCNT composite nanofibers with a porous structure were successfully obtained. We found that under certain constant spinning conditions, the concentration of the solution does not obviously affect the morphology of the fiber. However, the concentration will affect the diameter distribution of the obtained fibers. Based on the continuous optimization of the experimental parameters, nanoporous fibers can be formed. A better interconnected porous structure forms in a certain range and with greater relative humidity. In addition, under the optimized conditions, the formed PLGA/MWCNT composite nanofibers with relative uniform diameter distribution exhibited noticeably superior mechanical properties to those of pure PLGA nanofibers. The PLGA and PLGA/MWCNT composite nanofibers could be used for the future development of the fields of adsorption and filtration, which is currently ongoing in our laboratory.

Author Contributions

Fujuan Liu and Yue Fang designed the experiments; Yue Fang performed the experiments; Fujuan Liu and Yue Fang did the characterization. Lan Xu, Ping Wang and Jihuan He analyzed the data; Fujuan Liu and Yue Fang wrote the paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2017M621817), PAPD (Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions), Nantong Science and Technology Project (Grant No. GY12016034).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ji, S.Y.; Park, C.K.; Jeong, Y.H.; Cho, J.H.; Paik, J.H.; Yoon, S.H.; Hwang, K.R. The fabrication and characterization of piezoelectric PZT/PVDF electrospun nanofiber composites. Nanomater. Nanotechnol. 2016, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Su, Z.; Ding, J.; Wei, G. Cheminform abstract: Electrospinning: A facile technique for fabricating polymeric nanofibers doped with carbon nanotubes and metallic nanoparticles for sensor applications. Cheminform 2015, 46, 52598–52610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xue, W.; Zhang, Y.; Duan, J.J.; Liu, D.; Ma, Y.W.; Shi, N.; Chen, S.; Xie, L.; Qian, Y.; Huang, W. A highly sensitive fluorescent sensor based on small molecule doped in electrospun nanofibers: Detection of explosives as well as color modulation. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 8193–8199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jiang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, M.; Lv, D.; Yao, J.; Xiong, R.; Huang, C. Electrospun soy-protein-based nanofibrous membranes for effective antimicrobial air filtration. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 45766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chailek, N.; Daranarong, D.; Punyodom, W.; Molloy, R.; Worajittiphon, P. Crosslinking assisted fabrication of ultrafine poly(vinyl alcohol)/functionalized graphene electrospun nanofibers for crystal violet adsorption. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jin, G.; Prabhakaran, M.P.; Kai, D.; Annamalai, S.K.; Arunachalam, K.D.; Ramakrishna, S. Tissue engineered plant extracts as nanofibrous wound dressing. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Enayati, M.S.; Behzad, T.; Sajkiewicz, P.; Rafienia, M.; Bagheri, R.; Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, L.; Kolbuk, D.; Pahlevanneshan, Z.; Bonakdar, S.H. Development of electrospun poly(vinyl alcohol)-based bionanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2017, 106, 1111–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, Y.T.; Wang, Y.K.; Wang, Y.T.; Wang, Y.K. Investigation of the lamination of electrospun graphene-poly(vinyl alcohol) composite onto an electrode of bio-electro-fenton microbial fuel cell. Nanomater. Nanotechnol. 2017, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dosunmu, O.O.; Chase, G.G.; Kataphinan, W.; Reneker, D.H. Electrospinning of polymer nanofibres from multiple jets on a porous tubular surface. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 1123–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. He, J.H.; Liu, Y.; Xu, L.; Yu, J.Y.; Sun, G. BioMimic fabrication of electrospun nanofibers with high-throughput. