Cancers 2011, 3(2), 2421-2443; doi:10.3390/cancers3022421
Article

Comparison of Dose Response Models for Predicting Normal Tissue Complications from Cancer Radiotherapy: Application in Rat Spinal Cord

Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm S-17176, Sweden
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 14 March 2011; in revised form: 20 April 2011 / Accepted: 10 May 2011 / Published: 18 May 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiation and Cancers)
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [910 KB, Updated Version, uploaded 19 May 2011 11:37 CEST]
The original version is still available [904 KB, uploaded 18 May 2011 09:06 CEST]
Abstract: Seven different radiobiological dose-response models have been compared with regard to their ability to describe experimental data. The first four models, namely the critical volume, the relative seriality, the inverse tumor and the critical element models are mainly based on cell survival biology. The other three models: the Lyman (Gaussian distribution), the parallel architecture and the Weibull distribution models are semi-empirical and rather based on statistical distributions. The maximum likelihood estimation was used to fit the models to experimental data and the χ2-distribution, AIC criterion and F-test were applied to compare the goodness-of-fit of the models. The comparison was performed using experimental data for rat spinal cord injury. Both the shape of the dose-response curve and the ability of handling the volume dependence were separately compared for each model. All the models were found to be acceptable in describing the present experimental dataset (p > 0.05). For the white matter necrosis dataset, the Weibull and Lyman models were clearly superior to the other models, whereas for the vascular damage case, the Relative Seriality model seems to have the best performance although the Critical volume, Inverse tumor, Critical element and Parallel architecture models gave similar results. Although the differences between many of the investigated models are rather small, they still may be of importance in indicating the advantages and limitations of each particular model. It appears that most of the models have favorable properties for describing dose-response data, which indicates that they may be suitable to be used in biologically optimized intensity modulated radiation therapy planning, provided a proper estimation of their radiobiological parameters had been performed for every tissue and clinical endpoint.
Keywords: radiobiological models; NTCP; spinal cord complications

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Adamus-Górka, M.; Mavroidis, P.; Lind, B.K.; Brahme, A. Comparison of Dose Response Models for Predicting Normal Tissue Complications from Cancer Radiotherapy: Application in Rat Spinal Cord. Cancers 2011, 3, 2421-2443.

AMA Style

Adamus-Górka M, Mavroidis P, Lind BK, Brahme A. Comparison of Dose Response Models for Predicting Normal Tissue Complications from Cancer Radiotherapy: Application in Rat Spinal Cord. Cancers. 2011; 3(2):2421-2443.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adamus-Górka, Magdalena; Mavroidis, Panayiotis; Lind, Bengt K.; Brahme, Anders. 2011. "Comparison of Dose Response Models for Predicting Normal Tissue Complications from Cancer Radiotherapy: Application in Rat Spinal Cord." Cancers 3, no. 2: 2421-2443.

Cancers EISSN 2072-6694 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert