Next Article in Journal
Time-Preference Heterogeneity and Multiplicity of Equilibria in Two-Group Bargaining
Previous Article in Journal
Core Stability and Core Selection in a Decentralized Labor Matching Market
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Games 2016, 7(2), 11; doi:10.3390/g7020011

Inequalities between Others Do Matter: Evidence from Multiplayer Dictator Games

ICS/FSW, Utrecht University, Padualaan 14, 3584CH Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Ulrich Berger
Received: 11 January 2016 / Revised: 31 March 2016 / Accepted: 31 March 2016 / Published: 12 April 2016
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [950 KB, uploaded 12 April 2016]   |  

Abstract

Social motives are frequently used to explain deviations from selfishness in non-strategic settings such as the Dictator Game. Previous research has mainly focused on two-player games; the workings of social motives in multiplayer Dictator Games are less well understood. A core feature of multiplayer games is that players can consider inequalities between others, in addition to outcomes that have two-player analogues, such as social efficiency and the inequality between self and others. We expect that existing models of social motives can be improved if players are allowed to consider the inequality between others. Results from two laboratory experiments confirm this: motives for the inequality between others were found, and these motives could not be reduced to motives with dyadic analogues. Explorative analyses show that our findings are robust to a number of potential misspecifications: motives for the inequality between others were also found when utility included non-linear evaluations of inequality, and when alternative types of self-other comparison mechanisms were modeled. Thus, to adequately capture social motives in multiplayer games, models should account for the complexities of the multiplayer setting. We speculate that our findings also hold for strategic games; but further research is needed to elucidate this. View Full-Text
Keywords: social motives; game theory; games; non-selfish preferences; welfare; inequality; multi-player games; Dictator Game social motives; game theory; games; non-selfish preferences; welfare; inequality; multi-player games; Dictator Game
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Macro, D.; Weesie, J. Inequalities between Others Do Matter: Evidence from Multiplayer Dictator Games. Games 2016, 7, 11.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Games EISSN 2073-4336 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top