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2008, 37, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, Y.; He, J.H.; Xu, L.; Yu, J.Y. The principle of bubble electrospinning and its experimental verification. J. Polym. Eng. 2008, 28, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dou, H.; Liu, H.Y.; Wang, P.; He, J.H. A Belt-Like Superfine Film Fabricated by the Bubble-Electrospinning. Therm. Sci. 2013, 17, 1508–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shao, Z.; Song, Y.; Xu, L. Formation mechanism of highly aligned nanofibers by a modified bubble-electrospinning. Therm. Sci. 2018, 22, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. He, J.H.; Kong, H.Y.; Yang, R.R.; Dou, H.; Faraz, N.; Wang, L.; Feng, C. Review on fiber morphology obtained by bubble electrospinning and blown bubble spinning. Therm. Sci. 2012, 16, 1263–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lan, X.; Zhao, J.H.; Hua, L. Numerical simulation for the single-bubble electrospinning process. Therm. Sci. 2015, 19, 1255–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, J.H.; Xu, L.; Liu, Q. Effect of ethanol post-treatment on the bubble-electrospun poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofiber. Therm. Sci. 2015, 19, 1353–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bienek, D.R.; Hoffman, K.M.; Tutak, W. Blow-spun chitosan/PEG/PLGA nanofibers as a novel tissue engineering scaffold with antibacterial properties. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2016, 27, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Liu, F.; Li, S.; Fang, Y.; Zheng, F.; Li, J.; He, J. Fabrication of highly oriented nanoporous fibers via airflow bubble-spinning. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 421, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, S.; Han, X.; Jia, Y.; Zhang, H.; Tang, T. Hydroxypropyltrimethyl ammonium chloride chitosan functionalized-PLGA electrospun fibrous membranes as antibacterial wound dressing: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Polymers 2017, 9, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fu, C.; Bai, H.; Zhu, J.; Niu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, X.; Bai, Y. Enhanced cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in electrospun PLGA/hydroxyapatite nanofibre scaffolds incorporated with graphene oxide. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0188352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ko, J.E.; Ko, Y.-G.; Kim, W.I.; Kwon, O.K.; Kwon, O.H. Nanofiber mats composed of a chitosan-poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic acid)-poly(ethylene oxide) blend as a postoperative anti-adhesion agent. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B 2016, 105, 1906–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ru, C.; Wang, F.; Pang, M.; Sun, L.; Chen, R.; Sun, Y. Suspended, shrinkage-free, electrospun PLGA nanofibrous scaffold for skin tissue engineering. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 10872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Qi, R.; Tian, X.; Rui, G.; Luo, Y.; Shen, M.W.; Yu, J.Y.; Shi, X.Y. Controlled release of doxorubicin from electrospun MWCNTs/PLGA hybrid nanofibers. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2016, 34, 1047–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, J.; Chen, N.; Ramakrishna, S.; Tian, L.; Mo, X. The Effect of Plasma Treated PLGA/MWCNTs-COOH Composite Nanofibers on Nerve Cell Behavior. Polymers 2017, 9, 713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, F.; Guo, R.; Shen, M.; Cao, X.; Mo, X.; Wang, S.; Shi, X. Effect of the Porous Microstructures of Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/Carbon Nanotube Composites on the Growth of Fibroblast Cells. Soft Mater. 2010, 8, 239–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Choi, H.J.; Min, B.H.; Shin, J.H.; Bae, D.H. Strengthening in nanostructured 2024 aluminum alloy and its composites containing carbon nanotubes. Compos. Part A 2011, 42, 1438–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yoo, S.J.; Han, S.H.; Kim, W.J. Strength and strain hardening of aluminum matrix composites with randomly dispersed nanometer-length fragmented carbon nanotubes. Scr. Mater. 2013, 68, 711–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Morsi, K.; Esawi, A.M.K.; Lanka, S.; Sayed, A.; Taher, M. Spark plasma extrusion (SPE) of ball-milled aluminum and carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum composite powders. Compos. Part A 2010, 41, 322–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, F.; Guo, R.; Shen, M.; Wang, S.; Shi, X. Effect of processing variables on the morphology of electrospun poly[(lactic acid)-co-(glycolic acid)] nanofibers. