Cognitive Hierarchy Theory and Two-Person Games
AbstractThe outcome of many social and economic interactions, such as stock-market transactions, is strongly determined by the predictions that agents make about the behavior of other individuals. Cognitive hierarchy theory provides a framework to model the consequences of forecasting accuracy that has proven to fit data from certain types of game theory experiments, such as Keynesian beauty contests and entry games. Here, we focus on symmetric two-player-two-action games and establish an algorithm to find the players’ strategies according to the cognitive hierarchy approach. We show that the snowdrift game exhibits a pattern of behavior whose complexity grows as the cognitive levels of players increases. In addition to finding the solutions up to the third cognitive level, we demonstrate, in this theoretical frame, two new properties of snowdrift games: (i) any snowdrift game can be characterized by only a parameter, its class; (ii) they are anti-symmetric with respect to the diagonal of the pay-off’s space. Finally, we propose a model based on an evolutionary dynamics that captures the main features of the cognitive hierarchy theory. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Gracia-Lázaro, C.; Floría, L.M.; Moreno, Y. Cognitive Hierarchy Theory and Two-Person Games. Games 2017, 8, 1.
Gracia-Lázaro C, Floría LM, Moreno Y. Cognitive Hierarchy Theory and Two-Person Games. Games. 2017; 8(1):1.Chicago/Turabian Style
Gracia-Lázaro, Carlos; Floría, Luis M.; Moreno, Yamir. 2017. "Cognitive Hierarchy Theory and Two-Person Games." Games 8, no. 1: 1.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.