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2009, 294, 666–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yee, W.A.; Kong, J.H.; Zhang, C.; Liu, T.X.; Kotaki, M.; Lu, X.H. Polymorphism of electrospun polyvinylidene difluoride/carbon nanotube (CNT) nanocomposites: Synergistic effects of CNT surface chemistry, extensional force and supercritical carbon dioxide treatment. Polymer 2012, 53, 5097–5102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Budun, S.; İşgören, E.; Erdem, R.; Yüksek, M. Morphological and Mechanical Analysis of Electrospun Shape Memory Polymer Fibers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 380, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; Chen, W.; Li, L. Electrochemical properties of Mg3 MnNi2-x% polymethyl methacrylate-multiwalled carbon nanotubes (PMMA-MWCNTs) (x = 25, 50, 75, 100). J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 6033–6041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Debasis, M.; Krishnamoorthy, R.; Ramasamy, T.R.K. Polyvinyl alcohol wrapped multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNTs) network on fabrics for wearable room temperature ethanol sensor. Rajavel Krishnamoorthy 2018, 261, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yan, N.; Wu, J.K.; Zhan, Y.H.; Xia, H.S. Carbon nanotubes/carbon black synergistic reinforced natural rubber composites. Plast. Rubber Compos. 2009, 38, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 10 00481 g001 550
Figure 1. The schematic of the airflow bubble-spinning.
Figure 1. The schematic of the airflow bubble-spinning.
Polymers 10 00481 g001
Polymers 10 00481 g002 550
Figure 2. Collecting device schematic: (a)the collecting board for a full area, and (b) row column collecting device.
Figure 2. Collecting device schematic: (a)the collecting board for a full area, and (b) row column collecting device.
Polymers 10 00481 g002
Polymers 10 00481 g003a 550Polymers 10 00481 g003b 550
Figure 3. SEM micrographs and the diameter distribution histograms of nanoporous fibers via the airflow bubble-spun PLGA solutions with concentrations of (a) 6 wt %; (c) 7 wt %; (e) 8 wt %; (g) 10 wt % (temperature: 25 °C, collecting distance: 18 cm, relative humidity: 65%); (b,d,f,h) show the diameter distribution histograms of PLGA nanoporous fibers corresponding to (a,c,e,g), respectively. The diameter distribution histogram data are representative of independent experiments and all data are given as means ± SD (n = 20).
Figure 3. SEM micrographs and the diameter distribution histograms of nanoporous fibers via the airflow bubble-spun PLGA solutions with concentrations of (a) 6 wt %; (c) 7 wt %; (e) 8 wt %; (g) 10 wt % (temperature: 25 °C, collecting distance: 18 cm, relative humidity: 65%); (b,d,f,h) show the diameter distribution histograms of PLGA nanoporous fibers corresponding to (a,c,e,g), respectively. The diameter distribution histogram data are representative of independent experiments and all data are given as means ± SD (n = 20).
Polymers 10 00481 g003aPolymers 10 00481 g003b
Polymers 10 00481 g004 550
Figure 4. Average diameterof composite nanofibers with the different concentrations.
Figure 4. Average diameterof composite nanofibers with the different concentrations.
Polymers 10 00481 g004
Polymers 10 00481 g005a 550Polymers 10 00481 g005b 550
Figure 5. SEM micrographs and the diameter distribution histograms of nanoporous fibers via the airflow bubble-spun PLGA solutions with relative humidity of (a) 70%; (c) 75%; (e) 80%; (g) 85% (temperature: 25 °C, collecting distance: 18 cm, solutions concentration: 8 wt %); (b,d,f,h) show the diameter distribution histogram of PLGA nanoporous fibers shown in (a,c,e,g), respectively. The diameter distribution histogram data are representative of independent experiments and all data are given as means ± SD (n = 20).
Figure 5. SEM micrographs and the diameter distribution histograms of nanoporous fibers via the airflow bubble-spun PLGA solutions with relative humidity of (a) 70%; (c) 75%; (e) 80%; (g) 85% (temperature: 25 °C, collecting distance: 18 cm, solutions concentration: 8 wt %); (b,d,f,h) show the diameter distribution histogram of PLGA nanoporous fibers shown in (a,c,e,g), respectively. The diameter distribution histogram data are representative of independent experiments and all data are given as means ± SD (n = 20).
Polymers 10 00481 g005aPolymers 10 00481 g005b
Polymers 10 00481 g006 550
Figure 6. Average diameterof composite nanofibers with the different relative humidity.
Figure 6. Average diameterof composite nanofibers with the different relative humidity.
Polymers 10 00481 g006
Polymers 10 00481 g007 550
Figure 7. Rheological behavior between the shear viscosity and shear rate of the PLGA/MWCNT and PLGA solutions.
Figure 7. Rheological behavior between the shear viscosity and shear rate of the PLGA/MWCNT and PLGA solutions.
Polymers 10 00481 g007
Polymers 10 00481 g008 550
Figure 8. SEM micrographs and the diameter distribution histogramsof PLGA/MWCNTnanofibers (temperature: 25 °C, collecting distance: 18 cm, concentration: 8 wt %, relative humidity: 65%). (b) shows the diameter distribution histograms of PLGA/MWCNT nanoporous fibers shown in (a). The upper right corner in (a) isthe high-magnification image of the porous morphology. The diameter distribution histogram data are representative of independent experiments and all data are given as mean ± SD (n = 20).
Figure 8. SEM micrographs and the diameter distribution histogramsof PLGA/MWCNTnanofibers (temperature: 25 °C, collecting distance: 18 cm, concentration: 8 wt %, relative humidity: 65%). (b) shows the diameter distribution histograms of PLGA/MWCNT nanoporous fibers shown in (a). The upper right corner in (a) isthe high-magnification image of the porous morphology. The diameter distribution histogram data are representative of independent experiments and all data are given as mean ± SD (n = 20).
Polymers 10 00481 g008
Polymers 10 00481 g009 550
Figure 9. TGA profiles of PLGA/MWCNTs (a) and PLGA nanofibers (b) (temperature: 25 °C, collecting distance: 18 cm, concentration: 8 wt %, relative humidity: 65%).
Figure 9. TGA profiles of PLGA/MWCNTs (a) and PLGA nanofibers (b) (temperature: 25 °C, collecting distance: 18 cm, concentration: 8 wt %, relative humidity: 65%).
Polymers 10 00481 g009
Polymers 10 00481 g010 550
Figure 10. X-ray diffraction spectra of PLGA/MWCNTs (a) and PLGA nanofibers (b), respectively. (temperature: 25 °C, collecting distance: 18 cm, concentration: 8 wt %, humidity: 65%).
Figure 10. X-ray diffraction spectra of PLGA/MWCNTs (a) and PLGA nanofibers (b), respectively. (temperature: 25 °C, collecting distance: 18 cm, concentration: 8 wt %, humidity: 65%).
Polymers 10 00481 g010
Polymers 10 00481 g011 550
Figure 11. Infrared spectra of PLGA/MWCNT nanofibers (a) and PLGA nanofibers (b), respectively. (temperature: 25 °C, collecting distance: 18 cm, concentration: 8 wt %, humidity: 65%).
Figure 11. Infrared spectra of PLGA/MWCNT nanofibers (a) and PLGA nanofibers (b), respectively. (temperature: 25 °C, collecting distance: 18 cm, concentration: 8 wt %, humidity: 65%).
Polymers 10 00481 g011
Polymers 10 00481 g012 550
Figure 12. Load-strain curves for PLGA/MWCNTs (a) and PLGA (b)nanofibers, respectively.
Figure 12. Load-strain curves for PLGA/MWCNTs (a) and PLGA (b)nanofibers, respectively.
Polymers 10 00481 g012
Table
Table 1. Mechanical properties of PLGA/MWCNTs and PLGA nanofibers.
Table 1. Mechanical properties of PLGA/MWCNTs and PLGA nanofibers.
Sample Breaking Strength (cN)Elongation at Break (%)
PLGA/MWCNTs1.36 ± 0.3243.18 ± 6.22
PLGA0.42 ± 0.1722.35 ± 4.56

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fang, Y.; Liu, F.; Xu, L.; Wang, P.; He, J. Preparation of PLGA/MWCNT Composite Nanofibers by Airflow Bubble-Spinning and Their Characterization. Polymers 2018, 10, 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10050481

AMA Style

Fang Y, Liu F, Xu L, Wang P, He J. Preparation of PLGA/MWCNT Composite Nanofibers by Airflow Bubble-Spinning and Their Characterization. Polymers. 2018; 10(5):481. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10050481

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fang, Yue, Fujuan Liu, Lan Xu, Ping Wang, and Jihuan He. 2018. "Preparation of PLGA/MWCNT Composite Nanofibers by Airflow Bubble-Spinning and Their Characterization" Polymers 10, no. 5: 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10050481

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop